Justin S. Waters

Epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine with or without panitumumab for patients with previously untreated advanced oesophagogastric cancer (REAL3): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial.

Summary Background EGFR overexpression occurs in 27–55% of oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas, and correlates with poor prognosis. We aimed to assess addition of the anti-EGFR antibody panitumumab to epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (EOC) in patients with advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Methods In this randomised, open-label phase 3 trial (REAL3), we enrolled patients with untreated, metastatic, or locally advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma at 63 centres (tertiary referral centres, teaching hospitals, and district general hospitals) in the UK. Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive up to eight 21-day cycles of open-label EOC (epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 per day on days 1–21) or modified-dose EOC plus panitumumab (mEOC+P; epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1, capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 per day on days 1–21, and panitumumab 9 mg/kg on day 1). Randomisation was blocked and stratified for centre region, extent of disease, and performance status. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. We assessed safety in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. After a preplanned independent data monitoring committee review in October, 2011, trial recruitment was halted and panitumumab withdrawn. Data for patients on treatment were censored at this timepoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00824785. Findings Between June 2, 2008, and Oct 17, 2011, we enrolled 553 eligible patients. Median overall survival in 275 patients allocated EOC was 11·3 months (95% CI 9·6–13·0) compared with 8·8 months (7·7–9·8) in 278 patients allocated mEOC+P (hazard ratio [HR] 1·37, 95% CI 1·07–1·76; p=0·013). mEOC+P was associated with increased incidence of grade 3–4 diarrhoea (48 [17%] of 276 patients allocated mEOC+P vs 29 [11%] of 266 patients allocated EOC), rash (29 [11%] vs two [1%]), mucositis (14 [5%] vs none), and hypomagnesaemia (13 [5%] vs none) but reduced incidence of haematological toxicity (grade ≥3 neutropenia 35 [13%] vs 74 [28%]). Interpretation Addition of panitumumab to EOC chemotherapy does not increase overall survival and cannot be recommended for use in an unselected population with advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Funding Amgen, UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre.

Multivariate Prognostic Factor Analysis in Locally Advanced and Metastatic Esophago-Gastric Cancer—Pooled Analysis From Three Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trials Using Individual Patient Data

PURPOSE To identify baseline prognostic factors and assess whether pretreatment quality of life (QoL) predicts survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophago-gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1992 and 2001, 1,080 patients were enrolled into three randomized, controlled trials assessing fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy. All patients were required to complete the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core QoL questionnaire before random assignment. RESULTS Of the 1080 patients randomly assigned, 979 (91%) died. Four independent poor prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis: performance status >or= 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.58; 99% CI, 1.25 to 1.98), liver metastases (HR, 1.41; 99%CI, 1.14 to 1.74), peritoneal metastases (HR, 1.33; 99%CI, 1.01 to 1.74) and alkaline phosphatase >or= 100 U/L (HR, 1.41; 99% CI, 1.14 to 1.76). A prognostic index was constructed dividing patients into good (no risk factor), moderate (one or two risk factors) or poor (three or four risk factors) risk groups. One-year survival for good, moderate, and poor risk groups were 48.5%, 25.7%, and 11%, respectively, and the survival differences among these groups were highly significant (P <.00001). Compared with the good risk group, the moderate risk group had nearly twice the risk of death, and the poor risk group had 3.5-fold increased risk of death. Pretreatment physical (P =.003), role functioning (P <.001), and global QoL (P <.001) predicted survival. CONCLUSION Four poor prognostic factors were identified and a simple prognostic index was devised. Information from this analysis can be used to aid clinical decision-making, help individual patient risk stratification, and serve as benchmark for the planning for future phase III trials.

Do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for lung cancers

To examine whether weight loss at presentation influences outcome in patients who received chemotherapy for lung cancer or mesothelioma. Multivariate analysis of prospectively collected data 1994–2001. Data were available for age, gender, performance status, histology, stage, response, toxicity, progression-free and overall survival. The outcomes of patients with or without weight loss treated with chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC; n=290), stages III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; n=418), or mesothelioma (n=72) were compared. Weight loss was reported by 59, 58 and 76% of patients with SCLC, NSCLC and mesothelioma, respectively. Patients with weight loss and NSCLC (P=0.003) or mesothelioma (P=0.05) more frequently failed to complete at least three cycles of chemotherapy. Anaemia as a toxicity occurred significantly more frequently in NSCLC patients with weight loss (P=0.0003). The incidence of other toxicities was not significantly affected by weight loss. NSCLC patients with weight loss had fewer symptomatic responses (P=0.001). Mesothelioma patients with weight loss had fewer symptomatic (P=0.03) and objective responses (P=0.05). Weight loss was an independent predictor of shorter overall survival for patients with SCLC (P=0.003, relative risk (RR)=1.5), NSCLC (P=0.009, RR=1.33) and mesothelioma (P=0.03, RR=1.92) and an independent predictor of progression-free survival in patients with SCLC (P=0.01, RR=1.43). In conclusion, weight loss as a symptom of lung cancer predicts for toxicity from treatment and shorter survival.

Elderly patients with fluoropyrimidine and thymidylate synthase inhibitor-resistant advanced colorectal cancer derive similar benefit without excessive toxicity when treated with irinotecan monotherapy

Elderly patients are recommended to have a reduced starting dose (300 mg m−2 once every 3 weeks) of irinotecan monotherapy. The aims of this analysis are to compare toxicity and survival according to age, performance status (PS), gender and prior radical pelvic radiotherapy (RT). The primary end points were overall survival and an irinotecan-specific toxicity composite end point (TCE) defined as the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhoea, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, fever, infection or nausea and vomiting. Between 1997 and 2003, 339 eligible patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) progressing on or within 24 weeks of completing fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy were prospectively registered in a multicentre randomised trial. All patients commenced irinotecan at 350 mg m−2 once every 3 weeks. There were no differences in proportions of patients developing TCE by age (<70 vs ⩾70 : 37.8 vs 45.8%; P=0.218), PS (0–1 vs 2 : 39.3 vs 41.5%; P=0.793) or prior RT (RT vs no RT : 45.1 vs 38.5%; P=0.377). Males experienced more toxicity than females (44.3 vs 32.6%; P=0.031), but this was not significant after controlling for other co-variates (P=0.06). Patients aged ⩾70 had similar objective responses (11.1 vs 9%; P=0.585) and survival (median 9.4 vs 9 months; log rank P=0.74) compared to younger patients. Elderly patients derive the same benefit without experiencing more toxicity with second-line irinotecan treatment for advanced CRC. Our data do not support the recommendation to reduce the starting dose for the elderly patients.

A randomized multicenter trial of epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (EOC) plus panitumumab in advanced esophagogastric cancer (REAL3)

LBA4000 Background: EGFR overexpression occurs in 27-50% of esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (OGA), and correlates with poor prognosis. The REAL3 trial evaluated the addition of the anti-EGFR antibody panitumumab (P) to epirubicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabine (EOC) in advanced OGA. METHODS Patients with untreated, metastatic or locally advanced OGA were randomised to EOC (E 50mg/m2, O 130mg/m2, C 1250mg/m2/day) or mEOC+P (E 50mg/m2, O 100mg/m2, C 1000mg/m2/day, P 9mg/kg). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), toxicity, and biomarker evaluation. Response was evaluated by RECIST after 4 and 8 cycles. Following IDMC review in October 2011 trial recruitment was halted and panitumumab withdrawn. Data for patients on treatment were censored at this timepoint. RESULTS 553 patients were recruited (EOC 275, mEOC+P 278), with median follow-up 5.0 and 5.2 months respectively. Median OS was 11.3 months with EOC compared to 8.8 months with mEOC+P (HR 1.37: 95% CI 1.07-1.76, p=0.013). Median PFS was 7.4 and 6.0 months respectively (HR 1.22: 95% CI 0.98-1.52, p=0.068), with RR being 42% compared to 46% (odds ratio 1.16: 95% CI 0.81-1.57, p=0.467). mEOC+P was associated with ↑ G3/4 diarrhoea (17% vs 11%), skin rash (14% vs 1%) and thrombotic events (12% vs 7%), but ↓ haem toxicity (>G3 neutropenia 14% vs 31%). In the mEOC+P arm, OS was significantly improved in patients with G1-3 rash (77%, n=209) on treatment compared to those without (23%, n=63); median OS 10.2 vs 4.3 months (p<0.001), with similar significant improvements seen in RR and PFS. Biomarker analysis in the first 200 patients has not identified other predictive markers associated with P therapy. Multivariate analysis for OS in these patients demonstrated a negatively prognostic role for KRAS mutation (HR 2.1: 95% CI 1.10-4.05, p=0.025) and PIK3CA mutation (HR 3.2: 95% CI 1.01-10.40, p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS Addition of P to EOC chemotherapy was associated with worsening of OS in an unselected advanced OGA population. This may be in part due to lowered doses of O and C in the mEOC+P regimen. Outcomes in patients treated with P varied by grade of skin toxicity.

Bevacizumab with peri-operative epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) in localised gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a safety report

BACKGROUND Peri-operative chemotherapy and surgery is a standard treatment of localised oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma; however, the outcomes remain poor. PATIENTS AND METHODS ST03 is a multicentre, randomised, phase II/III study comparing peri-operative ECX with or without bevacizumab (ECX-B). The primary outcome measure of phase II (n = 200) was safety, specifically gastrointestinal (GI) perforation rates and cardiotoxicity. RESULTS Two hundred patients were randomised between October 2007 and April 2010. Ninety-one/101 (90%) ECX and 86/99 (87%) ECX-B patients completed pre-operative chemotherapy; 7 ECX and 9 ECX-B patients stopped due to toxicity. Gastrointestinal perforations (3 ECX, 1 ECX-B), cardiac events (1 ECX, 4 ECX-B) and venous thromboembolic events (VTEs, 8 ECX, 7 ECX-B) were uncommon. Arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs, myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebrovascular accident) were more frequent with ECX-B (5 versus 1 with ECX). Delayed wound healing, anastomotic leaks and GI bleeding rates were similar. More asymptomatic left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) falls (≥15% and/or to <50%) occurred with ECX-B (21.2% versus 11.1% with ECX). Clinically significant falls (≥10% to below lower limit of normal, LLN) occurred in (15.3%) and (8.9%) respectively, with no associated cardiac failure (median 22 months follow-up). CONCLUSIONS Addition of bevacizumab to peri-operative ECX chemotherapy is feasible with acceptable toxicity and no negative impact on surgical outcomes.

Gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone (GEM-P) is an effective salvage regimen in patients with relapsed and refractory lymphoma

There is currently no standard salvage chemotherapy regimen in relapsed and refractory lymphoma. Gemcitabine is a novel nucleoside analogue, which acts synergistically with cisplatin both in vitro and in clinical studies. We evaluated the combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone (GEM-P) in 41 heavily pretreated patients with relapsed and refractory Hodgkins and non-Hodgkins lymphoma. The best-achieved response rate (RR) was 79% (95% CI 64–91), with a complete RR of 21%. In patients with chemo-resistant disease, the RR was 63%. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity, the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was 17.1, 61.0 and 53.7% respectively. Only one patient had neutropenic sepsis and none of the patients suffered from haemorrhage. Grade 3 or 4 nonhaematological toxicity was minimal and stem cell mobilisation was not inhibited. GEM-P is an effective salvage regimen and its use prior to autologous stem cell transplant warrants further investigation.

The changing face of chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

Cytotoxic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer has undergone a period of dramatic development over the course of the last 5 years. Four distinct classes of drug with activity in this disease are now available, and the current challenge is to establish the best way to use these agents, either in sequence or in combination, for the benefit of patients. This review aims to summarize the data relating to the newer agents and to propose directions for future research. DRUGS TARGETING THYMIDYLATE SYNTHASE 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has established single-agent activity in advanced colorectal cancer. Its main intracellular target is thymidylate synthase, which is inhibited by the active metabolite of 5-FU, 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate (FdUMP) (Figure 1). The lack of alternative agents until recent years has fuelled extensive research into the biochemical modulation of 5-FU and alternative methods of delivery, primarily based on continuous infusion of the drug. Many individual clinical trials have demonstrated enhanced response rates when 5-FU is co-administered with folinic acid (calcium leucovorin). However a significant survival benefit has been more difficult to establish. Indeed a meta-analysis of nine trials showed no survival advantage for folinic acidmodulated 5-FU over 5-FU alone (Advanced Colorectal Cancer Meta-Analysis Project, 1992). Similarly, continuous infusion of 5FU using a variety of different schedules also enhances response rates over bolus delivery. A meta-analysis of seven randomized trials addressing this question showed a small but statistically significant improvement in median survival for 5-FU infusion over 5-FU bolus (12.1 vs 11.3 months, P = 0.039). Haematological toxicity was also significantly less common with 5-FU infusion, underlining the improved therapeutic ratio provided by this approach (Meta-analysis Group In Cancer, 1998). Drawing on the experience gained with 5-FU infusion, two new avenues of drug development have been explored. The direct thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitors are a group of rationally designed molecules that compete with folinic acid for binding to TS (Figure 1). Intracellular polyglutamation of some of these compounds leads to their retention within the cell, and hence prolonged inhibition of TS. Raltitrexed, the lead agent in this class, has been the subject of extensive clinical evaluation. Its efficacy at the established dose of 3 mg m −2

Biomarker analysis in oesophagogastric cancer: Results from the REAL3 and TransMAGIC trials

BACKGROUND REAL3 (Randomised ECF for Advanced or Locally advanced oesophagogastric cancer 3) was a phase II/III trial designed to evaluate the addition of panitumumab (P) to epirubicin, oxaliplatin and capecitabine (EOC) in untreated advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma, or undifferentiated carcinoma. MAGIC (MRC Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy) was a phase III study which demonstrated that peri-operative epirubicin, cisplatin and infused 5-fluorouracil (ECF) improved survival in early oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Analysis of response rate (RR; the primary end-point of phase II) and biomarkers in the first 200 patients randomised to EOC or modified dose (m) EOC+P in REAL3 was pre-planned to determine if molecular selection for the on-going study was indicated. KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations and PTEN expression were assessed in pre-treatment biopsies and results correlated with response to mEOC+P. Association between these biomarkers and overall survival (OS) was assessed in MAGIC patients to determine any prognostic effect. RESULTS RR was 52% to mEOC+P, 48% to EOC. Results from 175 assessable biopsies: mutations in KRAS (5.7%), BRAF (0%), PIK3CA (2.5%) and loss of PTEN expression (15.0%). None of the biomarkers evaluated predicted resistance to mEOC+P. In MAGIC, mutations in KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA and loss of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) were found in 6.3%, 1.0%, 5.0% and 10.9%, respectively, and were not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS The RR of 52% in REAL3 with mEOC+P met pre-defined criteria to continue accrual to phase III. The frequency of the mutations was too low to exclude any prognostic or predictive effect.

Oxaliplatin and protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced or relapsed 5-fluorouracil pretreated colorectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of oxaliplatin and protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) in patients with advanced or relapsed 5-FU pretreated colorectal cancer. 38 patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma with documented progression on or within 6 months following 5-FU or thymidylate synthase inhibitor containing chemotherapy were recruited between June 1997 and September 2000. Oxaliplatin (100 mg m–2) was given every 2 weeks and PVI 5-FU (300 mg m–2day–1) was administered. Median age of patients was 61 years. 17 patients had >2 sites of disease involvement. 10 had received 5-FU based adjuvant chemotherapy. 16 received oxaliplatin and PVI 5-FU as second-line chemotherapy for advanced disease and 22 as third or subsequent lines. Median follow up was 6.1 months. The best achieved objective tumour response rate was 29% (11 partial responses 95% confidence interval [CI] = 15–46%). 20 patients (52.6%) had stable disease. The median duration of response was 3.9 months. Even for patients who had previously received both 5-FU and irinotecan (n= 22), 27.3% had partial response with oxaliplatin and PVI 5-FU. 37 patients had symptoms on entry into the study. 25 patients had pain, 10 had anorexia and 28 had lethargy. 64%, 70% and 17.9% had symptomatic improvement after treatment respectively. Grade 3–4 toxicities were anaemia 10.6%, neutropenia 2.6%, thrombocytopenia 5.2%, diarrhoea 18.9%, nausea and vomiting 2.7%, infection 5.4% and lethargy 37.8%. The median survival was 9.1 months. Probability of overall survival at 6 months was 58.4% (95% CI = 38.7–73.7%). The median failure-free survival was 4 months. Oxaliplatin and PVI 5FU is an active and well tolerated regimen in patients with heavily pre-treated advanced colorectal cancer.