Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Justin A. Blaber is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Justin A. Blaber.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2017

Empirical consideration of the effects of acquisition parameters and analysis model on clinically feasible q-ball imaging

Kurt G. Schilling; Vishwesh Nath; Justin A. Blaber; Prasanna Parvathaneni; Adam W. Anderson; Bennett A. Landman

Q-ball imaging (QBI) is a popular high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) technique used to study brain architecture in vivo. Simulation and phantom-based studies suggest that QBI results are affected by the b-value, the number of diffusion weighting directions, and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). However, optimal acquisition schemes for QBI in clinical settings are largely undetermined given empirical (observed) imaging considerations. In this study, we acquire a HARDI dataset at five b-values with 11 repetitions on a single subject to investigate the effects of acquisition scheme and subsequent analysis models on the accuracy and precision of measures of tissue composition and fiber orientation derived from clinically feasible QBI at 3T. Clinical feasibility entails short scan protocols - less than 5minutes in the current study - resulting in lower SNR, lower b-values, and fewer diffusion directions than are typical in most QBI protocols with research applications, where time constraints are less prevalent. In agreement with previous studies, we find that the b-value and number of diffusion directions impact the magnitude and variation of QBI indices in both white matter and gray matter regions; however, QBI indices are most heavily dependent on the maximum order of the spherical harmonic (SH) series used to represent the diffusion orientation distribution function (ODF). Specifically, to ensure numerical stability and reduce the occurrence of false peaks and inflated anisotropy, we recommend oversampling by at least 8-12 more diffusion directions than the number of estimated coefficients for a given SH order. In addition, in an equal scan time comparison of QBI accuracy, we find that increasing the directional resolution of the HARDI dataset is preferable to repeating observations; however, our results indicate that as few as 32 directions at a low b-value (1000s/mm2) captures most of the angular information in the q-ball ODF. Our findings provide guidance for determining an optimal acquisition scheme for QBI in the low SNR and low scan time regime, and suggest that care must be taken when choosing the basis functions used to represent the QBI ODF.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2017

Stability of gradient field corrections for quantitative diffusion MRI

Baxter P. Rogers; Justin A. Blaber; E. Brian Welch; Zhaohua Ding; Adam W. Anderson; Bennett A. Landman

In magnetic resonance diffusion imaging, gradient nonlinearity causes significant bias in the estimation of quantitative diffusion parameters such as diffusivity, anisotropy, and diffusion direction in areas away from the magnet isocenter. This bias can be substantially reduced if the scanner- and coil-specific gradient field nonlinearities are known. Using a set of field map calibration scans on a large (29 cm diameter) phantom combined with a solid harmonic approximation of the gradient fields, we predicted the obtained b-values and applied gradient directions throughout a typical field of view for brain imaging for a typical 32-direction diffusion imaging sequence. We measured the stability of these predictions over time. At 80 mm from scanner isocenter, predicted b-value was 1-6% different than intended due to gradient nonlinearity, and predicted gradient directions were in error by up to 1 degree. Over the course of one month the change in these quantities due to calibration-related factors such as scanner drift and variation in phantom placement was <0.5% for b-values, and <0.5 degrees for angular deviation. The proposed calibration procedure allows the estimation of gradient nonlinearity to correct b-values and gradient directions ahead of advanced diffusion image processing for high angular resolution data, and requires only a five-minute phantom scan that can be included in a weekly or monthly quality assurance protocol.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2017

Effects of b-value and number of gradient directions on diffusion MRI measures obtained with Q-ball imaging

Kurt G. Schilling; Vishwesh Nath; Justin A. Blaber; Robert L. Harrigan; Zhaohua Ding; Adam W. Anderson; Bennett A. Landman

High-angular-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (HARDI) MRI acquisitions have become common for use with higher order models of diffusion. Despite successes in resolving complex fiber configurations and probing microstructural properties of brain tissue, there is no common consensus on the optimal b-value and number of diffusion directions to use for these HARDI methods. While this question has been addressed by analysis of the diffusion-weighted signal directly, it is unclear how this translates to the information and metrics derived from the HARDI models themselves. Using a high angular resolution data set acquired at a range of b-values, and repeated 11 times on a single subject, we study how the b-value and number of diffusion directions impacts the reproducibility and precision of metrics derived from Q-ball imaging, a popular HARDI technique. We find that Q-ball metrics associated with tissue microstructure and white matter fiber orientation are sensitive to both the number of diffusion directions and the spherical harmonic representation of the Q-ball, and often are biased when under sampled. These results can advise researchers on appropriate acquisition and processing schemes, particularly when it comes to optimizing the number of diffusion directions needed for metrics derived from Q-ball imaging.


NeuroImage | 2019

Limits to anatomical accuracy of diffusion tractography using modern approaches

Kurt G. Schilling; Vishwesh Nath; Colin B. Hansen; Prasanna Parvathaneni; Justin A. Blaber; Yurui Gao; Peter F. Neher; Dogu Baran Aydogan; Yonggang Shi; Mario Ocampo-Pineda; Simona Schiavi; Alessandro Daducci; Gabriel Girard; Muhamed Barakovic; Jonathan Rafael-Patino; David Romascano; Gaëtan Rensonnet; Marco Pizzolato; Alice P. Bates; Elda Fischi; Jean-Philippe Thiran; Erick Jorge Canales-Rodríguez; Chao Huang; Hongtu Zhu; Liming Zhong; Ryan P. Cabeen; Arthur W. Toga; Francois Rheault; Guillaume Theaud; Jean-Christophe Houde

&NA; Diffusion MRI fiber tractography is widely used to probe the structural connectivity of the brain, with a range of applications in both clinical and basic neuroscience. Despite widespread use, tractography has well‐known pitfalls that limits the anatomical accuracy of this technique. Numerous modern methods have been developed to address these shortcomings through advances in acquisition, modeling, and computation. To test whether these advances improve tractography accuracy, we organized the 3‐D Validation of Tractography with Experimental MRI (3D‐VoTEM) challenge at the ISBI 2018 conference. We made available three unique independent tractography validation datasets – a physical phantom and two ex vivo brain specimens ‐ resulting in 176 distinct submissions from 9 research groups. By comparing results over a wide range of fiber complexities and algorithmic strategies, this challenge provides a more comprehensive assessment of tractographys inherent limitations than has been reported previously. The central results were consistent across all sub‐challenges in that, despite advances in tractography methods, the anatomical accuracy of tractography has not dramatically improved in recent years. Taken together, our results independently confirm findings from decades of tractography validation studies, demonstrate inherent limitations in reconstructing white matter pathways using diffusion MRI data alone, and highlight the need for alternative or combinatorial strategies to accurately map the fiber pathways of the brain. HighlightsOrganized international tractography challenge utilizing three validation datasets.Anatomical accuracy of modern diffusion tractography techniques is limited.Advancements are needed to overcome limited sensitivity/specificity of reconstructions.


Medical Imaging 2018: Physics of Medical Imaging | 2018

Phantom-based field maps for gradient nonlinearity correction in diffusion imaging

Baxter P. Rogers; Justin A. Blaber; Allen T. Newton; Edward Brian Welch; Adam W. Anderson; Carlo Pierpaoli; Bennett A. Landman; Jeffrey J. Luci; Colin B. Hansen

Gradient coils in magnetic resonance imaging do not produce perfectly linear gradient fields. For diffusion imaging, the field nonlinearities cause the amplitude and direction of the applied diffusion gradients to vary over the field of view. This leads to site- and scan-specific systematic errors in estimated diffusion parameters such as diffusivity and anisotropy, reducing reliability especially in studies that take place over multiple sites. These errors can be substantially reduced if the actual scanner-specific gradient coil magnetic fields are known. The nonlinearity of the coil fields is measured by scanner manufacturers and used internally for geometric corrections, but obtaining and using the information for a specific scanner may be impractical for many sites that operate without special-purpose local engineering and research support. We have implemented an empirical field-mapping procedure using a large phantom combined with a solid harmonic approximation to the coil fields that is simple to perform and apply. Here we describe the accuracy and precision of the approach in reproducing manufacturer gold standard field maps and in reducing spatially varying errors in quantitative diffusion imaging for a specific scanner. Before correction, median B value error ranged from 33 - 41 relative to manufacturer specification at 100 mm from isocenter; correction reduced this to 0 - 4. On-axis spatial variation in the estimated mean diffusivity of an isotropic phantom was 2.2% - 4.1% within 60 mm of isocenter before correction, 0.5% - 1.6% after. Expected fractional anisotropy in the phantom was 0; highest estimated fractional anisotropy within 60 mm of isocenter was reduced from 0.024 to 0.012 in the phase encoding direction (48% reduction) and from 0.020 to 0.006 in the frequency encoding direction (72% reduction).


Medical Imaging 2018: Image Processing | 2018

Constructing statistically unbiased cortical surface templates using feature-space covariance.

Prasanna Parvathaneni; Ilwoo Lyu; Justin A. Blaber; Yuankai Huo; Allison E. Hainline; Neil D. Woodward; Hakmook Kang; Bennett A. Landman

The choice of surface template plays an important role in cross-sectional subject analyses involving cortical brain surfaces because there is a tendency toward registration bias given variations in inter-individual and inter-group sulcal and gyral patterns. In order to account for the bias and spatial smoothing, we propose a feature-based unbiased average template surface. In contrast to prior approaches, we factor in the sample population covariance and assign weights based on feature information to minimize the influence of covariance in the sampled population. The mean surface is computed by applying the weights obtained from an inverse covariance matrix, which guarantees that multiple representations from similar groups (e.g., involving imaging, demographic, diagnosis information) are down-weighted to yield an unbiased mean in feature space. Results are validated by applying this approach in two different applications. For evaluation, the proposed unbiased weighted surface mean is compared with un-weighted means both qualitatively and quantitatively (mean squared error and absolute relative distance of both the means with baseline). In first application, we validated the stability of the proposed optimal mean on a scan-rescan reproducibility dataset by incrementally adding duplicate subjects. In the second application, we used clinical research data to evaluate the difference between the weighted and unweighted mean when different number of subjects were included in control versus schizophrenia groups. In both cases, the proposed method achieved greater stability that indicated reduced impacts of sampling bias. The weighted mean is built based on covariance information in feature space as opposed to spatial location, thus making this a generic approach to be applicable to any feature of interest.


Medical Imaging 2018: Image Processing | 2018

SHARD: spherical harmonic-based robust outlier detection for HARDI methods

Vishwesh Nath; Kurt G. Schilling; Allison E. Hainline; Prasanna Parvathaneni; Justin A. Blaber; Ilwoo Lyu; Adam W. Anderson; Hakmook Kang; Allen T. Newton; Baxter P. Rogers; Bennett A. Landman

High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging (HARDI) models are used to capture complex intra-voxel microarchitectures. The magnetic resonance imaging sequences that are sensitized to diffusion are often highly accelerated and prone to motion, physiologic, and imaging artifacts. In diffusion tensor imaging, robust statistical approaches have been shown to greatly reduce these adverse factors without human intervention. Similar approaches would be possible with HARDI methods, but robust versions of each distinct HARDI approach would be necessary. To avoid the computational and pragmatic burdens of creating individual robust HARDI analysis variants, we propose a robust outlier imputation model to mitigate outliers prior to traditional HARDI analysis. This model uses a weighted spherical harmonic fit of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans to estimate the values which had been corrupted during acquisition to restore them. Briefly, spherical harmonics of 6th order were used to generate basis function which were weighted by diffusion signal for detection of outliers. For validation, a single healthy volunteer was scanned for a single session comprising of two scans one without head movement and the other with deliberate head movement at a b-value of 3000 s/mm2 with 64 diffusion weighted directions with a single b0 (5 averages) per scan. The deliberate motion from the volunteer created natural artifacts in the acquisition of one of the scans. The imputation model shows reduction in root mean squared error of the raw signal intensities and improvement for the HARDI method Q-ball in terms of the Angular Correlation Coefficient. The results reveal that there is quantitative and qualitative improvement. The proposed model can be used as general pre-processing model before implementing any HARDI model in general to restore the artifacts which are created because of the outlier diffusion signal in certain gradient volumes.


Medical Imaging 2018: Image Processing | 2018

Evaluation of inter-site bias and variance in diffusion-weighted MRI

Allison E. Hainline; Vishwesh Nath; Prasanna Parvathaneni; Justin A. Blaber; Baxter P. Rogers; Allen T. Newton; Jeffrey J. Luci; Heidi A. Edmonson; Hakmook Kang; Bennett A. Landman

An understanding of the bias and variance of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) acquisitions across scanners, study sites, or over time is essential for the incorporation of multiple data sources into a single clinical study. Studies that combine samples from various sites may be introducing confounding factors due to site-specific artifacts and patterns. Differences in bias and variance across sites may render the scans incomparable, and, without correction, inferences obtained from these data may be misleading. We present an analysis of the bias and variance of scans of the same subjects across different sites and evaluate their impact on statistical analyses. In previous work, we presented a simulation extrapolation (SIMEX) technique for bias estimation as well as a wild bootstrap technique for variance estimation in metrics obtained from a Q-ball imaging (QBI) reconstruction of empirical high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) data. We now apply those techniques to data acquired from 5 healthy volunteers on 3 independent scanners under closely matched acquisition protocols. The bias and variance of GFA measurements were estimated on a voxel-wise basis for each scan and compared across study sites to identify site-specific differences. Further, we provide model recommendations that can be used to determine the extent of the impact of bias and variance as well as aspects of the analysis to account for these differences. We include a decision tree to help researchers determine if model adjustments are necessary based on the bias and variance results.


Magnetic Resonance in Medicine | 2018

Empirical single sample quantification of bias and variance in Q‐ball imaging

Allison Hainline; Vishwesh Nath; Prasanna Parvathaneni; Justin A. Blaber; Kurt G. Schilling; Adam W. Anderson; Hakmook Kang; Bennett A. Landman

The bias and variance of high angular resolution diffusion imaging methods have not been thoroughly explored in the literature and may benefit from the simulation extrapolation (SIMEX) and bootstrap techniques to estimate bias and variance of high angular resolution diffusion imaging metrics.


Magnetic Resonance in Medicine | 2018

Functional tractography of white matter by high angular resolution functional-correlation imaging (HARFI)

Kurt G. Schilling; Yurui Gao; Muwei Li; Tung-Lin Wu; Justin A. Blaber; Bennett A. Landman; Adam W. Anderson; Zhaohua Ding; John C. Gore

Functional magnetic resonance imaging with BOLD contrast is widely used for detecting brain activity in the cortex. Recently, several studies have described anisotropic correlations of resting‐state BOLD signals between voxels in white matter (WM). These local WM correlations have been modeled as functional‐correlation tensors, are largely consistent with underlying WM fiber orientations derived from diffusion MRI, and appear to change during functional activity. However, functional‐correlation tensors have several limitations. The use of only nearest‐neighbor voxels makes functional‐correlation tensors sensitive to noise. Furthermore, adjacent voxels tend to have higher correlations than diagonal voxels, resulting in orientation‐related biases. Finally, the tensor model restricts functional correlations to an ellipsoidal bipolar‐symmetric shape, and precludes the ability to detect complex functional orientation distributions (FODs).

Collaboration


Dive into the Justin A. Blaber's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Allen T. Newton

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hakmook Kang

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge