Julie Adsett

Physiotherapy intervention in intensive care is safe: an observational study

Question : How often do adverse events (including adverse physiological changes) occur during physiotherapy intervention in intensive care? Design : A multi-centre prospective observational study. Participants : Five tertiary level university-affiliated intensive care units. Outcome measures : All physiotherapy intervention in five intensive care units over a three month period. When certain specified changes occurred during physiotherapy intervention, details were noted including diagnosis of patient, intervention, vital signs, radiological changes, co-morbidities, chemical pathology, and fluid balance. Results : 12 281 physiotherapy interventions were completed with 27 interventions resulting in adverse physiological changes (0.2%). This incidence was significantly lower than a previous study of adverse physiological changes (663 events in 247 patients over a 24-hour period); the incidence during physiotherapy intervention was lower than during general intensive care. Common factors in the patients who had an adverse physiological change were a deterioration in cardiovascular status (ie, decrease in blood pressure or arrhythmia) in patients on medium to high doses of inotropes/vasopressors, unstable baseline hemodynamic values, previous cardiac co-morbidities and intervention consisting of positive pressure or right side lying. Conclusion : The incidence of adverse events during physiotherapy intervention in these five tertiary hospitals was low, demonstrating that physiotherapy intervention in intensive care is safe.

Exercise training in recently hospitalized heart failure patients enrolled in a disease management programme: design of the EJECTION-HF randomized controlled trial

The Exercise Joins Education: Combined Therapy to Improve Outcomes in Newly‐discharged Heart Failure (EJECTION‐HF) study will evaluate the impact of a supervised exercise training programme (ETP) on clinical outcomes in recently hospitalized heart failure patients attending a disease management programme (DMP).

Implementing a community-based model of exercise training following cardiac, pulmonary, and heart failure rehabilitation

PURPOSE: Encouraging patients to continue regular activity beyond the period of formal cardiac, heart failure, or pulmonary rehabilitation is a challenge faced by all program coordinators. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a community model run by fitness instructors as long-term maintenance for patients exiting a disease-specific rehabilitation program. METHODS: Heartmoves programs were established in close proximity to all major tertiary hospitals in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, and all eligible patients were offered supported referral to a program. Referred patients and rehabilitation staff were surveyed regarding perceived barriers to attendance. Referral rates and individual attendance rates for the first 12 weeks were recorded. RESULTS: Over 12 months, 241 patients were referred to a community Heartmoves class, of whom 141 (59%) attended at least once and 76 (32% of referrals, 54% of initial attendees) attended more than 6 of the first 12 weeks. Preattendance surveys identified concerns about quality and safety, as well as social and logistic barriers. The programs proved to be sustainable, as evidenced by the growth of programs from 18 at the end of the project to 31 over a 18-month period. CONCLUSIONS: A supported referral pathway to Heartmoves provides a feasible and acceptable model for maintenance exercise following cardiac, heart failure, and pulmonary rehabilitation. Strategies that recognize and address barriers perceived by participants and by rehabilitation program staff should be part of the supported referral process.

Heart Failure and Thermoregulatory Control: Can Patients With Heart Failure Handle the Heat?

Upon heat exposure, the thermoregulatory system evokes reflex increases in sweating and skin blood flow responses to facilitate heat dissipation and maintain heat balance to prevent the continuing rise in core temperature. These heat dissipating responses are mediated primarily by autonomic and cardiovascular adjustments; which, if attenuated, may compromise thermoregulatory control. In patients with heart failure (HF), the neurohumoral and cardiovascular dysfunction that underpins this condition may potentially impair thermoregulatory responses and, consequently, place these patients at a greater risk of heat-related illness. The aim of this review is to describe thermoregulatory mechanisms and the factors that may increase the risk of heat-related illness in patients with HF. An understanding of the mechanisms responsible for impaired thermoregulatory control in HF patients is of particular importance, given the current and projected increase in frequency and intensity of heat waves, as well as the promotion of regular exercise as a therapeutic modality. Furthermore, novel therapeutic strategies that may improve thermoregulatory control in HF, and the clinical relevance of this work in this population will be discussed.

Aquatic Exercise Training is Effective in Maintaining Exercise Performance in Trained Heart Failure Patients: A Randomised Crossover Pilot Trial

BACKGROUND Providing flexible models and a variety of exercise options are fundamental to supporting long-term exercise participation for patients with heart failure (HF). The aim of this pilot study was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of aquatic exercise training during a maintenance phase for a clinical heart failure population. METHODS In this 2 x 2 crossover design trial, individuals who had previously completed HF rehabilitation were randomised into either a land-based or aquatic training program once per week for six weeks, after which time they changed to the alternate exercise training protocol for an additional six weeks. Six-minute walk test (6MWT), grip strength, walk speed, and measures of balance were compared for the two training protocols. RESULTS Fifty-one participants (43 males, mean age 69.2 yrs) contributed data for the analysis. Both groups maintained function during the follow-up period, however improvements in 6MWT were greater in the land-based training group (95% CI: 0.7, 22.5; p=0.038), by a mean difference of 10.8 metres. No significant difference was observed for other parameters when the two training protocols were compared. CONCLUSION Attending an aquatic exercise program once per week is feasible for patients with stable HF and may provide a suitable option to maintain functional performance in select patients.

Improving Care Transitions in Individuals Frequently Admitted to the Hospital

Individuals who are frequently admitted to the hospital have high levels of multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and functional impairment,1 and the sudden reduction in intensity of care in the posthospital period may contribute to high rates of hospital readmission.2–5 A multidisciplinary follow-up clinic for frequently admitted patients was piloted to address demonstrated gaps in transitional care.6 This report describes the patient perspective of care in this model.

Getting to the Heart of the Matter: What Is the Landscape of Exercise Rehabilitation for People With Heart Failure in Australia?

BACKGROUND The benefits of exercise rehabilitation for people with heart failure (HF) are well established. In Australia, little is known about how the guidelines around exercise rehabilitation for people with HF are being implemented in clinical practice. Furthermore, it is unknown what organisational barriers are faced in providing exercise rehabilitation programs for this population. The aim of this study is to provide an updated review of exercise rehabilitation services for people with HF in Australia and to identify perceived organisational barriers to providing these services. METHODS A cross-sectional survey of cardiac rehabilitation centres in Australia, investigating the number and characteristics of services providing exercise rehabilitation for people with HF. RESULTS A total of 334 of 457 identified services responded to the survey. Of these, 251 reported providing a supervised group-based exercise rehabilitation program for people with HF. These services were mapped, showing their distribution across Australia. Services which were unable to provide group-based exercise training for HF patients reported organisational barriers including insufficient funding (60%), staffing (56%) and clinical resources (53%). Of the 78 services that reported patients in their local area were unable to access appropriate exercise guidance, 81% were located in regional or remote areas. We found that reported exercise practices align with current best-practice guidelines with 99% of group based exercise programs reportedly including endurance training and 89% including resistance training. CONCLUSIONS In Australia, exercise practices for people with HF align with current best-practice guidelines for this condition. Limited resources, funding and geographic isolation are reported as the major organisational barriers to providing these programs. Future endeavours should include the development of alternative and flexible delivery models such as telerehabilitation and other home-based therapies to improve access for these individuals to such services.