Kang Young Lee

Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: The operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND Recently, robotic technology in the surgical area has gained wide popularity. However, in the filed of head and neck surgery, the applications of robotic instruments are problematic owing to spatial and technical limitations. The authors performed robot-assisted endoscopic thyroid operations in consecutive thyroid tumor patients using the newly introduced da Vinci S surgical system. Herein the authors describe the technique used and its utility for the operative management of thyroid tumors. METHODS From October 2007 to November 2008, 338 patients underwent robot-assisted endoscopic thyroid operations using a gasless, transaxillary approach. All procedures were successfully completed without conversion to an open procedure. Patients clinicopathologic characteristics, operation types, operation times, the learning curve, and postoperative hospital stays and complications were evaluated. RESULTS The mean patient age was 40 years (range, 16-69) and the male to female ratio was 1:16.8. Two hundred and thirty-four patients underwent less than total and 104 underwent bilateral total thyroidectomy. Ipsilateral central compartment node dissection was conducted in all malignant cases. Mean operation time was 144.0 minutes (range, 69-347) and mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.3 days (range, 2-7). No serious postoperative complication occurred; there were 3 cases of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and 1 of Horners syndrome. CONCLUSION Our technique of robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach is feasible and safe in selected patients with a benign or malignant thyroid tumor.

Assessment of Sexual and Voiding Function After Total Mesorectal Excision With Pelvic Autonomic Nerve Preservation in Males With Rectal Cancer

AbstractPURPOSE: Total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation has been reported to be an optimal surgery for rectal cancer. It minimizes local recurrence and sexual and urinary dysfunction. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation in terms of voiding and sexual function in males with rectal cancer. METHODS: We performed urine flowmetry using Urodyn® and a standard questionnaire using the International Index of Erectile Function and the International Prostate Symptom Score before and after surgery in 68 males with rectal cancer. RESULTS: Significant differences in mean maximal urinary flow rate and voided volume were seen before and after surgery (18.9 ± 5.7 vs. 13.7 ± 7.0, 240 ± 91.9 vs. 143 ± 78; P < 0.05, P < 0.05, respectively), but no differences in residual volume before and after surgery were apparent (4.4 ± 2.6 vs. 8.1 ± 4.4; P > 0.05). The total International Prostate Symptom Score was increased after surgery from 6.2 ± 5.8 to 9.8 ± 5.9 (P < 0.05). There were no changes of score for one of each of seven International Prostate Symptom Score items in 49 patients (73.5 percent) to 61 patients (89.7 percent). Five International Index of Erectile Function domain scores (erectile function, intercourse satisfaction, orgasmic function, sexual desire, and overall satisfaction) were significantly decreased after surgery (18.2 ± 9.3 vs. 13.5 ± 9, 8.4 ± 4.2 vs. 4.4 ± 2.9, 5.8 ± 2.9 vs. 4.4 ± 2.9, 6.1 ± 2.4 vs. 4.8 ± 2, 6.1 ± 2.2 vs. 4.5 ± 2.3, respectively; P < 0.05). Erection was possible in 55 patients (80.9 percent); penetration ability was possible in 51 patients (75 percent). Complete inability for erection and intercourse was observed in three patients (5.5 percent). Retrograde ejaculation was noted in 9 patients (13.2 percent). International Index of Erectile Function domains such as sexual desire and overall satisfaction were greatly decreased in 39 patients (57.4 percent) and 43 patients (63.2 percent), respectively. Multiple regression analysis of factors affecting postoperative sexual dysfunction showed that age older than 60 years (sexual desire, P = 0.019), within six months (erectile function, P = 0.04; intercourse satisfaction, P = 0.011; orgasmic function, P = 0.03), lower rectal cancer (erectile function, P = 0.02; intercourse satisfaction, P = 0.036; orgasmic function, P = 0.027) were significant factors adversely affecting sexual function. CONCLUSION: Total mesorectal excision with pelvic autonomic nerve preservation showed relative safety in preserving sexual and voiding function. The International Prostate Symptom Score and International Index of Erectile Function questionnaires were useful in assessing urinary and sexual function.

Initial experience with robot-assisted modified radical neck dissection for the management of thyroid carcinoma with lateral neck node metastasis

BACKGROUND Since the introduction of endoscopic techniques in thyroid surgery, several trials of endoscopic lateral neck dissection have been conducted with the aim of avoiding a long cervical scar, but these endoscopic procedures require more effort than open surgery, mainly because of the relatively nonsophisticated instruments used. However, the recent introduction of surgical robotic systems has simplified the operations and increased the precision of endoscopic techniques. We have described our initial experience with robot-assisted modified radical neck dissection (MRND) in thyroid cancer using the da Vinci S system. METHODS From October 2007 to October 2009, 33 patients with thyroid cancer with lateral neck lymph node (LN) metastases underwent robot-assisted thyroidectomy and additional robotic MRND using a gasless, transaxillary approach. Clinicopathologic data were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS Mean patient age was 37 ± 9 years and the gender ratio (male to female) was 7:26. The mean operating time was 281 ± 41 minutes and mean postoperative hospital stay was 5.4 ± 1.6 days. The mean tumor size was 1.1 ± 0.5 cm and 20 cases (61%) had papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. The mean number of retrieved LNs was 6.1 ± 4.4 in the central neck compartment and 27.7 ± 11.0 in the lateral compartment. No serious postoperative complications, such as Horners syndrome or major nerve injury, occurred. CONCLUSION Robot-assisted MRND is technically feasible, safe, and produces excellent cosmetic results. Based on our initial experience, robot-assisted MRND should be viewed as an acceptable alternative method in patients with low-risk, well-differentiated thyroid cancer with lateral neck node metastasis.

Multicenter Analysis of Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Excision The Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group

Objective:To assess the risk factors for clinical anastomotic leakage (AL) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Background:Little data are available about risk factors for AL after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection. Methods:This was a retrospective analysis of 1609 patients with rectal cancer who had undergone laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer with sphincter preservation. Clinical data related to AL were collected from 11 institutions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the risk factors for AL. Results:AL was noted in 101 (6.3%) of the patients. The leakage rate ranged from 2.0% to 10.3% for each hospital (P = 0.04). In patients without protective stomas (n = 1187), male sex [hazard ratio (HR), 3.468], advanced tumor stage (HR, 2.520), lower tumor level (HR, 2.418), preoperative chemoradiation (HR, 6.284), perioperative transfusion (HR, 10.705), and multiple firings of the linear stapler (HR, 6.181) were significantly associated with AL. Our theoretical model suggested that the HR for patients with 2 risk factors was significantly higher than that the HR for patients with no or only 1 risk factor. Conclusions:Male sex, low anastomosis, preoperative chemoradiation, advanced tumor stage, perioperative bleeding, and multiple firings of the linear stapler increased the risk of AL after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. A diverting stoma might be mandatory in patients with 2 or more of the risk factors identified in this analysis.

Oncologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative resection with tumor-specific mesorectal excision for fixed locally advanced rectal cancer: Impact of postirradiated pathologic downstaging on local recurrence and survival

Objective:The purpose of this study was to determine the oncologic outcomes and clinical factors affecting survival in patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy following tumor specific mesorectal excision for locally advanced, fixed rectal cancer. Summary Background Data:Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy has resulted in significant tumor downstaging, which enhances curative resection and subsequently improves local disease control for rectal cancer. However, oncologic outcomes, according to clinical factors, have not yet been fully understood in locally advanced and fixed rectal cancer. Methods:A total of 114 patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiation for advanced rectal cancer (T3 or T4 and node positive) were investigated retrospectively. Chemotherapy was administered intravenously with 5-FU and leucovorin during weeks 1 and 5 of radiotherapy. The total radiation dose was 5040 cGY in 25 fractions delivered over 5 weeks. Tumor-specific mesorectal excision was done 4 to 6 weeks after the completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Survival and recurrence rates, according to the pathologic stage, were evaluated. Moreover, factors affecting survival were investigated. Results:The 5-year survival rates according to pathologic stage were: 100% in pathologic complete remission (n = 10), 80% in stage I (n = 23), 56.8% in stage II (n = 34), and 42.3% in stage III (n = 47) (P = 0.0000). Local, systemic, and combined recurrence rates were 11.4%, 22.8%, and 3.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the pathologic N stage and operation method were the independent factors affecting survival rate. Conclusion:Pathologic complete remission showed excellent oncologic outcomes, and the pathologic N stage was the most important factor for oncologic outcomes.

Identification and characterization of the major allergens of buckwheat

Background: Buckwheat (BW) has been recognized as a common food allergen in Korea, Japan, and other countries. Until now, serologic findings of BW food‐allergic patients and its major allergenic components have not been clarified. In this study, we analyzed the serologic findings of BW food allergy and characterized its major allergenic components.

The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case-matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison--open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery.

Objective:The objective of this study was to clarify the impact of robotic surgery (RS) in the management of mid and low rectal cancer in comparison with open surgery (OS) and laparoscopic surgery (LS). Background:The benefits of RS in the treatment of rectal cancer have not yet been clearly described. Methods:Using propensity scores for adjustment of sex, age, body mass index, tumor stage, and tumor height, a well-balanced cohort with 165 patients in each group, was created by matching each patient who underwent RS as the study group with one who underwent OS or LS as the control group (RS:OS = 1:1, RS:LS = 1:1 match). Pathological results, morbidity, perioperative recovery, and short-term oncological results were compared between the 3 groups. Results:In RS and LS, the time to first flatus and resumed soft diet and length of hospital stay were significantly shortened compared with OS. Robotic surgery showed better recovery outcomes than LS with regard to time to resumed soft diet and length of hospital stay. The visual analog scale was significantly lower in the RS than in the OS and LS from postoperative days 1 to 5. The voiding problem and circumferential resection margin involvement rate were significantly lower in the RS group than in the OS group. No significant difference in 2-year disease-free survival was observed among the 3 groups. Conclusions:Robotic surgery may be an effective tool in the effort to maximize the advantages of minimally invasive surgery in the management of mid to low rectal cancer.

Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic surgery at a single institution. BACKGROUND Robotic surgery is regarded as a new modality to surpass the technical limitations of conventional surgery. Short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for rectal cancer were acceptable in previous reports. However, evidence of long-term feasibility and oncologic safety is required. METHODS Between April 2006 and August 2011, 217 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer with stage I-III disease were enrolled prospectively (robot, n = 133; laparoscopy, n = 84). Median follow-up period was 58 months (range, 4-80 months). Perioperative clinicopathologic outcomes, morbidities, 5-year survival rates, prognostic factors, and cost were evaluated. RESULTS Perioperative clinicopathologic outcomes demonstrated no significant differences except for the conversion rate and length of hospital stay. The 5-year overall survival rate was 92.8% in robotic, and 93.5% in laparoscopic surgical procedures (P = 0.829). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 81.9% and 78.7%, respectively (P = 0.547). Local recurrence was similar: 2.3% and 1.2% (P = 0.649). According to the univariate analysis, this type of surgical approach was not a prognostic factor for long-term survival. The patients mean payment for robotic surgery was approximately 2.34 times higher than laparoscopic surgery. CONCLUSIONS No significant differences were found in the 5-year overall, disease-free survival and local recurrence rates between robotic and laparoscopic surgical procedures. We concluded that robotic surgery for rectal cancer failed to offer any oncologic or clinical benefits as compared with laparoscopy despite an increased cost.

Accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography and computed tomography for restaging rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation

BACKGROUND Preoperative restaging of irradiated rectal cancer is essential for the planning of optimal therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography (ERUS) and CT in restaging rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation and to evaluate the factors affecting the accuracy of ERUS. STUDY DESIGN Eighty-three patients with initial, locally advanced rectal cancer were prospectively evaluated by ERUS (n=60) and CT (n=80) after preoperative chemoradiation and just before surgery. All patients then underwent subsequent surgical resection and complete pathologic staging. RESULTS In restaging the depth of invasion, the overall accuracy was 38.3% (23 of 60) by ERUS and 46.3% (37 of 80) by CT. Overstaging was more common than understaging with both imaging modalities. Accuracy for restaging lymph node metastasis was 72.6% (37 of 51) by ERUS and 70.4% (50 of 71) by CT. The predictive value of node-negative cases by ERUS was somewhat lower than that of CT (81.1% versus 85.4%, respectively). Complete pathology-proved remission was not correctly predicted in any of the 11 patients by any imaging modalities. Pathologic T and N staging correlated with the staging accuracy of ERUS (p=0.028 and p=0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS ERUS and CT may allow good prediction of node-negative rectal cancers, although they are inaccurate modalities for predicting treatment response on the rectal wall. New methods of interpretation and diagnostic criteria for ERUS and CT are essential for increasing the accuracy of cancer prediction in at-risk patients.

Prognostic Effect of Perioperative Change of Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level: A Useful Tool for Detection of Systemic Recurrence in Rectal Cancer

BackgroundThe prognosis of patients even with the same stage of rectal cancer varies widely. We analyzed the capability of perioperative change of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level for predicting recurrence and survival in rectal cancer patients.MethodsWe reviewed 631 patients who underwent potentially curative resection for stage II or III rectal cancer. Patients were categorized into three groups according to their serum CEA concentrations on the seventh day before and on the seventh day after surgery: group A, normal CEA level (≤5 ng/mL) in both periods; group B, increased preoperative and normal postoperative CEA; and group C, continuously increased CEA in both periods. The prognostic relevance of the CEA group was investigated by analyses of recurrence patterns and survival.ResultsStage III patients showed higher systemic recurrence (P = .001) and worse 5-year survival rates (P < .0001) for group C than for groups A and B. On multivariate analysis, the CEA group was a significant predictor for recurrence (P < .001; relative risk, 2.740; 95% confidence interval, 1.677–4.476) and survival (P = .001; relative risk, 2.174; 95% confidence interval, 1.556–3.308).ConclusionsThe perioperative serum CEA change was a useful prognostic indicator to predict for systemic recurrence and survival in stage III rectal cancer patients.