Julie A. Kish

An Intergroup Phase III Comparison of Standard Radiation Therapy and Two Schedules of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Unresectable Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancer

PURPOSE The Head and Neck Intergroup conducted a phase III randomized trial to test the benefit of adding chemotherapy to radiation in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients were randomly assigned between arm A (the control), single daily fractionated radiation (70 Gy at 2 Gy/d); arm B, identical radiation therapy with concurrent bolus cisplatin, given on days 1, 22, and 43; and arm C, a split course of single daily fractionated radiation and three cycles of concurrent infusional fluorouracil and bolus cisplatin chemotherapy, 30 Gy given with the first cycle and 30 to 40 Gy given with the third cycle. Surgical resection was encouraged if possible after the second chemotherapy cycle on arm C and, if necessary, as salvage therapy on all three treatment arms. Survival data were compared between each experimental arm and the control arm using a one-sided log-rank test. RESULTS Between 1992 and 1999, 295 patients were entered on this trial. This did not meet the accrual goal of 362 patients and resulted in premature study closure. Grade 3 or worse toxicity occurred in 52% of patients enrolled in arm A, compared with 89% enrolled in arm B (P <.0001) and 77% enrolled in arm C (P <.001). With a median follow-up of 41 months, the 3-year projected overall survival for patients enrolled in arm A is 23%, compared with 37% for arm B (P =.014) and 27% for arm C (P = not significant). CONCLUSION The addition of concurrent high-dose, single-agent cisplatin to conventional single daily fractionated radiation significantly improves survival, although it also increases toxicity. The loss of efficacy resulting from split-course radiation was not offset by either multiagent chemotherapy or the possibility of midcourse surgery.

Randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil and carboplatin plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) conducted a randomized comparison of cisplatin plus fluorouracil (5-FU) and carboplatin plus 5-FU versus single-agent methotrexate (MTX) in patients with recurrent and metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. The primary objective was to compare separately the response rates of each combination regimen to standard weekly MTX. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred seventy-seven patients diagnosed with SCC of the head and neck were randomized to one of three treatments: (1) cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on day 1 and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 per day for a 96-hour continuous infusion repeated every 21 days; (2) carboplatin 300 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 per day for a 96-hour continuous infusion repeated every 28 days; and (3) MTX 40 mg/m2 IV given weekly. RESULTS All three treatment regimens were well tolerated. However, both hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were significantly greater with cisplatin plus 5-FU compared with MTX (P = .001). Toxicity from carboplatin plus 5-FU was intermediate compared with the other regimens. The complete and partial response rates were 32% for cisplatin plus 5-FU, 21% for carboplatin plus 5-FU, and 10% for MTX. The comparison of cisplatin plus 5-FU to MTX was statistically significant (P less than .001), and the comparison of carboplatin plus 5-FU to MTX was of borderline statistical significance (P = .05). Median response durations and median survival times were similar for all three treatment groups. Logistic regression models showed that only treatment assigned was associated significantly with response (P = .001). Cox proportional hazards models indicated that only performance status was associated significantly with survival (P less than .01). CONCLUSIONS We conclude that combination chemotherapy resulted in improved response rates but was associated with an increased toxicity and no improvement in overall survival. Therefore, new treatments that may alter the course of disease in recurrent head and neck cancer patients still need to be identified.

Improved complete response rate and survival in advanced head and neck cancer after three‐course induction therapy with 120‐hour 5‐FU infusion and cisplatin

In a series of three consecutive pilot studies carried out between 1977 and 1981 at Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, designed to test the feasibility of multimodality therapy in patients with previously untreated advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, patients received three different induction chemotherapy regimens: cisplatin + Oncovin (vincristine) + bleomycin (COB) for two courses; 96‐hour 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) infusion and cisplatin for two courses, or 120‐hour 5‐FU infusion + cisplatin for three courses. Over‐all response rates (complete response + partial response) to each of the three induction chemotherapy regimens were high: 80%, 88%, and 93%, respectively. Superior complete response rate in the group receiving three courses of 120‐hour 5‐FU infusion + cisplatin was 54% versus 29% for COB and 19% for two‐course 96‐hour 5‐FU infusion + cisplatin (P = 0.04). Significant survival advantage at 18 months minimum follow‐up for the group receiving three courses of 120‐hour 5‐FU + cisplatin induction therapy was found. Actual T and N stage may influence the clinical complete response rate. Responders to initial chemotherapy have significantly better survival as compared to nonresponders regardless of subsequent surgery and/or radiotherapy. These studies show that a multimodality approach to management of advanced head and neck cancer is feasible. Superior complete response rate and survival in one of the treatment groups suggest that choice of induction chemotherapy regimens and/or number of courses is of prime importance in such multimodality treatment programs.

Correlation between response to cisplatinum‐combination chemotherapy and subsequent radiotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced squamous cell cancers of the head and neck

Induction chemotherapy, followed by surgery and/or radiotherapy was utilized in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. During these trials, the authors observed that response to chemotherapy predicts further response to subsequent radiotherapy. This study was comprised of 57 patients with 60 separate neoplasms who demonstrated less than complete response (partial or no response) to initial treatment with a combination chemotherapy containing cisplatin. Subsequently radiotherapy, either 5000 rad preoperatively or 6600 rad as definitive therapy, was employed. Forty‐one of the 42 tumors with initial partial response to chemotherapy also responded to radiotherapy (97.6%). Only one of the 18 tumors that initially failed to respond to chemotherapy subsequently responded to radiotherapy (5.5%). This observation suggests that patients with head and neck cancer sensitive to initial chemotherapy share parameters that are also radiation sensitive.

Superior clinical response and survival rates with initial bolus of cisplatin and 120 hour infusion of 5-fluorouracil before definitive therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer

One hundred ninety-one patients were treated by one of three cisplatin-containing multidrug protocols. The initial 77 patients received two courses of cisplatin and vincristine plus bleomycin. The next 26 patients received two courses of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, and the final 88 patients were placed on a three course 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin protocol. Overall response rates were similar for each of the three protocols. The complete response rate, however, was much better (54 percent) for three course 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin versus cisplatin vincristine, and bleomycin (29 percent) and two course 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (19 percent). Survival curves were also better for the three course 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin segment of this nonrandomized pilot study.

Evaluation of high-dose cisplatin and 5-FU infusion as initial therapy in advanced head and neck cancer

The combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion in head and neck cancer patients produces an overall response rate of 90% for advanced disease and 70% for recurrent disease. Whether or not escalating the platinum dose in combination with other agents, as has been done with refractory ovarian and testicular patients, would improve the response rates in patients with advanced head and neck cancer has not been evaluated. We undertook a study to determine the most efficacious dose of cisplatin that could be administered with 5-FU infusion in head and neck cancer patients. Eleven patients entered the study. Initial dose of cisplatin was 40 mg/m2 (in hypertonic saline) on days 1–5 plus 5-FU 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1–5 as a continuous infusion. Subsequent cisplatin doses were adjusted for the main toxicity, which was myelosuppression. The safest tolerable dose was 30 mg/m2 for 5 days. Overall response was 90% [45% complete response (CR) (5/11) plus 45% (5/11) partial response (PR)] which is comparable to that seen with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 and 5-FU in a 120-h infusion. Although patient numbers are small, there was no appreciable difference in response rate with higher dose cisplatin and there was a significant increase in serious toxicity.

An intensive, five course, alternating combination chemotherapy induction regimen used in patients with advanced, unresectable head and neck cancer.

Progress in the treatment of advanced squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the head and neck (H & N) has included the development of combination chemotherapeutic regimens that achieve impressive complete response (CR) rates using two to three courses therapy with minimal toxicity and good patient tolerance. Further improvements in these results will require intensification of induction regimens. Therefore, a five course, alternating combination chemotherapy induction trial was initiated in an attempt to test the feasibility and toxicity of a prolonged, intensive induction regimen in patients with advanced SCC of H & N. Courses 1, 3, and 5 consisted of fluorouracil as a 120-hour infusion (5FU-I) with cisplatin (CACP) as an intravenous (IV) bolus. Courses 2 and 4 consisted of 3 weekly doses of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) followed by 5FU (5FU-b) and leucovorin rescue (LR). Forty-six stage IV patients with SCC of H & N (85% T4 and 58% N3) were entered. Thirty-one patients completed the study and 15 did not. Twenty-one of the 46 patients (46%) achieved a CR. Twenty-five of the 46 patients had N3 neck disease, ten of these 25 achieved a CR (40%), and eight did not complete therapy. Of the 15 patients not completing this study, one patient achieved a CR and eight achieved a partial response (PR). Eight of 46 (17%) were removed from study for reasons of toxicity (6% to 13%) or tumor progression (2% to 4%). The remaining seven were removed due to intercurrent medical conditions (four uncomplicated pneumonias and one gun shot wound) or lost to follow-up (2). Myelosuppression, mucositis, and skin toxicity increased in frequency by the end of the trial but were acceptable and reversible. The activity of this five-course regimen is promising given the advanced disease status of patients treated. Consideration of concurrent medical conditions, patient compliance, intensity of medical, nutritional and social support, and levels of acceptable toxicity will be necessary in the design of future, intensive induction trials.

Determining optimal follow-up in the management of human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer

Determining the optimal follow‐up for patients can help maximize the use of health care resources. This is particularly true in a growing epidemic such as human papillomavirus‐positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+OPSCC). The objective of the current study was to evaluate time to disease recurrence or late toxicity in this cohort of patients to optimize patient management.

Increased acute mortality with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer in patients ≥70 years

PURPOSE Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care for many sites of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (LAHNC). However, on meta-analysis, the addition of chemotherapy did not improve survival for patients >70years. We hypothesized that elderly patients treated with CRT would have increased toxicity without similar improvements in survival. METHODS A single-institution, IRB-approved retrospective study took place from 2005 to 2012 including 369 patients treated with CRT for LAHNC. Multivariate models for death at 3months and death over time were developed using logistic regression and Cox modeling, respectively. RESULTS Patients ≥70years were treated less often with concurrent cisplatin dosed every 3weeks (25.5% vs. 71.4%, respectively) and more often with weekly carboplatin (31.9% vs. 3.4%) than patients <70years (n=322; p<0.001). Patients ≥70years experienced increased toxicity during treatment with more frequently hospitalizations (36.2% vs. 21.1%; p=0.02) and a lower rate of PEG removal at last follow-up or death (77.1% vs. 92.9%; p=0.004). A higher proportion of patients ≥70years died within 3months (12.8% vs. 2.8%; p=0.001) following CRT. Patients ≥70 had an increased risk of death at 3months following CRT (odds ratio 5.19, 95% CI 1.64-16.41; p=0.005) and worse survival over time (hazard ratio 2.30, 95% CI 1.34-3.93; p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS Patients ≥70years were more often treated with less toxic chemotherapy, yet experienced higher rates of hospitalization during treatment and increased rates of acute mortality following CRT. The efficacy of chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients should be evaluated in a prospective setting.

Combined modality therapy utilizing a cisplatin combination for effective chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated head and neck cancer

In patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, the results of standard definitive treatments of surgery, radiotherapy, or both were disappointing. The local and regional recurrence rates were high, despite adequate surgical resection with negative margins and postoperative radiotherapy to all known or possible disease areas. Combination cisplatin chemotherapy given initially before definitive treatments produced a high overall antitumor response and up to 50 percent clinical complete response. Before answering the question of value of chemotherapy as part of the multimodality treatment, it is important to identify the safest and most form of chemotherapy. The degre of chemotherapy effectiveness is defined by the incidence of clinical and, most important, histologic complete response. To assess this effectiveness, chemotherapy was given before definitive treatments to patients with measurable disease. From our 10 year experience we have concluded that continuing the development of induction chemotherapy, including investigating the timing of such effective treatment and assessing the value of such therapy, is of the utmost importance.