Jyothshna Bayya
Maimonides Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Jyothshna Bayya.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2011
Nelli Fisher; Lewis A. Eisen; Jyothshna Bayya; Alina Dulu; Peter S. Bernstein; Irwin R. Merkatz; Dena Goffman
OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of simulation-based maternal cardiac arrest training on performance, knowledge, and confidence among Maternal-Fetal Medicine staff. STUDY DESIGN Maternal-Fetal Medicine staff (n = 19) participated in a maternal arrest simulation program. Based on evaluation of performance during initial simulations, an intervention was designed including: basic life support course, advanced cardiac life support pregnancy modification lecture, and simulation practice. Postintervention evaluative simulations were performed. All simulations included a knowledge test, confidence survey, and debriefing. A checklist with 9 pregnancy modification (maternal) and 16 critical care (25 total) tasks was used for scoring. RESULTS Postintervention scores reflected statistically significant improvement. Maternal-Fetal Medicine staff demonstrated statistically significant improvement in timely initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (120 vs 32 seconds, P = .042) and cesarean delivery (240 vs 159 seconds, P = .017). CONCLUSION Prompt cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation and pregnancy modifications application are critical in maternal and fetal survival during cardiac arrest. Simulation is a useful tool for Maternal-Fetal Medicine staff to improve skills, knowledge, and confidence in the management of this catastrophic event.
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology | 2008
Jyothshna Bayya; Howard Minkoff; Neekinaund Khulpateea
[1] Akhan O, Cekrige S, Ozmen M, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter ethanol sclerotherapy of post operative pelvic lymphoceles with. Cardio Vasc Intervent 1992;15(4):224–7. [2] Pawlikowski M, Melen-Mucha G. Somatostatin analogs—from new molecules to new applications. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2004;4:608–13. [3] Paran H, Mayo A, Paran D, et al. Octreotide treatment in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 2000;45(11):2247–51. [4] Alivizatos V, Felekis D, Zorbalas A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of octreotide in the conservative treatment of postoperative enterocutaneous fistulas. Hepatogastroenterology 2002;49(46):1010–2. [5] Carcoforo P, Soliani G, Maestroni U, et al. Octreotide in the treatment of lymphorrhea after axillary node dissection: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196(3):365–9. [6] Capocasale E, Busi N, Valle RD, et al. Octreotide in the treatment of lymphorrhea after renal transplantation: a preliminary experience. Transplant Proc 2006; 38(4):1047–8.
Journal of Perinatal Medicine | 2014
Sumit Saraf; Jyothshna Bayya; Jeremy Weedon; Howard Minkoff; Nelli Fisher
Abstract Aims: The effect of positive vs. negative comments (praise vs. criticism) on trainees’ subsequent cognitive and technical performance is unknown, but of potential importance. We performed a randomized trial of giving either praise or criticism during simulated normal vaginal deliveries (using a high-fidelity birthing simulator) to assess the differential effect of these types of comments on students’ cognitive and technical performance, and perceived confidence after their learning experience. Methods: Medical and nursing students underwent stratified randomization to praise or criticism. Students (n=59) initially participated in a teaching demonstration and practiced normal spontaneous vaginal delivery using a birthing simulator. A baseline assessment of cognitive and technical skills, and of self-confidence, was followed by a second simulation during which positive or negative comments were given using standardized scripts. Cognitive performance, technical performance and confidence measures were then scored again. Results: Cognitive and technical performance scores in the “praise” group improved significantly by 2.5 (P=0.007) and 1.8 (P=0.032), respectively, while those in the “criticism” group remained unchanged. The self-reported confidence scores did not show any significant change from baseline in either group. Conclusions: Praise strengthens students’ cognitive and technical performances, while criticism does not.
Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2014
Marco J. Barzallo Salazar; Howard Minkoff; Jyothshna Bayya; Brian Gillett; Helen Onoriode; Jeremy Weedon; Lisa Altshuler; Nelli Fisher
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2014
Olufolakemi Williams; Nelli Fisher; Jyothshna Bayya; Kathleen Zafra; Rachel DAlexis; Lora Dibner-Garcia; Peter Homel; Sandra McCalla
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2012
Sumit Saraf; Jyothshna Bayya; Howard Minkoff; Jaimie Glick; Nelli Fisher
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2011
Nelli Fisher; Lewis A. Eisen; Jyothshna Bayya; Peter S. Bernstein; Alina Dulu; Leora Goodman; Irwin R. Merkatz; Dena Goffman
/data/revues/00029378/v204i1sS/S0002937810015851/ | 2011
Jyothshna Bayya; Ahmed I. Ahmed; Sandra McCalla; Howard Minkoff