Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kaifeng Lu is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kaifeng Lu.


Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology | 2015

Efficacy and Safety of Cariprazine in Acute Exacerbation of Schizophrenia: Results From an International, Phase III Clinical Trial.

John M. Kane; S. Zukin; Yao Wang; Kaifeng Lu; Adam Ruth; Krisztián Nagy; István Laszlovszky; Suresh Durgam

Abstract This phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of cariprazine, a dopamine D3 and D2 receptor partial agonist with preferential binding to D3 receptors, in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Patients were randomized to 6-week double-blind treatment with placebo, cariprazine 3 to 6 mg/d, or cariprazine 6 to 9 mg/d. Primary and secondary efficacy: change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scores, respectively, analyzed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures adjusting for multiple comparisons. Safety included treatment-emergent adverse events, clinical laboratory values, vital signs, electrocardiograms, ophthalmologic examination, Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale, and extrapyramidal symptom scales. In the Safety Population (placebo, n = 147; cariprazine 3–6 mg/d, n = 151; cariprazine 6–9 mg/d, n = 148), 60.5% of patients completed the study. At week 6, statistically significant least squares mean differences in favor of cariprazine versus placebo were observed for Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score (3–6 mg/d: −6.8, P = 0.003; 6–9 mg/d: −9.9, P < 0.001) and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (3–6 mg/d: −0.3, P = 0.012; 6–9 mg/d: −0.5, P < 0.001). Common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥5% and twice the rate of placebo) in both cariprazine groups were akathisia, extrapyramidal disorder, and tremor; most were mild to moderate in severity. Mean changes in metabolic parameters were generally small and similar between groups. Prolactin levels decreased in all groups. In conclusion, cariprazine 3 to 6 and 6 to 9 mg/d versus placebo demonstrated significant improvement on primary and secondary efficacy parameters. Cariprazine was generally well tolerated. These results suggest that cariprazine may be a new and effective treatment for schizophrenia.


The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry | 2015

Cariprazine in acute exacerbation of schizophrenia: A fixed-dose, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial

Suresh Durgam; Andrew J. Cutler; Kaifeng Lu; Raffaele Migliore; Adam Ruth; István Laszlovszky; György Németh; Herbert Y. Meltzer

OBJECTIVE This phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cariprazine in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. METHOD This multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled study was conducted from April 2010 to December 2011. Patients who met DSM-IV-TR criteria for schizophrenia were randomized to placebo (n = 153), cariprazine 3 mg/d (n = 155), cariprazine 6 mg/d (n = 157), or aripiprazole 10 mg/d (n = 152) for 6 weeks of double-blind treatment. The primary and secondary efficacy parameters were mean change from baseline to week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score, respectively. RESULTS Least squares mean differences (LSMDs) in PANSS total score change at week 6 significantly favored cariprazine 3 and 6 mg/d versus placebo (LSMD [95% CI]: 3 mg/d, -6.0 [-10.1 to -1.9], adjusted P = .0044; 6 mg/d, -8.8 [-12.9 to -4.7], adjusted P < .0001). Cariprazine 3 and 6 mg/d were also associated with significant improvements relative to placebo in CGI-S scores (LSMD [95% CI]: 3 mg/d, -0.4 [-0.6 to -0.2], adjusted P = .0044; 6 mg/d, -0.5 [-0.7 to -0.3], adjusted P < .0001). Significant differences from placebo were also observed with aripiprazole on the PANSS (LSMD [95% CI]: -7.0 [-11.0 to -2.9], P = .0008) and CGI-S (LSMD [95% CI]: -0.4 [-0.6 to -0.2], P = .0001). Common treatment-emergent adverse events (≥ 10%) were insomnia (all groups), akathisia (cariprazine 6 mg/d), and headache (placebo, cariprazine 6 mg/d). CONCLUSIONS This study supports the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cariprazine 3 and 6 mg/d in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01104766.


Journal of Affective Disorders | 2015

Cariprazine in the treatment of acute mania in bipolar I disorder: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial

Gary S. Sachs; William M. Greenberg; Anju Starace; Kaifeng Lu; Adam Ruth; István Laszlovszky; György Németh; Suresh Durgam

BACKGROUND This Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of flexibly-dosed cariprazine in patients with acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. METHODS Patients were randomized to 3 weeks of double-blind treatment with cariprazine 3-12mg/day (n=158) or placebo (n=154). The primary efficacy parameter was change from baseline to Week 3 in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score. The secondary efficacy parameter was change from baseline to Week 3 in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score. RESULTS Mean change from baseline to Week 3 in YMRS total score was significantly greater for patients receiving cariprazine 3-12mg/day versus placebo (P=0.0004). Significant differences between groups in YMRS total score mean change were observed by Day 4 (first postbaseline assessment) and maintained throughout double-blind treatment (all assessments, P<0.01). Cariprazine also demonstrated statistically significant superiority over placebo on YMRS response (≥50% improvement: cariprazine, 58.9%; placebo, 44.1%; P=0.0097) and remission (YMRS total score≤12: cariprazine, 51.9%; placebo, 34.9%; P=0.0025) and mean change in CGI-S (P=0.0027) score and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) (P=0.0035) total score. The most common cariprazine-related (≥10% and twice placebo) treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were akathisia, extrapyramidal disorder, tremor, dyspepsia, and vomiting. Mean change from baseline in metabolic parameters were generally small and similar between groups. LIMITATIONS Lack of active comparator arm; short duration of study. CONCLUSION In this study, cariprazine 3-12mg/day was effective and generally well tolerated in the treatment of manic and mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder.


The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry | 2015

Efficacy and safety of low- and high-dose Cariprazine in acute and mixed mania associated with bipolar i disorder: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Joseph R. Calabrese; Paul E. Keck; Anju Starace; Kaifeng Lu; Adam Ruth; István Laszlovszky; György Németh; Suresh Durgam

OBJECTIVE This phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of low- and high-dose cariprazine in patients meeting DSM-IV-TR criteria for acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. METHOD This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, fixed/flexible-dose study was conducted from February 2010 to December 2011. Patients were randomly assigned to placebo, cariprazine 3-6 mg/d, or cariprazine 6-12 mg/d for 3 weeks of double-blind treatment. Primary and secondary efficacy parameters were change from baseline to week 3 in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) score, respectively. Post hoc analysis examined change from baseline to week 3 in YMRS single items. RESULTS A total of 497 patients were randomized; 74% completed the study. The least squares mean difference (LSMD) for change from baseline to week 3 in YMRS total score was statistically significant in favor of both cariprazine groups versus placebo (LSMD [95% CI]: 3-6 mg/d, -6.1 [-8.4 to -3.8]; 6-12 mg/d, -5.9 [-8.2, -3.6]; P < .001 [both]). Both cariprazine treatment groups showed statistically significant superiority to placebo on all 11 YMRS single items (all comparisons, P < .05). Change from baseline in CGI-S scores was statistically significantly greater in both cariprazine groups compared with placebo (LSMD [95% CI]: 3-6 mg/d, -0.6 [-0.9 to -0.4]; 6-12 mg/d, -0.6 [-0.9 to -0.3]; P < .001 [both]). The most common (≥ 5% and twice the rate of placebo) treatment-related adverse events for cariprazine were akathisia (both groups) and nausea, constipation, and tremor (6-12 mg/d only). CONCLUSIONS Results of this study demonstrated that both low- and high-dose cariprazine were more effective than placebo in the treatment of acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder. Cariprazine was generally well tolerated, although the incidence of akathisia was greater with cariprazine than with placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01058668.


Schizophrenia Research | 2016

Long-term cariprazine treatment for the prevention of relapse in patients with schizophrenia: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Suresh Durgam; Willie Earley; Rui Li; Dayong Li; Kaifeng Lu; István Laszlovszky; W. Wolfgang Fleischhacker; Henry A. Nasrallah

Cariprazine, a dopamine D3/D2 receptor partial agonist with preference for D3 receptors, has demonstrated efficacy in randomized controlled trials in schizophrenia. This multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cariprazine for relapse prevention in adults with schizophrenia; total study duration was up to 97weeks. Schizophrenia symptoms were treated/stabilized with cariprazine 3-9mg/d during 20-week open-label treatment consisting of an 8-week, flexible-dose run-in phase and a 12-week fixed-dose stabilization phase. Stable patients who completed open-label treatment could be randomized to continued cariprazine (3, 6, or 9mg/d) or placebo for double-blind treatment (up to 72weeks). The primary efficacy parameter was time to relapse (worsening of symptom scores, psychiatric hospitalization, aggressive/violent behavior, or suicidal risk); clinical measures were implemented to ensure safety in case of impending relapse. A total of 264/765 patients completed open-label treatment; 200 eligible patients were randomized to double-blind placebo (n=99) or cariprazine (n=101). Time to relapse was significantly longer in cariprazine- versus placebo-treated patients (P=.0010, log-rank test). Relapse occurred in 24.8% of cariprazine- and 47.5% of placebo-treated patients (hazard ratio [95% CI]=0.45 [0.28, 0.73]). Akathisia (19.2%), insomnia (14.4%), and headache (12.0%) were reported in ≥10% of patients during open-label treatment; there were no cariprazine adverse events ≥10% during double-blind treatment. Long-term cariprazine treatment was significantly more effective than placebo for relapse prevention in patients with schizophrenia. The long-term safety profile in this study was consistent with the safety profile observed in previous cariprazine clinical trials. ClincalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01412060.


The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry | 2016

The effect of cariprazine on hostility associated with schizophrenia: post hoc analyses from 3 randomized controlled trials.

Leslie Citrome; Suresh Durgam; Kaifeng Lu; Paul Ferguson; István Laszlovszky

OBJECTIVE Although most patients with schizophrenia are not aggressive, individuals with the disorder have increased risk of hostile behavior. Cariprazine, a dopamine D3 and D2 receptor partial agonist antipsychotic with preferential binding to D3 receptors, was evaluated for antihostility effects in patients with schizophrenia. METHOD Post hoc analyses were conducted using pooled data from 3 positive randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 studies in inpatients (18-60 years) with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia according to DSM-IV-TR criteria; data were collected between 2008 and 2011. The principal post hoc outcome was mean change from baseline to week 6 on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) hostility item (P7); separate analyses adjusted for certain PANSS positive symptoms and sedation covariates. Analyses were based on the pooled intent-to-treat population (N = 1,466) using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures approach; separate analyses were conducted in subgroups categorized by baseline hostility item scores (P7: ≥ 2, ≥ 3, ≥ 4). RESULTS The least squares mean difference (LSMD) in change from baseline to week 6 was statistically significant on all PANSS hostility item analyses in favor of cariprazine versus placebo: unadjusted (-0.28; P < .0001), adjusted for PANSS positive symptoms (-0.12; P < .05), adjusted for positive symptoms plus sedation (-0.12; P < .05). The magnitude of change for cariprazine increased with greater baseline hostility (LSMD vs placebo for ≥ 2, ≥ 3, ≥ 4 subgroups: -0.32, -0.37, -0.51, respectively; P < .01 all). CONCLUSIONS Significant improvement on the hostility item was seen in cariprazine- versus placebo-treated patients with schizophrenia; the effect of cariprazine increased with greater levels of baseline hostility. TRIALS REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00694707, NCT01104766, and NCT01104779.


European Neuropsychopharmacology | 2015

Effect of cariprazine across the symptoms of mania in bipolar I disorder: Analyses of pooled data from phase II/III trials

Eduard Vieta; Suresh Durgam; Kaifeng Lu; Adam Ruth; Marc Debelle; S. Zukin

Bipolar I disorder is a chronic disorder characterized by episodic recurrences of mania, depression, and mixed affective states interspersed with periods of full or partial remission; subsyndromal residual symptoms between episodes are common and disabling. Cariprazine, an atypical antipsychotic, is a potent dopamine D3 and D2 receptor partial agonist with preferential binding to D3 receptors. Post-hoc analyses of pooled data from 3 positive trials were conducted to evaluate the effect of cariprazine 3-12 mg/d on the symptoms of mania in inpatients (18-65 years) with bipolar I disorder and a current manic episode. Analyses were based on the pooled intent-to-treat (ITT) population (placebo=429; cariprazine=608). Mean change from baseline to the end of treatment on individual Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) items was analysed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM); categorical symptom severity shifts were analysed using logistic regression. Statistically significant improvement in mean change was seen for cariprazine versus placebo on all 11 YMRS items (p<0.0001); significantly more cariprazine- versus placebo-treated patients had mild/no symptoms at the end of treatment on 11 YMRS items (p<0.0001) and concurrently on the 4 YMRS core symptoms (irritability, speech, content, and disruptive-aggressive behaviour) (p<0.0001). Significantly more cariprazine- versus placebo-treated patients shifted from a Moderate/Worse or Marked/Worse Symptoms categories to Mild/No Symptoms on all 11 (p<0.0001) and 9 of 11 YMRS items (p<0.05), respectively. Results suggest that cariprazine treatment improved mania across YMRS symptoms; a significant percentage of cariprazine- versus placebo-treated patients had mild/no symptoms at the end of treatment.


International Clinical Psychopharmacology | 2017

Safety and tolerability of cariprazine in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia: a pooled analysis of four phase II/III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

Willie Earley; Suresh Durgam; Kaifeng Lu; István Laszlovszky; Marc Debelle; John M. Kane

Cariprazine, a potent dopamine D3 and D2 receptor partial agonist antipsychotic with preferential binding to D3 receptors, is Food and Drug Administration approved for treating schizophrenia and manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder. A post-hoc safety/tolerability analysis of data from the four acute trials in the cariprazine schizophrenia clinical development program (NCT00404573; NCT00694707; NCT01104766; NCT01104779) was carried out using the overall safety population (all patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug) and modal daily dose subgroups (1.5–3, 4.5–6, and 9–12 mg/day). These exploratory findings were summarized using descriptive statistics. Cariprazine was generally well tolerated. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events versus placebo was similar for cariprazine 1.5–3 mg/day and higher for cariprazine 4.5–6 and 9–12 mg/day; a dose–response relationship was observed for akathisia, extrapyramidal symptoms, and diastolic blood pressure. The mean changes in metabolic parameters were generally similar in cariprazine-treated and placebo-treated patients. There was no prolactin level increase or QTc value greater than 500 ms; small increases in mean body weight (∼1to2 kg) versus placebo were observed. Within the Food and Drug Administration-approved dose range (1.5−6 mg/day), cariprazine was generally safe and well tolerated in patients with schizophrenia.


European Neuropsychopharmacology | 2014

P.3.d.025 Safety and tolerability of cariprazine in long-term treatment of schizophrenia: integrated summary of safety data

H.A. Nasrallah; Andrew J. Cutler; Y. Wang; Kaifeng Lu; K. Nagy; I. Laszlovszky; Suresh Durgam

Schizophrenia is a chronic disorder that is associated with morbidity, mortality, and functional impairment. Long‐term antipsychotic treatment is usually required, but many patients discontinue therapy due to tolerability issues associated with the medication. Cariprazine, a potent dopamine D3 and D2 receptor partial agonist with preferential binding to D3 receptors, is in clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar mania, bipolar depression, and the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). The efficacy and safety of cariprazine in patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia was established in 3 Phase II/III clinical trials.1‐3 Pooled data from 2 open‐label studies (NCT011047924 and NCT008398525) evaluated the long‐term safety and tolerability of cariprazine in patients with schizophrenia.


Journal of Affective Disorders | 2018

Clinically relevant response and remission outcomes in cariprazine-treated patients with bipolar I disorder

Willie Earley; Suresh Durgam; Kaifeng Lu; Adam Ruth; György Németh; István Laszlovszky; Lakshmi N. Yatham

BACKGROUND Rates of response and remission are measures that endorse the clinical significance of treatment. Cariprazine is FDA approved for the acute treatment of schizophrenia and manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in adults. Post hoc analyses of pooled data from 3 pivotal trials of cariprazine in manic/mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder were conducted to investigate the effect of cariprazine on various criteria of response and remission. METHODS The constituent studies were 3-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel-group phase II/III studies in adult patients (age 18-65 years) with bipolar I disorder (NCT00488618, NCT01058096, NCT01058668). Post hoc analyses included Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) outcomes for response (≥50% decrease in score), remission (total score ≤12 and ≤8), cumulative remission, and global improvement. Additionally, composite remission (YMRS total score ≤12 plus Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score ≤12) and worsening/switch to depression (MADRS total score ≥15) by week were investigated. RESULTS Rates of response and remission were significantly greater for cariprazine versus placebo on every measure evaluated (P < .01 all analyses); the estimated number needed to treat for each measure was ≤10. There was no evidence of worsening/switch to depression. LIMITATIONS Post hoc analyses, short treatment duration, no active comparator. DISCUSSION Cariprazine-treated patients with bipolar I disorder attained clinically significant improvement in manic symptoms as shown by significantly greater rates of response and remission versus placebo; improvement in manic symptoms did not induce depressive symptoms.

Collaboration


Dive into the Kaifeng Lu's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Suresh Durgam

Forest Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew J. Cutler

University of South Florida

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. Zukin

Forest Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eduard Vieta

University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dayong Li

Forest Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge