Julie Birt
Eli Lilly and Company
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Julie Birt.
PharmacoEconomics | 2010
Huseyin Naci; Rachael Fleurence; Julie Birt; Amy Duhig
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a disease of the CNS, typically striking adults during the primary productive time of their life. The symptoms of MS can restrict the individual’s physical activity and income-earning ability, resulting in a major financial burden on the patient, family, health system and society. This systematic literature review was conducted to document the economic burden of MS.Employing pre-defined search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria, systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, the Health Economic Evaluations Database (HEED), the NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) and the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) website as well as conference abstracts.We identified 29 cost-of-illness studies that met the a priori inclusion criteria. The cost categories responsible for the majority of costs associated with MS varied across countries. There was a significant increase in costs associated with an increase in disease severity as measured by the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. The increase in magnitude was coupled with changes in the distribution of costs; although direct medical costs were important contributors in earlier stages of disease, they were outweighed by indirect costs in later stages, mainly due to relapses and productivity losses.Considering the increased costs associated with relapse occurrence and increasing disease severity, pharmaceutical or non-pharmaceutical interventions aimed at delaying the progression of disease may help to reduce the economic burden of MS.
Annals of Clinical Psychiatry | 2003
Julie Birt
The prevalence of overweight and obesity in untreated patients with severe mental illness mimicks the trends seen in the general population. Furthermore, weight gain is likely to occur with the addition of pharmacotherapy with an antipsychotic. The literature does indicate that despite fundamental cognitive and psychosocial deficits seen in patients with severe and persistent mental disorders such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, it is possible to effectively manage weight gain in this population. In particular, behavioral interventions have been shown to be effective in the prevention and treatment of weight gain associated with antipsychotic therapy. Some success has also been seen with the use of adjunctive medication such as amantadine, histamine (H2) antagonists, metformin, topiramate, and orlistat. Additional, prospective, controlled studies of long-term antipsychotic drug associated weight gain and its clinical consequences are needed in order to identify the most effective therapy for the reduction and maintenance of body weight in patients taking antipsychotic therapy.
Journal of Medical Economics | 2010
Huseyin Naci; Rachael Fleurence; Julie Birt; Amy Duhig
Abstract Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a debilitating disease, accompanied by neurological symptoms of varying severity. Utilities are a key summary index measure used in assessing health-related quality of life in individuals with MS. Objectives: To provide a systematic review of the literature on utilities of relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) patients and to review changes in utilities associated with the increasing neurological disability of different stages of MS, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Methods: Employing pre-defined search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria, systematic searches of the literature were conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the Health Economic Evaluation Database (HEED), and the NHS Economic Evaluations Database (NHS/EED). Proceedings for the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR), the European Society for Treatment and Research in MS (ECTRIMS), the American Society for Treatment and Research in MS (ACTRIMS), and the Latin American Society for Treatment and Research in MS (LACTRIMS) were reviewed in addition to the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence website and the table of contents of PharmacoEconomics and Value in Health. Results: This review identified 18 studies reporting utilities associated with health states of MS. Utilities ranged from 0.80 to 0.92 for patients with an EDSS score of 1, from 0.49 to 0.71 for patients with an EDSS score of 3, from 0.39 to 0.54 for patients with an EDSS score of 6.5, and from –0.19 to 0.1 for patients with an EDSS score of 9. Limitations: Several of the studies reviewed relied on data from patient organizations, which may not be fully representative of the general patient populations. Additionally, the majority of the studies relied on retrospective data collection. Conclusions: Utilities decrease substantially with increasing neurological disability. Cross-country differences are minimal with utility scores following a similar pattern across countries for patients at similar disease severity levels. This consistency in findings is noteworthy, as there is a reliable evidence base for selecting utility values for economic evaluation analyses. However, more research is needed to explore potential differences in utilities between RRMS and SPMS patients.
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation | 2012
Evelina A. Zimovetz; Sorrel Wolowacz; Peter Classi; Julie Birt
BackgroundDecision makers in many jurisdictions use cost-effectiveness estimates as an aid for selecting interventions with an appropriate balance between health benefits and costs. This systematic literature review aims to provide an overview of published cost-effectiveness models in major depressive disorder (MDD) with a focus on the methods employed. Key components of the identified models are discussed and any challenges in developing models are highlighted.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed to identify all primary model-based economic evaluations of MDD interventions indexed in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, EconLit, and PsycINFO between January 2000 and May 2010.ResultsA total of 37 studies were included in the review. These studies predominantly evaluated antidepressant medications. The analyses were performed across a broad set of countries. The majority of models were decision-trees; eight were Markov models. Most models had a time horizon of less than 1 year. The majority of analyses took a payer perspective. Clinical input data were obtained from pooled placebo-controlled comparative trials, single head-to-head trials, or meta-analyses. The majority of studies (24 of 37) used treatment success or symptom-free days as main outcomes, 14 studies incorporated health state utilities, and 2 used disability-adjusted life-years. A few models (14 of 37) incorporated probabilities and costs associated with suicide and/or suicide attempts. Two models examined the cost-effectiveness of second-line treatment in patients who had failed to respond to initial therapy. Resource use data used in the models were obtained mostly from expert opinion. All studies, with the exception of one, explored parameter uncertainty.ConclusionsThe review identified several model input data gaps, including utility values in partial responders, efficacy of second-line treatments, and resource utilisation estimates obtained from relevant, high-quality studies. It highlighted the differences in outcome measures among the trials of MDD interventions, which can lead to difficulty in performing indirect comparisons, and the inconsistencies in definitions of health states used in the clinical trials and those used in utility studies. Clinical outcomes contributed to the uncertainty in cost-effectiveness estimates to a greater degree than costs or utility weights.
Circulation | 2014
Suzanne V. Arnold; Mikhail Kosiborod; Fengming Tang; Zhenxiang Zhao; Thomas M. Maddox; Patrick L. McCollam; Julie Birt; John A. Spertus
Background— Intensive statins are superior to moderate statins in reducing morbidity and mortality after an acute myocardial infarction. Although studies have documented rates of statin prescription as a quality performance measure, variations in hospitals’ rates of initiating, intensifying, and maximizing statin therapy after acute myocardial infarction are unknown. Methods and Results— We assessed statin use at admission and discharge among 4340 acute myocardial infarction patients from 24 US hospitals (2005–2008). Hierarchical models estimated site variation in statin initiation in naïve patients, intensification in those undergoing submaximal therapy, and discharge on maximal therapy (defined as a statin with expected low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering ≥50%) after adjustment for patient factors, including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Site variation was explored with a median rate ratio, which estimates the relative difference in risk ratios of 2 hypothetically identical patients at 2 different hospitals. Among statin-naïve patients, 87% without a contraindication were prescribed a statin, with no variability across sites (median rate ratio, 1.02). Among patients who arrived on submaximal statins, 26% had their statin therapy intensified, with modest site variability (median rate ratio, 1.47). Among all patients without a contraindication, 23% were discharged on maximal statin therapy, with substantial hospital variability (median rate ratio, 2.79). Conclusions— In a large, multicenter acute myocardial infarction cohort, statin therapy was begun in nearly 90% of patients during hospitalization, with no variability across sites; however, rates of statin intensification and maximization were low and varied substantially across hospitals. Given that more intense statin therapy is associated with better outcomes, changing the existing performance measures to include the intensity of statin therapy may improve care.
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care | 2013
Josephine Mauskopf; Costel Chirila; Catherine Masaquel; Kristina S. Boye; Lee Bowman; Julie Birt; David Grainger
Objectives: The aim of this study was to estimate the relationship between the financial impact of a new drug and the recommendation for reimbursement by the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC). Methods: Data in the PBAC summary database were abstracted for decisions made between July 2005 and November 2009. Financial impact—the upper bound of the values presented in the PBAC summary database—was categorized as ≤A
Health Policy | 2013
Josephine Mauskopf; Costel Chirila; Julie Birt; Kristina S. Boye; Lee Bowman
0, >A
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research | 2013
Daryl S Spinner; Julie Birt; Jeffrey Walter; Lee Bowman; Josephinie Mauskopf; Michael Drummond; Catherine Copley-Merriman
0 up to A
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care | 2011
Josephine Mauskopf; Jeffrey Walter; Julie Birt; Lee Bowman; Catherine Copley-Merriman; Michael Drummond
10 million, A
Obesity | 2012
Scott Doyle; Andrew Lloyd; Julie Birt; Bradley Curtis; Shehzad Ali; Kecia Godbey; Justo Sierra-Johnson; Jason Halford
10 million up to A