Jürgen B. Bulitta

Resurgence of Colistin: A Review of Resistance, Toxicity, Pharmacodynamics, and Dosing

Colistin is a polymyxin antibiotic that was discovered in the late 1940s for the treatment of gram‐negative infections. After several years of clinical use, its popularity diminished because of reports of significant nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. Recently, the antibiotic has resurfaced as a last‐line treatment option for multidrug‐resistant organisms such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The need for antibiotics with coverage of these gram‐negative pathogens is critical because of their high morbidity and mortality, making colistin a very important treatment option. Unfortunately, however, resistance to colistin has been documented among all three of these organisms in case reports. Although the exact mechanism causing colistin resistance has not been defined, it is hypothesized that the PmrA‐PmrB and PhoP‐PhoQ genetic regulatory systems may play a role. Colistin dosages must be optimized, as colistin is a last‐line treatment option; in addition, suboptimal doses have been linked to the development of resistance. The lack of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies and no universal harmonization of dose units, however, have made it difficult to derive optimal dosing regimens and specific dosing guidelines for colistin. In critically ill patients who may have multiorgan failure, renal insufficiency may alter colistin pharmacokinetics. Therefore, dosage alterations in this patient population are imperative to achieve maximal efficacy and minimal toxicity. With regard to colistin toxicity, most studies show that nephrotoxicity is reversible and less frequent than once thought, and neurotoxicity is rare. Further research is needed to fully understand the impact that the two regulatory systems have on resistance, as well as the dosages of colistin needed to inhibit and overcome these developing patterns.

Penetration of antibacterials into bone: pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and bioanalytical considerations.

Antibacterials play a key role in the treatment of bone infections and appropriate surgical prophylaxis. The rate and extent of penetration of antimicrobials into bone has been assessed and shown to be important for successful treatment in numerous studies. However, no recent review or critical evaluation of the analytical techniques is available. This review compares established and new sample preparation and analytical methods to measure bone concentrations.We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference abstracts and references from published articles on bone penetration of antibacterials. This article focuses on the standardization of drug analysis in bone, the extent and rate of bone penetration of antibacterials, and the design, evaluation and reporting techniques of pharmacokinetic studies of bone penetration. The focus is on studies conducted between 1998 and 2007, since a previous review was published in 1999. WinNonlin® Professional version 5.0.1 software was used for statistics.Very different methods for sample preparation, drug analysis, data handling and reporting have been employed in bone penetration studies. There is substantial variability in the reported mean bone penetration between drugs and between different studies of the same drug. Quinolones, macrolides and linezolid have mean bone:serum concentration ratios that are commonly between 0.3 and 1.2, and higher ratios have been found for azithromycin (bone concentration in mg/kg of total bone). The ratios are usually between 0.15 and 0.3 for cephalosporins and glycopeptides, and between 0.1 and 0.3 for penicillins. Cephalosporins and penicillins have shown significantly lower (p<0.05) concentration ratios than linezolid. For 20 of 25 different drugs, the ratios were higher for cancellous bone than for cortical bone.The available data show a larger extent of bone penetration for quinolones, macrolides and linezolid than for β-lactams. The bone penetration of penicillins and cephalosporins was significantly lower than that of linezolid. Guidelines on sample preparation, drug analysis, study design and pharmacokinetic evaluation of bone penetration studies are vitally needed.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic investigation of colistin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa using an in vitro model

ABSTRACT Colistin plays a key role in treatment of serious infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The aims of this study were to (i) identify the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index (i.e., the area under the unbound concentration-time curve to MIC ratio [ƒAUC/MIC], the unbound maximal concentration to MIC ratio [ƒCmax/MIC], or the cumulative percentage of a 24-h period that unbound concentrations exceed the MIC [ƒT>MIC]) that best predicts colistin efficacy and (ii) determine the values for the predictive PK/PD index required to achieve various magnitudes of killing effect. Studies were conducted in a one-compartment in vitro PK/PD model for 24 h using P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, PAO1, and the multidrug-resistant mucoid clinical isolate 19056 muc. Six intermittent dosing intervals, with a range of ƒCmax colistin concentrations, and two continuous infusion regimens were examined. PK/PD indices varied from 0.06 to 18 for targeted ƒCmax/MIC, 0.36 to 312 for ƒAUC/MIC, and 0 to 100% for ƒT>MIC. A Hill-type model was fit to killing effect data, which were expressed as the log10 ratio of the area under the CFU/ml curve for treated regimens versus control. With ƒCmax values equal to or above the MIC, rapid killing was observed following the first dose; substantial regrowth occurred by 24 h with most regimens. The overall killing effect was best correlated with ƒAUC/MIC (R2 = 0.931) compared to ƒCmax/MIC (R2 = 0.868) and ƒT>MIC (R2 = 0.785). The magnitudes of ƒAUC/MIC required for 1- and 2-log10 reductions in the area under the CFU/ml curve relative to growth control were 22.6 and 30.4, 27.1 and 35.7, and 5.04 and 6.81 for ATCC 27853, PAO1, and 19056 muc, respectively. The PK/PD targets identified will assist in designing optimal dosing strategies for colistin.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Continuous versus Short-Term Infusion of Imipenem-Cilastatin in Critically Ill Patients in a Randomized, Controlled Trial

ABSTRACT Beta-lactams are regularly administered in intermittent short-term infusions. The percentage of the dosing interval during which free drug concentrations exceed the MIC (fT>MIC) is the measure of drug exposure that best correlates with clinical outcome for beta-lactams. Therefore, administration by continuous infusion has gained increasing interest recently. We studied 20 critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia and investigated whether continuous infusion with a reduced total dose, compared to the standard regimen of intermittent short-term infusion, results in a superior probability of target attainment as assessed by the fT>MIC value of imipenem. In this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study, patients received either a loading dose of 1 g/1 g imipenem and cilastatin (as a short-term infusion) at time zero, followed by 2 g/2 g imipenem-cilastatin per 24 h as a continuous infusion for 3 days (n = 10), or 1 g/1 g imipenem-cilastatin three times per day as a short-term infusion for 3 days (total daily dose, 3 g/3 g; n = 10). Imipenem concentrations in plasma were determined by using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. A two-compartment open model was employed for population pharmacokinetic modeling. We simulated 10,000 intensive-care-unit patients via Monte Carlo simulations for pharmacodynamic evaluation using the target 40% fT>MIC. The probability of target attainment by MIC for intermittent infusion was robust (>90%) up to MICs of 1 to 2 mg/liter. The corresponding value for continuous infusion was 2 to 4 mg/liter. Although all 20 patients had an fT>MIC of 100%, 3 patients died. Patient survival was best described by employing a sepsis-related organ failure assessment score as a covariate in a logistic regression analysis. Larger clinical trials are warranted for evaluation of continuous infusions at a reduced dose of imipenem for critically ill patients.

Systematic Comparison of the Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Piperacillin in Cystic Fibrosis Patients and Healthy Volunteers

ABSTRACT Respiratory tract infections cause 90% of premature mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection is often very problematic. Piperacillin-tazobactam has good activity against P. aeruginosa, but its pharmacokinetics (PK) in CF patients has not been compared to the PK in healthy volunteers in a controlled clinical study. Therefore, we compared the population PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) of piperacillin between CF patients and healthy volunteers. We studied 8 adult (median age, 20 years) CF patients (average total body weight [WT], 43.1 ± 7.8 kg) and 26 healthy volunteers (WT, 71.1 ± 11.8 kg) who each received 4 g piperacillin as a 5-min intravenous infusion. We determined piperacillin levels by high-performance liquid chromatography, and we used NONMEM for population PK and Monte Carlo simulation. We used a target time of nonprotein-bound concentration above the MIC of 50%, which represents near-maximal bacterial killing. Unscaled total clearance was 25% lower, and the volume of distribution was 31% lower in CF patients. Allometric scaling by lean body mass reduced the unexplained (random) between-subject variability in clearance by 26% compared to the variability of linear scaling by WT. A standard dosage regimen of 3 g/70 kg body WT every 4 h as a 30-min infusion (daily dose, 18 g) achieved a robust (≥90%) probability-of-target attainment (PTA) for MICs of ≤12 mg/liter in CF patients and ≤16 mg/liter in healthy volunteers. Alternative modes of administration allowed a marked dose reduction to 9 g daily. Prolonged (4-h) infusions of 3 g/70 kg WT every 8 h and continuous infusion (daily dose, 9 g), achieved a robust PTA for MICs of ≤16 mg/liter in both groups. Piperacillin achieved PTA expectation values of 64% and 89% against P. aeruginosa infection in CF patients, based on susceptibility data from two German CF clinics.

Development of a New Pre- and Post-Processing Tool (SADAPT-TRAN) for Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Modeling in S-ADAPT

Mechanistic modeling greatly benefits from automated pre- and post-processing of model code and modeling results. While S-ADAPT provides many state-of-the-art parametric population estimation methods, its pre- and post-processing capabilities are limited. Our objective was to develop a fully automated, open-source pre- and post-processor for nonlinear mixed-effects modeling in S-ADAPT. We developed a new translator tool (SADAPT-TRAN) based on Perl scripts. These scripts (a) automatically translate the core model components into robust Fortran code, (b) perform extensive mutual error checks across all input files and the raw dataset, (c) extend the options of the Monte Carlo Parametric Expectation Maximization (MC-PEM) algorithm, and (d) improve the numerical robustness of the model code. The post-processing scripts automatically summarize the results of one or multiple models as tables and, by generating problem specific R scripts, provide an extended series of standard and covariate-stratified diagnostic plots. The SADAPT-TRAN package substantially improved the efficiency to specify, debug, and evaluate models and enhanced the flexibility of using the MC-PEM algorithm for parallelized estimation in S-ADAPT. The parameter variability model can take any combination of normally, log-normally, or logistically distributed parameters and the SADAPT-TRAN package can automatically generate the Fortran code required to specify between occasion variability. Extended estimation features are available to avoid local minima, estimate means with negligible variances, and estimate variances for fixed means. The SADAPT-TRAN package significantly facilitated model development in S-ADAPT, reduced model specification errors, and provided useful error messages for beginner and advanced users. This benefit was greatest for complex mechanistic models.

Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Dose-Ranging Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Population Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Oral Torezolid Phosphate in Patients with Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections

ABSTRACT Torezolid (TR-700) is the active moiety of the prodrug torezolid phosphate ([TP] TR-701), a second-generation oxazolidinone with 4- to 16-fold greater potency than linezolid against Gram-positive species including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). A double-blind phase 2 study evaluated three levels (200, 300, or 400 mg) of oral, once-daily TP over 5 to 7 days for complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI). Patients 18 to 75 years old with cSSSI caused by suspected or confirmed Gram-positive pathogens were randomized 1:1:1. Of 188 treated patients, 76.6% had abscesses, 17.6% had extensive cellulitis, and 5.9% had wound infections. S. aureus, the most common pathogen, was isolated in 90.3% of patients (139/154) with a baseline pathogen; 80.6% were MRSA. Cure rates in clinically evaluable patients were 98.2% at 200 mg, 94.4% at 300 mg, and 94.4% at 400 mg. Cure rates were consistent across diagnoses, regardless of lesion size or the presence of systemic signs of infection. Clinical cure rates in patients with S. aureus isolated at baseline were 96.6% overall and 96.8% for MRSA. TP was safe and well tolerated at all dose levels. No patients discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. Three-stage hierarchical population pharmacokinetic modeling yielded a geometric mean clearance of 8.28 liters/h (between-patient variability, 32.3%), a volume of the central compartment of 71.4 liters (24.0%), and a volume of the peripheral compartment of 27.9 liters (35.7%). Results of this study show a high degree of efficacy at all three dose levels without significant differences in the safety profile and support the continued evaluation of TP for the treatment of cSSSI in phase 3 trials.

Attenuation of colistin bactericidal activity by high inoculum of Pseudomonas aeruginosa characterized by a new mechanism-based population pharmacodynamic model.

ABSTRACT Colistin is increasingly being utilized against Gram-negative pathogens, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, resistant to all other antibiotics. Since limited data exist regarding killing by colistin at different initial inocula (CFUo), we evaluated killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by colistin at several CFUo and developed a mechanism-based mathematical model accommodating a range of CFUo. In vitro time-kill experiments were performed using ≥8 concentrations up to 64 × the MIC of colistin against P. aeruginosa PAO1 and two clinical P. aeruginosa isolates at CFUo of 106, 108, and 109 CFU/ml. Serial samples up to 24 h were simultaneously modeled in the NONMEM VI (results shown) and S-ADAPT software programs. The mathematical model was prospectively “validated” by additional time-kill studies assessing the effect of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on killing of PAO1 by colistin. Against PAO1, killing of the susceptible population was 23-fold slower at the 109 CFUo and 6-fold slower at the 108 CFUo than at the 106 CFUo. The model comprised three populations with different second-order killing rate constants (5.72, 0.369, and 0.00210 liters/h/mg). Bacteria were assumed to release signal molecules stimulating a phenotypic change that inhibits killing. The proposed mechanism-based model had a good predictive performance, could describe killing by colistin for all three studied strains and for two literature studies, and performed well in a prospective validation with various concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+. The extent and rate of killing of P. aeruginosa by colistin were markedly decreased at high CFUo compared to those at low CFUo. This was well described by a mechanism-based mathematical model, which should be further validated using dynamic in vitro models.

Clinically Relevant Plasma Concentrations of Colistin in Combination with Imipenem Enhance Pharmacodynamic Activity against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa at Multiple Inocula

ABSTRACT The use of combination antibiotic therapy may be beneficial against rapidly emerging resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The aim of this study was to systematically investigate in vitro bacterial killing and resistance emergence with colistin alone and in combination with imipenem against multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. Time-kill studies were conducted over 48 h using 5 clinical isolates and ATCC 27853 at two inocula (∼106 and ∼108 CFU/ml); MDR, non-MDR, and colistin-heteroresistant and -resistant strains were included. Nine colistin-imipenem combinations were investigated. Microbiological response was examined by log changes at 6, 24, and 48 h. Colistin combined with imipenem at clinically relevant concentrations increased the levels of killing of MDR and colistin-heteroresistant isolates at both inocula. Substantial improvements in activity with combinations were observed across 48 h with all colistin concentrations at the low inoculum and with colistin at 4× and 16× MIC (or 4 and 32 mg/liter) at the high inoculum. Combinations were additive or synergistic against imipenem-resistant isolates (MICs, 16 and 32 mg/liter) at the 106-CFU inoculum in 9, 11, and 12 of 18 cases (i.e., 9 combinations across 2 isolates) at 6, 24, and 48 h, respectively, and against the same isolates at the 108-CFU inoculum in 11, 7, and 8 cases, respectively. Against a colistin-resistant strain (MIC, 128 mg/liter), combinations were additive or synergistic in 9 and 8 of 9 cases at 24 h at the 106- and 108-CFU inocula, respectively, and in 5 and 7 cases at 48 h. This systematic study provides important information for optimization of colistin-imipenem combinations targeting both colistin-susceptible and colistin-resistant subpopulations.

Combination therapy for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria

The emergence of resistant to carbapenems Gram-negative bacteria (CR GNB) has severely challenged antimicrobial therapy. Many CR GNB isolates are only susceptible to polymyxins; however, therapy with polymyxins and other potentially active antibiotics presents some drawbacks, which have discouraged their use in monotherapy. In this context, along with strong pre-clinical evidence of benefit in combining antimicrobials against CR GNB, the clinical use of combination therapy has been raised as an interesting strategy to overcome these potential limitations of a single agent. Polymyxins, tigecycline and even carbapenems are usually the cornerstone agents in combination schemes. Optimization of the probability to attain the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets by both cornerstone drug and adjuvant drug is of paramount importance to achieve better clinical and microbiological outcomes. Clinical evidence of the major drugs utilized in combination schemes and how they should be prescribed considering pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics against CR GNB will be reviewed in this article.