Julien Edeline

High Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET for Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Long-Term Evaluation

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term prognostic usefulness of 18F-FDG PET for patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs). Methods: Thirty-eight patients with metastatic GEPNETs were prospectively enrolled. Initial check-up comprised CT scan, 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy (SRS), and 18F-FDG PET. Only 18F-FDG PET–positive lesions with a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) greater than 4.5 or an SUV ratio (SUVmax tumor to SUVmax nontumoral liver tissue, or T/NT ratio) of 2.5 or greater were considered positive for prognosis—that is, indicating a poor prognosis. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Factors associated with survival were assessed with univariate and multivariate analyses, using the Cox regression model. Results: Median PFS and OS were significantly higher for patients with a negative 18F-FDG PET finding, with an OS of 119.5 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 72–∞), than for patients with a positive 18F-FDG PET finding (only 15 mo [95% CI, 4–27]) (P < 10−3). Median PFS and OS were significantly higher for the patient group that had a positive SRS than the group with a negative SRS (P = 0.0002). For patients with a positive SRS, PFS and OS were significantly shorter when the 18F-FDG PET finding was positive: 19.5 mo (95% CI, 4–37) for PFS and 119.5 mo (95% CI, 81–∞) for OS (P < 10−3). In the patient group with a low-grade GEPNET and a positive SRS, PFS and OS were also significantly lower for patients with a positive 18F-FDG PET. At 48-mo follow-up, 100% of patients who had a positive 18F-FDG PET for disease progression (of which 47% were also SRS-positive) were deceased, and 87% of patients with a negative 18F-FDG PET were alive (P < 0.0001). The T/NT ratio was the only parameter associated with OS on multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Overall, 18F-FDG PET appears to be of major importance in the prognostic evaluation of metastatic GEPNET. A positive 18F-FDG PET with an SUV ratio (T/NT) of 2.5 or greater was a poor prognostic factor, with a 4-y survival rate of 0%. A positive SRS does not eliminate the need for performing 18F-FDG PET, which is of greater prognostic utility.

Personalized Dosimetry with Intensification Using 90Y-Loaded Glass Microsphere Radioembolization Induces Prolonged Overall Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Portal Vein Thrombosis

The objective of this study was to evaluate the response rate and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma portal vein thrombosis (PVT) patients treated with 90Y-loaded glass microspheres using a personalized dosimetry and intensification concept. Methods: The microspheres were administered to 41 hepatocellular carcinoma PVT patients (main = 12; lobar/segmental = 29). 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT quantitative analysis was used to calculate the tumor dose (TD), healthy injected liver dose (HILD), and injected liver dose (ILD). Response was evaluated at 3 mo using the criteria of the European Association for the Study of the Liver, with CT follow-up lasting until disease progression or death. Survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: The mean injected activity was 3.1 ± 1.5 GBq, and mean ILD was 143 ± 49 Gy. When a TD threshold of 205 Gy was applied, 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT achieved a 100% sensitivity and 90% overall accuracy (0 false-negatives; 4 false-positives) in response prediction. On the basis of TD and HILD values, 37% of patients received an intensification of the treatment (increased injected activity with the aim of achieving a TD ≥ 205 Gy and HILD < 120 Gy, applying an ILD > 150 Gy). This intensification resulted in a high response rate (85%) without increased liver toxicity of grade 3 or higher (6% vs. 12% in the patients who did not receive treatment intensification; not statistically significant). For the total 41 patients, median overall survival (OS) was 18 mo (95% confidence interval, 11–25 mo). For patients with a TD of less than 205 Gy, median OS was 4.3 mo (3.7–5 mo), versus 18.2 mo (8.5–28.7 mo) for those with a TD of 205 Gy or more (P = 0.005). Median OS was 20.9 mo for patients with a TD of 205 Gy or more and good PVT targeting (n = 36). OS was 12 mo (3 mo to ∞) for patients with main PVT, versus 21.5 mo (12–28.7 mo) for those with segmental or lobar PVT (not statistically significant). For the 5 patients with complete portal vein revascularization who underwent lobar hepatectomy, median OS was not reached yet exceeded 24.5 mo and was significantly higher than that of other patients (P = 0.0493). Conclusion: Using a 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT personalized dosimetry and intensification concept with 90Y-loaded glass microspheres induced prolonged OS for PVT patients as compared with the standard of care (sorafenib), without increasing liver toxicity. Prospective randomized studies are therefore warranted.

A multicentre comparison between Child Pugh and Albumin-Bilirubin scores in patients treated with sorafenib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The Albumin‐Bilirubin (ALBI) grade was proposed as an objective means to evaluate liver function in patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). ALBI grade 1 vs 2 were proposed as stratification factors within the Child Pugh (CP) A class. However, the original publication did not provide comparison with the subclassification by points (5–15) within the CP classification.

Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint blockade therapy has shown promising results in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in this patient population. METHODS KEYNOTE-224 is a non-randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial that is set in 47 medical centres and hospitals across ten countries. Eligible patients had pathologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma; had previously been treated with sorafenib and were either intolerant to this treatment or showed radiographic progression of their disease after treatment; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1; adequate organ function, and were Child-Pugh class A. Participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously every 3 weeks for about 2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal, or investigator decision. The primary endpoint was objective response, defined as the proportion of patients with complete or partial response in all patients who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab, which was radiologically confirmed by use of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 by central review. Safety was also assessed in all treated patients. This trial is ongoing but closed to enrolment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02702414. FINDINGS Between June 7, 2016, and Feb 9, 2017, we screened 169 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, of whom 104 eligible patients were enrolled and treated. As of data cutoff on Feb 13, 2018, 17 (16%) patients were still receiving pembrolizumab. We recorded an objective response in 18 (17%; 95% CI 11-26) of 104 patients. The best overall responses were one (1%) complete and 17 (16%) partial responses; meanwhile, 46 (44%) patients had stable disease, 34 (33%) had progressive disease, and six (6%) patients who did not have a post-baseline assessment on the cutoff date were considered not to be assessable. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 76 (73%) of 104 patients, which were serious in 16 (15%) patients. Grade 3 treatment-related events were reported in 25 (24%) of the 104 patients; the most common were increased aspartate aminotransferase concentration in seven (7%) patients, increased alanine aminotransferase concentration in four (4%) patients, and fatigue in four (4%) patients. One (1%) grade 4 treatment-related event of hyperbilirubinaemia occurred. One death associated with ulcerative oesophagitis was attributed to treatment. Immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in three (3%) patients, but there were no reported cases of viral flares. INTERPRETATION Pembrolizumab was effective and tolerable in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who had previously been treated with sorafenib. These results indicate that pembrolizumab might be a treatment option for these patients. This drug is undergoing further assessment in two phase 3, randomised trials as a second-line treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. FUNDING Merck & Co, Inc.

Extended liver resections for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Friend or foe?

BACKGROUND In patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), extended liver resections (ELRs) increase the rate of resectability. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the morbidity and oncologic outcomes of ELR compared with other liver resections (LR) for ICC. METHODS All LR for ICC that were performed in our center between January 1997 and September 2013 and conducted with curative intent were included in this retrospective analysis. ELRs were defined by resections of ≥5 liver segments. The factors that influenced the occurrence of major complications (Clavien ≥ 3) and overall survival (OS) were tested with univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS One hundred seven patients (82 men and 25 women) were resected, and 27 (25.3%) underwent ELRs. Compared with the LRs, the ELRs were performed in larger tumors (P = .003) and were significantly associated with more complex surgeries such as vascular (P < .001) or biliary reconstructions (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that ELR was an independent risk factor for major complications (odds ratio [OR], 6.2; 95% CI, 2.11-19.62; P < .001). Compared with the other LRs, ELRs had no effects on OS or disease-free survival (P = .881 and P = .228, respectively). Perioperative blood transfusion (Hazard ratio (HR), 2.51; 95% CI, 1.49-4.23; P < .001), the presence of >1 nodule (HR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.67-5.97; P < .001), and age ≥65 years (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.03-2.86; P = .036) were independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSION This study suggests that ELRs performed for large ICCs do not affect negatively oncologic outcomes, despite the increased risk of major complications.

High impact of MAA-based tumor dose on response and overall survival in HCC patients treated with 90Y-loaded glass microsphere radioembolization

Efficacy of radioembolization is derived from radioinduced damage, whereas tumour dosimetry is not considered as yet in prospective clinical trials.

Combination of Temsirolimus and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in renal carcinoma and endothelial cell lines.

PurposeMultitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (such as Sunitinib and Sorafenib) and mTOR inhibitors (such as Temsirolimus) are effective in treating metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), by acting on different pathways in both tumour and endothelial cells. A study of their combined effect could be of major interest.MethodsWe studied endothelial and CCRCC cell lines treated with Sunitinib, Sorafenib, Temsirolimus and 2 drug combinations: Sunitinib–Temsirolimus and Sorafenib–Temsirolimus. We studied inhibition of proliferation with an MTT assay under normoxia and hypoxia, VEGF expression by quantitative RT–PCR and ELISA, and angiogenesis with a Matrigel assay.ResultsTKIs and Temsirolimus inhibited proliferation of endothelial and tumour cell lines and inhibited angiogenesis. Anti-proliferative effects were more significant on cell lines with VHL gene inactivation and under hypoxic conditions. VEGF expression was induced by TKIs, but inhibited by Temsirolimus. The Sunitinib/Temsirolimus combination had synergistic or additive effects on the proliferation of tumour and endothelial cell lines. The Sorafenib–Temsirolimus combination had additive effects on the proliferation of most tumour cell lines, but not endothelial cell lines. Both combinations had additive effects on the inhibition of angiogenesis.ConclusionIn our model, Sunitinib, Sorafenib and Temsirolimus had anti-tumour and anti-angiogenic effects. The combinations of Sunitinib or Sorafenib with Temsirolimus had additive or synergistic effects on the inhibition of tumour and endothelial cell proliferation, and on the inhibition of angiogenesis. This work could lead to new trials with lower-dose combinations to prevent side effects and enhance efficacy.

Ki-67 index and response to chemotherapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumours

Chemotherapy (CT) is widely used for neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), but there are no validated biomarkers to predict response. The Ki-67 proliferation index has been proposed as a means of selecting patients for CT, but robust data are lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between response to chemotherapy and Ki-67 in NET. We reviewed data from 222 NET patients treated with CT. Tumours were graded according to Ki-67 index: G1 ≤2%, G2 3-20% and G3 >20%. Response was assessed according to RECIST and survival calculated from start of chemotherapy to death. To explore Ki-67 as a marker of response, we calculated the likelihood ratio and performed receiver operating characteristic analysis. Overall, 193 patients had a documented Ki-67 index, of which 173 were also evaluable for radiological response: 10% were G1, 46% G2 and 43% G3; 46% were pancreatic NET (PNET). Median overall survival was 22.1 months. Overall response rate was 30% (39% in PNET vs 22% in non-PNET) and 43% of patients had stable disease. Response rate increased with grade: 6% in G1 tumours, 24% in G2 and 43% in G3. However, maximum likelihood ratio was 2.3 at Ki-67=35%, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.60. As reported previously, a high Ki-67 was an adverse prognostic factor for overall survival. In conclusion, response to CT increases with Ki-67 index, but Ki-67 alone is an unreliable means to select patients for CT. Improved methods to stratify patients for systemic therapy are required.

Systemic therapy for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Sorafenib and beyond

The hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment landscape changed a decade ago, with sorafenib demonstrating survival benefit in the first-line setting and becoming the first systemic therapy to be approved for HCC. More recently, regorafenib and nivolumab have received approval in the second-line setting after sorafenib, with further positive phase 3 studies emerging in the first line (lenvatinib non-inferior to sorafenib) and second line versus placebo (cabozantinib and ramucirumab). A key recommendation in the management of patients receiving sorafenib is to promote close communication between the patient and the physician so that adverse events (AEs) are detected early and severe AEs can be prevented. Sorafenib-related AEs have been identified as clinical biomarkers for sorafenib efficacy. Healthcare professionals have become more efficient in managing AEs, identifying patients who are likely to benefit from treatment, and assessing response to treatment, resulting in a trend towards increased overall survival in the sorafenib arms of clinical studies. The rapidly changing treatment landscape due to the emergence of new treatment options (sorafenib and lenvatinib equally effective in first line; regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab showing OS benefit in second line with nivolumab approved by the FDA based on response rate) underscores the importance of re-assessing the role of the first approved systemic agent in HCC, sorafenib.

Reply: Modifying the Poor Prognosis Associated with 18F-FDG–Avid NET with Peptide Receptor Chemo-Radionuclide Therapy (PRCRT)

octreotate radiopeptide chemotherapy of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in long-term follow-up. Neuroendocrinology. 2014;99:108–117. 9. Hofman MS, Hicks RJ. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumours: standardized and randomized, or personalized? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:211–213. 10. Claringbold PG, Price RA, Turner JH. Phase I-II study of radiopeptide 177Luoctreotate in combination with capecitabine and temozolomide in advanced lowgrade neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2012;27:561–569.