Julie Lebeau

Nectar resource limitation affects butterfly flight performance and metabolism differently in intensive and extensive agricultural landscapes

Flight is an essential biological ability of many insects, but is energetically costly. Environments under rapid human-induced change are characterized by habitat fragmentation and may impose constraints on the energy income budget of organisms. This may, in turn, affect locomotor performance and willingness to fly. We tested flight performance and metabolic rates in meadow brown butterflies (Maniola jurtina) of two contrasted agricultural landscapes: intensively managed, nectar-poor (IL) versus extensively managed, nectar-rich landscapes (EL). Young female adults were submitted to four nectar treatments (i.e. nectar quality and quantity) in outdoor flight cages. IL individuals had better flight capacities in a flight mill and had lower resting metabolic rates (RMR) than EL individuals, except under the severest treatment. Under this treatment, RMR increased in IL individuals, but decreased in EL individuals; flight performance was maintained by IL individuals, but dropped by a factor 2.5 in EL individuals. IL individuals had more canalized (i.e. less plastic) responses relative to the nectar treatments than EL individuals. Our results show significant intraspecific variation in the locomotor and metabolic response of a butterfly to different energy income regimes relative to the landscape of origin. Ecophysiological studies help to improve our mechanistic understanding of the eco-evolutionary impact of anthropogenic environments on rare and widespread species.

Butterfly Density and Behaviour in Uncut Hay Meadow Strips: Behavioural Ecological Consequences of an Agri-Environmental Scheme

Sparing zones from mowing has been proposed, and applied, to improve local conditions for survival and reproduction of insects in hay meadows. However, little is known about the efficiency of refuge zones and the consequences for local populations. We studied population densities of butterflies before and after mowing in the refuge zone of 15 meadows in 2009 and 2011. We also studied the behaviour of the meadow brown (Maniola jurtina) comparing nectar use, interactions and flights in the refuge zone before and after mowing. Densities of grassland butterflies in this zone doubled on average after mowing. The density of females of M. jurtina increased on average fourfold, while males showed a more modest increase. In line with the idea of increased scramble competition in the refuge zone after mowing, M. jurtina increased the time spent on nectar feeding, the preferred nectar source was visited more frequently, and females made more use of non-preferred nectar sources. Maniola jurtina did not interact more with conspecifics after mowing, but interactions lasted longer. Flight tracks did not change in linearity, but were faster and shorter after mowing. After mowing, only a part of the local grassland butterflies moved to the uncut refuge zone. The resulting concentration effect alters the time allocated to different activities, nectar use and movements. These aspects have been largely ignored for agri-environmental schemes and grassland management in nature reserves and raise questions about optimal quantities and quality of uncut refuge sites for efficient conservation of grassland arthropods in agricultural landscapes.

Flower use of the butterfly Maniola jurtina in nectar‐rich and nectar‐poor grasslands: a nectar generalist with a strong preference?

Butterflies are often considered as opportunistic nectar consumers that visit a range of flower species. The degree of specialisation in foraging behaviour and flower choice may, however, vary considerably at the inter‐specific level, from highly specialised to generalist species. In generalist nectar use, there can be intra‐specific variation in the availability and use of floral resources (diversity and abundance) among different populations. Knowing the preferences of nectar‐feeding butterflies can increase the understanding of ecological relationships and resource use and help in developing better strategies for butterfly conservation. By means of behavioural tracking, we identified foraging patterns of Maniola jurtina butterflies in nectar‐rich and nectar‐poor grasslands. For both males and females, we showed significant preference for the brown knapweed Centaurea jacea and thistles (Cirsium sp.) in nectar‐rich, extensively managed grasslands. In the absence of these preferred species, as is typically the case in nectar‐poor intensively managed sites, M. jurtina nectared on Trifolium pratense and Leucanthemum vulgare. Flower visits were on average shorter on T. pratense compared to C. jacea. These observational results were confirmed by a field experiment in which a wild flower nectar array with C. jacea and T. pratense was introduced. In extensively managed grasslands, foraging bouts were generally confined to patches of flowering plants and did not involve long flights between flower visits. In intensively managed meadows, butterflies performed longer flights, and ignored more flowers between two consecutive visits. Despite the variety of flower species visited, M. jurtina showed a significant preference for a few nectar sources in a context‐dependent way.