Jungmee Lee
Northwestern University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jungmee Lee.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2008
Glenis R. Long; Carrick L. Talmadge; Jungmee Lee
Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level from normal hearing individuals can vary by as much as 30 dB with small frequency changes (a phenomenon known as DPOAE fine structure). This fine structure is hypothesized to stem from the interaction of components from two different regions of the cochlea (the nonlinear generator region and the reflection component from the DP region). An efficient procedure to separate these two components would improve the clinical and research utility of DPOAE by permitting separate evaluation of different cochlea regions. In this paper, two procedures for evaluating DPOAE fine structure are compared: DPOAE generated by fixed-frequency primaries versus continuously sweeping primaries. The sweep DPOAE data are analyzed with a least squares fit filter. Sweep rates of greater than 8 s per octave permit rapid evaluation of the cochlear fine structure. A higher sweep rate of 2 s per octave provided DPOAE without fine structure. Under these conditions, the longer latency reflection component falls outside the range of the filter. Consequently, DPOAE obtained with sweeping tones can be used either to get more rapid estimates of DPOAE fine structure or to obtain estimates of DPOAE from the generator region uncontaminated by energy from the reflection region.
Ear and Hearing | 2012
Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee M. Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven G. Zecker; Jonathan H. Siegel
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to obtain behavioral hearing thresholds for frequencies between 0.125 and 20 kHz from a large population between 10 and 65 yr old using a clinically feasible calibration method expected to compensate well for variations in the distance between the eardrum and an insert-type sound source. Previous reports of hearing thresholds in the extended high frequencies (>8 kHz) have either used calibration techniques known to be inaccurate or specialized equipment not suitable for clinical use. Design: Hearing thresholds were measured from 352 human subjects between 10 and 65 yr old having clinically normal-hearing thresholds (<20 dB HL) up to 4 kHz. An otoacoustic emission probe fitted with custom sound sources was used, and the stimulus levels individually tailored on the basis of an estimate of the insertion depth of the measurement probe. The calibrated stimulus levels were determined on the basis of measurements made at various depths of insertion in a standard ear simulator. Threshold values were obtained for 21 frequencies between 0.125 and 20 kHz using a modified Békésy technique. Forty-six of the subjects returned for a second measurement months later from the initial evaluation. Results: In agreement with previous reports, hearing thresholds at extended high frequencies were found to be sensitive to age-related changes in auditory function. In contrast with previous reports, no gender differences were found in average hearing thresholds at most evaluated frequencies. Two aging processes, one faster than the other in time scale, seem to influence hearing thresholds in different frequency ranges. The standard deviation (SD) of test–retest threshold difference for all evaluated frequencies was 5 to 10 dB, comparable to that reported in the literature for similar measurement techniques but smaller than that observed for data obtained using the standard clinical procedure. Conclusions: The depth-compensated ear simulator-based calibration method and the modified Békésy technique allow reliable measurement of hearing thresholds over the entire frequency range of human hearing. Hearing thresholds at the extended high frequencies are sensitive to aging and reveal subtle differences, which are not evident in the frequency range evaluated regularly (⩽8 kHz). Previously reported gender-related differences in hearing thresholds may be related to ear-canal acoustics and the calibration procedure and not because of differences in hearing sensitivity.
Hearing Research | 2012
Christopher Bergevin; Analydia Fulcher; Susan Richmond; David S. Velenovsky; Jungmee Lee
It has been proposed that OAEs be classified not on the basis of the stimuli used to evoke them, but on the mechanisms that produce them (Shera and Guinan, 1999). One branch of this taxonomy focuses on a coherent reflection model and explicitly describes interrelationships between spontaneous emissions (SOAEs) and stimulus-frequency emissions (SFOAEs). The present study empirically examines SOAEs and SFOAEs from individual ears within the context of model predictions, using a low stimulus level (20 dB SPL) to evoke SFOAEs. Emissions were recorded from ears of normal-hearing young adults, both with and without prominent SOAE activity. When spontaneous activity was observed, SFOAEs demonstrated a localized increase about the SOAE peaks. The converse was not necessarily true though, i.e., robust SFOAEs could be measured where no SOAE peaks were observed. There was no significant difference in SFOAE phase-gradient delays between those with and without observable SOAE activity. However, delays were larger for a 20 dB SPL stimulus level than those previously reported for 40 dB SPL. The total amount of SFOAE phase accumulation occurring between adjacent SOAE peaks tended to cluster about an integral number of cycles. Overall, the present data appear congruous with predictions stemming from the coherent reflection model and support the notion that such comparisons ideally are made with emissions evoked using relatively lower stimulus levels.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2014
Gayla L. Poling; Jonathan H. Siegel; Jungmee Lee; Jungwha Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Distortion-product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) fine structure and component characteristics are reported between 0.75 and 16u2009kHz in 356 clinically normal hearing human subjects ages 10 to 65u2009yr. Stimulus tones at 55/40, 65/55, and 75/75u2009dB SPL were delivered using custom designed drivers and a calibration method that compensated for the depth of insertion of the otoacoustic emission (OAE) probe in the ear canal. DPOAE fine structure depth and spacing were found to be consistent with previous reports with depth varying between 3 and 7u2009dB and average spacing ratios (f/Δf) between 15 and 25 depending on stimulus level and frequency. In general, fine structure depth increased with increasing frequency, likely due to a diminishing difference between DPOAE component levels. Fine structure spacing became wider with increasing age above 8u2009kHz. DPOAE components were extracted using the inverse fast Fourier transform method, adhering to a strict signal to noise ratio criterion for clearer interpretation. Component data from four age groups between 18 and 55u2009yr old were available for the stimulus levels of 75/75u2009dB SPL. The age groups could be differentiated with greater than 90% accuracy when using the level of the component presumed to originate from the DPOAE characteristic frequency place. This accuracy held even for frequencies at and below 4 kHz where the age groups exhibited similar average hearing thresholds.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2014
Rachael R. Baiduc; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Hearing thresholds have been shown to exhibit periodic minima and maxima, a pattern known as threshold microstructure. Microstructure has previously been linked to spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) and normal cochlear function. However, SOAEs at high frequencies (>4 kHz) have been associated with hearing loss or cochlear pathology in some reports. Microstructure would not be expected near these high-frequency SOAEs. Psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs), the expression of frequency selectivity, may also be altered by SOAEs. Prior comparisons of tuning between ears with and without SOAEs demonstrated sharper tuning in ears with emissions. Here, threshold microstructure and PTCs were compared at SOAE frequencies ranging between 1.2 and 13.9 kHz using subjects without SOAEs as controls. Results indicate: (1) Threshold microstructure is observable in the vicinity of SOAEs of all frequencies; (2) PTCs are influenced by SOAEs, resulting in shifted tuning curve tips, multiple tips, or inversion. High frequency SOAEs show a greater effect on PTC morphology. The influence of most SOAEs at high frequencies on threshold microstructure and PTCs is consistent with those at lower frequencies, suggesting that high-frequency SOAEs reflect the same cochlear processes that lead to SOAEs at lower frequencies.
Jaro-journal of The Association for Research in Otolaryngology | 2014
James B. Dewey; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Medial olivocochlear (MOC) influence on cochlear mechanics can be noninvasively, albeit indirectly, explored via the effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation (CAS) on otoacoustic emissions. CAS-mediated effects are particularly pronounced for spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs), which are typically reduced in amplitude and shifted upward in frequency by CAS. We investigated whether similar frequency shifts and magnitude reductions were observed behaviorally in the fine structure of pure-tone hearing thresholds, a phenomenon thought to share a common underlying mechanism with SOAEs. In normal-hearing listeners, fine-resolution thresholds were obtained over a narrow frequency range centered on the frequency of an SOAE, both in the absence and presence of 60-dB SPL broadband CAS. While CAS shifted threshold fine structure patterns and SOAEs upward in frequency by a comparable amount, little reduction in the presence or depth of fine structure was observed at frequencies near those of SOAEs. In fact, CAS typically improved thresholds, particularly at threshold minima, and increased fine structure depth when reductions in the amplitude of the associated SOAE were less than 10 dB. Additional measurements made at frequencies distant from SOAEs, or near SOAEs that were more dramatically reduced in amplitude by the CAS, revealed that CAS tended to elevate thresholds and reduce threshold fine structure depth. The results suggest that threshold fine structure is sensitive to MOC-mediated changes in cochlear gain, but that SOAEs complicate the interpretation of threshold measurements at nearby frequencies, perhaps due to masking or other interference effects. Both threshold fine structure and SOAEs may be significant sources of intersubject and intrasubject variability in psychoacoustic investigations of MOC function.
Hearing Research | 2012
Jungmee Lee; Glenis R. Long
When hearing thresholds are measured with high-frequency resolution there is a pseudo-periodic variation in thresholds across frequency of up to 15-20dB. This variation is called threshold fine structure (previously referred to as threshold microstructure). Consequently, estimates of auditory status based on threshold measures can depend greatly on the specific frequency evaluated. The impact of threshold fine structure on the prediction of auditory status was examined by measuring detection thresholds of pure tones (providing an indication of threshold fine structure) and comparing them with thresholds obtained using linear sweeps, sinusoidally frequency modulated tones, and narrow-band noise. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) were also obtained to confirm the established relationship between threshold fine structure and SOAEs. Thresholds obtained using linear sweeps and narrow-band noise provided stable threshold estimates indicating that such threshold estimates were less influenced by threshold fine structure. Consequently, thresholds obtained with these stimuli may provide estimates of cochlear status less dependent of the exact frequency being evaluated, permitting better prediction of performance on other psychoacoustic measures (such as cochlear tuning and loudness perception) and the properties of their more objective measures (such as otoacoustic emissions).
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2015
An-Chieh Chang; Robert A. Lutfi; Jungmee Lee
Stimulus uncertainty is known to critically affect auditory masking, but its influence on auditory streaming has been largely ignored. Standard ABA-ABA tone sequences were made increasingly uncertain by increasing the sigma of normal distributions from which the frequency, level, or duration of tones were randomly drawn. Consistent with predictions based on a model of masking by Lutfi, Gilbertson, Chang, and Stamas [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 2160-2170 (2013)], the frequency difference for which A and B tones formed separate streams increased as a linear function of sigma in tone frequency but was much less affected by sigma in tone level or duration.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2014
An-Chieh Chang; Inseok Heo; Jungmee Lee; Christophe N. J. Stoelinga; Robert A. Lutfi
As the frequency separation of A and B tones in an ABAABA tone sequence increases the tones are heard to split into separate auditory streams (fission threshold). The phenomenon is identified with our ability to ‘hear out’ individual sound sources in natural, multisource acoustic environments. One important difference, however, between natural sounds and the tone sequences used in most streaming studies is that natural sounds often vary unpredictably from one moment to the next. In the present study, fission thresholds were measured for ABAABA tone sequences made more or less predictable by sampling the frequencies, levels or durations of the tones at random from normal distributions having different values of sigma (0–800 cents, 0–8 dB, and 0–40 ms, respectively, for frequency, level, and duration). Frequency variation on average had the greatest effect on threshold, but the function relating threshold to sigma was non-monotonic; first increasing then decreasing for the largest value of sigma. Difference...
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2013
Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Amplitude modulation (AM) detection has been successfully used as a psychophysical measure of auditory temporal processing. Our understanding of the role of the auditory periphery in processing AM signals is emerging through physiological and psychophysical studies. Unfortunately, direct physiological estimates of the cochlea’s mechanical response to AM signals are not obtainable in humans. This study tries to fill this critical gap in knowledge by exploring the relationship between perception (through psychophysical AM detection) and mechanics (through otoacoustic emissions). Psychometric function for AM perception was measured for a 2-kHz carrier frequency and 10-Hz modulation frequency (fm). Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were recorded with amplitude-modulated f1 with fmu2009=u200910 Hz and steady-state f2. The frequencies of f1 and f2 were chosen to yield a 2f1u2009−u2009f2 DPOAE around 2 kHz near a peak in the fine structure. The ratio between the DPOAE pressure at 2f1u2009−u2009f2 and that of the sidebands separated by fm (AMOAE depth) was calculated as a function of different modulation depths. Results indicate that there might be a correlation between AM perception performance and AMOAE magnitude, suggesting that cochlear mechanics might play a role for AM perception. [Work supported by the Knowles Hearing Center and Northwestern University.]