Julie Denison
FHI 360
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Julie Denison.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews | 2012
Virginia A. Fonner; Julie Denison; Caitlin E. Kennedy; Kevin O'Reilly; Michael D. Sweat
BACKGROUNDnVoluntary counseling and testing (VCT) continues to play a critical role in HIV prevention, care and treatment. In recent years, different modalities of VCT have been implemented, including clinic-, mobile- and home-based testing and counseling. This review assesses the effects of all VCT types on HIV-related risk behaviors in low- and middle-income countries.nnnOBJECTIVESnThe primary objective of this review is to systematically review the literature examining the efficacy of VCT in changing HIV-related risk behaviors in developing countries across various populations.nnnSEARCH METHODSnFive electronic databases - PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) - were searched using predetermined key words and phrases. Hand-searching was conducted in four key journals including AIDS, AIDS and Behavior, AIDS Education and Prevention, and AIDS Care; the tables of contents of these four journals during the included time period were individually screened for relevant articles. The reference lists of all articles included in the review were screened to identify any additional studies; this process was iterated until no additional articles were found.nnnSELECTION CRITERIAnTo be included in the review, eligible studies had to meet the following inclusion criteria: 1) Take place in a low- or middle-income country as defined by the World Bank, 2) Published in a peer-reviewed journal between January 1, 1990 and July 6, 2010, 3) Involve client-initiated VCT, including pre-test counseling, HIV-testing, and post-test counseling, and 4) Use a pre/post or multi-arm design that compares individuals before and after receiving VCT or individuals who received VCT to those who did not, and 5) Report results pertaining to behavioral, psychological, biological, or social HIV-related outcomes.nnnDATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSISnAll citations were initially screened and all relevant citations were independently screened by two reviewers to assess eligibility. For all included studies data were extracted by two team members working independently using a standardized form.xa0 Differences were resolved through consensus or discussion with the study coordinator when necessary. Study rigor was assessed using an eight point quality score and through the Cochrane Collaborations Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Outcomes comparable across studies, including condom use and number of sex partners, were meta-analyzed using random effects models. With respect to both meta-analyses, data were included from multi-arm studies and from pre/post studies if adequate data were provided. Other outcomes, including HIV-incidence, STI incidence/prevalence, and positive and negative life events were synthesized qualitatively. For meta-analysis, all outcomes were converted to the standard metric of the odds ratio. If an outcome could not be converted to an odds ratio, the study was excluded from analysis.nnnMAIN RESULTSnxa0An initial search yielded 2808 citations. After excluding studies failing to meet the inclusion criteria, 19 were deemed eligible for inclusion. Of these studies, two presented duplicate data and were removed. The remaining 17 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and 8 studies were meta-analyzed.xa0 Twelve studies offered xa0clinic-based VCT, 3 were employment-based, 1 involved mobile VCT, and 1 provided home-based VCT.xa0 In meta-analysis, the odds of reporting increased number of sexual partners were reduced when comparing participants who received VCT to those who did not, unadjusted random effects pooled OR= 0.69 (95% CI: 0.53-0.90, p=0.007). When stratified by serostatus, these results only remained significant for those who tested HIV-positive. There was an insignificant increase in the odds of condom use/protected sex among participants who received VCT compared to those who did not, unadjusted random effects pooled OR=1.39 (95% CI: 0.97-1.99, p=0.076). When stratified by HIV status, this effect became significant among HIV-positive participants, random effects pooled OR= 3.24 (95% CI: 2.29-4.58, p<0.001).nnnAUTHORS CONCLUSIONSnThese findings add to growing evidence that VCT can change HIV-related sexual risk behaviors thereby reducing HIV-related risk, and confirming its importance as an HIV prevention strategy. To maximize the effectiveness of VCT, more studies should be conducted to understand which modalities and counseling strategies produce significant reductions in risky behaviors and lead to the greatest uptake of VCT.
Aids Care-psychological and Socio-medical Aspects of Aids\/hiv | 2008
Julie Denison; Ann P. McCauley; W. A. Dunnett-Dagg; Nalakwanji Lungu; Michael D. Sweat
Abstract This study explored how adolescents involve their families, friends and sex partners when making decisions about seeking HIV voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) and disclosing their HIV-status. The study is based on 40 qualitative in-depth interviews with 16 to 19 year olds who knew their HIV status in Ndola, Zambia. The findings show that: a) almost half of the youth turned to family members for advice or approval prior to seeking VCT; b) a disapproving reaction from family members or friends often discouraged youth from attending VCTuntil they found someone supportive; c) informants often attended VCTalone or with a friend, but rarely with a family member; and d) disclosure was common to family and friends, infrequent to sex partners, and not linked to accessing care and support services. Family members need access to information on VCT so they can support young peoples’ decisions to test for HIV and to disclose their HIV status. These results reinforce the need to provide confidential VCT services for adolescents and the need to develop and test innovative strategies to reach adolescents, their families and sex partners with VCT information and services.
Bulletin of The World Health Organization | 2012
Michael D. Sweat; Julie Denison; Caitlin E. Kennedy; Virginia Tedrow; Kevin O'Reilly
OBJECTIVEnTo examine the relationship between condom social marketing programmes and condom use.nnnMETHODSnStandard systematic review and meta-analysis methods were followed. The review included studies of interventions in which condoms were sold, in which a local brand name(s) was developed for condoms, and in which condoms were marketed through a promotional campaign to increase sales. A definition of intervention was developed and standard inclusion criteria were followed in selecting studies. Data were extracted from each eligible study, and a meta-analysis of the results was carried out.nnnFINDINGSnSix studies with a combined sample size of 23,048 met the inclusion criteria. One was conducted in India and five in sub-Saharan Africa. All studies were cross-sectional or serial cross-sectional. Three studies had a comparison group, although all lacked equivalence in sociodemographic characteristics across study arms. All studies randomly selected participants for assessments, although none randomly assigned participants to intervention arms. The random-effects pooled odds ratio for condom use was 2.01 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.42-2.84) for the most recent sexual encounter and 2.10 (95% CI: 1.51-2.91) for a composite of all condom use outcomes. Tests for heterogeneity yielded significant results for both meta-analyses.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe evidence base for the effect of condom social marketing on condom use is small because few rigorous studies have been conducted. Meta-analyses showed a positive and statistically significant effect on increasing condom use, and all individual studies showed positive trends. The cumulative effect of condom social marketing over multiple years could be substantial. We strongly encourage more evaluations of these programmes with study designs of high rigour.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2015
Andrew F. Auld; Ray W. Shiraishi; Francisco Mbofana; Aleny Couto; Ernest Benny Fetogang; Shenaaz El-Halabi; Refeletswe Lebelonyane; Pilatwe T lhagiso Pilatwe; Ndapewa Hamunime; Velephi Okello; Tsitsi Mutasa-Apollo; Owen Mugurungi; Joseph Murungu; Janet Dzangare; Gideon Kwesigabo; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Modest Mulenga; Sebastian Hachizovu; Virginie Ettiegne-Traore; Fayama Mohamed; Adebobola Bashorun; Do T hi Nhan; Nguyen H uu Hai; Tran H uu Quang; Joelle Deas Van Onacker; Kesner Francois; Ermane Robin; Gracia Desforges; Mansour Farahani; Harrison Kamiru
Equitable access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) for men and women with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is a principle endorsed by most countries and funding bodies, including the U.S. Presidents Emergency Plan for AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) Relief (PEPFAR) (1). To evaluate gender equity in ART access among adults (defined for this report as persons aged ≥15 years), 765,087 adult ART patient medical records from 12 countries in five geographic regions* were analyzed to estimate the ratio of women to men among new ART enrollees for each calendar year during 2002-2013. This annual ratio was compared with estimates from the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)(†) of the ratio of HIV-infected adult women to men in the general population. In all 10 African countries and Haiti, the most recent estimates of the ratio of adult women to men among new ART enrollees significantly exceeded the UNAIDS estimates for the female-to-male ratio among HIV-infected adults by 23%-83%. In six African countries and Haiti, the ratio of women to men among new adult ART enrollees increased more sharply over time than the estimated UNAIDS female-to-male ratio among adults with HIV in the general population. Increased ART coverage among men is needed to decrease their morbidity and mortality and to reduce HIV incidence among their sexual partners. Reaching more men with HIV testing and linkage-to-care services and adoption of test-and-treat ART eligibility guidelines (i.e., regular testing of adults, and offering treatment to all infected persons with ART, regardless of CD4 cell test results) could reduce gender inequity in ART coverage.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2017
Andrew F. Auld; Ray W. Shiraishi; Ikwo K. Oboho; Christine Ross; Moses Bateganya; Valerie Pelletier; Jacob Dee; Kesner Francois; Nirva Duval; Mayer Antoine; Chris Delcher; Gracia Desforges; Mark Griswold; Jean Wysler Domercant; Nadjy Joseph; Varough Deyde; Yrvel Desir; Joelle Deas Van Onacker; Ermane Robin; Helen M. Chun; Isaac Zulu; Ishani Pathmanathan; E. Kainne Dokubo; Spencer Lloyd; Rituparna Pati; Jonathan E. Kaplan; Elliot Raizes; Thomas J. Spira; Kiren Mitruka; Aleny Couto
Monitoring prevalence of advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease (i.e., CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/μL) among persons starting antiretroviral therapy (ART) is important to understand ART program outcomes, inform HIV prevention strategy, and forecast need for adjunctive therapies.*,†,§ To assess trends in prevalence of advanced disease at ART initiation in 10 high-burden countries during 2004-2015, records of 694,138 ART enrollees aged ≥15 years from 797 ART facilities were analyzed. Availability of national electronic medical record systems allowed up-to-date evaluation of trends in Haiti (2004-2015), Mozambique (2004-2014), and Namibia (2004-2012), where prevalence of advanced disease at ART initiation declined from 75% to 34% (p<0.001), 73% to 37% (p<0.001), and 80% to 41% (p<0.001), respectively. Significant declines in prevalence of advanced disease during 2004-2011 were observed in Nigeria, Swaziland, Uganda, Vietnam, and Zimbabwe. The encouraging declines in prevalence of advanced disease at ART enrollment are likely due to scale-up of testing and treatment services and ART-eligibility guidelines encouraging earlier ART initiation. However, in 2015, approximately a third of new ART patients still initiated ART with advanced HIV disease. To reduce prevalence of advanced disease at ART initiation, adoption of World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended treat-all guidelines and strategies to facilitate earlier HIV testing and treatment are needed to reduce HIV-related mortality and HIV incidence.
Bulletin of The World Health Organization | 2012
Michael D. Sweat; Julie Denison; Caitlin E. Kennedy; Virginia Tedrow; Kevin O'Reilly
OBJECTIVEnTo examine the relationship between condom social marketing programmes and condom use.nnnMETHODSnStandard systematic review and meta-analysis methods were followed. The review included studies of interventions in which condoms were sold, in which a local brand name(s) was developed for condoms, and in which condoms were marketed through a promotional campaign to increase sales. A definition of intervention was developed and standard inclusion criteria were followed in selecting studies. Data were extracted from each eligible study, and a meta-analysis of the results was carried out.nnnFINDINGSnSix studies with a combined sample size of 23,048 met the inclusion criteria. One was conducted in India and five in sub-Saharan Africa. All studies were cross-sectional or serial cross-sectional. Three studies had a comparison group, although all lacked equivalence in sociodemographic characteristics across study arms. All studies randomly selected participants for assessments, although none randomly assigned participants to intervention arms. The random-effects pooled odds ratio for condom use was 2.01 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.42-2.84) for the most recent sexual encounter and 2.10 (95% CI: 1.51-2.91) for a composite of all condom use outcomes. Tests for heterogeneity yielded significant results for both meta-analyses.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe evidence base for the effect of condom social marketing on condom use is small because few rigorous studies have been conducted. Meta-analyses showed a positive and statistically significant effect on increasing condom use, and all individual studies showed positive trends. The cumulative effect of condom social marketing over multiple years could be substantial. We strongly encourage more evaluations of these programmes with study designs of high rigour.
Bulletin of The World Health Organization | 2012
Michael D. Sweat; Julie Denison; Caitlin E. Kennedy; Virginia Tedrow; Kevin O'Reilly
OBJECTIVEnTo examine the relationship between condom social marketing programmes and condom use.nnnMETHODSnStandard systematic review and meta-analysis methods were followed. The review included studies of interventions in which condoms were sold, in which a local brand name(s) was developed for condoms, and in which condoms were marketed through a promotional campaign to increase sales. A definition of intervention was developed and standard inclusion criteria were followed in selecting studies. Data were extracted from each eligible study, and a meta-analysis of the results was carried out.nnnFINDINGSnSix studies with a combined sample size of 23,048 met the inclusion criteria. One was conducted in India and five in sub-Saharan Africa. All studies were cross-sectional or serial cross-sectional. Three studies had a comparison group, although all lacked equivalence in sociodemographic characteristics across study arms. All studies randomly selected participants for assessments, although none randomly assigned participants to intervention arms. The random-effects pooled odds ratio for condom use was 2.01 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.42-2.84) for the most recent sexual encounter and 2.10 (95% CI: 1.51-2.91) for a composite of all condom use outcomes. Tests for heterogeneity yielded significant results for both meta-analyses.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe evidence base for the effect of condom social marketing on condom use is small because few rigorous studies have been conducted. Meta-analyses showed a positive and statistically significant effect on increasing condom use, and all individual studies showed positive trends. The cumulative effect of condom social marketing over multiple years could be substantial. We strongly encourage more evaluations of these programmes with study designs of high rigour.
HIV Prevention#R##N#A comprehensive approach | 2009
Julie Denison; Donna L. Higgins; Michael D. Sweat
Publisher Summary This chapter provides a brief overview of how HIV testing and counseling evolved and the different purposes it serves. The first licensed test for HIV became available in 1985, 4 years after the initial Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report on the epidemic that described cases of Pneumocystis carina pneumonia in Los Angeles. In this context, the HIV test emerged as much more than a purely diagnostic tool. The test process, for example, involved counseling on risk reduction and behavior change. Expansion of HIV testing, and thus growing numbers of people who were aware that they were infected with HIV, also supported political mobilization and advocacy among those infected and affected by the virus. This chapter illustrates the evolving role the HIV test has had as a prevention and care tool. The reasons for taking a test and for promoting knowledge of ones HIV status are varied, and include gaining knowledge for behavior change and future decisions, testing as a human rights issue, government planning, political mobilization, and access to treatment. Corresponding with the increased uptake of HIV testing and counseling has been a rapid increase in the number of HIV-infected patients starting antiretroviral therapy (ART). The WHO and UNAIDS provide further guidance on which health facilities should provide PITC according to the typology of the HIV epidemic and the context where the facility exists.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2014
Andrew F. Auld; Simon Agolory; Ray W. Shiraishi; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Gideon Kwesigabo; Modest Mulenga; Sebastian Hachizovu; Emeka Asadu; Moise Zanga Tuho; Virginie Ettiegne-Traore; Francisco Mbofana; Velephi Okello; Charles Azih; Julie Denison; Sharon Tsui; Olivier Koole; Harrison Kamiru; Harriet Nuwagaba-Biribonwoha; Charity Alfredo; Kebba Jobarteh; Solomon Odafe; Dennis Onotu; Kunomboa A. Ekra; Joseph S. Kouakou; Peter Ehrenkranz; George Bicego; Kwasi Torpey; Ya Diul Mukadi; Eric van Praag; Joris Menten
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2013
Virginie Ettiegne-Traore; Moise Zanga Tuho; Fayama Mohamed; Charles Azih; Francisco Mbofana; Modest Mulenga; Fred Wabwire-Mangen; Gideon Kwesigabo; Joseph Essombo; Harrison Kamiru; Harriet Nuwagaba-Biribonwoha; Kwasi Torpey; Eric van Praag; Ya Diul Mukadi; Olivier Koole; Joris Menten; Robert Colebunders; Lisa Nelson; Georgette Adjorlolo-Johnson; Julie Denison; Sharon Tsui; Carol D. Hamilton; Timothy D. Mastro; David R. Bangsberg; Kunomboa A. Ekra; Joseph S. Kouakou; Peter Ehrenkranz; Trong Ao; Charity Alfredo; Kebba Jobarteh