Kamei S

The potential role of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate-specific antigen density in the detection of prostate cancer.

Aim:  Two‐thirds of patients with a gray‐zone prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level undergo unnecessary biopsy. Sensitivity is not yet sufficient to permit the use of modified PSA parameters or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging alone for prostate cancer screening. Thus, we evaluated the combination of MR imaging and PSA density (PSAD) for specificity and sensitivity.

A pretreatment nomogram predicting recurrence- and progression-free survival for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer in Japanese patients

PurposeOur aim was to provide nomograms that allow urologists to easily calculate a nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer patient’s risk of recurrence and progression.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 800 nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer patients newly diagnosed between 1991 and 2001 from the Gifu urothelial cancer registry program. We developed the nomogram using the original 500 patients and validated it using the remaining 300 patients. The prognostic factors of recurrence and progression were identified by multivariate analysis in 500 patients.ResultsIn the multivariate analysis, tumor number, shape, grade, and intravesical instillation were associated with recurrence-free survival. Tumor shape and grade were associated with progression-free survival. Six factors for recurrence and three factors for progression were used to make the nomogram. Using the original 500 patients who were modeled for the nomogram, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated to be 0.61 for recurrence and 0.71 for progression. To validate nomogram performance, we applied an additional 300 patients to the nomograms. The AUCs were 0.57 for recurrence and 0.67 for progression.ConclusionsThe nomograms that have been developed can be used to predict the probability of recurrence and progression of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

Does intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alter prostate size? Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of patients undergoing IMRT alone

AIM To assess the changes in prostate size in patients with prostate cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). BACKGROUND The effect of size change produced by IMRT is not well known. MATERIALS AND METHODS We enrolled 72 patients who received IMRT alone without androgen-deprivation therapy and underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination before and after IMRT. The diameter of the entire prostate in the anterior-posterior (P-AP) and left-right (P-LR) directions was measured. The transitional zone diameter in the anterior-posterior (T-AP) and left-right (T-LR) directions was also measured. RESULTS The average relative P-AP values at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after IMRT compared to the pre-IMRT value were 0.94, 0.90, 0.89, 0.89, and 0.90, respectively; the average relative P-LR values were 0.93, 0.92, 0.91, 0.91, and 0.90, respectively. The average P-AP and P-LR decreased by approximately 10% during the 12 months post-IMRT, and remained unchanged thereafter. The average relative T-AP values at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after IMRT compared to the pre-IMRT value were 0.93, 0.88, 0.91, 0.87, and 0.89, respectively; the average relative T-LR values were 0.96, 0.90, 0.91, 0.87, and 0.88, respectively. The average T-AP and T-LR also decreased by approximately 10% during the 12 months post-IMRT, and remained unchanged thereafter. At 12 months after IMRT, the average relative T-AP was significantly lower in patients with recurrence than in those without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS The average prostate diameter decreased by approximately 10% during the 12 months after IMRT; thereafter remained unchanged.