Juliet Solomon

A prospective study of the requirement for and the provision of epilepsy surgery in the United Kingdom.

Summary:  Purpose: Of the 30,000 persons in whom epilepsy develops annually in the United Kingdom, in ∼6000 (20%), intractability develops. Some of these patients will be appropriate for epilepsy surgery. We aimed to estimate the number of patients who should be considered surgical candidates, by extrapolation from a population‐based study of prognosis and the number who are receiving epilepsy surgery, by a survey of U.K. neurosurgeons.

Information recalled by women taking anti-epileptic drugs for epilepsy: a questionnaire study

Women with epilepsy have different needs from men, particularly associated with childbearing. Despite clinical guidelines, the care of women with epilepsy remains suboptimal. The aim of this study was to establish whether women with epilepsy recall being given information on topics relating to childbearing. Design of study and methods included a postal questionnaire study of 795 women with epilepsy and of childbearing age. The respondents were identified through both general practices and hospital clinics as part of the Clinical Standards Advisory Group study into Epilepsy Services. Of those women who considered the questions personally relevant, 38-48% recalled receiving information about contraception, pre-pregnancy planning, folic acid and teratogenicity, with lower overall proportions among adolescent women. The proportions that recalled receiving information about vitamin K, safety in child-care and breast-feeding were lower at 12, 24 and 24%, respectively. While it is recognised that information provided may not be recalled, our results suggest that further measures are required to improve the effectiveness of information provision in the UK in relation to women of childbearing age with epilepsy.

NHS services for epilepsy from the patient's perspective: a survey of primary, secondary and tertiary care access throughout the UK.

The aims of this study were to estimate the proportion of patients with epilepsy who made primary care and/or hospital outpatient medical consultations within 1 year; to formulate a model of the explanatory variables that influence whether patients consult or not; and to estimate the frequency of referral to, and waiting time for, hospital outpatient clinics in patients with new-onset seizures. Suggestions are offered for improvement of epilepsy services based on the findings. A questionnaire was distributed to 3455 unselected patients identified at population level from primary care practices in all NHS regions of the UK. There were 1652 respondents with epilepsy of all types, irrespective of aetiology, duration or severity. Fifty-two per cent of the whole sample made at least one medical consultation of any type specifically for epilepsy (42.0% primary care, 30.5% hospital, 20.4% both). Most patients with controlled epilepsy (74.5%) had no consultations. Of patients with severe epilepsy, 27.5% made no primary care consultations, 43.4% no hospital consultations and 14.1% no consultations of either type. Gender did not influence the likelihood of either GP or hospital consultations in patients with either controlled or active epilepsy. Increasing seizure frequency was associated with a greater likelihood of one or more hospital consultations for epilepsy, whereas increasing duration of epilepsy was associated with a decreased likelihood of either type of consultation. Age affected consultation rates: of those patients over the age of 65 years, only 29.9% made a medical consultation for epilepsy, compared to 53.8% of young adults. Patients under the age of 17 years were less likely to have consulted a GP and more likely to have consulted a hospital doctor. Ninety percent of new-onset patients had been referred to a hospital doctor, and the mean wait was 6.5 weeks. In conclusion, many patients with epilepsy, including severe epilepsy, are not receiving specialist input, and a significant proportion are receiving no medical supervision. The elderly are over-represented in this group. Care tends to be polarized between hospital or primary care, falling short of the ideal of shared care. It will be important to address the influences on consultation seeking in epilepsy, particularly for those patients currently under no medical supervision.

Chronic illness, reproductive health and moral work: women's experiences of epilepsy

Background: The impact of chronic illness on families has long been noted in the literature, but in such studies families appear as ready-formed entities. This exploratory qualitative study addresses the largely unacknowledged work involved in the production of families and the maintenance of reproductive health by women with epilepsy, a condition whose symptoms and treatment have serious implications for all aspects of reproductive health. Methods: Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with a sample of 15 women aged 20—40 years diagnosed with epilepsy and recruited from across the UK. The women had a range of neurological symptoms and hence different diagnostic categories; most had been diagnosed during childhood or adolescence. Ten women had at least one child. Results: Womens experiences of healthcare services for key phases of reproduction are explored. While some women reported that they had received good healthcare, others reported that they were given inadequate information and that advice was offered too late to enable them to take appropriate action. Discussion: Management of both epilepsy and reproductive health involves work with a significant moral dimension, the accomplishment of which is contingent on appropriate and timely advice from healthcare practitioners.

Current practice and recommendations in UK epilepsy monitoring units. Report of a national survey and workshop

PURPOSE Inpatient video-EEG monitoring (VEM) is an important investigation in patients with seizures or blackouts, and in the pre-surgical workup of patients with epilepsy. There has been an expansion in the number of Epilepsy Monitoring Units (EMU) in the UK offering VEM with a necessary increase in attention on quality and safety. Previous surveys have shown variation across centres on issues including consent and patient monitoring. METHOD In an effort to bring together healthcare professionals in the UK managing patients on EMU, we conducted an online survey of current VEM practice and held a one-day workshop convened under the auspices of the British Chapter of the ILAE. The survey and workshop aimed to cover all aspects of VEM, including pre-admission, consent procedures, patient safety, drug reduction and reinstatement, seizure management, staffing levels, ictal testing and good data recording practice. RESULTS This paper reports on the findings of the survey, the workshop presentations and workshop discussions. 32 centres took part in the survey and there were representatives from 22 centres at the workshop. There was variation in protocols, procedures and consent processes between units, and levels of observation of monitored patients. Nevertheless, the workshop discussion found broad areas of agreement on points. CONCLUSION A survey and workshop of UK epilepsy monitoring units found that some variability in practice is inevitable due to different local arrangements and patient groups under investigation. However, there were areas of clear consensus particularly in relation to consent and patient safety that can be applied to most units and form a basis for setting minimum standards.