Juliette M. Harik

Augmenting cognitive processing therapy to improve sleep impairment in PTSD: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE Despite the success of empirically supported treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), sleep impairment frequently remains refractory after treatment. This single-site, randomized controlled trial examined the effectiveness of sleep-directed hypnosis as a complement to an empirically supported psychotherapy for PTSD (cognitive processing therapy [CPT]). METHOD Participants completed either 3 weeks of hypnosis (n = 52) or a symptom monitoring control condition (n = 56) before beginning standard CPT. Multilevel modeling was used to investigate differential patterns of change to determine whether hypnosis resulted in improvements in sleep, PTSD, and depression. An intervening variable approach was then used to determine whether improvements in sleep achieved during hypnosis augmented change in PTSD and depression during CPT. RESULTS After the initial phase of treatment (hypnosis or symptom monitoring), the hypnosis condition showed significantly greater improvement than the control condition in sleep and depression, but not PTSD. After CPT, both conditions demonstrated significant improvement in sleep and PTSD; however, the hypnosis condition demonstrated greater improvement in depressive symptoms. As sleep improved, there were corresponding improvements in PTSD and depression, with a stronger relationship between sleep and PTSD. CONCLUSION Hypnosis was effective in improving sleep impairment, but those improvements did not augment gains in PTSD recovery during the trauma-focused intervention. (PsycINFO Database Record

A Review of Studies on the System-Wide Implementation of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the Veterans Health Administration

Since 2006, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has instituted policy changes and training programs to support system-wide implementation of two evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To assess lessons learned from this unprecedented effort, we used PubMed and the PILOTS databases and networking with researchers to identify 32 reports on contextual influences on implementation or sustainment of EBPs for PTSD in VHA settings. Findings were initially organized using the exploration, planning, implementation, and sustainment framework (EPIS; Aarons et al. in Adm Policy Ment Health Health Serv Res 38:4–23, 2011). Results that could not be adequately captured within the EPIS framework, such as implementation outcomes and adopter beliefs about the innovation, were coded using constructs from the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) framework (Glasgow et al. in Am J Public Health 89:1322–1327, 1999) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR; Damschroder et al. in Implement Sci 4(1):50, 2009). We highlight key areas of progress in implementation, identify continuing challenges and research questions, and discuss implications for future efforts to promote EBPs in large health care systems.

What people with PTSD symptoms do (and do not) know about PTSD: A national survey

If people do not recognize posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, they may not realize they are suffering from the disorder. Likewise, if people do not know that effective treatments exist, they may be unlikely to seek care. This study examined what people with PTSD symptoms know about PTSD and its treatment. We hypothesized that military service and prior receipt of PTSD treatment would be associated with greater PTSD knowledge.

Increased Utilization of Prolonged Exposure and Cognitive Processing Therapy Over Time: A Case Example From a Large Veterans Affairs Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Clinic.

Prior single-site and regional studies have documented difficulties in implementing prolonged exposure (PE) and cognitive processing therapy (CPT) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) into practice in Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers, estimating that between 6% and 13% of VA patients with PTSD receive PE or CPT (Lu, Plagge, Marsiglio, & Dobscha, 2016; Mott et al., 2014; Shiner et al., 2013). However, these studies examined data from fiscal years 2008–2012, and therefore may not reflect more recent utilization patterns. Beginning in 2007, the VA invested heavily in increasing implementation of PE and CPT, including nationwide training rollouts and consultation. Given the length of time required for successful implementation of new practices, it is important to evaluate use of PE and CPT over time. We examined current use of PE and CPT at 1 VA medical center PTSD specialty clinic and compared this to prior rates for the same clinic. Chart reviews for all patients receiving a PTSD clinic initial evaluation between January 1, 2015, and May 31, 2015, indicated that 52% of patients began a course of PE or CPT within the 1-year follow-up period, representing a 5-fold increase from 2008 to 2012. We discuss changes in clinic structure, processes, training, and clinician support that might account for the successful implementation of PE and CPT in this clinic. We also present data on alternative referrals provided to patients not engaging in PE and CPT, and predictors of engagement in PE and CPT.

Evidence-based psychotherapy completion and symptom improvement among returning combat veterans with PTSD.

Objective: Despite the availability of evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the Veterans Health Administration, treatment completion rates are low and not all veterans benefit from these treatments. Understanding factors associated with PTSD EBP completion and symptom improvement is critical to improving completion rates and effectiveness. Method: This chart review study used the Andersen Behavioral Model to examine whether predisposing characteristics (nonmodifiable characteristics such as demographics), enabling factors (modifiable logistic variables that can facilitate or impede treatment use), and need factors (clinical characteristics such as symptom severity or comorbidities) predicted treatment completion or symptom improvement following PTSD EBP treatment among 82 Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans. Logistic regression was used to examine treatment completion, and repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine changes in PTSD and depression symptoms following treatment. Results: EBP completers had greater improvement in PTSD symptoms than did EBP dropouts. Need factors (lack of comorbid substance use disorders and having problems with family members/significant others) were related to treatment completion, whereas enabling resources (receiving individual rather than group treatment) were related to symptom improvement. Conclusions: This is one the first studies to use a comprehensive model to examine factors relevant to treatment completion and symptom improvement. Results suggest that nonmodifiable predisposing characteristics do not drive treatment completion and symptom improvement, underscoring the potential importance of targeting enabling resources and needs factors for intervention.

“I had to somehow still be flexible”: exploring adaptations during implementation of brief cognitive behavioral therapy in primary care

BackgroundPrimary care clinics present challenges to implementing evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs) for depression and anxiety, and frontline providers infrequently adopt these treatments. The current study explored providers’ perspectives on fidelity to a manualized brief cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) as delivered in primary care clinics as part of a pragmatic randomized trial. Data from the primary study demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of the treatment and indicated that providers delivered brief CBT with high fidelity, as evaluated by experts using a standardized rating form. Data presented here explore challenges providers faced during implementation and how they adapted nonessential intervention components to make the protocol “fit” into their clinical practice.MethodsA multiprofessional group of providers (n = 18) completed a one-time semi-structured interview documenting their experiences using brief CBT in the primary care setting. Data were analyzed via directed content analysis, followed by inductive sorting of interview excerpts to identify key themes agreed upon by consensus. The Dynamic Adaptation Process model provided an overarching framework to allow better understanding and contextualization of emergent themes.ResultsProviders described a variety of adaptations to the brief CBT to better enable its implementation. Adaptations were driven by provider skills and abilities (i.e., using flexible content and delivery options to promote treatment engagement), patient-emergent issues (i.e., addressing patients’ broader life and clinical concerns), and system-level resources (i.e., maximizing the time available to provide treatment).ConclusionsThe therapeutic relationship, individual patient factors, and system-level factors were critical drivers guiding how providers adapted EBP delivery to improve the “fit” into their clinical practice. Adaptations were generally informed by tensions between the EBP protocol and patient and system needs and were largely not addressed in the EBP protocol itself. Adaptations were generally viewed as acceptable by study fidelity experts and helped to more clearly define delivery procedures to improve future implementation efforts. It is recommended that future EBP implementation efforts examine the concept of fidelity on a continuum rather than dichotomized as adherent/not adherent with focused efforts to understand the context of EBP delivery.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01149772

Delivery of mental health treatment to combat veterans with psychiatric diagnoses and TBI histories

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and mental health (MH) disorders are prevalent in combat veterans returning from Afghanistan and/or Iraq (hereafter referred to as returning veterans). Accurate estimates of service utilization for veterans with and without TBI exposure (referred to as TBI history) are imperative in order to provide high quality healthcare to returning veterans. We examined associations between TBI history and MH service utilization in a subsample of returning veterans who were newly diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and/or anxiety in the 2010 fiscal year (N = 55,458). Data were extracted from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Patient Care Database. Veterans with MH diagnoses and TBI histories attended significantly more psychotherapy visits, (M = 8.32 visits, SD = 17.15) and were more likely to attend at least 8 psychotherapy visits, (15.7%) than veterans with MH diagnoses but no TBI history (M = 6.48 visits, SD = 12.12; 10.1% attended at least 8 sessions). PTSD and TBI history, but not depression or anxiety, were associated with a greater number of psychotherapy visits when controlling for demographic and clinical variables. PTSD, anxiety, depression, and TBI history were associated with number of psychotropic medication-management visits. TBI history was related to greater MH service utilization, independent of MH diagnoses. Future research should examine what MH services are being utilized and if these services are helping veterans recover from their disorders.

Desired Involvement in Treatment Decisions Among Adults with PTSD Symptoms

UNLABELLED Most medical patients want to be involved in decisions about their care. Whether this is true for people with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-a disorder characterized by avoidance of trauma-related discussions-is unknown. We conducted an online survey assessing preferences for involvement in PTSD treatment decisions (level of control, timing) and information about PTSD treatment (content, format). Adults who screened positive for possible PTSD (N = 301) were recruited from a large online survey panel representative of the U. S. POPULATION Virtually all respondents (97.3%) desired involvement in treatment decisions; two thirds (67.8%) wanted primary responsibility for decisions. Most (64.2%) wanted 30-60 minutes to learn about treatments and 80.1% wanted at least 1-3 days to consider their options. Respondents expressed more interest in informational content on treatment effectiveness and side effects than any other topic. In-person discussion with a provider was preferred more than other learning formats (e.g., websites, brochures). Results suggested that people with symptoms of PTSD want involvement in decisions about their treatment and want to discuss treatment options with their provider. Providers may wish to prioritize information about effectiveness and side effects, and should expect that many patients will need several days after their visit to make a decision.