Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where K. M. Scharer is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by K. M. Scharer.


Geosphere | 2014

Rapid mapping of ultrafine fault zone topography with structure from motion

Kendra L. Johnson; Edwin Nissen; Srikanth Saripalli; J. Ramon Arrowsmith; Patrick McGarey; K. M. Scharer; Patrick L. Williams; Kimberly Blisniuk

Structure from Motion (SfM) generates high-resolution topography and coregistered texture (color) from an unstructured set of overlapping photographs taken from varying viewpoints, overcoming many of the cost, time, and logistical limitations of Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and other topographic surveying methods. This paper provides the first investigation of SfM as a tool for mapping fault zone topography in areas of sparse or low-lying vegetation. First, we present a simple, affordable SfM workflow, based on an unmanned helium balloon or motorized glider, an inexpensive camera, and semiautomated software. Second, we illustrate the system at two sites on southern California faults covered by existing airborne or terrestrial LiDAR, enabling a comparative assessment of SfM topography resolution and precision. At the first site, an ∼0.1 km 2 alluvial fan on the San Andreas fault, a colored point cloud of density mostly >700 points/m 2 and a 3 cm digital elevation model (DEM) and orthophoto were produced from 233 photos collected ∼50 m above ground level. When a few global positioning system ground control points are incorporated, closest point vertical distances to the much sparser (∼4 points/m 2 ) airborne LiDAR point cloud are mostly 530 points/m 2 and a 2 cm DEM and orthophoto were produced from 450 photos taken from ∼60 m above ground level. Closest point vertical distances to existing terrestrial LiDAR data of comparable density are mostly


Seismological Research Letters | 2015

The Mw 6.0 24 August 2014 South Napa Earthquake

Thomas M. Brocher; Annemarie S. Baltay; Jeanne L. Hardebeck; Fred F. Pollitz; Jessica R. Murray; Andrea L. Llenos; David P. Schwartz; James Luke Blair; Daniel J. Ponti; James J. Lienkaemper; V.E. Langenheim; Timothy E. Dawson; Kenneth W. Hudnut; David R. Shelly; Douglas S. Dreger; John Boatwright; Brad T. Aagaard; David J. Wald; Richard M. Allen; William D. Barnhart; Keith L. Knudsen; Benjamin A. Brooks; K. M. Scharer

The M wxa06.0 South Napa earthquake, which occurred at 10:20 UTC 24 August 2014 was the largest earthquake to strike the greater San Francisco Bay area since the M wxa06.9 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. The rupture from this right‐lateral earthquake propagated mostly unilaterally to the north and up‐dip, directing the strongest shaking toward the city of Napa, where peak ground accelerations (PGAs) between 45% g and 61% g were recorded and modified Mercalli intensities (MMIs) of VII–VIII were reported. Tectonic surface rupture with dextral slip of up to 46xa0cm was observed on a 12.5xa0km long segment, some of which was along a previously mapped strand of the West Napa fault system, although the rupture extended to the north of the mapped Quaternary strand. Modeling of seismic and geodetic data suggests an average coseismic slip of 50xa0cm, with a maximum slip of about 1xa0m at depths of 10–11xa0km. We observed up to 35xa0cm of afterslip along the surface trace in the week following the mainshock, primarily along the southern half of the surface rupture that experienced relatively little coseismic offset. Relocation of the sparse aftershock sequence suggests en echelon southwest‐ and northeast‐dipping fault planes, reflective of the complex fault geometry in this region. The Napa basin and historic and late Holocene alluvial flood deposits in downtown Napa amplified the ground motions there. Few ground failures were mapped, reflecting the dry season (as well as a persistent drought that had lowered the groundwater table) and the short duration of strong shaking in the epicentral area.nnThe South Napa fault rupture lies within an 80xa0km wide set of major north‐northwest‐trending faults of the San Andreas fault system, forming the boundary between the Pacific and North American tectonic …


Seismological Research Letters | 2014

Southern San Andreas Fault Evaluation Field Activity: Approaches to Measuring Small Geomorphic Offsets—Challenges and Recommendations for Active Fault Studies

K. M. Scharer; J. B. Salisbury; J R. Arrowsmith; Thomas K. Rockwell

In southern California, where fast slip rates and sparse vegetation contribute to crisp expression of faults and microtopography, field and high‐resolution topographic data (<1u2009u2009m/pixel) increasingly are used to investigate the mark left by large earthquakes on the landscape (e.g., Zielke etxa0al. , 2010; Zielke etxa0al. , 2012; Salisbury, Rockwell, etxa0al. , 2012, Madden etxa0al. , 2013). These studies measure offset streams or other geomorphic features along a stretch of a fault, analyze the offset values for concentrations or trends along strike, and infer that the common magnitudes reflect successive surface‐rupturing earthquakes along that fault section. Wallace (1968) introduced the use of such offsets, and the challenges in interpreting their “unique complex history” with offsets on the Carrizo section of the San Andreas fault; these were more fully mapped by Sieh (1978) and followed by similar field studies along other faults (e.g., Lindvall etxa0al. , 1989; McGill and Sieh, 1991). Results from such compilations spurred the development of classic fault behavior models, notably the characteristic earthquake and slip‐patch models, and thus constitute an important component of the long‐standing contrast between magnitude–frequency models (Schwartz and Coppersmith, 1984; Sieh, 1996; Hecker etxa0al. , 2013). The proliferation of offset datasets has led earthquake geologists to examine the methods and approaches for measuring these offsets, uncertainties associated with measurement of such features, and quality ranking schemes (Arrowsmith and Rockwell, 2012; Salisbury, Arrowsmith, etxa0al. , 2012; Gold etxa0al. , 2013; Madden etxa0al. , 2013). In light of this, the Southern San Andreas Fault Evaluation (SoSAFE) project at the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) organized a combined field activity and workshop (the “Fieldshop”) to measure offsets, compare techniques, and explore differences in interpretation. A thorough analysis of the measurements from the field activity will be provided separately; this …


Geophysical Research Letters | 2014

Paleoearthquakes at Frazier Mountain, California delimit extent and frequency of past San Andreas Fault ruptures along 1857 trace

K. M. Scharer; Ray J. Weldon; Ashley Streig; Thomas E. Fumal

Large earthquakes are infrequent along a single fault, and therefore historic, well-characterized earthquakes exert a strong influence on fault behavior models. This is true of the 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake (estimated M7.7–7.9) on the southern San Andreas Fault (SSAF), but an outstanding question is whether the 330 km long rupture was typical. New paleoseismic data for six to seven ground-rupturing earthquakes on the Big Bend of the SSAF restrict the pattern of possible ruptures on the 1857 stretch of the fault. In conjunction with existing sites, we show that over the last ~650 years, at least 75% of the surface ruptures are shorter than the 1857 earthquake, with estimated rupture lengths of 100 to <300 km. These results suggest that the 1857 rupture was unusual, perhaps leading to the long open interval, and that a return to pre-1857 behavior would increase the rate of M7.3–M7.7 earthquakes.


Geosphere | 2015

Validation of meter-scale surface faulting offset measurements from high-resolution topographic data

J. Barrett Salisbury; David E. Haddad; Thomas K. Rockwell; J R. Arrowsmith; C. Madugo; Olaf Zielke; K. M. Scharer

Studies of active fault zones have flourished with the availability of high-resolution topographic data, particularly where airborne light detection and ranging (lidar) and structure from motion (SfM) data sets provide a means to remotely analyze submeter-scale fault geomorphology. To determine surface offset at a point along a strike-slip earthquake rupture, geomorphic features (e.g., stream channels) are measured days to centuries after the event. Analysis of these and cumulatively offset features produces offset distributions for successive earthquakes that are used to understand earthquake rupture behavior. As researchers expand studies to more varied terrain types, climates, and vegetation regimes, there is an increasing need to standardize and uniformly validate measurements of tectonically displaced geomorphic features. A recently compiled catalog of nearly 5000 earthquake offsets across a range of measurement and reporting styles provides insight into quality rating and uncertainty trends from which we formulate best-practice and reporting recommendations for remote studies. In addition, a series of public and beginner-level studies validate the remote methodology for a number of tools and emphasize considerations to enhance measurement accuracy and precision for beginners and professionals. Our investigation revealed that (1) standardizing remote measurement methods and reporting quality rating schemes is essential for the utility and repeatability of fault-offset measurements; (2) measurement discrepancies often involve misinterpretation of the offset geomorphic feature and are a function of the investigator’s experience; (3) comparison of measurements made by a single investigator in different climatic regions reveals systematic differences in measurement uncertainties attributable to variation in feature preservation; (4) measuring more components of a displaced geomorphic landform produces more consistently repeatable estimates of offset; and (5) inadequate understanding of pre-event morphology and post-event modifications represents a greater epistemic limitation than the aleatoric limitations of the measurement process.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2017

Ground‐rupturing earthquakes on the northern Big Bend of the San Andreas Fault, California, 800 A.D. to Present

K. M. Scharer; Ray J. Weldon; Glenn P. Biasi; Ashley Streig; Thomas E. Fumal

Paleoseismic data on the timing of ground-rupturing earthquakes constrain the recurrence behavior of active faults and can provide insight on the rupture history of a fault if earthquakes dated at neighboring sites overlap in age and are considered correlative. This study presents the evidence and ages for 11 earthquakes that occurred along the Big Bend section of the southern San Andreas Fault at the Frazier Mountain paleoseismic site. The most recent earthquake to rupture the site was the Mw7.7–7.9 Fort Tejon earthquake of 1857. We use over 30 trench excavations to document the structural and sedimentological evolution of a small pull-apart basin that has been repeatedly faulted and folded by ground-rupturing earthquakes. A sedimentation rate of 0.4u2009cm/yr and abundant organic material for radiocarbon dating contribute to a record that is considered complete since 800u2009A.D. and includes 10 paleoearthquakes. Earthquakes have ruptured this location on average every ~100u2009years over the last 1200u2009years, but individual intervals range from ~22 to 186u2009years. The coefficient of variation of the length of time between earthquakes (0.7) indicates quasiperiodic behavior, similar to other sites along the southern San Andreas Fault. Comparison with the earthquake chronology at neighboring sites along the fault indicates that only one other 1857-size earthquake could have occurred since 1350u2009A.D., and since 800u2009A.D., the Big Bend and Mojave sections have ruptured together at most 50% of the time in Mwu2009≥u20097.3 earthquakes.


Archive | 2019

The San Andreas Fault System: Complexities Along a Major Transform Fault System and Relation to Earthquake Hazards

K. M. Scharer; Ashley Streig

Abstract The San Andreas fault system is a 1300-km-long transform boundary that accommodates motion between the North American and Pacific Plates. New technologies and data reveal rich details about the present configuration of faults, distribution of strain, and associated seismic hazard on this complex network of faults. This contribution provides a brief summary of the geologic history of the San Andreas fault system, followed by an introduction to recent research that has changed understanding of the hazards along the main faults. Organized by region, we highlight a selection of recent research using new geodetic techniques, improved topographic data, advanced geochronologic methods, and high-resolution geophysics. The contribution ends with a review of the historic earthquakes on the San Andreas and San Jacinto faults, comparing these to past ruptures interpreted from paleoseismic studies.


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2013

The 2011 Mw 7.1 Van (Eastern Turkey) earthquake

J. R. Elliott; Alexander Charles Copley; R. Holley; K. M. Scharer; Barry Parsons


Open-File Report | 2002

An update of Quaternary faults of central and eastern Oregon

Ray J. Weldon; D.K. Fletcher; Elise M. Weldon; K. M. Scharer; P.A. McCrory


Archive | 2003

Paleoseismic Data Used to Evaluate Long Term Earthquake Behavior

K. M. Scharer; R. J. Weldon; Thomas E. Fumal; Glenn P. Biasi

Collaboration


Dive into the K. M. Scharer's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas E. Fumal

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrea L. Llenos

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Annemarie S. Baltay

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Benjamin A. Brooks

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge