Julie Nickerson
Queensland University of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Julie Nickerson.
Compare | 2016
Jennifer Duke; Hitendra K. Pillay; Megan J. Tones; Julie Nickerson; Suzanne Carrington; Ailini Ioelu
This article presents a critical analysis of the development and implementation of the 2014 inclusive educational policy in Samoa. While Samoan culture is traditionally founded on inclusive social practices, rather than reflecting these practices in their policy, Samoan policy developers have been under pressure to adopt or borrow policy from other countries. The findings of this intrinsic case study highlight the complexity of formulating inclusive education policies for small developing countries and why policy developers borrow from other developed countries. The theoretical framework used to analyse observation data in this study is based on the notion that national process of development is a powerful influence in educational policy. The authors argue and advocate for the existing but overlooked strengths of the local knowledge community capacity when policy is borrowed from other countries, and how the findings of the case study contribute to future attempts at policy development. We found that the draft policy needs to and does reflect Samoan culture, values and vision. However, adopting foreign practices such as the individual education plan and placement rules is not relevant to the Samoan context. The identification and development of inclusive education beliefs, skills and practices in schools is a priority.
International Journal of Inclusive Education | 2018
Amrith Bdr Subba; Chokey Yangzom; Karma Dorji; Sangye Choden; Ugyen Namgay; Suzanne Carrington; Julie Nickerson
ABSTRACT Bhutanese educators are facing the challenge of implementing inclusive education for students with disability throughout their schooling system. Selected schools have started to implement inclusive policies and practices, and it is timely to investigate the progress of inclusive education in these schools. In this qualitative study, 14 Bhutanese principals responded to questions regarding inclusive practices in their schools. Responses were divided into two broad categories: the current status of inclusion in their school; and, inclusion in the future. Principals described barriers such as a lack of specialised teachers, inadequate resources and facilities, and a lack of holistic inclusion. However, they also noted that students were accepted by their peers, that the schools were working well with what they have, and that there was a positive attitude for the future. Changes that are required to progress inclusive education in Bhutan from the perspective of the principals are discussed. The findings of this research will be of interest to researchers and leaders in schools and ministries of education who are working to promote more inclusive schools in less developed countries.
International Journal of Inclusive Education | 2017
Suzanne Carrington; Hitendra K. Pillay; Megan J. Tones; Julie Nickerson; Jennifer Duke; Benedict Esibaea; Ambrose Malefoasi; Casper Joseph Fa'asala
ABSTRACT Inclusive education in general, and disability-inclusive education in particular, is a high-level priority for development work in aid-supported countries. This paper presents a bottom-up process of developing disability-inclusive education policy in one country – the Solomon Islands. It is well understood that the promotion of quality in disability-inclusive education requires a clearly stated policy; however, in many developing countries, there has been a history of policy borrowing rather than culturally informed policy development. This paper will critically discuss how policy development occurs in aid-funded development work and then offers an alternative model of Australian aid-supported policy development as an in-depth case study.
SAGE Open | 2015
Judy Smeed; Terri Bourke; Julie Nickerson; Tracy Corsbie
School curriculum change processes have traditionally been managed internally. However, in Queensland, Australia, as a response to the current high-stakes accountability regime, more and more principals are outsourcing this work to external change agents (ECAs). In 2009, one of the authors (a university lecturer and ECA) developed a curriculum change model (the Controlled Rapid Approach to Curriculum Change [CRACC]), specifically outlining the involvement of an ECA in the initiation phase of a school’s curriculum change process. The purpose of this article is to extend the CRACC model by unpacking the implementation phase, drawing on data from a pilot study of a single school. Interview responses revealed that during the implementation phase, teachers wanted to be kept informed of the wider educational context, use data to constantly track students, relate pedagogical practices to testing practices, share information between departments and professional levels, and own whole school performance. It is suggested that the findings would be transferable to other school settings and internal leadership of curriculum change. The article also strikes a chord of concern: Do the responses from teachers operating under thecurrent accountability regime live their professional lives within this corporate and globalized ideology whether they want to or not?
Faculty of Education | 2013
Julie Nickerson; Judy Smeed; Theresa Bourke
Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools | 2016
Suzanne Carrington; Donna Berthelsen; Julie Nickerson; Jan M. Nicholson; Sue Walker; Katrina Meldrum
Faculty of Education | 2016
Suzanne Carrington; Donna Berthelsen; Julie Nickerson; Jan M. Nicholson; Sue Walker; Katrina Meldrum
School of Cultural & Professional Learning; Faculty of Education | 2015
Judy Smeed; Wayne Troyahn; Julie Nickerson
Faculty of Education | 2015
Judy Smeed; Theresa Bourke; Julie Nickerson; Tracy Corsbie
Faculty of Education | 2013
Judy Smeed; Julie Nickerson; Ross Mackay