K. Jackson

The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients

Objective: To assess the use of patient-reported outcome (PROs) measures in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients. We assessed whether the addition of PROs in routine clinical care affected the duration of the consultation and patient’s and clinician’s views. Method: Consecutive lung–heart transplant patients visiting the outpatient clinic, University of Alberta Hospital, completed the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) and the Health Utilities Index (HUI) on touchscreen computers. Information on the patient’s responses was made available to the members of the transplant team prior to the encounter with the patient. The duration of clinical encounters was noted. At the end of every visit, clinicians completed a questionnaire on the usefulness of having PRO information available. After 6 months patients completed a survey of their experiences. Results: The final patient sample consisted of 172 patients with a mean (SD) age of 52 (13.3) years old; 47% were female; 68% were organ recipients and 32% candidates. The transplant team, comprising four pulmunologists, two nurses, and one pharmacist had an average of 9 years of practical experience in pulmunology. The mean duration of patient–clinician encounters in minutes was 15.15 (4.52). Ninety-eight percent of patients indicated that they would be happy to complete the CRQ and HUI at every clinic visit. Ninety-one percent of the assessments completed by clinicians showed complete satisfaction with the use of PROs in routine practice. Further, the clinicians developed guidelines for the use of PRO information in clinical practice. Conclusions: The incorporation of PRO measures in the routine clinical care of lung–heart transplant patients resulted in a reduction of the duration of patient–clinician encounters. The experience was well accepted by patients and clinicians. We conclude that the routine use of PROs in lung–heart transplant patients has become standard practice.

A Case Report of Living-donor Lobar Lung Transplantation for Scleroderma-associated Usual Interstitial Pneumonia: Eight Years and Counting

INTRODUCTION Scleroderma-associated interstitial lung disease is a life-limiting complication of scleroderma, often requiring lung transplantation. Living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) is a viable alternative to deceased-donor lung transplantation in specialized centers under select circumstances. CLINICAL CASE A 47-year-old female underwent LDLLT after nine years of symptomatic scleroderma-associated usual interstitial pneumonia and three years awaiting deceased-donor lung transplantation. Her manifestations of scleroderma included mild sclerodactyly, periungual erythema, Raynauds phenomenon, and gastroesophageal reflux, with positive antinuclear autoantibodies. Several years post-transplantation, manometry revealed feeble lower esophageal sphincteric pressure with ineffective esophageal motility. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome developed 64 months post-transplantation without evidence of aspiration or reflux on transbronchial biopsy. Currently, she has normal renal function and good allograft function [FEV1 1.52 L (73% predicted) and FVC 2.50 L (99% predicted)]. RELEVANCE This is the second reported case of LDLLT in scleroderma, and the first reporting long-term pulmonary, renal, and esophageal function post-transplantation.