K L Swanson

Methyllycaconitine and (+)-anatoxin-a differentiate between nicotinic receptors in vertebrate and invertebrate nervous systems

Specific high‐affinity binding sites for 125I‐α‐bungarotoxin and (−)‐[3H]nicotine have been measured in rat brain and locust (Schistocerca gregaria) ganglia. The binding sites for 125I‐α‐bungarotoxin had similar K d values of 1.5 × 10−9 and 0.8 × 10−9 M for rat and locust preparations, respectively; the corresponding values for the (−)‐[3H]nicotine‐binding site were 9.3 × 10−9 and 1.7 × 10−7 M. Methyllycaconitine (MLA) potently inhibited 125I‐α‐bungarotoxin binding in both rat and locust. MLA was a less effective inhibitor of (−)‐[3H]nicotine binding whereas (+)‐anatoxin‐a was a very potent inhibitor at this site in the rat but not in the locust. These data suggest that (+)‐anatoxin‐a is a useful probe for the high‐affinity nicotine‐binding receptor in vertebrate brain, whereas MLA is a preferential probe for the subclass of receptor that binds α‐bungarotoxin.

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in cultured neurons from the hippocampus and brain stem of the rat characterized by single channel recording

Single channel recording techniques have been applied to neurons cultured from the hippocampus and the respiratory area of the brain stem of fetal rats in order to search for nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR) in the central nervous system. In addition to acetylcholine (ACh), the potent and specific agonist (+)‐anatoxin‐a was also used to characterize nicotinic channels. nAChRs were concentrated on the somal surface near the base of the apical dendrite, and in some patches their density was sufficient to record 2 or more channel openings simultaneously. Although a multiplicity of conductance states was also evident, the predominant population showed a single channel conductance of 20 pS at 10°C. Thus, these neuronal nAChRs resembled the embryonic or denervated‐type nAChRs in muscle. However, channel opening and closing kinetics were faster than reported for similar conductance channels in muscle. Therefore the nicotinic channels described here are similar but not identical to those of the well‐characterized muscle nAChR, in agreement with biochemical, pharmacological, and molecular genetic studies on brain AChR.