K. Joan Murphy

Cell–cell and cell–matrix dynamics in intraperitoneal cancer metastasis

The peritoneal metastatic route of cancer dissemination is shared by cancers of the ovary and gastrointestinal tract. Once initiated, peritoneal metastasis typically proceeds rapidly in a feed-forward manner. Several factors contribute to this efficient progression. In peritoneal metastasis, cancer cells exfoliate into the peritoneal fluid and spread locally, transported by peritoneal fluid. Inflammatory cytokines released by tumor and immune cells compromise the protective, anti-adhesive mesothelial cell layer that lines the peritoneal cavity, exposing the underlying extracellular matrix to which cancer cells readily attach. The peritoneum is further rendered receptive to metastatic implantation and growth by myofibroblastic cell behaviors also stimulated by inflammatory cytokines. Individual cancer cells suspended in peritoneal fluid can aggregate to form multicellular spheroids. This cellular arrangement imparts resistance to anoikis, apoptosis, and chemotherapeutics. Emerging evidence indicates that compact spheroid formation is preferentially accomplished by cancer cells with high invasive capacity and contractile behaviors. This review focuses on the pathological alterations to the peritoneum and the properties of cancer cells that in combination drive peritoneal metastasis.

Low malignant potential tumors with micropapillary features are molecularly similar to low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary

OBJECTIVE Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) is a chemoresistant ovarian neoplasm thought to potentially arise in a background of low malignant potential tumors (LMP), which are typically non-aggressive. However, LMP with micropapillary features (LMP-MP) have more aggressive clinical behavior and may represent an intermediate in progression to LGSC. The objective of this study was to obtain and compare gene expression profiles of LMP, LMP-MP and LGSC to determine if LMP-MP more closely resembles LGSC, and to identify genes involved in LGSC carcinogenesis. METHODS Epithelial cells from LMP (n=17), LMP-MP (n=9) and LGSC (n=11) were isolated by laser capture microdissection. RNA was extracted, reverse transcribed to cDNA, amplified and hybridized to Affymetrix U133 Plus2 genechip arrays. Gene expression data were checked for quality, filtered and significantly altered genes between subgroups were identified. Differential expression of selected genes was verified by RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS Gene expression analysis identified differential expression between LMP and LMP-MP, LMP and LGSC but not LMP-MP and LGSC. Integration of differentially expressed genes into the protein interaction database CytoScape highlighted gene products in the MAPK pathway as differentially regulated between LMP and LGSC. Four genes were selected and validated by RT-qPCR performed on microarray samples (n=15) and immunohistochemistry on a representative microarray (n=57). CONCLUSION The gene expression profile of LMP-MP is similar to LGSC and distinct from LMP, reflecting their more aggressive clinical behavior. Candidate genes in the MAPK pathway were highlighted which may play a role in LGSC carcinogenesis and indicate potential therapeutic targets.

Canadian Consensus Guidelines on Human Papillomavirus

OBJECTIVE To serve as a guideline for health care providers on the use of continuous and extended combined hormonal contraception regimens, to prevent pregnancy, and to delay menses that affect health-related quality of life. OPTIONS All combined hormonal contraceptive methods available in Canada that may be used in a continuous or extended regimen are reviewed, and the implications are discussed. OUTCOMES Efficacy of cited regimens and assessment of their side effects, patient safety, medical usage and non-contraceptive benefits, cost-effectiveness, and availability in Canada. Indications for patient counselling are also provided. EVIDENCE Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Database were searched for articles published in English between 1977 and May 2007. Relevant publications and position papers from appropriate reproductive health and family planning organizations were also reviewed. VALUES The quality of evidence is rated using the criteria described by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS The guideline is intended to help reduce unintended pregnancies and improve health-related quality of life in women who find their menses problematic. Increased awareness and empowerment of women, their partners, and health care professionals will improve their ability to make appropriate choices between continuous or extended and cyclic usage of these regimens. SPONSORS The development of this guideline has been supported by unrestricted grants from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Ortho, Organon Canada Ltd., Paladin Labs Inc., Pfizer Canada Inc., and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals.Objective: To promote guidelines for health care providers on the key aspects of HPV infection and the management of HPV-related disease in the new era of vaccine availability.

Low-grade and high-grade serous Mullerian carcinoma: Review and analysis of publicly available gene expression profiles

OBJECTIVE Mullerian low grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) and high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) have distinct molecular profiles, clinical behavior and treatment response. Our objective was to study the biological profiles of these carcinomas. METHODS This study examines publicly available gene expression profiles of LGSC and HGSC to identify differentially expressed genes and key pathways involved in carcinogenesis and chemotherapy response. RESULTS Our analysis supports the hypothesis that serous mullerian carcinoma develop through two different pathways yielding two distinct malignancies, namely LGSC and HGSC. Furthermore, genes potentially involved in chemotherapeutic resistance of LGSC were identified. Suppressing the levels of these genes/proteins may increase clinical response to standard chemotherapy in patients with LGSC. CONCLUSION In summary, this review shows the molecular profile of LGSC and HGSC through multi-center analysis of gene expression profiles of these tumors. The gene signatures of these neoplasms may potentially be used to develop disease-specific, targeted therapy for LGSC and HGSC.

Molecular Profiling and Clinical Outcome of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Presenting with Low- versus High-Volume Ascites

Epithelial ovarian cancer consists of multiple histotypes differing in etiology and clinical course. The most prevalent histotype is high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), which often presents at an advanced stage frequently accompanied with high-volume ascites. While some studies suggest that ascites is associated with poor clinical outcome, most reports have not differentiated between histological subtypes or tumor grade. We compared genome-wide gene expression profiles from a discovery cohort of ten patients diagnosed with stages III-IV HGSOC with high-volume ascites and nine patients with low-volume ascites. An upregulation of immune response genes was detected in tumors from patients presenting with low-volume ascites relative to those with high-volume ascites. Immunohistochemical studies performed on tissue microarrays confirmed higher expression of proteins encoded by immune response genes and increased tumorinfiltrating cells in tumors associated with low-volume ascites. Comparison of 149 advanced-stage HGSOC cases with differential ascites volume at time of primary surgery indicated low-volume ascites correlated with better surgical outcome and longer overall survival. These findings suggest that advanced stage HGSOC presenting with low-volume ascites reflects a unique subgroup of HGSOC, which is associated with upregulation of immune related genes, more abundant tumor infiltrating cells and better clinical outcomes.

The optimal time for surgery in women with serous ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND Advanced high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) is commonly treated with surgery and chemotherapy. We investigated the survival of patients treated with primary or interval surgery at different times following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Their survival was compared with that of patients treated with primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS Patients with stage III or IV HGSC were included in this retrospective cohort study. Clinical data were obtained from patient records. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery (NAC) or with primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (PCS). Study groups were stratified by several clinical variables. RESULTS We included 334 patients in our study: 156 in the NAC and 178 in the PCS groups. Survival of patients in the NAC group was independent of when they underwent interval cytoreductive surgery following initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Optimal surgical cytoreduction had no impact on overall survival in the NAC group (p < 0.001). Optimal cytoreduction (p < 0.001) and platinum sensitivity (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of improved survival in the PCS but not in the NAC group. Patients in the NAC group had significantly worse overall survival than those in the PCS group (31.6 v. 61.3 mo, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Women with advanced HGSC who underwent PCS had better survival than those who underwent interval NAC, regardless of the number of cycles of neoadjuvant therapy. Optimal cytoreduction did not provide a survival advantage in the NAC group.

Breast and Ovarian Cancer: The Forgotten Paternal Contribution

Five to 10% of all cases of breast and ovarian cancer are attributed to a heritable genetic predisposition. Transmission of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is equally likely through maternal or paternal lineage; however, fewer referrals to cancer genetics clinics appear to be made for a paternal, than maternal, family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. To examine this potential bias, a retrospective review of 315 patient and family charts was conducted by one familial cancer clinic in Toronto, Canada. Referral letters, risk estimates, and family histories were analyzed to identify significant differences between patients referred with maternal and paternal family histories. It was determined that patients are approximately five times more likely to be referred with a maternal family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer as compared to those with a paternal family history (p = <.0001). Individuals with a paternal family history were found to have a different, and higher, pattern of risk estimates (p = .00064). No significant difference was seen between the type of referrals sent by general practitioners, oncologists, and gynecologists. Recommendations to increase the awareness of paternal family history in assessing cancer risk are provided.

Breast and ovarian cancer: Y do we forget about dad?

www.thelancet.com/oncology Vol 11 December 201

BRCA1 Mutation Status and Follicular Fluid Exposure Alters NFκB Signaling and ISGylation in Human Fallopian Tube Epithelial Cells

Germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations (mtBRCA1 and mtBRCA2) increase risk for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), the most commonly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer histotype. Other identified risk factors for this cancer, which originates primarily in the distal fallopian tube epithelium (FTE), implicate ovulation, during which the FTE cells become transiently exposed to follicular fluid (FF). To test whether mtBRCA1 or mtBRCA2 nonmalignant FTE cells respond differently to periovulatory FF exposure than control patient FTE cells, gene expression profiles from primary FTE cultures derived from BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers or control patients were compared at baseline, 24 hours after FF exposure, and 24 hours after FF replacement with culture medium. Hierarchical clustering revealed both FF exposure and BRCA mutation status affect gene expression, with BRCA1 mutation having the greatest impact. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed increased NFκB and EGFR signaling at baseline in mtBRCA1 samples, with increased interferon target gene expression, including members of the ISGylation pathway, observed after recovery from FF exposure. Gene set enrichment analysis did not identify altered pathway signaling in mtBRCA2 samples. An inverse relationship between EGFR signaling and ISGylation with BRCA1 protein levels was verified in an immortalized FTE cell line, OE-E6/E7, stably transfected with BRCA1 cDNA. Suppression of ISG15 and ISGylated protein levels by increased BRCA1 expression was found to be mediated by decreased NFκB signaling. These studies indicate that increased NFκB signaling associated with decreased BRCA1 expression results in increased ISG15 and protein ISGylation following FF exposure, which may be involved in predisposition to HGSOC.

Management of abnormal cervical cytology screening in adolescent and young women in a canadian colposcopy centre: a descriptive analysis.

OBJECTIVE To describe and analyze the management of young women referred for colposcopy at a Canadian comprehensive cancer centre for evaluation of atypical squamous intraepithelial lesion of unknown significance (ASC-US) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL). METHODS We conducted a retrospective descriptive study by searching the eCancerCare Colposcopy Database at our centre for 15- to 29-year-old females with referral cytology of ASC-US and LSIL who were seen between January 2000 and January 2009. Women in three age cohorts (15 to 19 years, 20 to 24 years, and 25 to 29 years) were reviewed for risk factors and relevant medical history, cytology and histology results, treatment, and follow-up visits. RESULTS A total of 407 women met the entry criteria, with 36 women in the group aged 15 to 19, 173 in the group aged 20 to 24, and 198 in the group aged 25 to 29. Ten excisional procedures were performed among the 36 participants in the group aged 15 to 19, with normal histology found in two (20%), low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in four (40%), and high-grade CIN in four (40%). An excisional procedure was performed in 52 of 173 participants in the group aged 20 to 24, with normal histology in 15%, low-grade CIN in 37%, and high-grade CIN in 48%. Among the group aged 25 to 29, 74 of 198 participants had an excisional procedure, with normal histology in 12%, low-grade CIN in 27%, high-grade CIN in 59%, and microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma in one woman (1%). CONCLUSION Many women under the age of 25 who were referred with low-grade abnormal cervical cytology underwent treatment(s) and many did not have significant pathology. One case of microinvasive cervical cancer was identified in a patient in the group aged 25 to 29 over the nine years of our study. Our results support the safety of developing a more conservative and coordinated approach to cervical cancer screening in adolescent and young women in Canada.