Julien Cohen

Retention in opioid substitution treatment: a major predictor of long-term virological success for HIV-infected injection drug users receiving antiretroviral treatment.

BACKGROUND The positive impact of opioid substitution treatment (OST) on opioid-dependent individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is well documented, especially with regard to adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). We used the data from a 5-year longitudinal study of the MANIF 2000 cohort of individuals infected with HIV (as a result of injection drug use) and receiving HAART to investigate the predictors of long-term virological success. Design. Data were collected every 6 months from outpatient hospital services delivering HIV care in France. We selected all patients who were receiving HAART for at least 6 months (baseline visit) and who had indications for OST (ie, still dependent on opioids). We selected a total of 113 patients, accounting for a total of 562 visits for all the analyses. METHODS Long-term virological success was defined as an undetectable viral load after at least 6 months on HAART. Retention in OST was defined as the time interval between the last initiation or reinitiation of OST during HAART follow-up and any given visit on OST. A mixed logistic model was used to identify predictors of long-term virological success. RESULTS At baseline, 53 patients were receiving buprenorphine, 28 patients were receiving methadone, and 32 patients were not on OST. The median duration of OST was 25 months (range, 3-42 months). In the multivariate analysis, after adjustment for significant predictors of long-term virological success such as adherence to HAART and early virological response, retention in OST was associated with long-term virological success (odds ratio, 1.20 per 6-month increase; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.32). CONCLUSIONS Our study presents important evidence of the positive impact of retention in OST on HIV outcomes. Increasing access to OST based on a comprehensive model of care for HIV-infected patients who have indications for OST may foster adherence and ensure long-term response to HAART.

Buprenorphine/naloxone as a promising therapeutic option for opioid abusing patients with chronic pain: reduction of pain, opioid withdrawal symptoms, and abuse liability of oral oxycodone.

&NA; In opioid‐dependent individuals with chronic pain, buprenorphine/naloxone may be an effective therapeutic option using adequate dose and paying attention to withdrawal symptoms and pain. &NA; Few studies have examined abuse of prescription opioids among individuals with chronic pain under buprenorphine/naloxone (Bup/Nx) maintenance. The current 7‐week inpatient study assessed oral oxycodone self‐administration by patients with chronic pain who had a history of opioid abuse. Participants (n = 25) were transitioned from their preadmission prescribed opioid to Bup/Nx. All of the participants were tested under each of the sublingual Bup/Nx maintenance doses (2/0.5, 8/2 or 16/4 mg) in random order. During each maintenance period, participants could self‐administer oxycodone orally (0, 10, 20, 40 or 60 mg prescription opioids) or receive money during laboratory sessions. Drug choice (percentage) was the primary dependent variable. Subjective ratings of clinical pain and withdrawal symptoms also were measured. Mann‐Whitney tests compared percentage of drug choice for each active oxycodone dose to placebo. Logistic regression analyses identified correlates of oxycodone preference, defined as 60% or greater choice of oxycodone compared to money. Pain was significantly reduced while participants were maintained on Bup/Nx compared to preadmission ratings. No differences in percentage drug choice were observed between the active oxycodone doses and placebo under each Bup/Nx maintenance dose. However, factors associated with oxycodone preference were lower Bup/Nx maintenance dose, more withdrawal symptoms and more pain. These data suggest that Bup/Nx was effective in reducing pain and supplemental oxycodone use. Importantly, adequate management of pain and withdrawal symptoms by Bup/Nx may reduce oxycodone preference in this population.

Methadone Induction in Primary Care for Opioid Dependence: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial (ANRS Methaville)

Objective Methadone coverage is poor in many countries due in part to methadone induction being possible only in specialized care (SC). This multicenter pragmatic trial compared the effectiveness of methadone treatment between two induction models: primary care (PC) and SC. Methods In this study, registered at ClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT00657397), opioid-dependent individuals not on methadone treatment for at least one month or receiving buprenorphine but needing to switch were randomly assigned to start methadone in PC (N = 155) or in SC (N = 66) in 10 sites in France. Visits were scheduled at months M0, M3, M6 and M12. The primary outcome was self-reported abstinence from street-opioids at 12 months (M12) (with an underlying 15% non-inferiority hypothesis for PC). Secondary outcomes were abstinence during follow-up, engagement in treatment (i.e. completing the induction period), retention and satisfaction with the explanations provided by the physician. Primary analysis used intention to treat (ITT). Mixed models and the log-rank test were used to assess the arm effect (PC vs. SC) on the course of abstinence and retention, respectively. Results In the ITT analysis (n = 155 in PC, 66 in SC), which compared the proportions of street-opioid abstinent participants, 85/155 (55%) and 22/66 (33%) of the participants were classified as street-opioid abstinent at M12 in PC and SC, respectively. This ITT analysis showed the non-inferiority of PC (21.5 [7.7; 35.3]). Engagement in treatment and satisfaction with the explanations provided by the physician were significantly higher in PC than SC. Retention in methadone and abstinence during follow-up were comparable in both arms (p = 0.47, p = 0.39, respectively). Conclusions Under appropriate conditions, methadone induction in primary care is feasible and acceptable to both physicians and patients. It is as effective as induction in specialized care in reducing street-opioid use and ensuring engagement and retention in treatment for opioid dependence. Trial registration Number Eudract 2008-001338-28; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00657397; International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN31125511

Determinants of the underreporting of alcohol consumption by HIV/HCV co-infected patients during face-to-face medical interviews: the role of the physician.

OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to assess to what extent HIV/HCV co-infected patients underreport alcohol use to their physician with respect to self-reports from self-administered questionnaires (SAQ) and identify correlates of alcohol underreporting during face-to-face medical interviews (FMI). DESIGN ANRS-CO13-HEPAVIH is a French multi-center cohort of HIV/HCV co-infected patients. METHODS Data were collected at enrolment using both SAQ and FMI while clinical data were retrieved from medical records. Alcohol consumption was assessed through SAQ and compared with FMI patient reports. Correlates of underreporting alcohol consumption during FMI with respect to SAQ were identified using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Among 544 patients, 37% were classified as alcohol abusers according to AUDIT-C in the SAQ. During FMI, 14% underreported alcohol consumption. The following correlates were independently associated with underreporting alcohol consumption in FMI: not receiving HIV treatment, being followed up by a hepatologist for HCV infection and reporting a history of injecting drug use. CONCLUSIONS These results highlight the difficulties in alcohol consumption assessment which HCV specialists may face when suggesting to their HIV/HCV co-infected patients that they cease drinking completely. Patient awareness about the real need to reduce their alcohol use before starting HCV therapy may also contribute to underreporting. Innovative strategies for alcohol risk-reduction, including the promotion of controlled consumption and access to multidisciplinary teams, should be implemented for HIV/HCV co-infected patients in order to reduce barriers to HCV treatment.

Elevated coffee consumption and reduced risk of insulin resistance in HIV‐HCV coinfected patients (HEPAVIH ANRS CO‐13)

Molloy and colleagues report original results about the association between caffeine consumption and the low risk of insulin resistance (IR) and fibrosis progression in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). These results are consistent with previous reports on the association between elevated coffee consumption (ECC) and a lower risk of fibrosis progression in other populations, including chronically infected hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients. In these HCV patients, an indirect protective effect of ECC on histological progression by the intermediary of a decrease in IR has never been investigated. The possible relationship between ECC and IR could also be assessed in populations like human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)HCV coinfected patients, where IR is common, multifactorial, and likely to predict negative liver disease outcomes. To test this hypothesis, we used enrollment data from the HEPAVIH ANRS CO-13 cohort of HIV-HCV infected patients. The study group consisted of 601 patients, 74% of whom were HIV-HCV coinfected through injected drug use. Median (interquartile range) age was 43 years (range, 40-46 years), 31% were female, 13% reported elevated alcohol consumption, and 26% of patients reported ECC (drinking 3 cups of coffee). Thirty-two percent of the patients presented with advanced liver fibrosis (F3/F4), and those with homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-IR 2.5 and 3 accounted for 59% and 69%, respectively. In multiple logistic regression, ECC was significantly associated with HOMA-IR 3 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] 1⁄4 1.62 [1.03-2.57], P 1⁄4 0.04), after adjustment for body mass index, EAC, and liver fibrosis (F3/F4 vs. F0/F1/F2). When using a different cutoff for HOMA-IR ( 2.5), after multiple adjustment the association between ECC and HOMA-IR was confirmed, although it was less significant (P 1⁄4 0.07).). ECC was also significantly associated with lower levels of fibrosis (F3/F4 vs. F0/F1/F2, AOR [95% CI] 1⁄4 1.56 [1.04-2.34], P 1⁄4 0.03), independently of EAC and HOMA-IR 3. Despite some limitations, such as difficulty standardizing selfreported coffee intake and lack of data about other caffeinecontaining products, our results are consistent with the hypothesis of a positive impact of ECC on IR and on liver fibrosis progression in HIV-HCV coinfected patients. Further research will help to better elucidate the causal mechanisms of this relationship and reveal whether polyphenols contained in coffee are also implicated. The use of coffee extracts to slow NAFLD and fibrosis progression is certain to soon become a clinical research concern. M. PATRIZIA CARRIERI, PH.D. PHILIPPE SOGNI, M.D. JULIEN COHEN, M.D. MARC-ARTHUR LOKO, M.D. MARIA WINNOCK, PH.D. BRUNO SPIRE, M.D., PH.D. and the HEPAVIH Study Group INSERM, U912 (SESSTIM), Marseille, France Universit e Aix Marseille, IRD, UMR-S912, Marseille, France ORS PACA, Observatoire R egional de la Sant e Provence Alpes Côte d’Azur, Marseille, France Institut Cochin, Universit e Paris-Descartes, INSERM U567-CNRS (UMR 8104), Paris, France APHP, Hôpital Cochin, Service d’H epatologie, Paris University of Bordeaux, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897-Epidemiologie-Biostatistique, F-33000 Bordeaux, France INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U897-EpidemiologieBiostatistique, F-33000 Bordeaux, France

Methadone induction in primary care (ANRS-Methaville): a phase III randomized intervention trial

BackgroundIn France, the rapid scale-up of buprenorphine, an opioid maintenance treatment (OMT), in primary care for drug users has led to an impressive reduction in HIV prevalence among injecting drug users (IDU) but has had no major effect on Hepatitis C incidence. To date, patients willing to start methadone can only do so in a methadone clinic (a medical centre for drug and alcohol dependence (CSAPA) or a hospital setting) and are referred to primary care physicians after dose stabilization. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of methadone in patients who initiated treatment in primary care compared with those who initiated it in a CSAPA, by measuring abstinence from street opioid use after one year of treatment.Methods/DesignThe ANRS-Methaville study is a randomized multicenter non-inferiority control trial comparing methadone induction (lasting approximately 2 weeks) in primary care and in CSAPA. The model of care chosen for methadone induction in primary care was based on study-specific pre-training of all physicians, exclusion criteria and daily supervision of methadone during the initiation phase. Between January 2009 and January 2011, 10 sites each having one CSAPA and several primary care physicians, were identified to recruit patients to be randomized into two groups, one starting methadone in primary care (n = 147), the other in CSAPA (n = 48). The primary outcome of the study is the proportion of participants abstinent from street opioids after 1 year of treatment i.e. non-inferiority of primary care model in terms of the proportion of patients not using street opioids compared with the proportion observed in those starting methadone in a CSAPA.DiscussionThe ANRS-Methaville study is the first in France to use an interventional trial to improve access to OMT for drug users. Once the non-inferiority results become available, the Ministry of Health and agency for the safety of health products may change the the New Drug Application (NDA) of methadone and make methadone induction by trained primary care physicians possible.The trial is registered with the French Agency of Pharmaceutical Products (AFSSAPS) under the number 2008-A0277-48, the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials.Number Eudract 2008-001338-28, the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00657397 and the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register ISRCTN31125511.

Limited access to HIV prevention in French prisons (ANRS PRI2DE): implications for public health and drug policy

BackgroundOverpopulation, poor hygiene and disease prevention conditions in prisons are major structural determinants of increased infectious risk within prison settings but evidence-based national and WHO guidelines provide clear indications on how to reduce this risk. We sought to estimate the level of infectious risk by measuring how French prisons adhere to national and WHO guidelines.MethodsA nationwide survey targeting the heads of medical (all French prisons) and psychiatric (26 French prisons) units was conducted using a postal questionnaire and a phone interview mainly focusing on access to prevention interventions, i.e. bleach, opioid substitution treatment (OST), HBV vaccination and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for French prisoners. Two scores were built reflecting adherence to national and WHO international guidelines, ranging from 0 (no adherence) to 10 (maximum adherence) and 0 to 9 respectively.ResultsA majority (N = 113 (66%)) of the 171 prisons answered the questionnaires, representing 74% coverage (46,786 prisoners) of the French prison population: 108 were medical units and 12 were psychiatric units. Inmate access to prevention was poor. The median[IQR] score measuring adherence to national guidelines was quite low (4.5[2.5; 5.5]) but adherence to WHO guidelines was even lower 2.5[1.5; 3.5]; PEP was absent despite reported risky practices. Unsuitable OST delivery practices were frequently observed.ConclusionsA wide gap exists between HIV prevention policies and their application in prisons. Similar assessments in other countries may be needed to guide a global policy reform in prison settings. Adequate funding together with innovative interventions able to remove structural and ideological barriers to HIV prevention are now needed to motivate those in charge of prison health, to improve their working environment and to relieve French prisoners from their currently debilitating conditions.

Adherence as a predictor of sexual behaviors in people living with HIV/AIDS during the first year of antiretroviral therapy in rural Cameroon: data from Stratall ANRS 12110/ESTHER trial.

Objective This study aims to investigate the time pattern of inconsistence condom use (ICU) during the first year of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and its relationship with treatment adherence in naïve HIV-infected adult patients. Methods Data collection was nested within a longitudinal trial on HIV treatment. ICU was defined as reporting to have “never”, “sometimes” or “nearly always” used condoms with one’s main or casual partner(s) - either HIV-negative or of unknown HIV status in the three previous months. Adherence was defined as taking 100% of their ART prescribed doses in the 4 days before the visit and “not having interrupted treatment”, even once, for more than two consecutive days during the 4 previous weeks. Mixed logistic regression was used to study the relationship between adherence and ICU. Results Among the 459 patients enrolled, 212 (46%) during 334 visits reported to have had sexual intercourse at least once with their partner(s) – either HIV-negative or of unknown HIV status- during the first 12 months of ART. The proportion of ICU was 76%, 50% and 59% at month 0 (M0), month 6 (M6) and month 12 (M12), while 60% and 66% of patients were ART-adherent at M6 and M12, respectively. After adjustment for the frequency of sexual activity, type of sexual partner(s), perceived social class and desire for a child, patients adherent to ART were less likely to report ICU when compared with baseline (AOR [95% CI]: 0.38 [0.19–0.76]; P = 0.006). Conclusions Adherence to ART is associated with a lower risk of ICU but this result needs to be interpreted carefully. As adherence behaviors are not only determined by problems with the healthcare systems but also by social barriers encountered by patients in their daily life, counseling should not only be ART adherence-centered but also patient-centered, including sexual risk minimization and psychosocial support.

Self-reported side effects in buprenorphine and methadone patients receiving antiretroviral therapy: results from the MANIF 2000 cohort study.

AIMS The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between methadone and buprenorphine treatment and self-reported symptoms in HIV-infected opioid dependent individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). DESIGN Longitudinal study. SETTING The French MANIF2000 cohort was used to compare self-reported symptoms in buprenorphine and methadone patients also receiving ART. PARTICIPANTS We selected individuals receiving ART and OAT (342 visits among 106 patients). MEASUREMENTS Symptoms were self-reported using a list of 14 symptoms (e.g. nausea, fatigue, fever) perceived during the previous 4 weeks, including three painful symptoms (abdominal or muscular pain, headaches). A two-step Heckman approach enabled us to account for the non-random assignment of OAT: a probit model identified predictors of starting either buprenorphine or methadone. A Poisson regression based on generalized estimating equations (GEE) was then used to identify predictors of the number of symptoms while adjusting for the non-random assignment of OAT. FINDINGS The median (interquartile range) number of symptoms was 4 (1-6) and 2 (1-6) among buprenorphine and methadone patients, respectively. After adjustment for non-random assignment of OAT type, depressive and opioid withdrawal symptoms, anxiolytics consumption and daily cannabis use, methadone patients were more likely to report a lower number of symptoms than those receiving buprenorphine. CONCLUSIONS Methadone patients on ART report fewer symptoms than buprenorphine patients on ART under current treatment conditions in France. Further experimental research is still needed to identify an OAT-ART strategy which would minimize the burden of self-reported symptoms and potential interactions, while assuring sustainability and response to both treatments.

Changes in sexual activity and risk behaviors among PLWHA initiating ART in rural district hospitals in Cameroon – Data from the STRATALL ANRS 12110/ESTHER trial

Abstract The continued scaling-up of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Sub-Saharan Africa provides an opportunity to further study its impact on sexual behaviors among people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). We explored time trend and correlates of sexual activity among PLWHA initiating ART in Cameroon and compared sexual risk behaviors between patients sexually active before and after initiating ART and those resuming sexual activity after ART initiation. Analyses were based on longitudinal data collected within the randomized trial (n = 459) conducted in nine rural district hospitals in Cameroon. Sexual activity was defined as reporting at least one sexual partner during the previous 3 months. Inconsistent condom use (ICU) was defined as reporting to have “never,” “sometimes,” or “nearly always” used condoms at least once with a partner(s) either HIV-negative or of unknown HIV status during the same period. Mc Nemar tests were used to assess time trend, while mixed-effect logistic regressions were conducted to analyze the effect of time since ART initiation on sexual activity. The proportion of sexually active patients significantly increased over time: from 31.8% at baseline to 40.2 and 47.1% after 6 and 12 months of ART, respectively (p=0.001), to 55.9% after 24 months (p=0.02). After adjustment for behavioral and psychosocial factors, time since ART initiation was independently associated with reporting sexual activity (AOR [95% CI] = 1.30 [1.17–1.46] per 6-month increase, p=0.001). ICU was more frequent among patients sexually active both before and after ART initiation than among those who resumed sexual activity after ART initiation (82 vs. 59%, p<0.001). To conclude, while ART initiation fosters resumption of sexual activity in patients who are inactive before starting treatment; unsafe sexual behaviors remain less frequent in this population than in patients who are already sexually active before starting ART. Risk reduction programs should be reinforced among PLWHA in the context of ART scaling-up.