K. Moritani

Importance of left atrial function in patients with myocardial infarction.

Left atrial function was evaluated in patients with and without remote myocardial infarction. The simultaneous left atrial pressure recording and left atrial and left ventricular cineangiograms were obtained with a catheter-tip micromanometer. The pressure-volume curve of the left atrium was composed of an A-loop and a V-loop. The ratio of active atrial emptying to left ventricular stroke volume in patients with myocardial infarction was significantly larger than that in normal subjects (42 + 12% vs 29 + 10%, p < 0.05). The left atrial work was also significantly greater in patients with myocardial infarction (1690 + 717 mm Hgml) than in normal subjects (940 426 mm Hg-ml, p < 0.05). The ratio of active atrial emptying to left ventricular stroke volume and left atrial work were significantly related in both normal subjects and patients with myocardial infarction (y = 0.72, p < 0.01). The left ventricular ejection fraction correlated inversely with left atrial work (y = - 0.5, p < 0.05). Left atrial work also showed a significant linear correlation with left atrial volume before active atrial emptying (y = 0.82, p < 0.01). We conclude that the left atrial contribution to left ventricular function is increased in patients with remote myocardial infarction. This left atrial contribution to the left ventricle is attributed to the Frank- Starling mechanism in the left atrium.

Clinical characteristics of left ventricular pressure decline during isovolumic relaxation in normal and diseased hearts

To compare two expressions of the time constant for ventricular relaxation, 39 patients with various heart diseases (six normal, six angina pectoris [AP], 13 myocardial infarction [MI], eight hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [HCM], and six congestive cardiomyopathy [CCM]) were studied. One time constant was obtained by the method of Weiss et al. (T1) and the other was the ratio of left ventricular pressure at peak (-) dP/dt (Pm) to peak (-) dP/dt (T2). The deviation of T2 from T1 was expressed as 100 X (T2 - T1)/T1 (delta %). In normal subjects, T1 was nearly equal to T2 (32 +/- 3 and 32 +/- 6 msec, respectively), resulting in a low value of delta (-1 +/- 9). However, delta values in AP (20 +/- 23, p less than 0.05), MI (24 +/- 26, p less than 0.05), HCM (37 +/- 21, p less than 0.001), and CCM (46 +/- 24, p less than 0.001) were significantly higher than in normal subjects. Thus T1, T2, or delta separated the patient groups from the control subjects, and there were significant differences between T1 and T2 among the types of heart disease.