Julie Giroux

Sarcopenia and body mass index predict sunitinib-induced early dose-limiting toxicities in renal cancer patients

Background:Little is known on factors predicting sunitinib toxicity. Recently, the condition of low muscle mass, named sarcopenia, was identified as a significant predictor of toxicity in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients treated with sorafenib. We investigated whether sarcopenia could predict early dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurrence in mRCC patients treated with sunitinib.Methods:Consecutive mRCC patients treated with sunitinib were retrospectively reviewed. A DLT was defined as any toxicity leading to dose reduction or treatment discontinuation. Body composition was evaluated using CT scan obtained within 1 month before treatment initiation.Results:Among 61 patients eligible for analysis, 52.5% were sarcopenic and 32.8% had both sarcopenia and a body mass index (BMI)<25 kg m−2. Eighteen patients (29.5%) experienced a DLT during the first cycle. Sarcopenic patients with a BMI<25 kg m−2 experienced more DLTs (P=0.01; odds ratio=4.1; 95% CI: (1.3–13.3)), more cumulative grade 2 or 3 toxicities (P=0.008), more grade 3 toxicities (P=0.04) and more acute vascular toxicities (P=0.009).Conclusion:Patients with sarcopenia and a BMI<25 kg m−2 experienced significantly more DLTs during the first cycle of treatment.

Effect of glucuronidation on transport and tissue accumulation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors: consequences for the clinical management of sorafenib and regorafenib

Introduction: UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) are a multigenic family of enzymes responsible for the glucuronidation reaction. Many therapeutic classes of drugs used in solid tumors are UGT substrates, including cancer therapies. Areas covered: This article describes the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) undergoing hepatic glucuronidation; its effect on transport and tissue accumulation and the clinical consequences of this particular metabolism. A PubMed search concerning the pharmacokinetics of the TKIs was performed. All are extensively metabolized by CYP450. Two TKIs, sorafenib and regorafenib, also have a major UGT-mediated metabolism and were therefore studied. Expert opinion: The prescription of the same dose of sorafenib and regorafenib for all patients may be inappropriate since at each enzymatic step of this multistep metabolism inter-individual fluctuations exist. Having a non-exclusive CYP-mediated route of metabolism may reduce the risk of variability in drug exposure when CYP3A4 substrates are concomitantly given. Several clinical consequences derive from this pharmacokinetic particularity of sorafenib and regorafenib. Since no clear difference distinguishes TKIs in efficacy in large randomized trials, the differences for the clinical management of their toxicity is a critical aspect.

Large artery stiffness and hypertension after antiangiogenic drugs: influence on cancer progression.

Background: Systemic hypertension is a frequent side effect of antiangiogenic drugs (AADs) and may represent a marker of efficacy on cancer. We hypothesized that large artery properties are affected by AADs, and contribute to the rise of blood pressure and may be better related to cancer progression and mortality than hypertension. Methods and results: Participants were studied before AADs (V0), 10 days later (V1) and then every 2 weeks for 6 weeks (V1–V4). We included 57 consecutive patients in whom treatment with sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) or sunitinib (37.5–50 mg once daily) was indicated. The target dose could be adjusted according to tolerance and response. Aortic and carotid stiffness, brachial and central blood pressure and augmentation index were measured noninvasively at each visit. Data regarding cancer progression and mortality were collected at 6 months. Twenty-eight patients (49%) developed hypertension. Brachial SBP significantly increased during follow-up (V0–V1: +9.6 ± 15.2 mmHg, P < 0.001; V0–V4: +6.0 ± 17.8 mmHg, P = 0.04). Central BP, and aortic and carotid stiffness increased independently of brachial BP changes. Aortic and carotid stiffening were associated with cancer progression independently of BP changes [hazard risk 1.24 (1.01–1.51) and 1.34 (1.03–1.73), respectively; P < 0.05], but not with cancer mortality. Brachial SBP had no predictive value. Conclusion: Large arteries stiffen during AAD treatment partly independently of BP changes. Arterial mechanical properties are associated with BP rise. Arterial stiffening is related with the effects of AAD on cancer progression independently of BP changes. Large artery properties might help monitor AAD therapy in cancer patients.

Drug safety evaluation of sorafenib for treatment of solid tumors: consequences for the risk assessment and management of cancer patients

Introduction: Sorafenib is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Considerable clinical experience has been accumulated since its first Phase III clinical trial in metastatic renal cancer patients in 2007. The management of its early acute toxicity in fit patients is well known. The management of prolonged treatment becomes the new challenge. Areas covered: Using sorafenib as a key word for PubMed search, we review preclinical and clinical data and discuss the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sorafenib, its acute and cumulative toxicities and their consequences for patient management. Expert opinion: The systematic multi-disciplinary risk assessment of cancer patients prior to TKI initiation reduces the risks of acute and late toxicity, especially drug–drug interactions and arterial risks. Sarcopenia is now identified as a major risk of severe toxicity. The very diverse clinical pictures of cumulative toxicity must be known. The monitoring of sorafenib systemic exposure is helpful especially in elderly patients. Moreover, at disease progression, it allows distinguishing between underexposure to sorafenib and truly acquired resistance to the drug. The optimal use of sorafenib should allow improving the reported results of flat-dose. Finally, most of this knowledge could be used for the development and optimal use of the other TKIs.

Pemetrexed, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND Oxaliplatin has less haematological toxicity than cisplatin and carboplatin. The combination of pemetrexed, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab appeared well tolerated and active as second- or third-line treatment in a previous phase II study. Its role as first-line therapy remains to define. PATIENTS AND METHODS From August 2008 to May 2011, consecutive chemo-naïve patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received pemetrexed 500mg/m(2), oxaliplatin 100mg/m(2) and bevacizumab 7.5mg/kg every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, in the outpatient setting. Maintenance therapy including pemetrexed and bevacizumab was given to patients with non-progressive disease. The primary evaluation criterion was safety. Secondary evaluation criteria were response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Thirty-eight patients (50% males, median age: 55 years, range 38-76) received a total of 199 cycles (median per patient: 6, range 2-6), plus 98 cycles of maintenance therapy. Twenty patients (52.6%) had a PS of 2, and 6 (15.8%) had brain metastases. The most frequent toxicities were hypertension (all grades: 42.1%) and peripheral neuropathy (grade 2-3: 21.1%). Haematological toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 anaemia and thrombopenia (5.3% each). Neither febrile neutropenia nor arterial thrombo-embolic event occurred. The objective response rate was 55.3% (95%CI: 39.5-71.1). The median PFS and OS were 6.2 (95%CI: 5.4-9.0) and 14.6 (95%CI: 9.8-19.5) months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In this single centre experience, the combination of pemetrexed, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab was well tolerated and had promising activity as first-line therapy in unselected patients with stage IV non-squamous NSCLC.

Drug monitoring of sunitinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: a monocentric observational French study

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could be helpful in oral targeted therapies. Data are sparse to evaluate its impact on treatment management. This study aimed to determine a threshold value of plasma drug exposure associated with the occurrence of grade 3–4 toxicity, then the potential impact of TDM on clinical decision. Consecutive outpatients treated with sunitinib were prospectively monitored between days 21 and 28 of the first cycle, then monthly until disease progression. At each consultation, the composite AUCƬ,ss (sunitinib + active metabolite SU12662) was assayed. The decisions taken during each consultation were matched with AUCƬ,ss and compared to the decisional algorithm based on TDM. A total of 105 cancer patients and 288 consultations were matched with the closest AUCƬ,ss measurement. The majority (60%) of the patients had metastatic renal clear‐cell carcinoma (mRCC). Fifty‐five (52%) patients experienced grade 3–4 toxicity. Multivariate analysis identified composite AUCƬ,ss as a parameter independently associated with grade 3–4 toxicity (P < 0.0001). Using the ROC curve, the threshold value of composite AUCƬ,ss predicting grade ≥3 toxicity was 2150 ng/mL/h (CI 95%, 0.6–0.79%; P < 0.0001). At disease progression in patients with mRCC, AUCƬ,ss tended to be lower than the one assayed during the first cycle (1678 vs. 2004 ng/mL/h, respectively, P = 0.072). TDM could have changed the medical decision for sunitinib dosing in 30% of patients at the first cycle of treatment, and in 46% of the patients over the whole treatment course. TDM is routinely feasible and may both contribute to improve toxicity management and to identify sunitinib underexposure at the time of disease progression.

Nutritional Status Is Superior to the ECOG Performance Status in Predicting the Dose-Intensity of the GEMOX Chemotherapy Regimen in Patients with Advanced Cancer

The increasing number of unfit patients calls for better risk assessment prior to initiating anti-tumor treatment. This is a major concern in the prevention and reduction of treatment-related complications. The aim of our study was to evaluate the nutritional status for the risk assessment of patients qualifying to receive the gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen. This single-center, retrospective study examined baseline clinical and biological characteristics in a cohort of 165 unselected, consecutive cancer patients receiving GEMOX. Malnutrition was defined as either body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m2, body weight loss >10% over 3 mo, or albuminemia <35 g/L. A total of 165 patients (median age 61 yr, PS 0–1: 71%) were studied. Malnutrition was seen in 43% of PS 0–1 patients, vs. 60% of PS 2 and 66% of PS 3 patients (P > 0.05). Median relative dose-intensity was 0.90 (0.17–1.04). GEMOX dose-intensity correlated negatively with loss of baseline weight (r = −0.24, P < 0.02). In patients who did not complete more than 2 cycles of chemotherapy, median PS (P < 0.01), mean C-reactive protein (CRP; P < 0.01), and mean albuminemia (P < 0.05) were, respectively, significantly higher, higher, and lower. Malnutrition is associated with a high risk of early discontinuance of treatment. Systematic basal evaluation of the nutritional status, including albuminemia and BMI, is recommended.

Multidisciplinary risk assessment to reveal cancer treatments in complex cancer patients.

170 Background: Older age is a cause of disparity in cancer treatment decision and treatment guidelines for patients with comorbidities, polypharmacy, denutrition or psycho-social frailty are needed. A pre-therapeutic multidimensional assessment might improve the complex patient management. We developed an experimental program of integrated medicine called ARIANE. We report 18 months activity of this outpatient setting evaluation, its feasibility and impact on treatment decision-making. METHODS Complex patients with predefined cancer treatment strategy entered into the program. A one-day evaluation combined consultations of cardiologist, geriatrician, diabetologist, anesthetist, pharmacist, pain specialist, dietician, psychologist and social worker. Evaluation of performance status, EKG, ejection fraction, ASA score, diabetes, social vulnerability and malnutrition was performed including a geriatric assessment, which focused on items like comorbidity (CIRS-G), dependance (ADL, IADL), fails (Up and Go Test), cognitive impairment (MMSE, Clock Drawing Test) and depression (GDS scale). A pharmacist assessed the risk of drug-drug interactions. RESULTS Eighty-seven pts, median age 81 years (range 25-94), 76% male, 51% PS 0-1, 77% grade 3 or 4 comorbidity were included. Genito-urinary, lung cancers and sarcoma represented 77% of pts. Eighty-two percent of pts were assessed by at least ≥ 7 participants. Identified factors of vulnerability were polypharmacy (n=65; 75%; >3 drugs), social distress or severe malnutrition (both n=21; 24%), depression (n=17; 19.5%) and cognitive impairment (n=13; 15%). We identified drug interaction in 18 pts (27%). The risk assessment resulted in anticancer treatment changes in 47/87 patients (54%): protocol adaptation (n=19/87; 22%), less aggressive treatment (n=15/87; 17.2%), or more intensive therapy (n=13/87; 15%). CONCLUSIONS A one-day multidisciplinary risk assessment is an answer to the complexity of unfit cancer patients and improves the safety of anticancer treatments.