K. Lauritsen

Effects of topical 5-aminosalicylic acid and prednisolone on prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 levels determined by equilibrium in vivo dialysis of rectum in relapsing ulcerative colitis

To determine the influence of inflammation and topical treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid or prednisolone on arachidonic acid metabolism in vivo, we carried out a double-blind controlled study on the release of prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 to the rectal lumen in 24 consecutive patients with proven distally located ulcerative colitis. Before and at days 15 and 29 a dialysis bag was placed in the emptied rectum for 4 h prior to assessing clinical, endoscopic, and histologic disease activity. A single enema was given daily at bedtime (1 g 5-aminosalicylic acid or 25 mg prednisolone) until complete remission or for a maximum of 4 wk. Clinical and endoscopic remission was obtained in 16 (7 on 5-aminosalicylic acid) and 11 (3 on 5-aminosalicylic acid) patients, respectively. Luminal concentrations of prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 were positively correlated to disease activity and significantly decreased among the prednisolone-treated patients. In both treatment groups a decrease toward normal levels occurred in patients responding to therapy. In retrospect, the pretreatment prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 levels were significantly higher in patients not responding to therapy than in those improving during treatment. In conclusion, luminal prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 levels may prove more useful predictors of the outcome of treatment in relapsing ulcerative colitis than clinical indices of disease activity.

In vivo profiles of eicosanoids in ulcerative colitis, Crohn's colitis, and Clostridium difficile colitis

To compare the local release of arachidonic acid metabolites in inflammatory diarrheal disease, in vivo equilibrium dialysis of the rectum was done in consecutive untreated patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 20), Crohns colitis (n = 10), and Clostridium difficile colitis (n = 7). All patients had endoscopically proven rectal inflammation. Eicosanoid profiles were determined in rectal dialysates by radioimmunoassay after preliminary purification. Concentrations of prostaglandin E2, prostaglandin F2 alpha, and thromboxane B2, but not 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha, were raised in all groups and compared with healthy controls. The highest levels within each group were obtained in patients with widespread epithelial damage, as judged by endoscopy. In patients with ulcerative colitis, an extreme rise in prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane B2 were observed. Similarly, concentrations of leukotriene B4 were substantially increased in ulcerative colitis, but in Crohns colitis and Clostridium difficile colitis only those patients with rectal ulcerations showed elevations. These findings probably reflect more severe tissue damages in ulcerative colitis, but differences between disease groups in cell-to-cell interaction may also contribute. The data suggest, therefore, that therapeutic inhibition of lipoxygenase pathways may prove more effective in ulcerative colitis than in Crohns disease.

Disposition of 5-aminosalicylic acid by olsalazine and three mesalazine preparations in patients with ulcerative colitis: comparison of intraluminal colonic concentrations, serum values, and urinary excretion.

To compare the disposition of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) and its acetylated metabolite during treatment with olsalazine and mesalazine, 14 patients with inactive ulcerative colitis were randomly assigned to olsalazine (1 g twice daily) and the mesalazines, Asacol (800 + 400 + 800 mg daily), Pentasa (750 + 500 + 750 mg daily), and Salofalk (750 + 500 + 750 mg daily) in a crossover design trial so that all received each drug for seven days. Intraluminal colonic concentrations of 5-ASA were estimated after five days by the method of equilibrium in vivo dialysis of faeces. A predose serum sample and a 24 hour urine collection were obtained on day seven. The 5-ASA and acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid (Ac-5-ASA) values were determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Olsalazine almost doubled the colonic concentrations (mean 23.7 (SEM) (1.9) mmol/l) of its therapeutically active ingredient (5-ASA) compared with equimolar doses of Pentasa (12.6 (2.2) mmol/l; p less than 0.0003) and Salofalk (15.0 (2.0) mmol/l; p less than 0.003). At the same time, olsalazine treatment was associated with lower serum concentrations and urinary excretions (p less than 0.05) of 5-ASA and Ac-5-ASA compared with the mesalazine preparations. The low systemic load of 5-ASA provided by olsalazine reduces the potential risk of nephrotoxicity during long term treatment.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Drugs Used in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Diseases (Part II)

SummaryDrug treatment of gastrointestinal diseases, which was previously limited to the use of antacids, anticholinergics, antispasmodics, cathartics and laxatives, has changed markedly over the past decade. Histamine H2-receptor antagonists (e.g. cimetidine, ranitidine and more recently famotidine and nizatidine) have revolutionised the treatment of peptic acid disorders, but their role is currently challenged by muscarinic-M1-receptor antagonists (e.g. pirenzepine), proton pump inhibitors (e.g. omeprazole), prostaglandin analogues and site-protective drugs (e.g. colloidal bismuth subcitrate and sucralfate). Newer anti-emetics with prokinetic properties (e.g. metoclopramide, domperidone and cisapride) have also been introduced in the management of gastrointestinal motility disturbances, and new anti-inflammatory salicylates (e.g. olsalazine and mesalazine) have been developed for the treatment of chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. Finally, diphenoxylate and loperamide have gained wide clinical application as nonspecific antidiarrhoeal agents. The basic pharmacokinetic properties of the above agents are briefly reviewed with the main emphasis on the newer and more important drugs in current use. Furthermore, the effects of age and disease on pharmacokinetics, in addition to drug interaction potentials and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships, are discussed.The anti-inflammatory salicylates, nonspecific antidiarrhoeal agents, laxatives and cathartics will be dealt with in Part II.

Use of colonic eicosanoid concentrations as predictors of relapse in ulcerative colitis: double blind placebo controlled study on sulphasalazine maintenance treatment.

To establish whether concentrations of eicosanoids determined by equilibrium in vivo dialysis of faeces and equilibrium in vivo dialysis of rectum might predict a relapse in ulcerative colitis, 23 patients with completely inactive disease, maintained on sulphasalazine, stopped treatment and entered a prospective study. Concentrations of prostaglandin E2 were determined by radioimmunoassay on purified faecal and rectal dialysates at entry, at two weeks, and at two, six, and 12 months. If the above concentrations exceeded control concentrations (0.5 ng/ml and 1.0 ng/ml in faecal and rectal fluid, respectively) at any study day, the patient was allocated at random to double blind treatment with sulphasalazine 2 g/day, or placebo for six months. A relapse, defined as recurrence of symptoms accompanied by endoscopic inflammation occurred in none of six and in four of five patients allocated to sulphasalazine and placebo, respectively (p less than 0.05). In no case a normal rectal prostaglandin E2 concentration was associated with a relapse in the short term, but only two of 12 patients observed passively remained in remission. In retrospect, leukotriene B4 was a less sensitive predictor of relapse than prostaglandin E2. We conclude that raised concentrations of prostaglandin E2 in rectal dialysis fluid identify patients with a substantial risk of relapse.

Longterm olsalazine treatment: pharmacokinetics, tolerance and effects on local eicosanoid formation in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis.

To examine pharmacokinetics and tolerance of long term administration of olsalazine (azodisalicylate), increasing doses of the drug were given for one year to 31 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and nine patients with Crohns colitis (CC), refractory to, or intolerant of sulphasalazine, until sustained remission was obtained or a maximum of 4 g/day was reached. Colonic drug metabolism was studied by equilibrium in vivo dialysis of faeces. Complete azoreduction occurred in most cases. Concentrations of 5-aminosalicylic acid, but not N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid, in faecal dialysates increased dose dependently. Serum concentrations disclosed no cumulation in the long term and olsalazine was well tolerated, although loose stools occurred transiently in some patients with extensive disease: this was associated with a larger proportion of unsplit olsalazine in the faecal dialysates. Patients with ulcerative colitis having a high prostaglandin E2 concentration (greater than ng/ml) determined by equilibrium dialysis of rectum, were less likely to benefit from treatment. Olsalazine is a very effective means of delivery of 5-aminosalicylic acid to the colonic mucosa in active disease. Use of the drug in controlled trials may be considered safe even in prolonged high dosage.

Effect of 10 mg and 20 mg omeprazole daily on duodenal ulcer: double‐blind comparative trial

One‐hundred and seventy‐one patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcers were allocated at random to double‐blind treatment with 10 or 20 mg of omeprazole in the morning for up to 4 weeks. Patients completed the study if ulcer healing and pain relief had occurred at 2 weeks. A total of 155 patients completed the trial. Patients treated with 20 mg of omeprazole daily responded significantly more rapidly than those treated with 10 mg of omeprazole daily (P < 0.001; Cochran‐Mantel‐Haenszel test covering both time points), cumulative healing rates at 2 and 4 weeks were 74% (58/78) and 91% (71/78), respectively. The corresponding rates in the group treated with 10 mg daily were 48% (39/81) and 75% (58/77). Pain relief was again more pronounced during treatment with the larger dose (P < 0.05; stratified Wilcoxon test). No major clinical or biochemical side effects were noted. An omeprazole dose of 20 mg daily is preferable to a lower dose for the treatment of duodenal ulcer disease in the short term.

Effects of topical ropivacaine on eicosanoids and neurotransmitters in the rectum of patients with distal ulcerative colitis

Background: Topical administration of lidocaine has been suggested to have beneficial clinical effects in patients with active ulcerative colitis, but the mechanism of action, if any, remains obscure. As local anaesthetics may exert anti-inflammatory actions through their inhibition of nervous reflexes, we have studied the local effects of a single rectal dose of ropivacaine gel on rectal concentrations of eicosanoids and neurotransmittors in patients with relapsing ulcerative colitis. Methods: In a randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled study, concentrations of leukotriene B 4 , thromboxane B 2 and prostaglandin E 2 in rectal dialysates and concentrations of substance P, neurokinin A, somatostatin, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and calcitonin gene-related peptide in rectal biopsies from 19 patients with active, distally located, ulcerative colitis were measured before and after rectal administration of a 200-mg dose of ropivacaine- or placebo-gel by use of radioimmunoassays. For comparison with normal conditions, concentrations of neuropeptides were measured in another 19 patients with relapsing ulcerative colitis and 14 controls with non-inflamed colon. Results: No significant changes in concentrations of eicosanoids or neuropeptides were observed after ropivacaine or placebo administration. Baseline concentrations of all neuropeptides, except somatostatin, were significantly lower in active ulcerative colitis than in controls with non-inflamed colon. Conclusions: These findings reveal no evidence of antiinflammatory actions by ropivacaine in active ulcerative colitis and thus provide no rationale for topical treatment with local anaesthetics.

Prevention of Duodenal Ulcer Recurrence with Penicillin: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori is associated with a reduced recurrence of duodenal ulcer (DU). The relationship between H. pylori and DU has been interpreted as causal, but the evidence has been criticized for methodologic reasons. To ascertain whether an antibiotic with no effect on epithelial-cell integrity prevents DU recurrence, we conducted a randomized double-blind trial of phenoxymethylpenicillin (PEN), 2.4 twice daily, and placebo (PLA). Patients with an active DU and positive H. pylori culture from antral biopsy specimens were treated with 40 mg omeprazole daily for 4 weeks, but at week 2 they were allocated at random to PEN (85 patients) or PLA (85 patients) for up to 14 weeks. Those without recurrence during this treatment were followed up for another 6 months. Endoscopy and H. pylori culture were performed at the end of the treatment period and at the end of follow-up, and in between if ulcer symptoms recurred. During the treatment period the ulcer relapse rate was 5 of 58 (9%) in the PEN group and 34 of 68 (50%) in the PLA group (P < 0.0001, log-rank test), with 53% and 14%, respectively, of the patients in the two groups being H. pylori-negative. The relapse rate in the PEN group did not differ between H. pylori-negative and H. pylori-positive patients. The recurrence rate in the PEN group remained low for another 5 months but then approached the rate in the PLA group. The prevalence of H. pylori-negative patients at the end of follow-up was 20% in the PEN group and 10% in the PLA group. These data provide strong evidence that DU has a bacterial cause, with H. pylori as the likely agent.

Colonic Prostaglandin E2 Levels and Olsalazine Metabolism in Relapsing Ulcerative Colitis: Implications for Controlled Trials in the Long Term

To examine the tolerance and pharmacokinetics of long-term olsalazine administration, increasing doses of the drug were given to 31 patients with ulcerative colitis. All patients were refractory to or intolerant of sulphasalazine. Complete azo-reduction occurred in most cases. Concentrations of 5-ASA, but not acetyl-5-ASA, in faecal dialysates increased dose-dependently. Estimates of efficacy were more favourable among those intolerant of sulphasalazine. Patients with high prostaglandin E2 levels determined by equilibrium in vivo dialysis of rectum were less likely to benefit from treatment. In conclusion, olsalazine is a highly effective means of delivering 5-ASA to the colonic mucosa. Long-term use of olsalazine in controlled trials may be considered safe, even in high doses.