K. A. Cunningham

Neuropharmacological reassessment of the discriminative stimulus properties of d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD).

The neuropharmacological mechanisms underlying the behavioral effects ofd-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) were assessed by comparing the discriminative stimulus properties of LSD with those of agonists and antagonists that act selectively at putative serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) receptor subtypes (5-HT1 and 5-HT2). Male Sprague-Dawley rats (N=23) were trained to discriminate LSD (0.08 mg/kg) from saline and given substitution tests with the following agents: 8-hydroxy-2(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OHDPAT; 0.02–0.64 mg/kg), Ru 24969 (0.2–3.2 mg/kg),m-chlorophenylpiperazine (MCPP; 0.1–1.6 mg/kg), 1-(m-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP; 0.1–1.6 mg/kg), and quipazine (0.2–3.2 mg/kg). Only quipazine mimicked LSD. In combination tests, BC 105 (0.2–3.2 mg/kg), 2-bromolysergic acid diethylamide (BOL; 0.1–1.6 mg/kg), Ly 53857 (0.4–3.2 mg/kg), metergoline (0.05–0.8 mg/kg), ketanserin (0.2–3.2 mg/kg), and pipenperone (0.0025–0.08 mg/kg), all of which act as 5-HT2 antagonists, blocked the LSD cue; only spiperone (0.02–0.32 mg/kg) was without effect. Although commonalities may exist among “5-HT agonists”, the present results demonstrate that such “agonists” are not identical. Since putative 5-HT1 agonists do not mimic LSD and the LSD cue is potently blocked by 5-HT2 antagonists, it appears that 5-HT2 neuronal systems are of greater importance than 5-HT1 systems in mediating the discriminative stimulus and, perhaps, other effects of LSD.

Discriminative stimulus properties of the serotonin agonist MK 212

In an attempt to clarify the role of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in the discriminative stimulus properties of MK 212 (6-chloro-2[1-piperazinyl]pyrazine), male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate 0.5 mg/kg of this compound from saline. While the putative 5-HT agonists fenfluramine and m-chlorophenylpiperazine (MCPP) mimicked MK 212 in a dose-related manner, d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), 8-hydroxy-2(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OHDPAT), 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeODMT), quipazine, Ru 24969, and 1-(m-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP) failed to substitute completely. The 5-HT1/5-HT2 antagonists BC 105, metergoline, and methysergide completely blocked the MK 212 cue, while the selective 5-HT2 antagonists ketanserin and pirenperone, the dopamine antagonists haloperidol and spiperone, and the beta-noradrenergic antagonist propranolol were without effect. The substitutions of fenfluramine and MCPP for MK 212 support a role for 5-HT in the MK 212 cue; however, the lack of substitution of many other 5-HT agonists is difficult to explain. The complete antagonism by 5-HT1/5-HT2 but not by selective 5-HT2, antagonists suggests the possibility that 5-HT1 receptors mediate the stimulus properties of MK 212. Further research is needed to support this hypothesis and to investigate the relative role of 5-HT and other neurotransmitters in the stimulus effects of MK 212.

Dopamine D1 receptor mediation of the discriminative stimulus properties of SKF 38393.

Dopaminergic mediation of the stimulus properties of SKF 38393 was analyzed in a two-lever, drug discrimination task. After acquiring the ability to discriminate SKF 38393 (10 mg/kg) from saline, rats (N = 12) were given substitution (generalization) and combination (antagonism) tests with selective D1 and D2 receptor agonists and antagonists. The D2 agonists apomorphine and Ly 171555 (levo-isomer of Ly 141865) produced predominantly saline-lever responding; the D1 antagonist Sch 23390, but not the D2 antagonist haloperidol, dose dependently antagonized the SKF 38393 cue. These data support previous neurochemical and behavioral research which suggest that SKF 38393 may act by stimulating D1 receptors.

Antagonism of the lsd cue by putative serotonin antagonists: Relationship to inhibition of in vivo [3H]spiroperidol binding

In two groups of rats trained to discriminate 0.08 or 0.16 mg/kg of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) from saline, pirenperone and ketanserin completely blocked the stimulus effect of LSD. Pizotifen (BC-105) blocked the LSD cue when the training dose was 0.08 mg/kg, but had variable effects in the 0.16 mg/kg of LSD-trained group. The antagonism of the 0.08 mg/kg cue occurred at doses of the antagonists which blocked [3H]spiroperidol labeled 5-HT2 receptors in the frontal cortex in vivo; binding in the striatum was unaffected by the LSD antagonists. However, in doses which produce the LSD cue, neither LSD nor the 5-HT agonist, 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine, which substitutes for LSD, inhibited the binding in either the cortex or the striatum. The results are discussed in relation to the possible neuropharmacological basis for the LSD cue.

Differentiation between the stimulus effects of 1-5-hydroxytryptophan and LSD☆

The stimulus properties of the serotonin precursor 1-5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) and the hallucinogen d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) were compared in a two-lever, water-reinforced drug discrimination task. 5-HTP (in combination with the peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor Ro 4-4602) elicited no more than 50% drug-lever responding in rats trained to discriminate LSD (0.08 mg/kg) from saline while LSD substituted completely in animals trained to discriminate 5-HTP (50 mg/kg) from saline. Combination tests indicated that, while the 5-HTP cue was unaffected by pretreatment with various serotonin antagonists, the substitution of LSD for 5-HTP was abolished by the putative serotonin-2 antagonist ketanserin. It was concluded that LSD mimics 5-HTP by stimulating a subset of serotonin receptors activated by 5-HTP which are sensitive to ketanserin (serotonin-2?).

Discriminative stimulus properties of clonidine: Substitution by ergot derivatives

Bromocriptine, lergotrile and lisuride but not apomorphine, ergonovine or lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) mimicked clonidine in rats trained to discriminate this compound (0.02 mg/kg) from saline. BC 105, ketanserin and haloperidol failed to block the clonidine cue. Yohimbine was an effective antagonist of clonidine but not of the lisuride substitution for clonidine. Since dopamine does not appear to be involved in the stimulus effects of clonidine, the behavioral similarities between clonidine and some ergots may be related to alpha-adrenoceptor stimulation; however, the role of blood pressure changes in the stimulus effects of all of these compounds should not be overlooked.

Effects of repeated administration of the monoamine oxidase inhibitor phenelzine on the discriminability of d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and 1-(m-trifluoromethylphenyl) piperazine (TFMPP)

Rats trained to discriminate d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD; 0.08 mg/kg) or 1-(m-trifluoromethylphenyl) piperazine (TFMPP; 0.8 mg/kg) were treated with the monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) phenelzine (10 mg/kg/day) for 7 days. After a 24 h “washout” period, they were challenged with the training drug (and dose) or saline, during extinction test sessions. Following 0.08 mg/kg LSD, LSD-trained rats responded primarily on the saline lever (29% drug-appropriate responding) while, after TFMPP (0.8 mg/kg), TFMPP-trained animals responded on the drug lever (75% drug-appropriate responding). These preliminary data suggest that, if serotonin receptors are involved in the behavioral effects of TFMPP, these receptors differ from those involved in the effects of LSD.