Jussi Nikkola

Abstinence after First Acute Alcohol-Associated Pancreatitis Protects Against Recurrent Pancreatitis and Minimizes the Risk of Pancreatic Dysfunction

AIMS To determine the recurrence of pancreatitis and subsequent pancreatic function in patients who stop drinking after the first episode of alcohol-associated pancreatitis. METHODS Of a total of 118 patients suffering from their first alcohol-associated pancreatitis, 18 (all men, age median 47 (27-71) years) met the inclusion criterion for abstinence during follow-up. The criterion for abstinence was alcohol consumption <24 g per 2 months (self-estimated), which is in line with questionnaires eliciting alcohol consumption and dependency (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test < 8 and Short Alcohol Dependence Data < 9). Recurrent attacks of acute pancreatitis were studied. Smoking, body mass index and laboratory tests detecting heavy consumption of alcohol were recorded. Blood and faecal tests were studied to assess endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function. RESULTS During a mean follow-up time of 5.15 (1.83-9.13) years and a total of 92.7 patient-years, there were no recurrent attacks of acute pancreatitis among the 18 abstainers. Two patients had diabetes prior to and one was diagnosed immediately after the first episode of acute pancreatitis. One patient had impaired glucose metabolism at 2 years. Two patients had low insulin secretion in glucagon-C-peptide test, one at 4 years and the other at 5 years. Only one patient (6%) maintained low elastase-1 activity during the abstinence follow-up. Of the 100 non-abstainers, 34% had at least one recurrence during the follow-up. CONCLUSION Regardless of the mediator mechanisms of acute alcoholic pancreatitis, abstinence after the first episode protects against recurrent attacks. Pancreatic dysfunction is also rare among abstinent patients.

The Long-term Prospective Follow-up of Pancreatic Function After the First Episode of Acute Alcoholic Pancreatitis: Recurrence Predisposes One to Pancreatic Dysfunction and Pancreatogenic Diabetes.

Background: Data on the prevalence of pancreatic dysfunction after an episode of acute pancreatitis are conflicting. Our aim was to evaluate the natural course of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function in the long-term follow-up after the first episode of acute alcoholic pancreatitis (AAP). Methods: A total of 77 patients who survived their first episode of AAP between January 2001 and February 2005 were prospectively followed up for a maximum of 13 years. During the follow-up, patients were repeatedly interviewed and monitored for recurrences, new diabetes, and chronic pancreatitis. The pancreatic function was evaluated repeatedly during the follow-up. Results: Of the patients, 35% had ≥1 recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) episodes during the follow-up. New pancreatogenic diabetes developed in 19% of the previously nondiabetic patients, but only in patients with RAP (13/26 vs. 0/42; OR=39; 95% CI, 4.6-327.1). In addition, 55% of the patients developed new prediabetes or diabetes, and even this was more frequent in patients with RAP (86% vs. 42%; OR=8.2; 95% CI, 1.2-54.3). Exocrine dysfunction developed in 24% of the patients and was associated with abnormal findings in the endocrine function (P=0.003). Patients with RAP had a higher overall mortality compared with patients without RAP episodes during the follow-up (36% vs. 13%; HR=4.0; 95% CI, 1.4-11.0). Conclusions: The risk for pancreatic endocrine dysfunction, pancreatogenic diabetes and mortality increases significantly if the patient has recurrent episodes of AAP. The risk of developing pancreatic dysfunction after AAP should be recognized and pancreatic function should be screened routinely during the years after the first episode of AAP.

The Intensity of Brief Interventions in Patients with Acute Alcoholic Pancreatitis Should be Increased, Especially in Young Patients with Heavy Alcohol Consumption

Aims After the first acute alcoholic pancreatitis (AAP), active repeated brief interventions (BIs) have been shown to protect against recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP). However, in daily hospital practice the treatment of alcohol problems varies. Our aim was to study BIs performed in the clinic during AAP and whether this prevents from future RAP episodes. Methods Data on all patients discharged between 10/2010 and 10/2012 with acute pancreatitis as the primary diagnosis were obtained from the hospital database. Patients with the first attack of AAP were included in the study. Documented BIs during hospitalization for AAP and RAP and the development of RAP and chronic pancreatitis during median (range) follow-up of 4.2 (0.2-6.1) years were analyzed. Patients were also contacted with a mailed questionnaire. Results A total of 74 patients with first AAP during the study period were included. Of these, 32% developed RAP during follow-up. Of the patients, 72% received a documented BI during initial hospitalization, with no difference between patients who later did or did not develop RAP (71 vs. 72%; ns). Younger age (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.92-1.00) and higher AUDIT points (P = 0.044; OR = 5.6; 95% CI = 1.02-30.9 for ≥20 AUDIT points) were associated with RAP. AUDIT test had 70% sensitivity and 71% specificity at a cut-off value of 20 points for predicting RAP. Conclusions Only 72% of the patients received a documented BI during the initial hospitalization for AAP. The in-hospital BI as such did not prevent the development of RAP. Young patients with AUDIT points ≥20 are especially at high risk for developing RAP and should be included in a more intense follow-up care program to maximize prevention. Short summary During hospitalization for acute alcoholic pancreatitis (AAP), one third of the patients did not receive brief interventions (BIs). The in-hospital BI by itself was not sufficient enough to prevent disease recurrence in follow-up of 4 years. Young age and higher AUDIT-points were significant risk factors for recurrent attacks of AAP.