Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by K.H. de Greef.
Domestic Animal Endocrinology | 2001
M.F.W. te Pas; J.W.M. Freriksen; A.J.H.M. van Bijnen; C.L.M. Gerritsen; T.J. van den Bosch; F.H Harders; F.J. Verburg; A.H. Visscher; K.H. de Greef
Selection for increased growth rate or decreased back fat thickness results in concomitant changes in endocrine and metabolic status. Growth hormone (GH) changes in blood plasma concentration related to selection for growth rate and fat deposition were reported in pigs. The molecular mechanisms regulating selection-induced changes in GH plasma concentration remain largely unknown. We investigated selection-associated changes in GH axis parameters in 2 pig lines selected for increased growth rate (F-line), or decreased back fat thickness (L-line), respectively. First, we investigated selection-associated changes in GH pulse parameters. In both selection lines we found each generation a declining GH peak maximum concentration and area under the GH curve. GH pulse width was not associated with generation number. In both lines generation number was associated with a declined pulse interval, indicating that the number of pulses per day increased on average with 1 pulse per 24 h per generation. Second, plasma concentration of GH axis related Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and insulin were investigated. Plasma IGF-I concentration was not associated with generation number in the F-line. Mean plasma insulin concentration declined each generation in both lines. Third, we investigated changes in GH and Pit-1 mRNA levels. In both selection lines GH and Pit-1 mRNA levels increased approximately 50% each generation. The high SD of the GH mRNA levels in both lines may suggest that the GH mRNA levels are pulsatile in vivo. We postulate a molecular mechanism that may explain how selection is associated with increased GH mRNA levels and GH pulse numbers, while lowering GH release per pulse.
Veterinary Quarterly | 2002
A.H. Visscher; Llg Janss; Theodoor Niewold; K.H. de Greef
Summary Disease is a major issue in animal production systems and society demands that the use of medicines and vaccines be reduced. This review describes the breeding approaches that could be used to improve disease resistance and focuses especially on their application to pigs. Disease reduction by genetic means has certain advantages through cumulative and permanent effects, and direct and indirect selection methods are available. Direct selection for disease incidence requires, besides a unique pig identification and disease registration system, challenge routines that are inconvenient in intensive pig production. Indirect selection for the expression of immune capacity may be an alternative but requires detailed knowledge of the different components of the immune system. There is ample opportunity for genetic improvement of the immune capacity because immune traits show substantial genetic variation between pigs. We therefore conclude that indirect selection via immune traits is very interesting, also for practical implementation, and that there is an urgent need for knowledge, within lines, about the genetic relationships between immune capacity traits and resistance to specific diseases or to disease incidence in general. Furthermore, knowledge about the relationship between immune system traits and production traits is needed as well as knowledge about the effect of selection on the epidemiology of disease at a farm/population level and on the host‐pathogen interaction and coevolution.
Journal of Animal Science | 2003
J. J. Eissen; E. J. Apeldoorn; E. Kanis; M.W.A. Verstegen; K.H. de Greef
Journal of Animal Science | 2005
E. Kanis; K.H. de Greef; A. Hiemstra; J.A.M. van Arendonk
Journal of Animal Science | 2000
L. Brocks; R.E. Klont; W. Buist; K.H. de Greef; M. Tieman; B. Engel
Journal of Animal Science | 2000
M.F.W. te Pas; F.J. Verburg; C.L.M. Gerritsen; K.H. de Greef
Journal of Animal Science | 1990
E. Kanis; G. J. Nieuwhof; K.H. de Greef; W. Van Der Hel; M.W.A. Verstegen; J. Huisman; P.G. van der Wal
Journal of Animal Science | 2001
K.H. de Greef; L.L.G. Janss; A. L. J. Vereijken; R. Pit; C.L.M. Gerritsen
Journal of Animal Science | 1992
K.H. de Greef
Journal of Animal Science | 2001
M.F.W. te Pas; A.H. Visscher; E.J. van Steenbergen; E.F. Knol; K.H. de Greef; Theodoor Niewold; L.L.G. Janss