Kamil Bielak
Warsaw University of Life Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Kamil Bielak.
European Journal of Forest Research | 2016
Miren del Río; Hans Pretzsch; Iciar Alberdi; Kamil Bielak; Felipe Bravo; Andreas Brunner; Sonia Condés; Mark J. Ducey; Teresa Fonseca; Nikolas von Lüpke; Maciej Pach; Sanja Perić; Thomas Perot; Zahera Souidi; Peter Spathelf; Hubert Sterba; Martina Tijardović; Margarida Tomé; Patrick Vallet; Andrés Bravo-Oviedo
The growth and yield of mixed-species stands has become an important topic of research since there are certain advantages of this type of forest as regards functions and services. However, the concepts and methods used to characterize mixed stands need to be understood, as well as harmonized and standardized. In this review we have compiled a set of measures, indices, and methods at stand level to characterize the structure, dynamics, and productivity of mixed stands, and we discuss the pros and cons of their application in growth and yield studies. Parameters for the characterization of mixed stand structure such as stand density, species composition, horizontal (intermingling) and vertical tree distribution pattern, tree size distribution, and age composition are described, detailing the potential as well as the constraints of these parameters for understanding resource capture, use, and efficiency in mixed stands. Furthermore, a set of stand-level parameters was evaluated to characterize the dynamics of mixed stands, e.g. height growth and space partitioning, self- and alien-thinning, and growth partitioning among trees. The deviations and changes in the behaviour of the analysed parameters in comparison with pure stand conditions due to inter-specific interactions are of particular interest. As regards stand productivity, we reviewed site productivity indices, the growth–density relationship in mixed stands as well as methods to compare productivity in mixed versus monospecific stands. Finally, we discuss the main problems associated with the methodology such as up-scaling from tree to stand level as well as the relevance of standardized measures and methods for improving forest growth and yield research in mixed stands. The main challenges are also outlined, especially the need for qualitatively sound data.
European Journal of Forest Research | 2017
Gerald Dirnberger; Hubert Sterba; Sonia Condés; Christian Ammer; Peter Annighöfer; Admir Avdagić; Kamil Bielak; Gediminas Brazaitis; Lluís Coll; Michael Heym; Václav Hurt; Viktor Kurylyak; Renzo Motta; Maciej Pach; Quentin Ponette; Ricardo Ruiz-Peinado; Jerzy Skrzyszewski; Vít Šrámek; Géraud de Streel; Miroslav Svoboda; Tzvetan Zlatanov; Hans Pretzsch
Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) dominate many of the European forest stands. Also, mixtures of European beech and Scots pine more or less occur over all European countries, but have been scarcely investigated. The area occupied by each species is of high relevance, especially for growth evaluation and comparison of different species in mixed and monospecific stands. Thus, we studied different methods to describe species proportions and their definition as proportion by area. 25 triplets consisting of mixed and monospecific stands were established across Europe ranging from Lithuania to Spain in northern to southern direction and from Bulgaria to Belgium in eastern to western direction. On stand level, the conclusive method for estimating the species proportion as a fraction of the stand area relates the observed density (tree number or basal area) to its potential. This stand-level estimation makes use of the potential from comparable neighboring monospecific stands or from maximum density lines derived from other data, e.g. forest inventories or permanent observations plots. At tree level, the fraction of the stand area occupied by a species can be derived from the proportions of their crown projection area or of their leaf area. The estimates of the potentials obtained from neighboring monospecific stands, especially in older stands, were poorer than those from the maximum density line depending on the Martonne aridity index. Therefore, the stand-level method in combination with the Martonne aridity index for potential densities can be highly recommended. The species’ proportions estimated with this method are best approximated by the proportions of the species’ leaf areas. In forest practice, the most commonly applied method is an ocular estimation of the proportions by crown projection area. Even though the proportions of pine were calculated here by measuring crown projection areas in the field, we found this method to underestimate the proportion by 25% compared to the stand-level approach.
Annals of Forest Science | 2017
Michael Heym; Ricardo Ruiz-Peinado; Miren del Río; Kamil Bielak; David I. Forrester; Gerald Dirnberger; Ignacio Barbeito; Gediminas Brazaitis; Indrė Ruškytkė; Lluís Coll; Marek Fabrika; Lars Drössler; Magnus Löf; Hubert Sterba; Václav Hurt; Viktor Kurylyak; Fabio Lombardi; Dejan Stojanović; Jan den Ouden; Renzo Motta; Maciej Pach; Jerzy Skrzyszewski; Quentin Ponette; Géraud de Streel; Vít Šrámek; Tomáš Čihák; Tzvetan Zlatanov; Admir Avdagić; Christian Ammer; Kris Verheyen
Key messageThis data set provides unique empirical data from triplets of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestrisL.) and European beech (Fagus sylvaticaL.) across Europe. Dendrometric variables are provided for 32 triplets, 96 plots, 7555 treesand 4695 core samples. These data contribute to our understanding of mixed stand dynamics.Dataset access athttp://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8v04m. Associated metadata available athttps://metadata-afs.nancy.inra.fr/geonetwork/apps/georchestra/?uuid=b3e098ca-e681-4910-9099-0e25d3b4cd52&hl=eng.
European Journal of Forest Research | 2013
Hans Pretzsch; Kamil Bielak; Joachim Block; Arkadiusz Bruchwald; Jochen Dieler; Hans-Peter Ehrhart; Ulrich Kohnle; Jürgen Nagel; Hermann Spellmann; M. Zasada; Andreas Zingg
Forest Ecology and Management | 2016
Hans Pretzsch; M. del Río; Gerhard Schütze; Ch. Ammer; Peter Annighöfer; Admir Avdagić; Ignacio Barbeito; Kamil Bielak; Gediminas Brazaitis; Lluís Coll; Lars Drössler; Marek Fabrika; David I. Forrester; Viktor Kurylyak; Magnus Löf; Fabio Lombardi; Bratislav Matović; Frits Mohren; Renzo Motta; J. den Ouden; Maciej Pach; Quentin Ponette; Jerzy Skrzyszewski; Vít Šrámek; Hubert Sterba; Miroslav Svoboda; Kris Verheyen; Tzvetan Zlatanov; Andrés Bravo-Oviedo
Forest Ecology and Management | 2014
Hans Pretzsch; Peter Biber; Gerhard Schütze; Kamil Bielak
Journal of Ecology | 2017
Miren del Río; Hans Pretzsch; Ricardo Ruiz-Peinado; Evy Ampoorter; Peter Annighöfer; Ignacio Barbeito; Kamil Bielak; Gediminas Brazaitis; Lluís Coll; Lars Drössler; Marek Fabrika; David I. Forrester; Michael Heym; Václav Hurt; Viktor Kurylyak; Magnus Löf; Fabio Lombardi; Ekaterina Madrickiene; Bratislav Matović; Frits Mohren; Renzo Motta; Jan den Ouden; Maciej Pach; Quentin Ponette; Gerhard Schütze; Jerzy Skrzyszewski; Vít Šrámek; Hubert Sterba; Dejan Stojanović; Miroslav Svoboda
Forest Systems | 2014
Kamil Bielak; Małgorzata Dudzińska; Hans Pretzsch
Forest Ecology and Management | 2017
Sonia Condés; Patrick Vallet; Kamil Bielak; Andrés Bravo-Oviedo; Lluís Coll; Mark J. Ducey; Maciej Pach; Hans Pretzsch; Hubert Sterba; Jordi Vayreda; Miren del Río
Journal of Ecology | 2018
David I. Forrester; Christian Ammer; Peter Annighöfer; Ignacio Barbeito; Kamil Bielak; Andrés Bravo-Oviedo; Lluís Coll; Miren del Río; Lars Drössler; Michael Heym; Václav Hurt; Magnus Löf; Jan den Ouden; Maciej Pach; Mário G. Pereira; Benjamin N. E. Plaga; Quentin Ponette; Jerzy Skrzyszewski; Hubert Sterba; Miroslav Svoboda; Tzvetan Zlatanov; Hans Pretzsch