Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Julie V. Vasile is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Julie V. Vasile.


Clinics in Plastic Surgery | 2012

Microlymphatic surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic lymphedema.

Corinne Becker; Julie V. Vasile; Joshua L. Levine; Bernardo Nogueira Batista; Rebecca M. Studinger; Constance M. Chen; Marc Riquet

Lymphedema is a chronic and progressive condition that occurs after cancer treatment. Autologous lymph node transplant, or microsurgical vascularized lymph node transfer (ALNT), is a surgical treatment option that brings vascularized vascular endothelial growth factor-C-producing tissue into the operated field to promote lymphangiogenesis and bridge the distal obstructed lymphatic system with the proximal lymphatic system. Operative techniques for upper- and lower-extremity ALNT are described with 3 donor lymph node flaps (inguinal, thoracic, cervical). Surgical technique is described for the combination of ALNT with abdominal flaps and nonabdominal flaps. Imaging showing restoration of lymphatic drainage after ALNT is shown.


Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery | 2010

Anatomic imaging of abdominal perforator flaps without ionizing radiation: Seeing is believing with magnetic resonance imaging angiography

David T. Greenspun; Julie V. Vasile; Joshua L. Levine; Heather Erhard; Rebecca Studinger; Victoria Chernyak; Tiffany M. Newman; Martin R. Prince; Robert J. Allen

The tremendous variability of the inferior epigastric arterial system makes accurate imaging of the vasculature of the anterior abdominal wall an essential component of optimal perforator selection. Preoperative imaging of the abdominal vasculature allows for preoperative perforator selection, resulting in improved operative efficiency and flap design. Abdominal wall perforators of 1-mm diameter can be reliably visualized without exposing patients to ionizing radiation or iodinated intravenous contrast through advances in magnetic resonance imaging angiography (MRA). In this study, MRA imaging was performed on 31 patients who underwent 50 abdominal flaps. For each flap, the location, relative to the umbilicus, of the three largest perforators on both the left and right sides of the abdomen was determined with MRA. Vessel diameter and anatomic course were also evaluated. Postoperatively, a survey was completed by the surgeon to assess the accuracy of the MRA with respect to the intraoperative findings. All perforators visualized on MRA were found at surgery (0% false-positive). In 2 of 50 flaps, the surgeon transferred a flap based upon a vessel not visualized on the MRA (4% false-negative). This article details our experience with MRA as a reliable preoperative imaging technique for abdominal perforator flap breast reconstruction.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2010

Perforator flap magnetic resonance angiography for reconstructive breast surgery: A review of 25 deep inferior epigastric and gluteal perforator artery flap patients

Tiffany M. Newman; Julie V. Vasile; Joshua L. Levine; David T. Greenspun; Robert J. Allen; Minh-Tam Chao; Priscilla A. Winchester; Martin R. Prince

To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for preoperative mapping of rectus and gluteal muscle perforating arteries prior to autologous flap breast reconstruction.


Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery | 2010

Anatomic imaging of gluteal perforator flaps without ionizing radiation: seeing is believing with magnetic resonance angiography.

Julie V. Vasile; Tiffany M. Newman; David G. Rusch; David T. Greenspun; Robert J. Allen; Martin R. Prince; Joshua L. Levine

Preoperative imaging is essential for abdominal perforator flap breast reconstruction because it allows for preoperative perforator selection, resulting in improved operative efficiency and flap design. The benefits of visualizing the vasculature preoperatively also extend to gluteal artery perforator flaps. Initially, our practice used computed tomography angiography (CTA) to image the gluteal vessels. However, with advances in magnetic resonance imaging angiography (MRA), perforating vessels of 1-mm diameter can reliably be visualized without exposing patients to ionizing radiation or iodinated intravenous contrast. In our original MRA protocol to image abdominal flaps, we found the accuracy of MRA compared favorably with CTA. With our increased experience with MRA, we decided to use MRA to image gluteal flaps. Technical changes were made to the MRA protocol to improve image quality and extend the field of view. Using our new MRA protocol, we can image the vasculature of the buttock, abdomen, and upper thigh in one study. We have found that the spatial resolution of MRA is sufficient to accurately map gluteal perforating vessels, as well as provide information on vessel caliber and course. This article details our experience with preoperative imaging for gluteal perforator flap breast reconstruction.


Annals of Plastic Surgery | 2009

Simultaneous Bilateral Breast Reconstruction With In-the-Crease Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flaps

Joshua L. Levine; Quintessa Miller; Julie V. Vasile; Kamran Khoobehi; James E. Craigie; Matthew W. Wise; Robert J. Allen

The inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) free flap represents an alternative technique for autogenous breast reconstruction in patients with insufficient abdominal donor tissue. Historically, patients underwent a staged approach for bilateral breast reconstruction with the IGAP because it is technically demanding and can be time consuming. The bilateral simultaneous IGAP can be performed effectively with 2 microsurgeons operating together. This is a retrospective study of 22 patients (44 flaps) who underwent bilateral breast reconstruction with bilateral IGAP flaps in one operation between January 2005 and December 2007. The following parameters were evaluated and compared to our published data with unilateral IGAP flap reconstruction: operating time, blood loss, flap weight, hospital length of stay, and perioperative complications. A follow-up patient survey was also conducted to gauge patients satisfaction with the donor site and procedure. The flap survival rate was 100%. Complications included 1 patient with 1 flap with partial fat necrosis, 2 patients who required reoperation for venous congestion, 1 patient with a hematoma, 2 patients with delayed buttock wound healing, 2 patients requiring resuturing for buttock wound dehiscence, and 1 patient with resolved paresthesias. The majority of patients were satisfied with the procedure and donor site. In this study, we detail our experience with the inferior gluteal region as a reliable source of donor tissue and the simultaneous bilateral IGAP flap as an efficient method of breast reconstruction.


Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2012

Gadofosveset trisodium-enhanced abdominal perforator MRA.

Zhitong Zou; Hwayoung Kate Lee; Joshua L. Levine; David T. Greenspun; Robert J. Allen; Julie V. Vasile; Christine H. Rohde; Martin R. Prince

To compare image quality including the number of perforators visualized, vessel contrast ratios, and vessel sharpness with blood pool and extracellular contrast agents in abdominal perforator flap magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).


Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery | 2014

Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Perforator Flap Vessel Mapping

Mukta D. Agrawal; Nanda Deepa Thimmappa; Julie V. Vasile; Joshua L. Levine; Robert J. Allen; David T. Greenspun; Christina Y. Ahn; Constance M. Chen; Sandeep Hedgire; Martin R. Prince

BACKGROUND Selection of a vascular pedicle for autologous breast reconstruction is time consuming and depends on visual evaluation during the surgery. Preoperative imaging of donor site for mapping the perforator artery anatomy greatly improves the efficiency of perforator selection and significantly reduces the operative time. In this article, we present our experience with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for perforator vessel mapping including MRA technique and interpretation. METHODS We have performed over 400 MRA examinations from August 2008 to August 2013 at our institution for preoperative imaging of donor site for mapping the perforator vessel anatomy. Using our optimized imaging protocol with blood pool magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents, multiple donor sites can be imaged in a single MRA examination. Following imaging using the postprocessing and reporting tool, we estimated incidence of commonly used perforators for autologous breast reconstruction. RESULTS In our practice, anterior abdominal wall tissue is the most commonly used donor site for perforator flap breast reconstruction and deep inferior epigastric artery perforators are the most commonly used vascular pedicle. A thigh flap, based on the profunda femoral artery perforator has become the second most used flap at our institution. In addition, MRA imaging also showed evidence of metastatic disease in 4% of our patient subset. CONCLUSION Our MRA technique allows the surgeons to confidently assess multiple donor sites for the best perforator and flap design. In conclusion, a well-performed MRA with specific postprocessing provides an accurate method for mapping perforator vessel, at the same time avoiding ionizing radiation.


Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery | 2011

Deep Femoral Artery Perforator Flap: A New Perforator Flap for Breast Reconstruction

Lisa F Schneider; Julie V. Vasile; Joshua L. Levine; Robert J. Allen

We present the deep femoral artery perforator (DFAP) flap, a new perforator flap for breast reconstruction, with a detailed description of operative technique and four clinical examples. The DFAP flap allows harvest of tissue from the lower buttock and lateral thigh with similar territory to an in-the-crease inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flap but based on a different perforator. When present, the DFAP is the largest vessel supplying this territory and is often septocutaneous, facilitating dissection when compared with the IGAP flap. We used preoperative imaging with magnetic resonance angiography to assist in accurate flap planning which also permitted precise determination of perforator origin. In patients with either a contraindication to abdominal wall-based perforator flaps or weight distribution below the waist, the DFAP flap provides an alternative to the IGAP flap with an excellent pedicle and a favorable location on the lateral thigh.


Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | 2016

Breast Tissue Expanders with Magnetic Ports: Clinical Experience at 1.5 T.

Nanda Deepa Thimmappa; Martin R. Prince; Kari L. Colen; Christina Y. Ahn; Silvina P. Dutruel; S Boddu; David T. Greenspun; Julie V. Vasile; Constance M. Chen; Hakan Usal; Christine H. Rohde; Jeremiah S. Redstone; Maria M. LoTempio; Oren Z. Lerman; Anik K. Nath; Robert J. Allen; Joshua L. Levine

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate breast tissue expanders with magnetic ports for safety in patients undergoing abdominal/pelvic magnetic resonance angiography before autologous breast reconstruction. Methods: Magnetic resonance angiography of the abdomen and pelvis at 1.5 T was performed in 71 patients in prone position with tissue expanders with magnetic ports labeled “MR Unsafe” from July of 2012 to May of 2014. Patients were monitored during magnetic resonance angiography for tissue expander–related symptoms, and the chest wall tissue adjacent to the tissue expander was examined for injury at the time of tissue expander removal for breast reconstruction. Retrospective review of these patients’ clinical records was performed. T2-weighted fast spin echo, steady-state free precession and gadolinium-enhanced spoiled gradient echo sequences were assessed for image artifacts. Results: No patient had tissue expander or magnetic port migration during the magnetic resonance examination and none reported pain during scanning. On tissue expander removal (71 patients, 112 implants), the surgeons reported no evidence of tissue damage, and there were no operative complications at those sites of breast reconstruction. Conclusion: Magnetic resonance angiography of the abdomen and pelvis in patients with certain breast tissue expanders containing magnetic ports can be performed safely at 1.5 T for pre–autologous flap breast reconstruction perforator vessel mapping. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.


Gland surgery | 2016

Magnetic resonance angiography in perforator flap breast reconstruction

Julie V. Vasile; Joshua L. Levine

Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is an extremely useful preoperative imaging test for evaluation of the vasculature of donor tissue to be used in autologous breast reconstruction. MRA has sufficient spacial resolution to reliably visualize 1 mm perforating vessels and to accurately locate vessels in reference to a patients anatomic landmarks without exposing patients to ionizing radiation or iodinated contrast. The use of a blood pool contrast agent and the lack of radiation exposure allow multiple studies of multiple anatomic regions in one examination. The following article is a detailed description of our MRA protocol developed with our radiologists with examples that illustrate the utility of MRA in perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Collaboration


Dive into the Julie V. Vasile's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joshua L. Levine

New York Eye and Ear Infirmary

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert J. Allen

New York Eye and Ear Infirmary

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Constance M. Chen

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David T. Greenspun

New York Eye and Ear Infirmary

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christine H. Rohde

Columbia University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ernest S. Chiu

Louisiana State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hakan Usal

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge