K Caca
Heidelberg University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by K Caca.
Gut | 2018
Arthur Schmidt; Torsten Beyna; Brigitte Schumacher; Alexander Meining; Hans-Juergen Richter-Schrag; Helmut Messmann; Horst Neuhaus; David Albers; Michael Birk; Robert Thimme; Andreas Probst; Martin Faehndrich; Thomas Frieling; Martin Goetz; Bettina Riecken; K Caca
Objective Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a novel treatment of colorectal lesions not amenable to conventional endoscopic resection. The aim of this prospective multicentre study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the full-thickness resection device. Design 181 patients were recruited in 9 centres with the indication of difficult adenomas (non-lifting and/or at difficult locations), early cancers and subepithelial tumours (SET). Primary endpoint was complete en bloc and R0 resection. Results EFTR was technically successful in 89.5%, R0 resection rate was 76.9%. In 127 patients with difficult adenomas and benign histology, R0 resection rate was 77.7%. In 14 cases, lesions harboured unsuspected cancer, another 15 lesions were primarily known as cancers. Of these 29 cases, R0 resection was achieved in 72.4%; 8 further cases had deep submucosal infiltration >1000 µm. Therefore, curative resection could only be achieved in 13/29 (44.8%). In the subgroup with SET (n=23), R0 resection rate was 87.0%. In general, R0 resection rate was higher with lesions ≤2 cm vs >2 cm (81.2% vs 58.1%, p=0.0038). Adverse event rate was 9.9% with a 2.2% rate of emergency surgery. Three-month follow-up was available from 154 cases and recurrent/residual tumour was evident in 15.3%. Conclusion EFTR has a reasonable technical efficacy especially in lesions ≤2 cm with acceptable complication rates. Curative resection rate for early cancers was too low to recommend its primary use in this indication. Further comparative studies have to show the clinical value and long-term outcome of EFTR in benign colorectal lesions. Trial registration number NCT02362126; Results.
United European gastroenterology journal | 2017
Arthur Schmidt; Tilman Pickartz; Markus M. Lerch; Fabrizio Fanelli; Fausto Fiocca; Pierleone Lucatelli; Fabrizio Cereatti; Albrecht Hoffmeister; Werner Van Steenbergen; Matthias Kraft; Benjamin Meier; K Caca
Background Temporary placement of removable, fully covered, self-expandable metal stents (fcSEMS) for treatment of benign biliary strictures (BBS) has been reported to be effective. However, the optimal extraction time point remains unclear and stent migration has been a major concern. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this treatment modality using an fcSEMS with a special antimigration design and prolonged stent indwell time. Methods We performed a prospective, single-arm study at six tertiary care centers in Europe. Patients with BBS underwent endoscopic or percutaneous implantation of an fcSEMS (GORE® VIABIL® Biliary Endoprosthesis, W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA). The devices were scheduled to be removed nine months later, and patients were to return for follow-up for an additional 15 months. Results Forty-three patients were enrolled in the study. Stricture etiology was chronic pancreatitis in the majority of patients (57.5%). All fcSEMS were placed successfully, either endoscopically (76.7%) or percutaneously (23.3%). Stent migration was observed in two patients (5.2%). Primary patency of the SEMS prior to removal was 73.0%. All attempted stent removals were successful. At removal, stricture was resolved or significantly improved without need for further therapy in 78.9% of patients. Stricture recurrence during a follow-up of two years post-implant was observed in two patients. Conclusions Temporary placement of the fcSEMS is a feasible, safe and effective treatment for BBS. The design of the device used in this study accounts for very low migration rates and facilitates easy stent retrieval, even after it has been in place for up to 11 months.
Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie | 2016
Arthur Schmidt; Horst Neuhaus; T Beyna; Alexander Meining; M Birk; Brigitte Schumacher; David Albers; Helmut Messmann; Andreas Probst; Hj Richter-Schrag; Robert Thimme; M Götz; M Ulmer; M Fähndrich; K Caca
Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie | 2018
Benjamin Meier; Arthur Schmidt; Alexander Meining; K Caca
Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie | 2018
M Bauder; A Wannhoff; Benjamin Meier; K Caca
Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie | 2018
A Wannhoff; Arthur Schmidt; K Caca
Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie | 2018
A Küllmer; J Behn; N Glaser; Robert Thimme; K Caca; Arthur Schmidt
Der Internist | 2018
M. Bauder; A. Fiala; C. Klinger; W. Kersjes; K Caca
Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie | 2016
M Bauder; Benjamin Meier; K Caca; Arthur Schmidt
Zeitschrift Fur Gastroenterologie | 2016
Arthur Schmidt; M Bauder; C Kama; A Küllmer; Benjamin Meier; K Caca