Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Julie A. Nordlee is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Julie A. Nordlee.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 1996

Identification of a Brazil-nut allergen in transgenic soybeans

Julie A. Nordlee; Steve L. Taylor; Jeffrey A. Townsend; Laurie A. Thomas; Robert K. Bush

BACKGROUND The nutritional quality of soybeans (Glycine max) is compromised by a relative deficiency of methionine in the protein fraction of the seeds. To improve the nutritional quality, methionine-rich 2S albumin from the Brazil nut (Betholletia excelsa) has been introduced into transgenic soybeans. Since the Brazil nut is a known allergenic food, we assessed the allergenicity of the 2S albumin. METHODS The ability of proteins in transgenic and non-transgenic soybeans, Brazil nuts, and purified 2S albumin to bind to IgE in serum from subjects allergic to Brazil nuts was determined by radioallergosorbent tests (4 subjects) and sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide-gel electrophoresis (9 subjects) with immunoblotting and autoradiography. Three subjects also underwent skin-prick testing with extracts of soybean, transgenic soybean, and Brazil nut. RESULTS On radioallergosorbent testing of pooled serum from four subjects allergic to Brazil nuts, protein extracts of transgenic soybean inhibited binding of IgE to Brazil-nut proteins. On immunoblotting, serum IgE from eight of nine subjects bound to purified 2S albumin from the Brazil nut and the transgenic soybean. On skin-prick testing, three subjects had positive reactions to extracts of Brazil nut and transgenic soybean and negative reactions to soybean extract. CONCLUSIONS The 2S albumin is probably a major Brazil-nut allergen, and the transgenic soybeans analyzed in this study contain this protein. Our study show that an allergen from a food known to be allergenic can be transferred into another food by genetic engineering.


Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry | 2009

Allergen immunoassays—considerations for use of naturally incurred standards

Steve L. Taylor; Julie A. Nordlee; Lynn Niemann; Debra M. Lambrecht

The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) offers many advantages for the detection of potentially hazardous allergenic food residues that might become adventitious components of other foods during the course of food production and processing. ELISAs detect proteins, and food allergens are proteins. ELISAs are sufficiently sensitive and specific for detection of food allergen residues. ELISAs can also be produced in formats that are compatible with the industrial food processing environment. However, ELISAs also have disadvantages that should be carefully evaluated and widely recognized. Various food-processing operations can have profound effects on the detectability of allergenic food residues. ELISAs detect intact proteins but protein hydrolysates evade detection in some ELISA formats. The residual proteins present in some ingredients derived from commonly allergenic sources may also not be easily detected with ELISAs because of the nature of the protein residues remaining, e.g. lipophilic. Processing operations can dramatically lower the solubility of proteins. In some food formulations, heat processing, in particular, induces chemical modifications that can affect antibody binding to epitopes in the ELISA. The use of naturally incurred standards where allergenic food residues are incorporated into various representative food matrices and then processed in a manner similar to “real-world” food processing can reveal some of the limitations of allergen ELISAs. Methods for the preparation of naturally incurred standards in chocolate, cookie, muffin, ice cream, pasta, frankfurter, and cream of potato soup are provided as examples.


Scientific Reports | 2016

Conformational stability of digestion-resistant peptides of peanut conglutins reveals the molecular basis of their allergenicity

Danijela Apostolovic; Dragana Stanic-Vucinic; Harmen H. J. de Jongh; Govardus A.H. de Jong; Jelena Mihailovic; Jelena Radosavljevic; Milica Radibratovic; Julie A. Nordlee; Joseph L. Baumert; Miloš K. Milčić; Steve L. Taylor; Nuria Garrido Clua; Tanja Cirkovic Velickovic; Stef J. Koppelman

Conglutins represent the major peanut allergens and are renowned for their resistance to gastro-intestinal digestion. Our aim was to characterize the digestion-resistant peptides (DRPs) of conglutins by biochemical and biophysical methods followed by a molecular dynamics simulation in order to better understand the molecular basis of food protein allergenicity. We have mapped proteolysis sites at the N- and C-termini and at a limited internal segment, while other potential proteolysis sites remained unaffected. Molecular dynamics simulation showed that proteolysis only occurred in the vibrant regions of the proteins. DRPs appeared to be conformationally stable as intact conglutins. Also, the overall secondary structure and IgE-binding potency of DRPs was comparable to that of intact conglutins. The stability of conglutins toward gastro-intestinal digestion, combined with the conformational stability of the resulting DRPs provide conditions for optimal exposure to the intestinal immune system, providing an explanation for the extraordinary allergenicity of peanut conglutins.


Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry | 2015

Comparison of six commercial ELISA kits for their specificity and sensitivity in detecting different major peanut allergens

Shyamali Jayasena; Mieke Smits; Daniëlle Fiechter; Aard de Jong; Julie A. Nordlee; Joseph L. Baumert; Steve L. Taylor; Raymond Pieters; Stef J. Koppelman

Six commercial peanut enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits were assessed for their ability to recover peanut from the standard reference material 2387 peanut butter and also for their specificity in detecting four major peanut allergens, Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, and Ara h 6. The percentage recovery of peanut from peanut butter differed across different kits as well as at different sample concentrations. The highest recovery was observed with the Romer and R-Biopharm kits, while four other kits were found to underestimate the protein content of the reference peanut butter samples. Five of the kits were most sensitive in detecting Ara h 3 followed by Ara h 1, while hardly recognizing Ara h 2 and Ara h 6. The other kit showed the highest sensitivity to Ara h 2 and Ara h 6, while Ara h 1 and Ara h 3 were poorly recognized. Although Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 are known to be heat stable and more potent allergens, antisera specific to any of these four peanut proteins/allergens may serve as good markers for the detection of peanut residues.


Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry | 2011

Evaluation and Comparison of the Species-Specificity of 3 Antiparvalbumin IgG Antibodies

Poi Wah Lee; Julie A. Nordlee; Stef J. Koppelman; Joseph L. Baumert; Steve L. Taylor

Parvalbumin is a pan-allergen in fish and frogs that triggers IgE-mediated reactions in fish-allergic individuals. Previous studies demonstrated that antibodies raised against fish and frog parvalbumins displayed varying specificity for different fish species, and thus, the applicability of these antibodies for potential use in immunoassays to detect fish residues were limited. We aimed to determine the specificity of 3 IgG antibodies for various fish species. Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and IgG-immunoblotting were used to compare the reactivity of the polyclonal anticod parvalbumin antibody and the commercially available, monoclonal antifrog and monoclonal anticarp parvalbumin antibodies against raw muscle extracts of 29 fish species. All antibodies demonstrated varying specificities for different fish species. Of the 3 antibodies, the polyclonal anticod parvalbumin antibody is the most suitable for the detection of fish parvalbumins as it showed reactivity to the widest range of species, including herring, pilchard, carp, pike, cod, pollock, haddock, cusk, hake, bluegill, tilapia, bass, grouper, trout, catfish, and perch, although detection was still limited for several key fish species.


The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology | 2017

Peanut Allergen Threshold Study (PATS): Novel single-dose oral food challenge study to validate eliciting doses in children with peanut allergy

Jonathan O'b Hourihane; Katrina J. Allen; Wayne G. Shreffler; Gillian Dunngalvin; Julie A. Nordlee; Giovanni A. Zurzolo; A. DunnGalvin; Lyle C. Gurrin; Joseph L. Baumert; Steve L. Taylor

Background: Eliciting doses (EDs) of allergenic foods can be defined by the distribution of threshold doses for subjects within a specific population. The ED05 is the dose that elicits a reaction in 5% of allergic subjects. The predicted ED05 for peanut is 1.5 mg of peanut protein (6 mg of whole peanut). Objective: We sought to validate the predicted peanut ED05 (1.5 mg) with a novel single‐dose challenge. Methods: Consecutive eligible children with peanut allergy in 3 centers were prospectively invited to participate, irrespective of previous reaction severity. Predetermined criteria for objective reactions were used to identify ED05 single‐dose reactors. Results: Five hundred eighteen children (mean age, 6.8 years) were eligible. No significant demographic or clinical differences were identified between 381 (74%) participants and 137 (26%) nonparticipants or between subjects recruited at each center. Three hundred seventy‐eight children (206 male) completed the study. Almost half the group reported ignoring precautionary allergen labeling. Two hundred forty‐five (65%) children experienced no reaction to the single dose of peanut. Sixty‐seven (18%) children reported a subjective reaction without objective findings. Fifty‐eight (15%) children experienced signs of a mild and transient nature that did not meet the predetermined criteria. Only 8 (2.1%; 95% CI, 0.6%‐3.4%) subjects met the predetermined criteria for an objective and likely related event. No child experienced more than a mild reaction, 4 of the 8 received oral antihistamines only, and none received epinephrine. Food allergy–related quality of life improved from baseline to 1 month after challenge regardless of outcome (&eegr;2 = 0.2, P < .0001). Peanut skin prick test responses and peanut‐ and Ara h 2–specific IgE levels were not associated with objective reactivity to peanut ED05. Conclusion: A single administration of 1.5 mg of peanut protein elicited objective reactions in fewer than the predicted 5% of patients with peanut allergy. The novel single‐dose oral food challenge appears clinically safe and patient acceptable, regardless of the outcome. It identifies the most highly dose‐sensitive population with food allergy not otherwise identifiable by using routinely available peanut skin prick test responses or specific IgE levels, but this single‐dose approach has not yet been validated for risk assessment of individual patients.


BioMed Research International | 2013

Digestibility and IgE-binding of glycosylated codfish parvalbumin.

Harmen H. J. de Jongh; Carlos López Robles; Eefjan Timmerman; Julie A. Nordlee; Poi Wah Lee; Joseph L. Baumert; Robert G. Hamilton; Steve L. Taylor; Stef J. Koppelman

Food-processing conditions may alter the allergenicity of food proteins by different means. In this study, the effect of the glycosylation as a result of thermal treatment on the digestibility and IgE-binding of codfish parvalbumin is investigated. Native and glycosylated parvalbumins were digested with pepsin at various conditions relevant for the gastrointestinal tract. Intact proteins and peptides were analysed for apparent molecular weight and IgE-binding. Glycosylation did not substantially affect the digestion. Although the peptides resulting from digestion were relatively large (3 and 4 kDa), the IgE-binding was strongly diminished. However, the glycosylated parvalbumin had a strong propensity to form dimers and tetramers, and these multimers bound IgE intensely, suggesting stronger IgE-binding than monomeric parvalbumin. We conclude that glycosylation of codfish parvalbumin does not affect the digestibility of parvalbumin and that the peptides resulting from this digestion show low IgE-binding, regardless of glycosylation. Glycosylation of parvalbumin leads to the formation of higher order structures that are more potent IgE binders than native, monomeric parvalbumin. Therefore, food-processing conditions applied to fish allergen can potentially lead to increased allergenicity, even while the proteins digestibility is not affected by such processing.


Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment | 2012

Parvalbumin in fish skin-derived gelatin: is there a risk for fish allergic consumers?

Stef J. Koppelman; Julie A. Nordlee; Poi Wah Lee; R.P. Happe; M. Hessing; R. Norland; T. Manning; R. Deschene; G.A.H.de Jong; Steve L. Taylor

The major allergen parvalbumin was purified from cod muscle tissues, and polyclonal antibodies were raised towards it. The antibodies were tested for specificity and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was developed using these antibodies. The ELISA was applied to measure parvalbumin in cod skin, the starting material for fish gelatin made from deep sea, wild fish. The ELISA was sufficiently sensitive (LLOQ = 0.8 ng ml−1 in extracts, corresponding to 0.02 µg of parvalbumin per g of tissue), and did not cross-react with common food constituents. Fish gelatin, wine and beer, matrices for the potential use of this ELISA, did not cause disturbance of the assay performance. The data show that the parvalbumin content in cod muscle tissue is 6.25 mg g−1, while the skins contained considerably less, 0.4 mg g−1. Washing of the skins, a common industrial procedure during the manufacturing of fish gelatin, reduced the level of parvalbumin about 1000-fold to 0.5 µg g−1, or 0.5 ppm. From 95 commercial lots of fish gelatin it is shown that 73 are below 0.02 µg g−1 parvalbumin. From the other 22 lots, the one with the highest concentration contained 0.15 µg g−1 of parvalbumin. These levels are generally assumed to be safe for fish-allergic individuals.


Journal of Food Science | 2009

Detection of Mustard, Egg, Milk, and Gluten in Salad Dressing Using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISAS)

Poi Wah Lee; Lynn Niemann; Debra M. Lambrecht; Julie A. Nordlee; Steve L. Taylor

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is a commonly used method for the detection of trace amounts of potentially allergenic protein residues in foods. However, food matrices and processing conditions can affect the detection of protein residues. The effects of acidity on the detectability of several allergenic proteins commonly found in salad dressing using ELISAs was investigated. First, recovery experiments were performed on salad dressing formulated with 0 to 1000 ppm mustard flour (mustard). The mean percent recovery for mustard from the salad dressing was only 7.7%+/- 1.6%. When the pH of the salad dressing was adjusted to pH 7 prior to spiking with mustard, recovery improved to 94.1%+/- 7.6%. However, if the pH was adjusted to pH 7 after spiking and extraction, the recovery was only 11.1%+/- 1.7%. When vinegar was spiked with mustard flour at pH 3, 3.5, and 4, detectability of mustard was lowest at pH 3. Basic extraction of mustard proteins from salad dressing did not improve the mustard detection. Acidic salad dressing matrices reduced the detectability of mustard by the mustard ELISA probably because of acid precipitation of mustard proteins that renders them insoluble and nonextractable. Commercial salad dressings containing 100 ppm (mg/kg) of egg, milk, or gluten were analyzed every 2 to 4 d for 90 d using 3 commercially available ELISAs. A decrease in the detection of the egg, milk, and gluten in the salad dressing upon storage was observed. Our study highlighted the importance of evaluating the utility of various ELISAs for specific food matrices and the recovery as a function of product storage.


Food Chemistry | 2012

Measuring parvalbumin levels in fish muscle tissue: relevance of muscle locations and storage conditions.

Poi Wah Lee; Julie A. Nordlee; Stef J. Koppelman; Joseph L. Baumert; Steve L. Taylor

Fish is an allergenic food capable of provoking severe anaphylactic reactions. Parvalbumin is the major allergen identified in fish and frog muscles. Antibodies against fish and frog parvalbumin have been used to quantify parvalbumin levels from fish. However, these antibodies react variably with parvalbumin from different fish species. Several factors might be responsible for this variation including instability of parvalbumin in fish muscle as a result of frozen storage and differential parvalbumin expression in muscles from various locations within the whole fish. We aimed to investigate whether these factors contribute to the previously observed variable immunoreactivity of the anti-parvalbumin antibodies. Results showed the detection of parvalbumin by these antibodies was unaffected by frozen storage of muscles for 112 days. However, the parvalbumin content decreased in fish muscles from anterior to posterior positions. This factor may partially explain for the inconsistent reactivity of anti-parvalbumin antibodies to different fish species.

Collaboration


Dive into the Julie A. Nordlee's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Steve L. Taylor

University of Nebraska–Lincoln

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joseph L. Baumert

University of Nebraska–Lincoln

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stef J. Koppelman

University of Nebraska–Lincoln

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan L. Hefle

University of Nebraska–Lincoln

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Poi Wah Lee

University of Nebraska–Lincoln

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Debra M. Lambrecht

University of Nebraska–Lincoln

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael B. Levy

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard E. Goodman

University of Nebraska–Lincoln

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Shyamali Jayasena

University of Nebraska–Lincoln

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge