Kaj Stenlöf

Effects of bariatric surgery on cancer incidence in obese patients in Sweden (Swedish Obese Subjects Study): a prospective, controlled intervention trial

BACKGROUND Obesity is a risk factor for cancer. Intentional weight loss in the obese might protect against malignancy, but evidence is limited. To our knowledge, the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study is the first intervention trial in the obese population to provide prospective, controlled cancer-incidence data. METHODS The SOS study started in 1987 and involved 2010 obese patients (body-mass index [BMI] >or=34 kg/m(2) in men, and >or=38 kg/m(2) in women) who underwent bariatric surgery and 2037 contemporaneously matched obese controls, who received conventional treatment. While the main endpoint of SOS was overall mortality, the main outcome of this exploratory report was cancer incidence until Dec 31, 2005. Cancer follow-up rate was 99.9% and the median follow-up time was 10.9 years (range 0-18.1 years). FINDINGS Bariatric surgery resulted in a sustained mean weight reduction of 19.9 kg (SD 15.6 kg) over 10 years, whereas the mean weight change in controls was a gain of 1.3 kg (SD 13.7 kg). The number of first-time cancers after inclusion was lower in the surgery group (n=117) than in the control group (n=169; HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53-0.85, p=0.0009). The sex-treatment interaction p value was 0.054. In women, the number of first-time cancers after inclusion was lower in the surgery group (n=79) than in the control group (n=130; HR 0.58, 0.44-0.77; p=0.0001), whereas there was no effect of surgery in men (38 in the surgery group vs 39 in the control group; HR 0.97, 0.62-1.52; p=0.90). Similar results were obtained after exclusion of all cancer cases during the first 3 years of the intervention. INTERPRETATION Bariatric surgery was associated with reduced cancer incidence in obese women but not in obese men. FUNDING Swedish Research Council, Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, Swedish Federal Government under the LUA/ALF agreement, Hoffmann La Roche, Cederoths, AstraZeneca, Sanofi-Aventis, Ethicon Endosurgery.

Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin monotherapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise

Canagliflozin is a sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitor in development for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The efficacy and safety of canagliflozin were evaluated in subjects with T2DM inadequately controlled with diet and exercise.

Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin treatment in older subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized trial.

Abstract Introduction: Canagliflozin is a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor developed for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Our randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01106651) evaluated the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin therapy in older subjects (aged 55–80 years) with T2DM inadequately controlled on their current regimen of blood glucose–lowering agents (any approved oral or injectable treatment). Methods: Subjects (N = 716) aged 55 to 80 years (mean, 63.6 years) with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels ≥ 7.0% to ≤ 10.0% were randomized. Seven hundred fourteen received canagliflozin 100 mg or 300 mg or placebo (1:1:1) daily. The prespecified primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c level at week 26. Prespecified secondary endpoints included proportion of subjects achieving HbA1c levels < 7.0%, change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level and systolic blood pressure (BP), and percent change from baseline in body weight, triglyceride levels, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level. Adverse events (AEs) were reported throughout the study. Results: At week 26, treatment with canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg significantly reduced HbA1c levels compared with placebo (−0.60%, corresp0.73%, corresp0.03%, respectively; P < 0.001); more subjects achieved HbA1c levels < 7.0%) with both canagliflozin doses compared with placebo (P < 0.001). Both canagliflozin doses significantly reduced body weight, FPG level, and systolic BP, and increased HDL-C level compared with placebo (P < 0.001); low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was increased with both canagliflozin doses compared with placebo. The overall AE incidence was slightly higher with canagliflozin 300 mg than with canagliflozin 100 mg or placebo (78.0%), 72.2%), 73.4%o, respectively). Serious AE and AE-related discontinuation rates were low across groups. Both canagliflozin doses were associated with higher rates than placebo of genital mycotic infections, urinary tract infections, and osmotic diuresis–related AEs (ie, pollakiuria, polyuria). Documented hypoglycemia rates were modestly higher with both canagliflozin doses compared with placebo. Conclusion: Canagliflozin improved glycemic control, reduced body weight and systolic BP, and was generally well tolerated in older subjects with T2DM who were on background therapy with a variety of blood glucose–lowering agents.

Long-term efficacy and safety of canagliflozin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and exercise: findings from the 52-week CANTATA-M study

Abstract Objective: Canagliflozin is a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor developed for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The long-term efficacy and safety of canagliflozin monotherapy were evaluated over 52 weeks in patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with diet and exercise. Research design and methods: This randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 study included a placebo-controlled, 26-week core period (canagliflozin 100 or 300 mg vs placebo) and an active-controlled, 26-week extension (blinded switch of placebo-treated patients to sitagliptin 100 mg [placebo/sitagliptin]). Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01081834. Main outcome measures: Efficacy endpoints assessed at 52 weeks included changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and systolic blood pressure (BP); and percentage changes in body weight and fasting plasma lipids. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. Efficacy data are reported for canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg (placebo/sitagliptin group was used to maintain the double-blind and to serve as a control group for safety purposes; not as an efficacy comparator); safety data are reported for canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg and placebo/sitagliptin. Results: Efficacy analyses included 451 patients who were randomized and dosed, entered the extension, and did not receive rescue therapy during the core period. Safety analyses included 584 patients who were randomized and dosed. At Week 52, canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg provided dose-related decreases from baseline in HbA1c of −0.81% and −1.11%. Canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg decreased FPG (−1.5 and −2.2 mmol/L [−27.4 and −39.1 mg/dL]), body weight (−3.3% and −4.4%), and systolic BP (−1.4 and −3.9 mmHg); decreased triglycerides and increased HDL-C and LDL-C were also seen. Over 52 weeks, overall AE rates were 67.2%, 66.0%, and 64.1% with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg and placebo/sitagliptin; rates of serious AEs and AE-related discontinuations were low across groups. Compared with placebo/sitagliptin, canagliflozin was associated with higher rates of genital mycotic infections and AEs related to osmotic diuresis; these led to few discontinuations. Rates of volume depletion AEs and documented hypoglycemia were low across groups. Conclusions: Canagliflozin monotherapy provided sustained improvement in glycemic control and body weight reduction, and was generally well tolerated in patients with T2DM over 52 weeks.

Long-term efficacy and safety of canagliflozin over 104 weeks in patients aged 55–80 years with type 2 diabetes

The long‐term efficacy and safety of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitor, was evaluated over 104 weeks in patients aged 55–80 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on a stable antihyperglycaemic agent regimen.

Intestinal Permeability Is Associated With Visceral Adiposity in Healthy Women

Increased visceral fat, as opposed to subcutaneous/gluteal, most strongly relates to key metabolic dysfunctions including insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis, and inflammation. Mesenteric fat hypertrophy in patients with Crohns disease and in experimental rodent models of gut inflammation suggest that impaired gut barrier function with increased leakage of gut‐derived antigens may drive visceral lipid deposition. The aim of this study was to determine whether increased intestinal permeability is associated with visceral adiposity in healthy humans. Normal to overweight female subjects were recruited from a population‐based cohort. Intestinal permeability was assessed using the ratio of urinary excretion of orally ingested sucralose to mannitol (S/M). In study 1 (n = 67), we found a positive correlation between waist circumference and S/M excretion within a time frame of urine collection consistent with permeability of the lower gastrointestinal tract (6–9 hours post‐ingestion; P = 0.022). These results were followed up in study 2 (n = 55) in which we used computed tomography and dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry to measure visceral and subcutaneous fat areas of the abdomen, liver fat content, and total body fat of the same women. The S/M ratio from the 6–12 h urine sample correlated with visceral fat area (P = 0.0003) and liver fat content (P = 0.004), but not with subcutaneous or total body fat. This novel finding of an association between intestinal permeability and visceral adiposity and liver fat content in healthy humans suggests that impaired gut barrier function should be further explored as a possible mediator of excess visceral fat accumulation and metabolic dysfunction.

Increased Postprandial Energy Expenditure May Explain Superior Long Term Weight Loss after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Compared to Vertical Banded Gastroplasty

Background and Aims Gastric bypass results in greater weight loss than Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In addition to effects on energy intake the two bariatric techniques may differentially influence energy expenditure (EE). Gastric bypass in rats increases postprandial EE enough to result in elevated EE over 24 hours. This study aimed to investigate alterations in postprandial EE after gastric bypass and VBG in humans. Methods Fourteen women from a randomized clinical trial between gastric bypass (n = 7) and VBG (n = 7) were included. Nine years postoperatively and at weight stability patients were assessed for body composition and calorie intake. EE was measured using indirect calorimetry in a respiratory chamber over 24 hours and focused on the periods surrounding meals and sleep. Blood samples were analysed for postprandial gut hormone responses. Results Groups did not differ regarding body composition or food intake either preoperatively or at study visit. Gastric bypass patients had higher EE postprandially (p = 0.018) and over 24 hours (p = 0.048) compared to VBG patients. Postprandial peptide YY (PYY) and glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) levels were higher after gastric bypass (both p<0.001). Conclusions Gastric bypass patients have greater meal induced EE and total 24 hours EE compared to VBG patients when assessed 9 years postoperatively. Postprandial satiety gut hormone responses were exaggerated after gastric bypass compared to VBG. Long-term weight loss maintenance may require significant changes in several physiological mechanisms which will be important to understand if non-surgical approaches are to mimic the effects of bariatric surgery.

Topiramate in the treatment of obese subjects with drug‐naive type 2 diabetes

Aim:  The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of topiramate as an adjunct to diet and exercise in drug‐naive, obese subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Feasibility of bariatric surgery as a strategy for secondary prevention in cardiovascular disease: a report from the Swedish Obese Subjects trial.

Aims. Evaluation of bariatric surgery as secondary prevention in obese patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). Methods. Analysis of data from 4047 subjects in the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOSs) study. Thirty-five patients with IHD are treated with bariatric surgery (n = 21) or conventional treatment (n = 14). Mean follow-up is 10.8 years. Results. Bariatric surgery resulted in sustained weight loss during the study period. After 2 years, the surgery group displayed significant reductions in cardiovascular risk factors, relief from cardiorespiratory symptoms, increments in physical activity, and improved quality of life. After 10 years, recovery from hypertension, diabetes, physical inactivity, and depression was still more common in the surgery group. There were no signs of increased cardiovascular morbidity or mortality in the surgery group. Conclusion. Bariatric surgery appears to be a safe and feasible treatment to achieve long-term weight loss and improvement in cardiovascular risk factors, symptoms, and quality of life in obese subjects with IHD.

Saxagliptin and metformin XR combination therapy provides glycemic control over 24 hours in patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with metformin

Abstract Objective: To assess 24-hour glycemic control with saxagliptin compared with placebo as add-on treatment to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and inadequate glycemic control. Research design and methods: This was a 4-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase IIIb trial comparing the antihyperglycemic activity of saxagliptin 5 mg once daily in combination with a stable dose of metformin extended release (XR) vs. placebo in combination with metformin XR in patients with T2DM inadequately controlled (screening glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] 7–10%) with stable doses of metformin immediate release or metformin XR ≥ 1500 mg/day. Ninety-three adult patients were randomized and received treatment. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to week 4 in 24-hour mean weighted glucose (MWG). Results: The reduction from baseline in 24-hour MWG was significantly greater for saxagliptin 5 mg + metformin XR (−13.8 mg/dL; −0.77 mmol/L) compared with placebo + metformin XR (3.0 mg/dL; 0.17 mmol/L) (p = 0.0001). At week 4, the mean decrease in plasma glucose was sustained through a 24-hour period in saxagliptin-treated patients. Treatment with saxagliptin 5 mg + metformin XR resulted in significant mean reductions from baseline in 4-hour mean weighted postprandial glucose (PPG), 2-hour PPG, 3-day average mean daily glucose, and fasting plasma glucose levels compared with placebo + metformin XR (p ≤ 0.001). The proportion of adverse events (AEs) was similar in the two treatment groups, with no reported hypoglycemic AEs in saxagliptin-treated patients. The 4-week evaluation period may have been insufficient to evaluate longer term effects on hyperglycemia or to identify additional AEs. Conclusions: In patients with T2DM treated with metformin XR, saxagliptin 5 mg orally administered once daily in the evening for 4 weeks effectively lowered plasma glucose concentrations through the 24-hour dosing interval and was well tolerated.