Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where K. Nakagawa is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by K. Nakagawa.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2011

Biomarker Analyses and Final Overall Survival Results From a Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, First-Line Study of Gefitinib Versus Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Clinically Selected Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Asia (IPASS)

M. Fukuoka; Yi-Long Wu; Sumitra Thongprasert; Patrapim Sunpaweravong; Swan Swan Leong; Virote Sriuranpong; Tsu Yi Chao; K. Nakagawa; Da Tong Chu; Nagahiro Saijo; Emma Duffield; Yuri Rukazenkov; Georgina Speake; Haiyi Jiang; Alison Armour; Ka Fai To; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Tony Mok

PURPOSEnThe results of the Iressa Pan-Asia Study (IPASS), which compared gefitinib and carboplatin/paclitaxel in previously untreated never-smokers and light ex-smokers with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma were published previously. This report presents overall survival (OS) and efficacy according to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) biomarker status.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnIn all, 1,217 patients were randomly assigned. Biomarkers analyzed were EGFR mutation (amplification mutation refractory system; 437 patients evaluable), EGFR gene copy number (fluorescent in situ hybridization; 406 patients evaluable), and EGFR protein expression (immunohistochemistry; 365 patients evaluable). OS analysis was performed at 78% maturity. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess biomarker status by randomly assigned treatment interactions for progression-free survival (PFS) and OS.nnnRESULTSnOS (954 deaths) was similar for gefitinib and carboplatin/paclitaxel with no significant difference between treatments overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.02; P = .109) or in EGFR mutation-positive (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.33; P = .990) or EGFR mutation-negative (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.63; P = .309; treatment by EGFR mutation interaction P = .480) subgroups. A high proportion (64.3%) of EGFR mutation-positive patients randomly assigned to carboplatin/paclitaxel received subsequent EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. PFS was significantly longer with gefitinib for patients whose tumors had both high EGFR gene copy number and EGFR mutation (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.67) but significantly shorter when high EGFR gene copy number was not accompanied by EGFR mutation (HR, 3.85; 95% CI, 2.09 to 7.09).nnnCONCLUSIONnEGFR mutations are the strongest predictive biomarker for PFS and tumor response to first-line gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel. The predictive value of EGFR gene copy number was driven by coexisting EGFR mutation (post hoc analysis). Treatment-related differences observed for PFS in the EGFR mutation-positive subgroup were not apparent for OS. OS results were likely confounded by the high proportion of patients crossing over to the alternative treatment.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1992

CPT-11 in combination with cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Noriyuki Masuda; M. Fukuoka; Minoru Takada; Yoko Kusunoki; Shunichi Negoro; Kaoru Matsui; Shinzoh Kudoh; Nobuhide Takifuji; K. Nakagawa; S Kishimoto

PURPOSEnThe purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and the dose-limiting toxicities of CPT-11, a new derivative of camptothecin, in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnTwenty-seven previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were assessable for toxicity, and 26 were assessable for response. The initial dose of CPT-11 was 30 mg/m2 given as a 90-minute intravenous (IV) infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with cisplatin (80 mg/m2 IV on day 1) given every 4 weeks. The dose of CPT-11 was escalated in increments of 10 mg/m2 until severe or life-threatening toxic effects were observed.nnnRESULTSnSignificant toxicity was infrequent up to 60 mg/m2 of CPT-11. The maximum-tolerated toxicity was reached at a dose of 70 mg/m2. Three of six patients either had leukocyte count nadirs of less than 2,000/microL or experienced grade 4 diarrhea during the first cycle of therapy at 70 mg/m2. The major toxic effects were leukopenia and diarrhea. There were 14 partial responses (54%) among the 26 patients.nnnCONCLUSIONSnA combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin seems to be effective against NSCLC with acceptable toxicities. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 60 mg/m2 of CPT-11 on days 1, 8, and 15, and 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin on day 1 every 4 weeks.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1994

Phase I study of irinotecan and cisplatin with granulocyte colony- stimulating factor support for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Noriyuki Masuda; M. Fukuoka; Shinzoh Kudoh; Yoko Kusunoki; Kaoru Matsui; K. Nakagawa; Tomonori Hirashima; M Tamanoi; T Nitta; Takashi Yana

PURPOSEnSince leukopenia was one of the dose-limiting toxicities of the combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin in a previous trial, we conducted a phase I trial to investigate whether support with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) would permit further intensification of the CPT-11 dose in combination with a fixed cisplatin dose.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnTwenty previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with CPT-11 on days 1, 8, and 15 in combination with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1. In addition, rhG-CSF (2 micrograms/kg/d) was administered on days 4 to 21, except on the days of CPT-11 treatment. The starting dose of CPT-11 was 70 mg/m2, and the CPT-11 dose was escalated in 10-mg/m2 increments until the maximum-tolerated dose was reached.nnnRESULTSnDiarrhea was the dose-limiting toxicity at 90 mg/m2. Two of six patients experienced either grade 3 or 4 diarrhea or grade 3 leukopenia during the first course of therapy at this dose level. Modest escalation of the CPT-11 dose from 80 to 90 mg/m2 resulted in a marked increase in the plasma concentration of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38). Occurrence of diarrhea was well correlated with the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of SN-38 (P = .035). There were 10 partial responses (50%) among 20 patients.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe recommended dose for phase II studies is 80 mg/m2 of CPT-11, and 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin plus rhG-CSF. With the use of rhG-CSF, the CPT-11 dose can be increased 33% above that in the original regimen (60 mg/m2 of CPT-11 and 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin).


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1994

Phase I and pharmacologic study of irinotecan and etoposide with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support for advanced lung cancer.

Noriyuki Masuda; M. Fukuoka; Shinzoh Kudoh; Kaoru Matsui; Yoko Kusunoki; Minoru Takada; K. Nakagawa; Tomonori Hirashima; H Tsukada; Takashi Yana

PURPOSEnWe conducted a phase I trial of irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, combined with etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) support because of the overlapping neutrophil toxicity of both drugs. The aim was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of CPT-11 combined with a fixed dose of etoposide in patients with advanced lung cancer, as well as the dose-limiting toxicities of this combination.nnnPATIENTS AND METHODSnTwenty-five patients with stage III or IV lung cancer, 15 (60%) with prior chemotherapy, were treated at 4-week intervals using CPT-11 (90-minute intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15) plus etoposide (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 to 3). In addition, rhG-CSF (2 micrograms/kg/d) was given from day 4 to day 21, except on the days of CPT-11 administration. The starting dose of CPT-11 was 60 mg/m2, and it was escalated in 10-mg/m2 increments until the maximum-tolerated dose was reached.nnnRESULTSnThe maximum-tolerated dose of CPT-11 was 90 mg/m2, since two of the three patients developed grade 3 to 4 leukopenia or grade 3 to 4 diarrhea during the first cycle of treatment at this dose level. Diarrhea and leukopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities, while thrombocytopenia was only a moderate problem. Elimination of CPT-11 was biphasic, with a mean +/- SD beta half-life of 18.17 +/- 9.09 hours. The mean terminal half-life of 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38; the major metabolite of CPT-11) was 43.40 +/- 37.84 hours. There was one complete response (5%) and eight partial responses (38%) among 21 assessable patients, for an overall response rate of 43%. The response rates for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were 58% (seven of 12 patients) and 22% (two of nine patients), respectively.nnnCONCLUSIONnThe combination of CPT-11 and etoposide with rhG-CSF support seems to be active against lung cancer, especially SCLC, with acceptable toxicity. The recommended dose for phase II studies in previously untreated patients is 80 mg/m2 of CPT-11 (days 1, 8, and 15) and 80 mg/m2 of etoposide (days 1 to 3) plus 2 micrograms/kg of rhG-CSF (days 4 to 21, except when CPT-11 is given). In addition, 70 mg/m2 of CPT-11 appears to be the appropriate dose for previously treated patients receiving this regimen.


Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology | 2011

Gemcitabine: Efficacy in the Treatment of Advanced Stage Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Hidetoshi Hayashi; Takayasu Kurata; K. Nakagawa

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in many countries. Approximately half of the patients with non-small cell lung cancer have advanced disease and systemic chemotherapy, especially platinum-based doublets, is currently the standard treatment. Several trials have recently indicated the importance of histological subtype for treatment with molecular target chemotherapy and pemetrexed. Over the last decade, gemcitabine, a pyrimidine nucleoside antimetabolite, has been one of the most effective agents for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. It is unknown whether histological type is a predictor of the outcome of treatment with this agent. This is a review of the past trials and reviews of first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, focusing on efficacy and safety of treatment with gemcitabine according to histological subtype.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005

Weekly paclitaxel (P) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

K. Nakagawa; M. Fukuoka; Nagahiro Saijo

7336 Background: Weekly schedule of P administration (WP) has already been extensively used especially for breast cancer due to its mild toxicity profile with the better feasibility than conventional tri weekly schedule of P administration.(TP). The present study was conducted to evalutate that WP may produce the same efficacy or toxicity profile for NSCLC as well as breast cancer. Patients and Methods: A single arm phase II study of WP was conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety in patients with advanced NSCLC. The present results were historically compared with the previous data of TP in the same trial group in Japan. Eligibility included < 75 years old, histologically or cytologically proven NSCLC, stage IIIB or IV, chemotherapy naive, and performance status (PS) of 0 to 2. Patients received Paclitaxel 100mg/sqm per week for 6 consecutive weeks followed by 1 week treatment off (1 course includes 7 weeks). On the other hand, patients in the historical TP group received P 210mg/sqm in every 3-weeks and...


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2008

Randomized phase III study of platinum-doublet chemotherapy followed by gefitinib versus continued platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results of West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group trial (WJTOG

Toyoaki Hida; Isamu Okamoto; Tatsuhiko Kashii; Miyako Satouchi; Yukito Ichinose; Nobuyuki Katakami; Masahiko Ando; Takayasu Kurata; K. Nakagawa; M. Fukuoka


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2004

The Four-Arm Cooperative Study (FACS) for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Kaoru Kubota; Yutaka Nishiwaki; Yasuo Ohashi; Nagahiro Saijo; Yuichiro Ohe; Tomohide Tamura; Shunichi Negoro; Yutaka Ariyoshi; K. Nakagawa; M. Fukuoka


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2011

Randomized phase III trial comparing weekly docetaxel (D)-cisplatin (P) combination with triweekly D alone in elderly patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An intergroup trial of JCOG0803/WJOG4307L.

Tetsuya Abe; Akira Yokoyama; Koji Takeda; Yuichiro Ohe; Shinzoh Kudoh; Yukito Ichinose; Hiroaki Okamoto; Noboru Yamamoto; Hiroshige Yoshioka; Koichi Minato; Toshiyuki Sawa; Yasuo Iwamoto; Hideo Saka; Junki Mizusawa; Taro Shibata; Shinichiro Nakamura; Masahiko Ando; K. Nakagawa; Nagahiro Saijo; Tomohide Tamura


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005

Randomized phase III study of docetaxel (D) versus vinorelbine (V) for elderly patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results of a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group trial (WJTOG9904)

Kouji Takeda; Shinzoh Kudoh; K. Nakagawa; Minoru Takada; Nobuyuki Katakami; Kaoru Matsui; M. Andoh; Taroh Satoh; Shunichi Negoro; M. Fukuoka

Collaboration


Dive into the K. Nakagawa's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kaoru Matsui

Hyogo College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Takayasu Kurata

Kansai Medical University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge