Jun Nakatani
University of Tokyo
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jun Nakatani.
Waste Management | 2014
Habuer; Jun Nakatani; Yuichi Moriguchi
Given the amounts of end-of-life electrical and electronic equipment (EoL-EEE) being generated and their contents of both harmful and valuable materials, the EoL-EEE issue should be regarded not only as an emerging environmental problem but also as a resource management strategy in China. At present, in order to provide the basis for managing EoL-EEE at both product and substance levels in China, it is necessary to carry out a quantitative analysis on EoL-EEE and to determine how much of it will be generated and how much materials and substances it contains. In this study, the possession and obsolescence amounts of five types of household appliance (HA) including television (TV) sets and the amounts of substances contained in EoL TV sets were estimated using time-series product flow analysis (PFA) and substance flow analysis (SFA). The results of PFA indicated that the total possession amounts of those five types of HAs will exceed 3.1 billion units in 2030, which will be two times higher than those in 2010. In addition, it was estimated that cumulatively over 4.8-5.1 billion units of these five types of EoL HA would be obsoleted between 2010-2030. The results of SFA on TV sets indicated that the generated amounts of most of the less common metals and a part of common metals such as copper (Cu) would tend to decrease, whereas those of other common metals such as iron (Fe) as well as precious metals would tend to increase in EoL TV sets in 2015-2030. The results of this study provide a quantitative basis for helping decision makers develop strategic policies for the management of EoL-EEE considering both environmental and resource aspects. Moreover, a calculation scheme of obsolete HAs presented in this study can be applied to estimate other types of EoL durable good. Meanwhile, the frameworks of this study will help not only the policy decision makers in the Chinese government but also those in developing countries that are facing similar problems.
Journal of Hazardous Materials | 2011
Yasunori Kikuchi; Kohjiro Kurata; Jun Nakatani; Masahiko Hirao; Yoshito Oshima
Spray incineration and supercritical water oxidation (SCWO) processes have been used for detoxifying waste organic fluids in the University of Tokyo. In this study, we aim to elucidate the environmental aspects of these waste treatment processes by life cycle assessment (LCA). Through the investigation of actual plants, the inventory data and other characteristics of actual plants were collected and analyzed. To confirm the potential of SCWO, three modification types of the process and operation were considered and assessed on the basis of estimated inventory data. The results demonstrate that spray incineration has less environmental impact than SCWO in all scenarios. However, SCWO has various advantages for installation as a treatment process in universities such as negligible risk of creating dioxins and particulate matter. Proper choice of the treatment method for organic waste fluid requires a comprehensive analysis of risks. Spray incineration poses the risk of providing dioxins and particulate matter, while SCWO has such risk at negligible level. This means that waste including concerned materials related to such emission should be treated by SCWO. Using the right technologies for the right tasks in the detoxification of hazardous materials should be implemented for sustainable universities.
PLOS ONE | 2016
Michio Murakami; Jun Nakatani; Taikan Oki
In the wake of the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident, to facilitate evidence-based risk communication we need to understand radiation risk perception and the effectiveness of risk-comparison information. We measured and characterized perceptions of dread risks and unknown risks regarding dietary radionuclides in residents of Fukushima, Tokyo, and Osaka to identify the primary factors among location, evacuation experience, gender, age, employment status, absence/presence of spouse, children and grandchildren, educational background, humanities/science courses, smoking habits, and various types of trustworthy information sources. We then evaluated the effects of these factors and risk-comparison information on multiple outcomes, including subjective and objective understanding, perceived magnitude of risk, perceived accuracy of information, backlash against information, and risk acceptance. We also assessed how risk-comparison information affected these multiple outcomes for people with high risk perception. Online questionnaires were completed by people (n = 9249) aged from 20 to 69 years in the three prefectures approximately 5 years after the accident. We gave each participant one of 15 combinations of numerical risk data and risk-comparison information, including information on standards, smoking-associated risk, and cancer risk, in accordance with Covello’s guidelines. Dread-risk perception among Fukushima residents with no experience of evacuation was much lower than that in Osaka residents, whereas evacuees had strikingly higher dread-risk perception, irrespective of whether their evacuation had been compulsory or voluntary. We identified location (distance from the nuclear power station), evacuation experience, and trust of central government as primary factors. Location (including evacuation experience) and trust of central government were significantly associated with the multiple outcomes above. Only information on “cancer risk from radiation and smoking risk” enhanced both subjective and objective understanding without diminishing trust in all participants and in the high dread-risk perception group; use of other risk-comparison information could lead the public to overestimate risk.
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | 2008
Jun Nakatani; Minoru Fujii; Yuichi Moriguchi; Masahiko Hirao
Journal of Environmental Management | 2007
Jun Nakatani; Toshiya Aramaki; Keisuke Hanaki
Sustainability | 2015
Qian Zhang; Jun Nakatani; Yuichi Moriguchi
Sustainability | 2014
Jun Nakatani
Renewable Energy | 2016
Joana Portugal-Pereira; Jun Nakatani; Kiyo Kurisu; Keisuke Hanaki
Journal of Cleaner Production | 2016
Emi Kikuchi-Uehara; Jun Nakatani; Masahiko Hirao
Energy | 2015
Joana Portugal-Pereira; Jun Nakatani; Kiyo Kurisu; Keisuke Hanaki