Kalliopi Andrikou

Neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: an emerging strategy.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths among men and women, being responsible for 6% of all cancer-related deaths. Surgical resection offers the only chance of cure, but only 15 to 20 percent of cases are potentially resectable at presentation. In recent years, increasing evidences support the use of neoadjuvant strategies in pancreatic cancer in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer as well as in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC in order to allow early treatment of micrometastatic disease, tumour regression, and reduced risk of peritoneal tumour implantation during surgery. Furthermore, neoadjuvant treatment allows evaluation of tumour response and increases patients compliance. However, most evidences in this setting come from retrospective analysis or small case series and in many studies chemotherapy or chemoradiation therapies used were suboptimal. Currently, prospective randomized trials using the most active chemotherapy regimens available are trying to define the real benefit of neoadjuvant strategies compared to conventional adjuvant strategies. In this review, the authors examined available data on neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer as well as in patients with borderline resectable or locally advanced PDAC and the future directions in this peculiar setting.

Toll like receptors and pancreatic diseases: From a pathogenetic mechanism to a therapeutic target

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) mediate interactions between environmental stimuli and innate immunity. TLRs play a major role in the development of numerous pancreatic diseases, making these molecules attractive as potential therapeutic targets. TLR2, TLR7 and TLR9 are involved in the initiation of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), whereas TLR2 and TLR4 play a major role in the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Furthermore, TLRs cause derangements in several tumor suppressor proteins (such as p16, p21, p27, p53 and pRb), induce STAT3 activation and promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition as well as oncogene-induced senescence. In this review we will focus on the contribution of TLRs in pancreatic disease including cancer and we describe recent progress in TLR-modulation for the treatment of these patients.

The value of lactate dehydrogenase serum levels as a prognostic and predictive factor for advanced pancreatic cancer patients receiving sorafenib

Although lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) serum levels, indirect markers of angiogenesis, are associated with a worse outcome in several tumours, their prognostic value is not defined in pancreatic cancer. Moreover, high levels are associated even with a lack of efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, contributing to explain negative results in clinical trials. We assessed the role of LDH in advanced pancreatic cancer receiving sorafenib. Seventy-one of 114 patients included in the randomised phase II trial MAPS (chemotherapy plus or not sorafenib) and with available serum LDH levels, were included in this analysis. Patients were categorized according to serum LDH levels (LDH ≤vs.> upper normal rate). A significant difference was found in progression free survival (PFS) and in overall survival (OS) between patients with LDH values under or above the cut-off (PFS: 5.2 vs. 2.7 months, p = 0.0287; OS: 10.7 vs. 5.9 months, p = 0.0021). After stratification according to LDH serum levels and sorafenib treatment, patients with low LDH serum levels treated with sorafenib showed an advantage in PFS (p = 0.05) and OS (p = 0.0012). LDH appears to be a reliable parameter to assess the prognosis of advanced pancreatic cancer patients, and it may be a predictive parameter to select patients candidate to receive sorafenib.

Tumor angiogenesis genotyping and efficacy of first-line chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer patients.

AIM Besides correlating with prognosis, tumor-driven angiogenesis also seemed able to influence response/resistance to chemotherapy in preclinical models. We examined the role of tumor angiogenesis genotyping in determining clinical outcome in metastatic gastric cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy. PATIENTS & METHODS VEGF-A, VEGF-C, FLT1, KDR and FLT4 genotyping was analyzed in gastric tumors from patients receiving platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. RESULTS VEGF-A rs25648 correlated with response rate (partial response: 18% among patients showing the VEGF-A rs25648 CT or TT genotype vs 44% among patients showing the VEGF-A rs25648 C genotype; p = 0.04). At multivariate analysis only VEGF-A rs25648 maintained an independent role in determining median progression-free survival (hazard ratio: 1.65 95% CI: 1.12-2.78) and overall survival (hazard ratio: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.17-2.65). CONCLUSION VEGF-A rs25648 genotyping may help identify a patient subgroup unlikely to benefit from a first-line, platinum-based combination and potential candidates for alternative therapy choices.

Cetuximab: still an option in the treatment of pancreatic cancer?

Introduction: In this review, we analyzed the current literature about cetuximab to clarify its role in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Using single-agent gemcitabine has been the standard treatment for more than 15 years for advanced pancreatic cancer. The attempts at improving the results by combining it with several other drugs, such as fluorouracil, cisplatin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, or pemetrexed produced no clear survival benefit. Recently, however, new combination chemotherapy regimens (e.g., FOLFIRINOX, nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine) achieved a significant survival benefit compared to gemcitabine alone. Areas covered: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) transmembrane glycoprotein has been demonstrated to be overexpressed in pancreatic cancer, and it correlates with more advanced disease, poor survival, and the presence of metastases. Therefore, inhibition of the EGFR signaling pathway could be an attractive therapeutic target in this tumor. Although several combinations of EGFR inhibitors with chemotherapy demonstrate inhibition of tumor-induced angiogenesis, tumor cell apoptosis, and regression in xenograft models, these benefits remain to be confirmed. Expert opinion: The encouraging results from preclinical and early clinical studies with cetuximab in pancreatic cancer were not confirmed in a Phase III trial. Cetuximab failed to demonstrate improved patient outcome when paired with various chemotherapeutic regimens and/or other biological agents.

Angiogenesis genotyping in the selection of first-line treatment with either sunitinib or pazopanib for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Introduction Recent data from the COMPARZ study seem to suggest a non-inferiority of pazopanib confronted with sunitinib in PFS and OS. We previously reported how VEGF and VEGFR polymorphisms might have a predictive role in patients treated with first-line sunitinib. Aim of our study was to investigate whether tumour angiogenesis genotyping could influence clinical outcome in RCC patients treated with either sunitinib or pazopanib, in order to help clinicians select the appropriate treatment for each patient. Results 19 patients were treated with pazopanib while 78 received sunitinib. VEGF A rs833061 resulted significant in PFS in sunitinib vs pazopanib patients (CC+CT>TT in sunitinib, TT>CC+CT in pazopanib; p<0,0001); VEGF A rs2010963 resulted significant in PFS in sunitinib vs pazopanib patients (GG+CG>CC in sunitinib, CC>GG+CG in pazopanib; p<0,0001); VEGF A rs699947 resulted significant in PFS in sunitinib vs pazopanib patients (AA+AC>CC in sunitinib, CC>AA+AC in pazopanib; p<0,0001). OS showed no statistically significant difference. Conclusions in our analysis patients with opposite polymorphisms of rs833061, rs2010963, rs699947 of VEGF A seems to have a better PFS if treated with either sunitinib or pazopanib. Our data seem to suggest that biology could have a role choosing first line treatment for mRCC patients. Methods a retrospective analysis on 97 histologic samples of mRCC patients was conducted for VEGF-A, VEGF-C and VEGFR-1,2,3 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

Risk of pruritus in cancer patients treated with biological therapies: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

BACKGROUND Pruritus has been described with targeted therapies in cancer patients. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to determine the incidence and RR in patients with cancer treated with these agents. METHODS PubMed databases were searched for articles published till October 2014. Eligible studies were selected according to PRISMA statement. Summary incidence, RR, and 95% CIs were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity of selected studies. FINDINGS A total of 4803 potentially relevant trials were identified; of them, 33 randomized phase III studies were included in this meta-analysis; 20,151 patients treated with 14 distinct targeted agents were available for this analysis; 8816 (44%) had Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 12,257 had other malignancies. The highest incidences of all-grade pruritus were observed with panitumumab (56.8) and gefitinib (49.4), while the lowest incidences were reported by erlotinib (3.6) and sunitinib (5.8). In addition, the highest incidence of high-grade pruritus was reported by gefitinib (5.9). The summary RR of developing all-grade and high-grade pruritus with targeted agents vs. controls were 2.2 and 2.6, respectively. The highest RRs of all-grade pruritus were associated with panitumumab (25.6) and ipilimumab (4.5). Grouping by drug category, the RR of all-grade pruritus with anti-EGFR mAbs was 2.84 (95% CI 2.39 to 3.37) compared to anti-EGFR/HER2 TKIs and 1.24 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.49) to immunotherapy. INTERPRETATION Treatment with biological therapy in cancer patients is associated with a significant increase in the risk of pruritus, and frequent clinical monitoring of pruritus should be emphasized when managing these and newer targeted agents.

Angiogenesis genotyping and clinical outcome during regorafenib treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Regorafenib monotherapy is a potential option for metastatic colorectal cancer patients. However, the lack of predictive factors and the severe toxicities related to treatment have made its use in clinical practice challenging. Polymorphisms of VEGF and its receptor (VEGFR) genes might regulate angiogenesis and thus potentially influence outcome during anti-angiogenesis treatment such as regorafenib. Aim of our study was to evaluate the role of VEGF and VEGFR genotyping in determining clinical outcome for colorectal cancer patients receiving regorafenib. We retrospectively collected clinical data and samples (tumour or blood) of 138 metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with regorafenib. We analysed the correlation of different VEGF-A, VEGF-C and VEGFR-1,2,3 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with patients’ progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results from angiogenesis genotyping showed that only VEGF-A rs2010963 maintained an independent correlation with PFS and OS. Among clinical factors only ECOG PS was independently correlated with OS, whereas no correlation with PFS was evident. Grouping together those results allowed further patients stratification into 3 prognostic groups: favourable, intermediate and unfavourable. VEGF-A rs2010963 genotyping may represent an important tool for a more accurate selection of optimal candidates for regorafenib therapy.

Lactate Dehydrogenase in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Something Old, Something New

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver tumour (80–90%) and represents more than 5.7% of all cancers. Although in recent years the therapeutic options for these patients have increased, clinical results are yet unsatisfactory and the prognosis remains dismal. Clinical or molecular criteria allowing a more accurate selection of patients are in fact largely lacking. Lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) is a glycolytic key enzyme in the conversion of pyruvate to lactate under anaerobic conditions. In preclinical models, upregulation of LDH has been suggested to ensure both an efficient anaerobic/glycolytic metabolism and a reduced dependence on oxygen under hypoxic conditions in tumour cells. Data from several analyses on different tumour types seem to suggest that LDH levels may be a significant prognostic factor. The role of LDH in HCC has been investigated by different authors in heterogeneous populations of patients. It has been tested as a potential biomarker in retrospective, small, and nonfocused studies in patients undergoing surgery, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and systemic therapy. In the major part of these studies, high LDH serum levels seem to predict a poorer outcome. We have reviewed literature in this setting trying to resume basis for future studies validating the role of LDH in this disease.

Lgr5 expression, cancer stem cells and pancreatic cancer: results from biological and computational analyses

AIMS To determine the relationship between Lgr5 and other stemness markers and pathologic features in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) samples. MATERIALS & METHODS In 69 samples, Lgr5 was analyzed by qRT-PCR together with a panel of 29 genes. Bioinformatic analysis was carried out to identify a possible pathway regulating Lgr5 expression in PDAC. RESULTS Lgr5 expression was not associated with the expression of tested cancer stem cell markers. Moreover, it was not an independent predictor of survival neither at univariate analysis (p = 0.21) nor at multivariate analysis (p = 0.225). CONCLUSION Based on the lack of correlation between Lgr5 and tested cancer stem cell markers, Lgr5 does not seem to be a potential stemness marker or prognostic factor in PDAC.