Jürgen Pohl

Endoscopic interventions in the small bowel using double balloon enteroscopy: feasibility and limitations.

BACKGROUND:Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is a new endoscopic tool that not only allows diagnostic workup of small bowel diseases, but also makes it possible to carry out therapeutic interventions. However, for a variety of reasons, endoscopic therapy appears to be more difficult to carry out deep in the small bowel than in the upper or lower gastrointestinal tract.AIM:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute technical success and acute complication rate of DBE.PATIENTS:Between June 2003 and July 2006, 353 patients (152 women, 201 men; mean age 60.3 ± 17.1 yr) with suspected or known small bowel disease underwent 635 consecutive DBE procedures. The majority of the patients were suffering from midgastrointestinal bleeding (N = 210, 60%). The overall diagnostic yield was 75% (265/353) for relevant lesions in the small bowel. The overall therapeutic yield was 67% (236/353).METHODS:Endoscopic therapy was performed in 59% of these patients (139/236). All therapeutic interventions were done in an inpatient manner. The majority of the procedures were carried out with the patients under conscious sedation (N = 130, 73%); sedation with propofol was administered in 37 (20.8%) and with a combination of propofol and meperidine in 11 (6.2%) investigations.RESULTS:A total of 178 therapeutic procedures was carried out. A median of 270 cm of the small bowel was visualized using the oral route and a median of 150 cm using the anal route. The investigation time averaged 78 ± 30 minutes. The endoscopic treatments included argon plasma coagulation (APC, 102 treatment sessions), injection therapy (N = 2), a combination of APC and injection (N = 6), polypectomies (N = 46), dilation therapy (N = 18), and foreign-body extraction (N = 3). In 6/178 cases (3.4%), polypectomy (N = 2), dilation (N = 3), and implantation of a self-expanding metal stent (N = 1) could not be performed successfully for technical or anatomical reasons. Severe treatment-associated complications occurred in six of the 178 therapeutic procedures (3.4%) and 4/139 patients (2.9%), consisting of bleeding (N = 2) and perforation (N = 3) during and after polypectomy of large polyps (>3 cm in size), as well as one case of segmental enteritis after APC.CONCLUSIONS:Endoscopic therapeutic interventions can be performed safely even in the more difficult conditions of the small bowel in the majority of patients. Polypectomy of large polyps appears to be the procedure associated with the highest risk.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Resection for Patients With Mucosal Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS Barretts esophagus-associated high-grade dysplasia is commonly treated by endoscopy. However, most guidelines offer no recommendations for endoscopic treatment of mucosal adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (mAC). We investigated the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection in a large series of patients with mAC. METHODS We collected data from 1000 consecutive patients (mean age, 69.1 ± 10.7 years; 861 men) with mAC (481 with short-segment and 519 with long-segment Barretts esophagus) who presented at a tertiary care center from October 1996 to September 2010. Patients with low-grade and high-grade dysplasia and submucosal or more advanced cancer were excluded. All patients underwent endoscopic resection of mACs. Patients found to have submucosal cancer at their first endoscopy examination were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS After a mean follow-up period of 56.6 ± 33.4 months, 963 patients (96.3%) had achieved a complete response; surgery was necessary in 12 patients (3.7%) after endoscopic therapy failed. Metachronous lesions or recurrence of cancer developed during the follow-up period in 140 patients (14.5%) but endoscopic re-treatment was successful in 115, resulting in a long-term complete remission rate of 93.8%; 111 died of concomitant disease and 2 of Barretts esophagus-associated cancer. The calculated 10-year survival rate of patients who underwent endoscopic resection of mACs was 75%. Major complications developed in 15 patients (1.5%) but could be managed conservatively. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic therapy is highly effective and safe for patients with mAC, with excellent long-term results. In an almost 5-year follow-up of 1000 patients treated with endoscopic resection, there was no mortality and less than 2% had major complications. Endoscopic therapy should become the standard of care for patients with mAC.

Prospective Multicenter Trial Comparing Push-and-Pull Enteroscopy With the Single- and Double-Balloon Techniques in Patients With Small-Bowel Disorders

OBJECTIVES:Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is now an established method for diagnostic and therapeutic small-bowel endoscopy. Single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) has been introduced to simplify the technique. A prospective randomized study was carried out to compare the two methods.METHODS:The study included 100 patients (50 in each group; 63 men, 37 women; mean age 55 years), with no previous small-bowel or colon surgery. The indications for enteroscopy were (suspected) mid-gastrointestinal bleeding, Crohns disease, small-bowel masses, chronic diarrhea or abdominal pain or both, and other conditions. Fujinon instruments were used, with either two balloons or one. The end point of the study was complete enteroscopy as the most objective parameter.RESULTS:No severe complications such as perforation, bleeding, or pancreatitis occurred. Instrument preparation time was significantly faster with SBE than with DBE (P<0.0001). Complete enteroscopy was achieved with the DBE technique in 66% of cases (33 patients), either with the oral route alone or with combined oral and anal approaches. With the SBE technique, the complete enteroscopy rate was significantly lower at 22% (P<0.0001; 11 patients, only with oral and anal routes combined). The rate of therapeutic consequences for the patients based on diagnostic yield and negative complete enteroscopy was significantly higher (P=0.025) in the DBE group at 72%, compared with 48% in the SBE group.CONCLUSIONS:The complete enteroscopy rate was three times higher with DBE than with SBE, accompanied by a higher diagnostic yield. DBE must therefore continue to be regarded as the nonsurgical gold standard procedure for deep small-bowel endoscopy.

Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND Water-aided methods for colonoscopy are distinguished by the timing of removal of infused water, predominantly during withdrawal (water immersion) or during insertion (water exchange). OBJECTIVE To discuss the impact of these approaches on colonoscopy pain and adenoma detection rate (ADR). DESIGN Systematic review. SETTING Randomized, controlled trial (RCT) that compared water-aided methods and air insufflation during colonoscope insertion. PATIENTS Patients undergoing colonoscopy. INTERVENTION Medline, PubMed, and Google searches (January 2008-December 2011) and personal communications of manuscripts in press were considered to identify appropriate RCTs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Pain during colonoscopy and ADR. RCTs were grouped according to whether water immersion or water exchange was used. Reported pain scores and ADR were tabulated based on group assignment. RESULTS Pain during colonoscopy is significantly reduced by both water immersion and water exchange compared with traditional air insufflation. The reduction in pain scores was qualitatively greater with water exchange as compared with water immersion. A mixed pattern of increases and decreases in ADR was observed with water immersion. A higher ADR, especially proximal to the splenic flexure, was obtained when water exchange was implemented. LIMITATIONS Differences in the reports limit application of meta-analysis. The inability to blind the colonoscopists exposed the observations to uncertain bias. CONCLUSION Compared with air insufflation, both water immersion and water exchange significantly reduce colonoscopy pain. Water exchange may be superior to water immersion in minimizing colonoscopy discomfort and in increasing ADR. A head-to-head comparison of these 3 approaches is required.

Diagnostic and therapeutic yield of push-and-pull enteroscopy for symptomatic small bowel Crohn's disease strictures.

Objective Crohns disease is frequently complicated by obstructive symptoms secondary to small bowel strictures that cannot be accessed by conventional endoscopy. Push-and-pull enteroscopy is a new endoscopic tool that might allow not only diagnostic work-up but also therapeutic interventions of these strictures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of push-and-pull enteroscopy in the treatment of symptomatic small bowel Crohns disease strictures. Methods Between September 2003 and May 2006, 19 consecutive patients with known or suspected Crohns disease and symptomatic small bowel strictures were subjected to push-and-pull enteroscopy and included in our analysis. Results With push-and-pull enteroscopy at least one small bowel stricture was accessed in each patient. On the basis of endoscopic assessment strictures in nine patients were not amenable to endoscopic therapy because of anatomical reasons (3/9) or severe inflammatory activity within the stenotic segment (6/9). They underwent direct surgery or intensified immunomodulatory treatment, respectively. In 10 patients with 13 strictures we performed 15 dilations in combination with push-and-pull enteroscopy under fluoroscopic guidance. Technical success was achieved in 8/10 patients, symptomatic relief with avoidance of surgery was achieved in 6/10 patients who remained symptom free during a mean follow-up period of 10 months (range, 4–16 months). No complications were encountered after dilation. Conclusions Push-and-pull enteroscopy is very useful for diagnosis and directing therapy in patients with Crohns disease-associated strictures within the small bowel. Balloon dilation with the push-and-pull enteroscopy device appears safe and effective and can be considered as an alternative to surgery in selected patients with medically refractory strictures.

Long-term outcome after argon plasma coagulation of small-bowel lesions using double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with mid-gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Vascular malformations are the most common sources of bleeding in the small bowel. They can be treated with argon plasma coagulation (APC) during double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE). This study aimed to evaluate the long-term follow-up of the effectiveness of APC for small-bowel bleeding by means of a single-center retrospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between June 2003 and December 2005, APC treatment for small-bowel lesions was carried out during DBE in 63 patients with known or suspected mid-gastrointestinal bleeding. Fifty patients were included in the analysis. Main outcome measurements were comparison of hemoglobin values and blood transfusion requirements before and after APC, and rebleeding rates. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients (58%) had only oral DBE, whereas 21 patients (42%) underwent combined oral and anal approaches. The most frequent bleeding sources treated with APC were angiodysplasias in 44 patients (88%). Hemoglobin levels increased distinctly and stabilized after APC during a mean long-term follow-up of 55 ± 7 months, with mean levels of 7.6 g/dL before APC and 11.0 g/dL afterwards. Blood transfusion requirements substantially declined, from 30 patients (60%) before APC to 8 (16%) afterwards. However, small-bowel bleeding recurred in 21 patients (42%), particularly in patients with Osler disease (6 of 8 patients, 75%). CONCLUSIONS Bleeding sources in the small bowel can be effectively treated with APC using DBE, and long-term follow-up data show a clear increase in hemoglobin levels and reduced blood transfusion requirements after APC. Further efforts are needed to reduce the rebleeding rate, possibly through more intensive initial treatment.

Endoscopic closure of postoperative esophageal leaks with a novel over-the-scope clip system

Management of esophageal anastomotic leaks is associated with high morbidity and mortality and remains an interdisciplinary challenge. We describe the first two cases of endoscopic closure of postoperative leaks following gastrectomy and primary repair after spontaneous acute esophageal perforation, using the over-the-scope clip (OTSC) system (Ovesco Endoscopy GmbH, Tübingen, Germany). Both leaks were successfully sealed with one clip. While one patient recovered without reintervention, in the other patient the postoperative leak reappeared following clip displacement 13 days later.

Water Infusion for Cecal Intubation Increases Patient Tolerance, but Does Not Improve Intubation of Unsedated Colonoscopies

BACKGROUND & AIMS Several studies have indicated that water infusion, instead of air insufflation, enhances cecal intubation in selected patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopy. We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to investigate whether the water technique increases the proportion of patients that are able to complete unsedated colonoscopy. METHODS We analyzed data from 116 consecutive outpatients who were willing to start colonoscopy without sedation; 58 were each randomly assigned to groups given water infusion or air insufflation during the insertion phase. Sedation and analgesia were administered on demand. RESULTS Fewer patients requested sedation in the water group (8.6%) than in the air group (34.5%; P = .003) and their maximum pain scores were lower (2.8 ± 1.9 vs 4.2 ± 2.3 in the air group; P = .011). However, differences in percentages of patients who received complete, unsedated colonoscopy between the water group (74.1%) and air group (62.1%) did not reach statistical significance (P = .23); the percentage of successful cecal intubations was lower in the water group (82.8%) than in the air group (96.5%; P = .03) because of poor visibility. Failed procedures in the water group were completed successfully after air insufflation. The cecal intubation time was shorter in the air group (6.2 ± 3.4 min) than in the water group (8.1 ± 3.0 min; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS In patients willing to undergo unsedated colonoscopy, water infusion improves patient tolerance for cecal intubation, compared with air insufflation. However, it does not increase the overall percentage of successful cecal intubations because suboptimal bowel preparation interferes with visibility.

Standardized Long-Term Follow-Up After Endoscopic Resection of Large, Nonpedunculated Colorectal Lesions: A Prospective Two-Center Study

OBJECTIVES:Endoscopic removal of large, nonpedunculated colorectal lesions is challenging. Long-term outcome data based on standardized protocols, including detailed inspection of the resection site, are scarce. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection (ER) of large, nonpedunculated lesions (LNLs; >20 mm) and to assess the long-term recurrence rate afterward.METHODS:A total of 243 consecutive patients (141 men, 102 women) with 252 adenomas (>20 mm) was followed up using a standardized protocol after complete ER. After endoscopic treatment, the patients received standardized follow-up examinations after 3–6 months and 12 months. The postpolypectomy scar was re-examined, assessed for residual neoplasia, and biopsied at each follow-up colonoscopy.RESULTS:Evident residual neoplasia was noted after 3–6 months in 58 of 183 lesions (31.69%). After 12 months, 126 LNLs were examined, with 19 late recurrences (16.37%). Twenty-one (6.5%) postpolypectomy scars were not detected during 321 surveillance examinations. Biopsy evidence of residual/recurrent lesions was found in 16 of 228 macroscopically inconspicuous polypectomy scars (7%). All residual adenomas were treated using ER and/or argon plasma coagulation. There were 43 complications with the 252 lesions (17%), including 20 major complications (7.9%), all managed conservatively.CONCLUSIONS:A detailed study design with systematic biopsies of inconspicuous scars reveals a significant number of residual adenomas after completed resection. However, these residual neoplasias can be effectively treated at follow-up colonoscopies.

Long-Term Results of Endoscopic Resection in Early Gastric Cancer: The Western Experience

OBJECTIVES:In the West, neither acute nor long-term results of endoscopic resection (ER) for early gastric cancer (EGC) have been reported in large studies. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of ER in patients with EGC in a long-term follow-up (FU).METHODS:From May 1995 to October 2004, 179 patients were referred to our department for endoscopic therapy (ET) of gastric cancer (GC). Of these, 43 patients had intramucosal GC with a diameter of up to 30 mm and underwent ER with curative intent. All patients underwent a strict FU protocol at regular intervals.RESULTS:Of the 43 patients, 42 fulfilled our low-risk criteria for ET of EGC: gross tumor type I/II, intramucosal GC, diameter up to 30 mm, tumor differentiation G1/G2, and no infiltration into lymph vessels/veins. Two patients were not available for FU (remission status not evaluated). In another patient, gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma was detected simultaneously, and he was referred for surgery. 38 (97%) of the remaining 39 patients who underwent definitive ET (23 males (59%); mean age 69±10 years) achieved complete remission (CR) after a mean of 1.3±0.6 ER sessions. Minor complications (not Hb-relevant bleeding) occurred in 7 of the 39 patients (18%) and major complications (5 Hb-relevant bleeds, 1 covered perforation; all managed conservatively) in 6 patients (15%). During FUs (mean 57 months; range 5–137), recurrent or metachronous lesions were observed in 11 patients (29%). All lesions were successfully treated by repeated ET. No tumor-related deaths occurred during FU.CONCLUSIONS:Although ER for EGC in Western countries is effective, it is associated with a relevant risk of complications. In view of the possibility of recurrent or metachronous neoplasia, a strict FU protocol is mandatory.