Juraj Mesik

Spontaneous recovery of motion and face aftereffects

The ability of the visual system to rapidly adjust to changing environmental conditions is one of its key characteristics. Environmental changes can occur over a variety of timescales, however, and it remains unknown how the visual system adapts to these. Does a single mechanism control adaptation across all timescales, or is adaptation subserved by multiple mechanisms, each of which is tuned to its preferred duration? To address this question, we conducted three experiments in which subjects viewed motion (Exp. 1 and 2) or faces (Exp. 3) in a sequence designed to produce opposing aftereffects. A first adapter was presented for a relatively long duration, while a second one was presented only long enough to extinguish the effects of the initial adapter. Continued measurement of aftereffects revealed a spontaneous recovery of adaptation caused by the initial, longer-lasting adapter in all three experiments. This pattern of results suggests that adaptation in the visual system generally reflects a combination of multiple temporally-tuned mechanisms.

Equalization and decorrelation in primary visual cortex

There are many theories on the purpose of neural adaptation, but evidence remains elusive. Here, we discuss the recent work by Benucci et al. (Nat Neurosci 16: 724-729, 2013), who measured for the first time the immediate effects of adaptation on the overall activity of a neuronal population. These measurements confirm two long-standing hypotheses about the purpose of adaptation, namely that adaptation counteracts biases in the statistics of the environment, and that it maintains decorrelation in neuronal stimulus selectivity.

Orientation-selective contrast adaptation measured with SSVEP

Exposure to oriented luminance contrast patterns causes a reduction in visual sensitivity specifically for the adapter orientation. This orientation selectivity is probably the most studied aspect of contrast adaptation, but it has rarely been measured with steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs), despite their becoming one of the more popular methods of human neuroscience. Here, we measured orientation selective adaptation by presenting a plaid stimulus of which the horizontal and vertical grating reversed contrast at different temporal frequencies, while recording EEG signals from occipital visual areas. In three experiments, we compared SSVEP responses to the plaid before and after adaptation. All experiments showed a significant decrease in SSVEP response at the frequency of the adapter orientation, whereas such an effect was absent for the frequency of the orthogonal orientation. Adaptation also led to robust phase delays, selectively for the SSVEP frequency corresponding to the adapter orientation. These results demonstrate the efficiency of SSVEPs for measuring orientation selective adaptation; the method can measure changes in both amplitude and phase, simultaneously for two orientations.

Beneficial Effects of Spatial Remapping for Reading With Simulated Central Field Loss

Purpose People with central field loss (CFL) lose information in the scotomatous region. Remapping is a method to modify images to present the missing information outside the scotoma. This study tested the hypothesis that remapping improves reading performance for subjects with simulated CFL. Methods Circular central scotomas, with diameters ranging from 4° to 16°, were simulated in normally sighted subjects using an eye tracker on either a head-mounted display (HMD) (experiments 1, 2) or a traditional monitor (experiment 3). In the three experiments, reading speed was measured for groups of 7, 11, and 13 subjects with and without remapping of text. Results Remapping increased reading speed in all three experiments. On the traditional monitor, it increased reading speed by 34% (8°), 38% (12°), and 35% (16°). In the two HMD experiments, remapping increased reading speed only for the largest scotoma size, possibly due to latency of updating of the simulated scotoma. Conclusions Remapping significantly increased reading speed in simulated CFL subjects. Additional testing should examine the efficacy of remapping for reading and other visual tasks for patients with advanced CFL.

Adaptation, the Coding Catastrophe and Disaster Management in Natural Vision.

If we stare at a waterfall for a while and then shift our gaze away, our visual environment will appear to move upward. First reported by Aristotle ∼330 BC, this phenomenon is known as the waterfall illusion or the motion aftereffect ([Anstis et al., 1998][1]). The motion aftereffect is a