Kang Tsou

Immunohistochemical distribution of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the rat central nervous system.

Immunohistochemical distribution of cannabinoid receptors in the adult rat brain was studied using specific purified antibodies against the amino-terminus of the CB1 receptor. Our results generally agree well with the previous studies using CB1 receptor autoradiography and messenger RNA in situ hybridization. However, because of its greater resolution, immunohistochemistry allowed identification of particular neuronal cells and fibers that possess cannabinoid receptors. CB1-like immunoreactivity was found in axons, cell bodies and dendrites, where it appeared as puncta in somata and processes. Both intensely and moderately or lightly stained neurons were observed. The intensely stained neurons were dispersed and only occur in cortical structures including hippocampal formation and olfactory bulb. Moderately or lightly stained neurons were found in caudate-putamen and amygdala. In the hippocampal formation only intensely stained neurons were observed. The cell bodies of pyramidal neurons in CA1 and CA3 fields appeared to be unstained but surrounded by a dense plexus of immunoreactive fibers. The granule cells in the dentate area were also immunonegative. Many intensely stained neurons were located at the base of the granule cell layer. CB1-like immunoreactive neurons and fibers were also found in the somatosensory, cingulate, perirhinal, entorhinal and piriform cortices, in claustrum, amygdaloid nuclei, nucleus accumbens and septum. Beaded immunoreactive fibers were detected in periaqueductal gray, nucleus tractus solitarius, spinal trigeminal tract and nucleus, dorsal horn and lamina X of the spinal cord. A triangular cap-like mass of immunoreactivity was found to surround the basal part of the Purkinje cell body in the cerebellum. Only small, lightly stained cells were found in the molecular layer in the cerebellum close to the Purkinje cell layer. The CB1 receptor is widely distributed in the forebrain and has a more restricted distribution in the hindbrain and the spinal cord. It appears to be expressed on cell bodies, dendrites and axons. According to the location and morphology, many, but not all, CB1-like immunoreactive neurons appear to be GABAergic. Therefore, cannabinoids and cannabinoid receptors may play a role in modulating GABAergic neurons.

Cannabinoid CB1 receptors are localized primarily on cholecystokinin-containing GABAergic interneurons in the rat hippocampal formation.

Localization of cannabinoid CB 1 receptors on GABAergic interneurons in the rat hippocampal formation was studied by double-labeling immunohistochemistry with confocal microscopy. Virtually all CB1-immunoreactive neurons (95%) are GABAergic. CB 1 fluorescence showed a punctate pattern. In contrast, the GABA fluorescence was distributed homogeneously, suggesting that while CB 1 receptors and GABA exist in the same cells they are not localized in the same subcellular compartments. Although virtually all CB1 neurons were GABAergic, many GABAergic neurons did not contain CB1 receptors. GABAergic interneurons in the hippocampal formation can be further divided into subpopulations with distinct connections and functions, using cell markers such as neuropeptides and calcium binding proteins. CB1 receptors were highly co-localized with cholecystokinin and partially co-localized with calretinin and calbindin, but not with parvalbumin. This suggests that cannabinoids may modulate GABAergic neurotransmission at the synapses on the soma and at synapses on the proximal dendrites of the principal neurons, as well as at synapses on other GABAergic interneurons.

Fatty acid amide hydrolase is located preferentially in large neurons in the rat central nervous system as revealed by immunohistochemistry

The distribution in the rat brain of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) an enzyme that catalyzes the hydrolysis of the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide was studied by immunohistochemistry. An immunopurified, polyclonal antibody to the C terminal region of FAAH was used in these studies. The large principal neurons, such as pyramidal cells in the cerebral cortex, the pyramidal cells the hippocampus, Purkinje cells in the cerebellar cortex and the mitral cells in the olfactory bulb, showed the strongest FAAH immunoreactivity. These FAAH-containing principal neurons except the mitral cells in the olfactory bulb are in close proximity with cannabinoid CB1 receptors as revealed by our previous immunohistochemical study. Moderately or lightly stained FAAH-containing neurons were also found in the amygdala, the basal ganglia, the deep cerebellar nuclei, the ventral posterior nuclei of the thalamus, the optic layer and the intermediate white layer of the superior colliculus and the red nucleus in the midbrain, and motor neurons of the spinal cord. These data demonstrate that FAAH is heterogeneously distributed and this distribution exhibits considerable, although not complete, overlap with the distribution of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in rat brain.

Physical withdrawal in rats tolerant to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol precipitated by a cannabinoid receptor antagonist

Tolerance to delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC) was produced in rats by twice daily injections (15 mg/kg i.p.) for 6.5 days. Administration of the cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A (i.p. or i.c.v.) induced a profound precipitated withdrawal syndrome in delta 9-THC-tolerant animals. The syndrome was characterized by a disorganized pattern of constantly changing brief sequences of motor behavior. Autonomic signs were not evident. THC-tolerant animals that were treated with vehicle remained quiet throughout the observation period.

Endogenous cannabinoids as an aversive or counter-rewarding system in the rat

Human use of marijuana (Cannabis sativa) is widely assumed to have rewarding properties, a notion supported by its widespread recreational use. However, no study has clearly demonstrated such effects in animal models. The purpose of this study was to test for the presumed rewarding effect of cannabinoids using a conditioned place preference paradigm. The results showed that animals failed to develop place conditioning at a low dose (1.5 mg/kg) and developed a place aversion at a high dose (15 mg/kg) of the active principle in marijuana, delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC), a finding consistent with most previous studies. Moreover, the administration of the cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A induced a conditioned place preference at both a low (0.5 mg/kg) and a high (5 mg/kg) dose. In summary, cannabinoid antagonism produced place preference while cannabinoid agonism induced place aversion. These results suggest that endogenous cannabinoids serve normally to suppress reward or to induce aversion.

Anatomical basis for cannabinoid-induced antinociception as revealed by intracerebral microinjections

Cannabinoids suppress behavioral and neurophysiological responses to noxious stimuli in rodents when administered systemically. The purpose of this study was to extend previous studies of the site of cannabinoid analgesia. Rats were tested in the tail flick test before and after microinjections of the cannabinoid agonist WIN55, 212-2 (5 microg) into one of 17 different brain regions. WIN55,212-2 significantly elevated tail-flick latencies when injected into the amygdala, the lateral posterior and submedius regions of the thalamus, the superior colliculus and the noradrenergic A5 region. By contrast, pain behavior was unaffected by microinjections of the cannabinoid into the other 11 areas examined (prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, lateral hypothalamus, substantia nigra, cuneiform nucleus, anterior pretectal, intralaminar, parafasicular, posterior, thalamic nuclei, as well as the ventral medial, ventral lateral nuclei in the posterior thalamus).

An examination of the central sites of action of cannabinoid-induced antinociception in the rat

Microinjections of low doses of the potent and selective cannabinoids WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940 into the lateral ventricle produce long-lasting reduction in sensitivity to noxious thermal stimuli (1). To determine the central distribution of ventricularly administered WIN 55,212-2, we microinjected an analgesic dose of the drug with [3H]WIN 55,212-2. At the peak time of antinociception, the radiolabeled drug was confined to periventricular sites throughout the brain. The contribution of particular periventricular structures to the antinociceptive effect was evaluated using intracerebral microinjection techniques and the tail-flick test. Guide cannulae were implanted above the following periventricular structures: the medial septal area, lateral habenlua, perihypothalamic area, arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus, dorsal raphe nucleus and the dorsolateral and ventrolateral aspects of the periaqueductal gray. Microinjections of WIN 55,212-2 (5 micrograms/0.5 microliter) into the medial septal area, lateral habenula, perihypothalamic area, arcuate nucleus, and ventrolateral periaqueductal gray did not significantly affect tail-flick latencies. By contrast, microinjections of WIN 55,212-2 into the dorsolateral periaqueductal gray and the dorsal raphe significantly elevated tail-flick latencies. The results of this study indicate that at least two periventricular structures within the brain are involved in cannabinoid antinociception.

Motor actions of cannabinoids in the basal ganglia output nuclei.

The levels of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in the basal ganglia are the highest in the brain, comparable to the levels of dopamine receptors, a major transmitter in the basal ganglia. This localization of receptors is consistent with the profound effects on motor function exerted by cannabinoids. The output nuclei of the basal ganglia, the globus pallidus (GP) and substantia nigra reticulata (SNr), apparently lack intrinsic cannabinoid receptors. Rather, the receptors are located on afferent terminals, the striatum being the major source. Cannabinoids blocked the inhibitory action of the striatal input in the SNr. Furthermore, cannabinoids blocked the excitatory effect of stimulation of the subthalamic input to the SNr revealing, along with data from in situ hybridization studies, that this input is another likely source of cannabinoid receptors to the SNr. Similar actions of cannabinoids were observed in the GP. Behavioral studies further revealed that the action of cannabinoids differs depending upon which input to the output nuclei of the basal ganglia is active. The inhibitory striatal input is quiescent and the cannabinoid action is observable only upon stimulation of the striatum, while the noticeable effect of cannabinoids under basal conditions would be on the tonically active subthalamic input. These data suggest that the recently discovered endogenous cannabinergic system exerts a major modulatory action in the basal ganglia by its ability to block both the major excitatory and inhibitory inputs to the SNr and GP.

Cannabinoid receptor-mediated inhibition of the rat tail-flick reflex after microinjection into the rostral ventromedial medulla

Systemic administration of cannabinoids produce profound antinociception in rodents. The purpose of this study was to examine the contribution of the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) to cannabinoid-mediated inhibition of the tail-flick reflex. Rats received direct injections of two selective cannabinoid agonists, WIN55,212-2 and HU210, into the RVM. Both compounds significantly elevated tail-flick latencies by over 50%. WIN55,212-3, the inactive enantiomer, was without effect. Furthermore, co-administration of the selective cannabinoid receptor antagonist, SR141716A greatly attenuated the antinociception produced by HU210. Finally, injections of WIN55,212-2 outside the region of the RVM did not affect tail-flick latencies. These results demonstrate that the cannabinoid receptor system participates in the descending control of nociception and raise the possibility that actions of endogenous cannabinoids in the RVM may modulate nociceptive responsiveness.

Inhibition of noxious stimulus-evoked activity of spinal cord dorsal horn neurons by the cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2.

The effects of a potent synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 on nociceptive responses of wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons in the lumbar spinal cord were investigated in anesthetized rats. WDR neurons were identified by their responses to innocuous brushing and to a range of pressure stimuli from innocuous to noxious. Noxious pressure was applied to regions of the ipsilateral hind paw corresponding to the receptive field of the neuron. WIN 55,212-2 (125 micrograms/kg and 250 micrograms/kg, i.v.) produced a profound inhibition of firing evoked by the noxious pressure stimulus. By contrast, the cannabinoid did not alter the evoked activity of non-nociceptive neurons in response to non-noxious levels of stimulation. Treatment with either vehicle or the inactive enantiomer WIN 55,212-3 (250 micrograms/kg) failed to alter noxious stimulus-evoked activity of WDR neurons. These data provide direct evidence for cannabinoid-mediated inhibition of pain neurotransmission in the spinal dorsal horn. The site of action for these effects remains to be determined.