Jun-Ming Liao

Ribosomal proteins: functions beyond the ribosome

Although ribosomal proteins are known for playing an essential role in ribosome assembly and protein translation, their ribosome-independent functions have also been greatly appreciated. Over the past decade, more than a dozen of ribosomal proteins have been found to activate the tumor suppressor p53 pathway in response to ribosomal stress. In addition, these ribosomal proteins are involved in various physiological and pathological processes. This review is composed to overview the current understanding of how ribosomal stress provokes the accumulation of ribosome-free ribosomal proteins, as well as the ribosome-independent functions of ribosomal proteins in tumorigenesis, immune signaling, and development. We also propose the potential of applying these pieces of knowledge to the development of ribosomal stress-based cancer therapeutics.

p53 downregulates Down syndrome-associated DYRK1A through miR-1246

Several microRNAs mediate the functions of p53 family members. Here we characterize miR‐1246 as a new target of this family. In response to DNA damage, p53 induces the expression of miR‐1246 which, in turn, reduces the level of DYRK1A, a Down syndrome‐associated protein kinase. Knockdown of p53 has the opposite effect. Overexpression of miR‐1246 reduces DYRK1A levels and leads to the nuclear retention of NFATc1, a protein substrate of DYRK1A, and the induction of apoptosis, whereas a miR‐1246‐specific inhibitor prevented the nuclear import of NFATc1. Together, these results indicate that p53 inhibits DYRK1A expression through the induction of miR‐1246.

Ribosomal protein S14 unties the MDM2-p53 loop upon ribosomal stress.

The MDM2–p53 feedback loop is crucially important for restricting p53 level and activity during normal cell growth and proliferation, and is thus subjected to dynamic regulation in order for cells to activate p53 upon various stress signals. Several ribosomal proteins, such as RPL11, RPL5, RPL23, RPL26 or RPS7, have been shown to have a role in regulation of this feedback loop in response to ribosomal stress. Here, we identify another ribosomal protein S14, which is highly associated with 5q-syndrome, as a novel activator of p53 by inhibiting MDM2 activity. We found that RPS14, but not RPS19, binds to the central acidic domain of MDM2, similar to RPL5 and RPL23, and inhibits its E3 ubiquitin ligase activity toward p53. This RPS14–MDM2 binding was induced upon ribosomal stress caused by actinomycin D or mycophenolic acid. Overexpression of RPS14, but not RPS19, elevated p53 level and activity, leading to G1 or G2 arrest. Conversely, knockdown of RPS14 alleviated p53 induction by these two reagents. Interestingly, knockdown of either RPS14 or RPS19 caused a ribosomal stress that led to p53 activation, which was impaired by further knocking down the level of RPL11 or RPL5. Together, our results demonstrate that RPS14 and RPS19 have distinct roles in regulating the MDM2–p53 feedback loop in response to ribosomal stress.

Scission of the p53-MDM2 Loop by Ribosomal Proteins

The oncoprotein MDM2 is both the transcriptional target and the predominant antagonist of the tumor suppressor p53. MDM2 inhibits the functions of p53 via a negative feedback loop that can be circumvented by several ribosomal proteins in response to nucleolar or ribosomal stress. Stress conditions in the nucleolus can be triggered by a variety of extracellular and intracellular insults that impair ribosomal biogenesis and function, such as chemicals, nutrient deprivation, DNA damaging agents, or genetic alterations. The past decade has witnessed a tremendous progress in understanding this previously underinvestigated ribosomal stress-MDM2-p53 pathway. Here, we review the recent progress in understanding this unique signaling pathway, discuss its biological and pathological significance, and share with readers our insight into the research in this field.

Autoregulatory Suppression of c-Myc by miR-185-3p

Background: No study shows any negative feedback regulation of c-Myc by miRNAs. Results: miR-185-3p is expressed in response to c-Myc and in return inhibits c-Myc expression. Conclusion: miR-185-3p is a novel negative feedback regulator of c-Myc. Significance: Unveiling this feedback loop of c-Myc-miR-185-3p offers new insight into c-Myc regulation and a potential anti-cancer agent. The expression of the c-myc oncogene at both protein and mRNA levels is transient and begins to be turned off 3–6 h after growth stimulation of cultured cells. The exact mechanism(s) underlying this down-regulation of c-Myc remains incompletely understood. Here we report the identification of miR-185-3p as a novel feedback regulator of c-Myc. This microRNA (miRNA) was initially identified as one of the c-Myc target miRNA transcripts through analysis of RNA samples isolated from cells prior to and after serum stimulation and further verified by real-time PCR, luciferase reporter, and ChIP assays. Interestingly, overexpression of wild type, but not mutant, miR-185-3p decreased the protein, but not mRNA, level of c-Myc in a dose-dependent fashion and also drastically abated the serum induction of c-Myc level in human cancer cells by targeting the coding sequence of c-Myc mRNA, consequently suppressing c-Myc-mediated proliferation. A miR-185-3p inhibitor rescued the inhibition of c-Myc expression by endogenous miR-185-3p. Thus, our results unveil miR-185-3p as the first miRNA that monitors c-Myc levels via an autoregulatory feedback mechanism in response to serum stimulation.

New insights into p53 functions through its target microRNAs

The tumor suppressor p53 pathway, whose alterations are highly associated with all types of human cancers, plays an essential role in preventing tumor development and progression mostly through its downstream target genes. Over the last decade, a growing list of p53 microRNA (miRNA) targets has been identified as additional downstream players of this pathway. Further studies of these miRNAs have revealed their more complicated regulations and functions in executing and/or regulating p53 activity. Here, we review the p53 miRNA targets identified thus far, and discuss how they fine-tune p53 stress responses, mediate the crosstalk between p53 and other signaling pathways, and expand the role of p53 in other human diseases in addition to cancers.

Ribosomal Protein S14 Negatively Regulates c-Myc Activity

Background: Although ribosomal protein L11 (RPL11) inhibits c-Myc activity, it remains unclear if other RPs can do so. Results: RPS14 negates c-Myc functions by reducing its transcriptional activity and level. Conclusion: RPS14 suppresses c-Myc activity and cell proliferation independently of p53. Significance: RPS14 may serve as a tumor suppressor that not only activates p53, but also inhibits c-Myc. The ribosomal gene RPS14 is associated with the cancer-prone 5q-syndrome, which is caused by an interstitial deletion of the long arm of human chromosome 5. Previously, we found that ribosomal protein S14 (RPS14) binds to and inactivates MDM2, consequently leading to p53-dependent cell-cycle arrest and growth inhibition. However, it remains elusive whether RPS14 regulates cell proliferation in a p53-independent manner. Here, we show that RPS14 interacts with the Myc homology box II (MBII) and the C-terminal basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLH-LZ) domains of the oncoprotein c-Myc. Further, RPS14 inhibited c-Myc transcriptional activity by preventing the recruitment of c-Myc and its cofactor, TRRAP, to the target gene promoters, as thus suppressing c-Myc-induced cell proliferation. Also, siRNA-mediated RPS14 depletion elevated c-Myc transcriptional activity determined by its target gene, Nucleolin, expression. Interestingly, RPS14 depletion also resulted in the induction of c-Myc mRNA and subsequent protein levels. Consistent with this, RPS14 promoted c-Myc mRNA turnover through an Argonaute 2 (Ago2)- and microRNA-mediated pathway. Taken together, our study demonstrates that RPS14 negates c-Myc functions by directly inhibiting its transcriptional activity and mediating its mRNA degradation via miRNA.

Ribosomal proteins L5 and L11 co-operatively inactivate c-Myc via RNA-induced silencing complex

Oncogene MYC is highly expressed in many human cancers and functions as a global regulator of ribosome biogenesis. Previously, we reported that ribosomal protein (RP) L11 binds to c-Myc and inhibits its transcriptional activity in response to ribosomal stress. Here, we show that RPL5, co-operatively with RPL11, guides the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) to c-Myc mRNA and mediates the degradation of the mRNA, consequently leading to inhibition of c-Myc activity. Knocking down of RPL5 induced c-Myc expression at both mRNA and protein levels, whereas overexpression of RPL5 suppressed c-Myc expression and activity. Immunoprecipitation revealed that RPL5 binds to 3′UTR of c-Myc mRNA and two subunits of RISC, TRBP (HIV-1 TAR RNA-binding protein) and Ago2, mediating the targeting of c-Myc mRNA by miRNAs. Interestingly, RPL5 and RPL11 co-resided on c-Myc mRNA and suppressed c-Myc expression co-operatively. These findings uncover a mechanism by which these two RPs can co-operatively suppress c-Myc expression, allowing a tightly controlled ribosome biogenesis in cells.

Ribosomal proteins L11 and L5 activate TAp73 by overcoming MDM2 inhibition

Over the past decade, a number of ribosomal proteins (RPs) have been found to have a role in activating the tumor suppressor p53 by directly binding to MDM2 and impeding its activity toward p53. Herein, we report that RPL5 and RPL11 can also enhance the transcriptional activity of a p53 homolog TAp73, but through a distinct mechanism. Interestingly, even though RPL5 and RPL11 were not shown to bind to p53, they were able to directly associate with the transactivation domain of TAp73 independently of MDM2 in response to RS. This association led to perturbation of the MDM2-TAp73 interaction, consequently preventing MDM2 from its association with TAp73 target gene promoters. Furthermore, ectopic expression of RPL5 or RPL11 markedly induced TAp73 transcriptional activity by antagonizing MDM2 suppression. Conversely, ablation of either of the RPs compromised TAp73 transcriptional activity, as evident by the reduction of p21 and Puma expression, in response to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Consistently, overexpression of RPL5 or RPL11 enhanced, but knockdown of either of them hampered, TAp73-mediated apoptosis. Intriguingly, simultaneous knockdown of TAp73 and either of the RPs was required for rescuing the 5-FU-triggered S-phase arrest of p53-null tumor cells. These results demonstrate a novel mechanism underlying the inhibition of tumor cell proliferation and growth by these two RPs via TAp73 activation.

Global Effect of Inauhzin on Human p53-Responsive Transcriptome

Background Previously, we reported that Inauhzin (INZ) induces p53 activity and suppresses tumor growth by inhibiting Sirt1. However, it remains unknown whether INZ may globally affect p53-dependent gene expression or not. Herein, we have conducted microarray and real-time PCR analyses of gene expression to determine the global effect of INZ on human p53-responsive transcriptome. Methodology/Principal Findings In this study, we conducted microarray analysis followed by PCR validation of general gene expression in HCT116p53+/+ and HCT116p53−/− cells treated with or without INZ. Microarray data showed that 324 genes were up-regulated by ≥2.3-fold and 266 genes were down-regulated by ≥2-fold in response to INZ treatment in a p53-dependent manner. GO analysis for these genes further revealed that INZ affects several biological processes, including apoptosis (GO:0006915), cell cycle (GO:0007049), immune system process (GO:0002376), and cell adhesion (GO:0007155), which are in line with p53 functions in cells. Also, pathway and STRING analyses of these genes indicated that the p53-signaling pathway is the most significant pathway responsive to INZ treatment as predicted, since a number of these p53 target genes have been previously reported and some of them were validated by RT-qPCR. Finally, among the 9 tested and highly expressed genes, ACBD4, APOBEC3C, and FLJ14327 could be novel p53 target genes, for they were up-regulated by INZ in HCT116p53+/+ cells, but not in HCT116p53−/− cells. Conclusions/Significance From our whole genome microarray analysis followed by validation with RT-qPCR, we found that INZ can indeed induce the expression of p53 target genes at a larger scale or globally. Our findings not only verify that INZ indeed activates the p53 signaling pathway, but also provide useful information for identifying novel INZ and/or p53 targets. The global effect of INZ on human p53-responsive transcriptome could also be instrumental to the future design of INZ clinical trials.