Justin D. Berning

Induction Therapy With Monoclonal Antibodies Specific For Cd80 And Cd86 Delays The Onset Of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection In Non-human Primates1

CD80 and CD86 (also known as B7–1 and B7–2, respectively) are both ligands for the T cell costimulatory receptors CD28 and CD152. Both CD80 and CD86 mediate T cell costimulation, and as such, have been studied for their role in promoting allograft rejection. In this study we demonstrate that administering monoclonal antibodies specific for these B7 ligands can delay the onset of acute renal allograft rejection in rhesus monkeys. The most durable effect results from simultaneous administration of both anti-B7 antibodies. The mechanism of action does not involve global depletion of T or B cells. Despite in vitro and in vivo evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of the anti-B7 antibodies in suppressing T cell responsiveness to alloantigen, their use does not result in durable tolerance. Prolonged therapy with murine anti-B7 antibodies is limited by the development of neutralizing antibodies, but that problem was avoided when humanized anti-B7 reagents are used. Most animals develop rejection and an alloantibody response although still on antibody therapy and before the development of a neutralizing antibody response. Anti-B7 antibody therapy may have use as an adjunctive agent for clinical allotransplantation, but using the dosing regimens we used, is not a tolerizing therapy in this non-human primate model.

Treatment with the humanized CD154-specific monoclonal antibody, hu5C8, prevents acute rejection of primary skin allografts in nonhuman primates.

BACKGROUND Allogeneic skin transplantation remains a rigorous test of any immune intervention designed to prevent allograft rejection. To date, no single, clinically available immunosuppressant has been reported to induce long-term primary skin allograft survival in primates. We have previously shown that treatment with the humanized CD154-specific monoclonal antibody, humanized 5C8 (hu5C8), induces long-term renal allograft survival in nonhuman primates. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of hu5C8 in preventing primary skin allograft rejection in rhesus monkeys. METHODS Ten rhesus monkeys were transplanted with full-thickness skin allografts mismatched at both class I and class II major histocompatibility loci. Of these, two were given no treatment, five were treated with hu5C8 alone, and three received hu5C8 combined with whole blood donor-specific transfusion (DST). All recipients also received skin autografts for comparison. Animals were followed by inspection, serial biopsy, mixed lymphocyte culture, and alloantibody determination. RESULTS Treatment with hu5C8 alone or hu5C8 plus DST greatly prolonged allograft survival. Rejection occurred in the untreated group within 7 days. Mean allograft survival in the monotherapy hu5C8 group was >236 days and in the DST group was >202 days; these differences were not significant. Rejection eventually occurred in most animals. Allograft survival was not correlated with the development of T cell hyporesponsiveness in mixed lymphocyte culture. Rejection was not predicted by the development of donor-specific alloantibody. CONCLUSION These results show that treatment with the CD154-specific monoclonal antibody, hu5C8, greatly delays the onset of acute skin allograft rejection.

Combination induction therapy with monoclonal antibodies specific for CD80, CD86, and CD154 in nonhuman primate renal transplantation.

Background. Antibodies and fusion proteins specific for CD80, CD86, and CD154 have shown promise as agents capable of inducing donor-specific tolerance in rodents. These agents have also been shown to be synergistic with one another in many settings of counter-adaptive immunity. In the nonhuman primate, monoclonal antibodies specific for CD80 and CD86 have prolonged the time to rejection of renal allografts but have not resulted in tolerance. A monoclonal antibody specific for CD154 has resulted in markedly prolonged survival of kidney, islet, cardiac, and skin allografts, but again most animals have eventually developed rejection after prolonged periods of rejection-free survival off therapy. Methods. A combination of monoclonal antibodies specific for CD80, CD86, and CD154 were used in a mismatched nonhuman primate renal-allograft model. Doses used were based on optimized treatment protocols for each agent individually. Results. Treatment of four rhesus macaques with this combination yielded a mean rejection-free survival of 565 days (311–911 days), significantly greater than untreated controls (mean survival=7.0 days, P =0.001) and animals treated with only a combination of anti-CD80 and CD86 (mean survival=191 days, P =0.01). The survival of animals treated with this combination of monoclonal antibodies was not significantly greater than those treated with anti-CD154 alone, but the production of alloantibody was delayed compared with monotherapy anti-CD154. Conclusion. These data suggest that a synergy exists between these agents, particularly with regard to T-dependent B-cell responses, but that they fail to induce durable tolerance in nonhuman primates.

Humanized anti-CD154 antibody therapy for the treatment of allograft rejection in nonhuman primates.

The anti-CD154 antibody hu5C8 prevents acute allograft rejection and prolongs allograft survival after withdrawal of therapy in nonhuman primates. This study describes the use of hu5C8 as a rescue agent for rejection developing after the withdrawal of hu5C8. Twelve rhesus monkeys that had received renal allografts under hu5C8 induction and subsequently rejected were studied. Rescue with hu5C8 was analyzed based on the histological character of the rejection (acute versus chronic) and whether conventional therapy was received at the time of rescue or induction. The diagnosis of rejection and response to therapy was based on allograft function and histology. Four monkeys that had acute rejection associated with conventional immunosuppression and hu5C8 were not reversed by hu5C8 rescue. Four animals with isolated chronic rejection following prolonged rejection-free survival after the withdrawal of hu5C8 did not respond to hu5C8 rescue therapy. Hu5C8 rescue therapy effectively reversed acute rejection occurring in two monkeys after hu5C8 withdrawal. One of two animals with combined acute on chronic rejection responded to hu5C8 rescue therapy. Hu5C8 effectively reverses acute but not chronic allograft rejection and appears to have no synergistic effect with conventional rescue agents.

Efficacy and Toxicity of a Protocol Using Sirolimus, Tacrolimus and Daclizumab in a Nonhuman Primate Renal Allotransplant Model

A regimen combining sirolimus, tacrolimus, and daclizumab has recently been shown to provide adequate immunosuppression for allogeneic islet transplantation in humans, but remains unproven for primarily vascularized allografts. We evaluated this regimen for renal allograft transplantation in mismatched nonhuman primates. Dosages of sirolimus and tacrolimus were adjusted for trough levels of 10–15 ng/mL and 4–6 ng/mL, respectively. Treated monkeys (n = 5) had significantly prolonged allograft survival, with a mean survival of 36 days vs. 7 days in untreated controls (n = 6, p = 0.008). Four of five treated animals, but none of the controls, developed fibrinoid vascular necrosis of the small intestine. A review of gut histology from animals on other immunosuppressive protocols performed by our laboratory suggested that these lesions were a result of sirolimus exposure. In summary, this regimen prolongs the survival of vascularized renal allografts, but is limited by profound GI toxicity in rhesus macaques.