Kaan Tunceli

Employment pathways in a large cohort of adult cancer survivors

Employment and work‐related disability were investigated in a cohort of adult cancer survivors who were working when they were diagnosed from 1997 to 1999 with a variety of cancers. Employment from the time of diagnosis through the early years of survivorship was studied, self‐reported effects of cancer survival on disability and employment were quantified, and risk factors associated with cancer‐related disability and withdrawal from employment were identified.

Reducing the Health Risks of Diabetes How Self-determination Theory May Help Improve Medication Adherence and Quality of Life

Purpose The purpose of this study is to apply the self-determination theory (SDT) model of health behavior to predict medication adherence, quality of life, and physiological outcomes among patients with diabetes. Methods Patients with diabetes (N = 2973) receiving care from an integrated health care delivery system in 2003 and 2004 were identified from automated databases and invited to participate in this study. In 2005, patients responded to a mixed telephone-and-mail survey assessing perceived autonomy support from health care providers, autonomous self-regulation for medication use, perceived competence for diabetes self-management, medication adherence, and quality of life. In 2006, pharmacy claims data were used to indicate medication adherence, and patients non—high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, A1C, and glucose levels were assessed. Results The SDT model of health behavior provided adequate fit to the data. As hypothesized, perceived autonomy support from health care providers related positively to autonomous self-regulation for medication use, which in turn related positively to perceived competence for diabetes self-management. Perceived competence then related positively to quality of life and medication adherence, and the latter construct related negatively to non-HDL cholesterol, A1C, and glucose levels. Conclusions Health care providers support for patients autonomy and competence around medication use and diabetes self-management related positively to medication adherence, quality of life, and physiological outcomes among patients with diabetes.

Long-Term Effects of Obesity on Employment and Work Limitations Among U.S. Adults, 1986 to 1999

Objective: To determine the relationships between BMI and workforce participation and the presence of work limitations in a U.S. working‐age population.

Automated Outreach to Increase Primary Adherence to Cholesterol-Lowering Medications

BACKGROUNDnPrimary nonadherence occurs when new prescriptions are not dispensed. Little is known about how to reduce primary nonadherence. We performed a randomized controlled trial to evaluate an automated system to decrease primary nonadherence to statins for lowering cholesterol.nnnMETHODSnAdult members of Kaiser Permanente Southern California with no history of statin use within the past year who did not fill a statin prescription after 1 to 2 weeks were passively enrolled. The intervention group received automated telephone calls followed 1 week later by letters for continued nonadherence; the control group received no outreach. The primary outcome was a statin dispensed up to 2 weeks after delivery of the letter. Secondary outcomes included refills at intervals up to 1 year. Intervention effectiveness was determined by intent-to-treat analysis and Fisher exact test. Subgroups were examined using logistic regression.nnnRESULTSnThere were 2606 participants in the intervention group and 2610 in the control group. Statins were dispensed to 42.3% of intervention participants and 26.0% of control participants (absolute difference, 16.3%; P < .001). The relative risk for the intervention vs control group was 1.63 (95% CI, 1.50-1.76). Intervention effectiveness varied slightly by age (P = .045) but was effective across all age strata. Differences in the frequency of statin dispensations persisted up to 1 year (P < .001).nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe intervention was effective in reducing primary nonadherence to statin medications. Because of low marginal costs for outreach, this strategy appears feasible for reducing primary nonadherence. This approach may generalize well to other medications and chronic conditions.

Cancer Survivorship, Health Insurance, and Employment Transitions among Older Workers

This study examined the effect of job-related health insurance on employment transitions (labor force exits, reductions in hours, and job changes) of older working cancer survivors. Using multivariate models, we compared longitudinal data for the period 1997–2002 from the Penn State Cancer Survivor Study to similar data for workers with no cancer history in the Health and Retirement Study, who were also ages 55 to 64 at follow-up. The interaction of cancer survivorship with health insurance at diagnosis was negative and significant in predicting labor force exits, job changes, and transitions to part-time employment for both genders. The differential effect of jobrelated health insurance on the labor market dynamics of cancer survivors represents an additional component of the economic and psychosocial burden of cancer on survivors.

Factors associated with adherence to oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes

Aim To estimate the rate of adherence to oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes in the US and describe factors associated with adherence in these patients. Materials and methods In this retrospective cohort analysis, patients aged 18 years or older with a type 2 diabetes diagnosis received between 1 January 2007 and 31 March 2010 were identified using a large US-based health care claims database. The index date was defined as the date of the first prescription for oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy during this period. Patients had to have continuous enrollment in the claims database for 12 months before and after the index date. Adherence was assessed using proportion of days covered (PDC) and an adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with adherence (PDC ≥80%). Results Of the 133,449 eligible patients, the mean age was 61 years and 51% were men. Mean PDC was 75% and the proportion of patients adherent to oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy was 59%. Both mean PDC and PDC ≥80% increased with increasing age and the number of concomitant medications, and were slightly higher in men compared to women. Results from the logistic regression demonstrate an increased likelihood of non-adherence for patients who were younger, new to therapy, on a twice-daily dose, female, or on fewer than three concomitant medications compared to their reference groups. Higher average daily out-of-pocket pharmacy expense was also associated with an increased likelihood of non-adherence. All results were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Patient characteristics, treatment regimens, and out-of-pocket expenses were associated with adherence to oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy in our study.

Changes in LDL-C levels and goal attainment associated with addition of ezetimibe to simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin compared with titrating statin monotherapy

Background Many high-risk coronary heart disease (CHD) patients on statin monotherapy do not achieve guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals, and combination lipid-lowering therapy may be considered for these individuals. The effect of adding ezetimibe to simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin therapy versus titrating these statins on LDL-C changes and goal attainment in CHD or CHD risk-equivalent patients was assessed in a large, managed-care database in the US. Methods Eligible patients (n = 17,830), initially on statin monotherapy who were ≥18 years with baseline and follow-up LDL-C values, no concomitant use of other lipid-lowering therapy, and on lipid-lowering therapy for ≥42 days, were identified between November 1, 2002 and September 30, 2009. The percent change from baseline in LDL-C levels and the odds ratios for attainment of LDL-C <1.8 and <2.6 mmol/L (70 and 100 mg/dL) were estimated using an analysis of covariance and logistic regression, respectively, adjusted for various baseline factors. Results LDL-C reductions from baseline and goal attainment improved substantially in patients treated with ezetimibe added onto simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin therapy (n = 2,312) versus those (n = 13,053) who titrated these statins. In multivariable models, percent change from baseline in LDL-C was −13.1% to −14.8% greater for those who added ezetimibe onto simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin versus those who titrated. The odds of attaining LDL-C <1.8 and <2.6 mmol/L (70 and 100 mg/dL) increased by 2.6–3.2-fold and 2.5–3.1-fold, respectively, in patients who added ezetimibe onto simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin versus titrating statins. Conclusion CHD/CHD risk-equivalent patients in a large US managed-care database, who added ezetimibe onto simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin, had greater LDL-C reductions and goal attainment than those who uptitrated these statin therapies. Our study suggests that high-risk CHD patients in need of more intensive LDL-C lowering therapy may benefit by adding ezetimibe onto statin therapy.

Use of Add-on Treatment to Metformin Monotherapy for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Suboptimal Glycemic Control: A U.S. Database Study

BACKGROUNDnThe American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommends metformin to treat individuals diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and recommends that hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) be maintained below or around 7%. If the HbA1c target is not achieved or maintained by metformin monotherapy at maximal tolerated dose over 3 to 6 months, treatment modification with addition of a second oral antihyperglycemic agent or by initiating insulin is recommended. Despite the importance of attaining and maintaining HbA1c goals, actual treatment behavior may not follow ADA guidelines to add a second oral agent or to initiate insulin as expected even considering that individual patients needs are taken into account when treatment decisions are made.nnnOBJECTIVEnTo evaluate treatment addition for metformin monotherapy users with suboptimal glycemic control and associated factors.nnnMETHODSnA retrospective health care claims study identified 7,109 subjects aged 18 to 89 years, treated for type 2 diabetes with an HbA1c > 7% following at least 60 days of continuous metformin monotherapy. Subjects were required to have 12 months continuous enrollment with the health plan before and after the index lab date. Pharmacological treatment additions after the HbA1c lab result and time to treatment addition were evaluated. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the patient characteristics and comorbidities associated with the treatment addition.nnnRESULTSnThirty-eight percent of study subjects had evidence of addition of a second antidiabetic medication to primary metformin monotherapy, 57.5% remained on metformin monotherapy, and 4.5% discontinued metformin altogether. A logistic regression model found age inversely related to treatment addition: age 45-64 versus 18-44 (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.59-0.99) and age 65-89 versus 18-44 (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.43-0.74). HbA1c was positively related to treatment addition: > 8%-9% versus > 7%-8% (OR = 2.31, 95% CI = 2.00-2.67); > 9%-10% versus > 7%-8% (OR = 2.88, 95% CI = 2.32-3.58); and > 10% versus > 7%-8% (OR = 3.54, 95% CI = 2.92-4.28). Evidence of ophthalmic disorder was not related to treatment addition (P = 0.056), but evidence of hypertension (OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.28-1.89); hyperlipidemia (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.05-1.55); other cardiovascular diseases (OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.16-1.45); obesity (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.08-1.36); and renal disease (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.21-1.51) were associated.nnnCONCLUSIONSnThe majority of the metformin monotherapy users with suboptimal glycemic control did not initiate add-on therapy as recommended by guidelines, and prolonged time on metformin monotherapy demonstrated clinical inertia in real-world clinical practice. Several factors were associated with this delay including older age, lower index HbA1c, and lack of evidence of certain comorbidities.

A simulation model approach to analysis of the business case for eliminating health care disparities

BackgroundPurchasers can play an important role in eliminating racial and ethnic disparities in health care. A need exists to develop a compelling business case from the employer perspective to put, and keep, the issue of racial/ethnic disparities in health care on the quality improvement agenda for health plans and providers.MethodsTo illustrate a method for calculating an employer business case for disparity reduction and to compare the business case in two clinical areas, we conducted analyses of the direct (medical care costs paid by employers) and indirect (absenteeism, productivity) effects of eliminating known racial/ethnic disparities in mammography screening and appropriate medication use for patients with asthma. We used Markov simulation models to estimate the consequences, for defined populations of African-American employees or health plan members, of a 10% increase in HEDIS mammography rates or a 10% increase in appropriate medication use among either adults or children/adolescents with asthma.ResultsThe savings per employed African-American woman aged 50-65 associated with a 10% increase in HEDIS mammography rate, from direct medical expenses and indirect costs (absenteeism, productivity) combined, was

Trends in lipid management among patients with diabetes

50. The findings for asthma were more favorable from an employer point of view at approximately