Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Kara N. D. Polen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Kara N. D. Polen.


Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2016

Update: Interim Guidance for Health Care Providers Caring for Women of Reproductive Age with Possible Zika Virus Exposure — United States, 2016

Emily E. Petersen; Kara N. D. Polen; Dana Meaney-Delman; Sascha R. Ellington; Titilope Oduyebo; Amanda C. Cohn; Alexandra M. Oster; Kate Russell; Jennifer F. Kawwass; Mateusz P. Karwowski; Ann M. Powers; Jeanne Bertolli; John T. Brooks; Dmitry M. Kissin; Julie Villanueva; Jorge L. Muñoz-Jordán; Matthew J. Kuehnert; Christine K. Olson; Margaret A. Honein; Maria Rivera; Denise J. Jamieson; Sonja A. Rasmussen

CDC has updated its interim guidance for U.S. health care providers caring for women of reproductive age with possible Zika virus exposure to include recommendations on counseling women and men with possible Zika virus exposure who are interested in conceiving. This guidance is based on limited available data on persistence of Zika virus RNA in blood and semen. Women who have Zika virus disease should wait at least 8 weeks after symptom onset to attempt conception, and men with Zika virus disease should wait at least 6 months after symptom onset to attempt conception. Women and men with possible exposure to Zika virus but without clinical illness consistent with Zika virus disease should wait at least 8 weeks after exposure to attempt conception. Possible exposure to Zika virus is defined as travel to or residence in an area of active Zika virus transmission ( http://www.cdc.gov/zika/geo/active-countries.html), or sex (vaginal intercourse, anal intercourse, or fellatio) without a condom with a man who traveled to or resided in an area of active transmission. Women and men who reside in areas of active Zika virus transmission should talk with their health care provider about attempting conception. This guidance also provides updated recommendations on testing of pregnant women with possible Zika virus exposure. These recommendations will be updated when additional data become available.


Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2016

Update: Interim Guidance for Health Care Providers Caring for Pregnant Women with Possible Zika Virus Exposure — United States, July 2016

Titilope Oduyebo; Irogue Igbinosa; Emily E. Petersen; Kara N. D. Polen; Satish K. Pillai; Elizabeth C. Ailes; Julie Villanueva; Kimberly Newsome; Marc Fischer; Priya M. Gupta; Ann M. Powers; Margaret A. Lampe; Susan L. Hills; Kathryn E. Arnold; Laura E. Rose; Carrie K. Shapiro-Mendoza; Charles B. Beard; Jorge L. Muñoz; Carol Y. Rao; Dana Meaney-Delman; Denise J. Jamieson; Margaret A. Honein

CDC has updated its interim guidance for U.S. health care providers caring for pregnant women with possible Zika virus exposure, to include the emerging data indicating that Zika virus RNA can be detected for prolonged periods in some pregnant women. To increase the proportion of pregnant women with Zika virus infection who receive a definitive diagnosis, CDC recommends expanding real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) testing. Possible exposures to Zika virus include travel to or residence in an area with active Zika virus transmission, or sex* with a partner who has traveled to or resides in an area with active Zika virus transmission without using condoms or other barrier methods to prevent infection.(†) Testing recommendations for pregnant women with possible Zika virus exposure who report clinical illness consistent with Zika virus disease(§) (symptomatic pregnant women) are the same, regardless of their level of exposure (i.e., women with ongoing risk for possible exposure, including residence in or frequent travel to an area with active Zika virus transmission, as well as women living in areas without Zika virus transmission who travel to an area with active Zika virus transmission, or have unprotected sex with a partner who traveled to or resides in an area with active Zika virus transmission). Symptomatic pregnant women who are evaluated <2 weeks after symptom onset should receive serum and urine Zika virus rRT-PCR testing. Symptomatic pregnant women who are evaluated 2-12 weeks after symptom onset should first receive a Zika virus immunoglobulin (IgM) antibody test; if the IgM antibody test result is positive or equivocal, serum and urine rRT-PCR testing should be performed. Testing recommendations for pregnant women with possible Zika virus exposure who do not report clinical illness consistent with Zika virus disease (asymptomatic pregnant women) differ based on the circumstances of possible exposure. For asymptomatic pregnant women who live in areas without active Zika virus transmission and who are evaluated <2 weeks after last possible exposure, rRT-PCR testing should be performed. If the rRT-PCR result is negative, a Zika virus IgM antibody test should be performed 2-12 weeks after the exposure. Asymptomatic pregnant women who do not live in an area with active Zika virus transmission, who are first evaluated 2-12 weeks after their last possible exposure should first receive a Zika virus IgM antibody test; if the IgM antibody test result is positive or equivocal, serum and urine rRT-PCR should be performed. Asymptomatic pregnant women with ongoing risk for exposure to Zika virus should receive Zika virus IgM antibody testing as part of routine obstetric care during the first and second trimesters; immediate rRT-PCR testing should be performed when IgM antibody test results are positive or equivocal. This guidance also provides updated recommendations for the clinical management of pregnant women with confirmed or possible Zika virus infection. These recommendations will be updated when additional data become available.


Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2016

Update: Interim Guidance for Preconception Counseling and Prevention of Sexual Transmission of Zika Virus for Persons with Possible Zika Virus Exposure — United States, September 2016

Emily E. Petersen; Dana Meaney-Delman; Robyn Neblett-Fanfair; Fiona Havers; Titilope Oduyebo; Susan L. Hills; Ingrid B. Rabe; Amy J. Lambert; Julia Abercrombie; Stacey W. Martin; Carolyn V. Gould; Nadia Oussayef; Kara N. D. Polen; Matthew J. Kuehnert; Satish K. Pillai; Lyle R. Petersen; Margaret A. Honein; Denise J. Jamieson; John T. Brooks

CDC has updated its interim guidance for persons with possible Zika virus exposure who are planning to conceive (1) and interim guidance to prevent transmission of Zika virus through sexual contact (2), now combined into a single document. Guidance for care for pregnant women with possible Zika virus exposure was previously published (3). Possible Zika virus exposure is defined as travel to or residence in an area of active Zika virus transmission (http://www.cdc.gov/zika/geo/index.html), or sex* without a condom† with a partner who traveled to or lived in an area of active transmission. Based on new though limited data, CDC now recommends that all men with possible Zika virus exposure who are considering attempting conception with their partner, regardless of symptom status,§ wait to conceive until at least 6 months after symptom onset (if symptomatic) or last possible Zika virus exposure (if asymptomatic). Recommendations for women planning to conceive remain unchanged: women with possible Zika virus exposure are recommended to wait to conceive until at least 8 weeks after symptom onset (if symptomatic) or last possible Zika virus exposure (if asymptomatic). Couples with possible Zika virus exposure, who are not pregnant and do not plan to become pregnant, who want to minimize their risk for sexual transmission of Zika virus should use a condom or abstain from sex for the same periods for men and women described above. Women of reproductive age who have had or anticipate future Zika virus exposure who do not want to become pregnant should use the most effective contraceptive method that can be used correctly and consistently. These recommendations will be further updated when additional data become available.


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2016

Prolonged Detection of Zika Virus RNA in Pregnant Women.

Dana Meaney-Delman; Titilope Oduyebo; Kara N. D. Polen; Jennifer L. White; Andrea Bingham; Sally Slavinski; Lea Heberlein-larson; Kirsten St. George; Jennifer L. Rakeman; Susan L. Hills; Christine K. Olson; Alys Adamski; Lauren Culver Barlow; Ellen H. Lee; Anna Likos; Jorge L. Muñoz; Emily E. Petersen; Elizabeth Dufort; Amy B. Dean; Margaret M. Cortese; Gilberto A. Santiago; Julu Bhatnagar; Ann M. Powers; Sherif R. Zaki; Lyle R. Petersen; Denise J. Jamieson; Margaret A. Honein

OBJECTIVE: Zika virus infection during pregnancy is a cause of microcephaly and other fetal brain abnormalities. Reports indicate that the duration of detectable viral RNA in serum after symptom onset is brief. In a recent case report involving a severely affected fetus, Zika virus RNA was detected in maternal serum 10 weeks after symptom onset, longer than the duration of RNA detection in serum previously reported. This report summarizes the clinical and laboratory characteristics of pregnant women with prolonged detection of Zika virus RNA in serum that were reported to the U.S. Zika Pregnancy Registry. METHODS: Data were obtained from the U.S. Zika Pregnancy Registry, an enhanced surveillance system of pregnant women with laboratory evidence of confirmed or possible Zika virus infection. For this case series, we defined prolonged detection of Zika virus RNA as Zika virus RNA detection in serum by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) 14 or more days after symptom onset or, for women not reporting signs or symptoms consistent with Zika virus disease (asymptomatic), 21 or more days after last possible exposure to Zika virus. RESULTS: Prolonged Zika virus RNA detection in serum was identified in four symptomatic pregnant women up to 46 days after symptom onset and in one asymptomatic pregnant woman 53 days postexposure. Among the five pregnancies, one pregnancy had evidence of fetal Zika virus infection confirmed by histopathologic examination of fetal tissue, three pregnancies resulted in live births of apparently healthy neonates with no reported abnormalities, and one pregnancy is ongoing. CONCLUSION: Zika virus RNA was detected in the serum of five pregnant women beyond the previously estimated timeframe. Additional real-time RT-PCR testing of pregnant women might provide more data about prolonged detection of Zika virus RNA and the possible diagnostic, epidemiologic, and clinical implications for pregnant women.


Birth Defects Research Part A-clinical and Molecular Teratology | 2013

Association between reported venlafaxine use in early pregnancy and birth defects, national birth defects prevention study, 1997-2007.

Kara N. D. Polen; Sonja A. Rasmussen; Tiffany Riehle-Colarusso; Jennita Reefhuis

BACKGROUND Few epidemiologic studies have investigated the use of venlafaxine (Effexor XR capsules, Product Monograph, Wyeth, Montreal, Canada), an antidepressant used to treat major depression and anxiety disorders in adults, during pregnancy. Our objective was to determine whether use of venlafaxine during pregnancy is associated with specific birth defects. METHODS We used data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS), a population-based, case-control study in the United States. Our analysis included mothers with pregnancies affected by one of 30 selected birth defects (cases) and babies without birth defects (controls) with estimated dates of delivery between 1997 and 2007. Exposure was any reported use of venlafaxine from 1 month preconception through the third month of pregnancy. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% Fisher Exact confidence intervals (CIs) for 24 birth defect groups for which at least 400 case mothers were interviewed. Our adjusted analyses controlled for maternal age and race/ethnicity. RESULTS Among the 27,045 NBDPS participants who met inclusion criteria, 0.17% (14/8002) of control mothers and 0.40% (77/19,043) of case mothers reported any use of venlafaxine from 1 month preconception through the third month of pregnancy. Statistically significant associations were found for anencephaly, atrial septal defect (ASD) secundum, or ASD not otherwise specified, coarctation of the aorta, cleft palate, and gastroschisis. CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest associations between periconceptional use of venlafaxine and some birth defects. However, sample sizes were small, CIs were wide, and additional studies are needed to confirm these results.


Emerging Infectious Diseases | 2016

Projecting Month of Birth for At-Risk Infants after Zika Virus Disease Outbreaks.

Jennita Reefhuis; Suzanne M. Gilboa; Michael A. Johansson; Diana Valencia; Regina M. Simeone; Susan L. Hills; Kara N. D. Polen; Denise J. Jamieson; Lyle R. Petersen; Margaret A. Honein

A modifiable spreadsheet tool will enable health officials to plan for these births.


Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2016

Estimating Contraceptive Needs and Increasing Access to Contraception in Response to the Zika Virus Disease Outbreak — Puerto Rico, 2016

Naomi K. Tepper; Howard I. Goldberg; Manuel I. Vargas Bernal; Brenda Rivera; Meghan T. Frey; Claritsa Malave; Christina M. Renquist; Nabal Bracero; Kenneth L. Dominguez; Ramon E. Sanchez; Carrie K. Shapiro-Mendoza; Blanca R. Cuevas Rodriguez; Regina M. Simeone; Nicki Pesik; Wanda D. Barfield; Jean Y. Ko; Romeo R. Galang; Janice Perez-Padilla; Kara N. D. Polen; Margaret A. Honein; Sonja A. Rasmussen; Denise J. Jamieson

Zika virus is a flavivirus transmitted primarily by Aedes species mosquitoes. Increasing evidence links Zika virus infection during pregnancy to adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes, including pregnancy loss, intrauterine growth restriction, eye defects, congenital brain abnormalities, and other fetal abnormalities. The virus has also been determined to be sexually transmitted. Because of the potential risks associated with Zika virus infection during pregnancy, CDC has recommended that health care providers discuss prevention of unintended pregnancy with women and couples who reside in areas of active Zika virus transmission and do not want to become pregnant. However, limitations in access to contraception in some of these areas might affect the ability to prevent an unintended pregnancy. As of March 16, 2016, the highest number of Zika virus disease cases in the United States and U.S. territories were reported from Puerto Rico. The number of cases will likely rise with increasing mosquito activity in affected areas, resulting in increased risk for transmission to pregnant women. High rates of unintended and adolescent pregnancies in Puerto Rico suggest that, in the context of this outbreak, access to contraception might need to be improved. CDC estimates that 138,000 women of reproductive age (aged 15-44 years) in Puerto Rico do not desire pregnancy and are not using one of the most effective or moderately effective contraceptive methods, and therefore might experience an unintended pregnancy. CDC and other federal and local partners are seeking to expand access to contraception for these persons. Such efforts have the potential to increase contraceptive access and use, reduce unintended pregnancies, and lead to fewer adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with Zika virus infection during pregnancy. The assessment of challenges and resources related to contraceptive access in Puerto Rico might be a useful model for other areas with active transmission of Zika virus.


Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety | 2016

Assessment of Youtube Videos As a Source of Information on Medication Use in Pregnancy

Craig Hansen; Julia D. Interrante; Elizabeth C. Ailes; Meghan T. Frey; Cheryl S. Broussard; Valerie J Godoshian; Courtney Lewis; Kara N. D. Polen; Amanda P. Garcia; Suzanne M. Gilboa

When making decisions about medication use in pregnancy, women consult many information sources, including the Internet. The aim of this study was to assess the content of publicly accessible YouTube videos that discuss medication use in pregnancy.


Birth Defects Research Part A-clinical and Molecular Teratology | 2014

Sociodemographic and hispanic acculturation factors and isolated anotia/microtia

Adrienne T. Hoyt; Mark A. Canfield; Gary M. Shaw; Dorothy Kim Waller; Kara N. D. Polen; Tunu A. Ramadhani; Marlene Anderka; Angela Scheuerle

BACKGROUND It has been observed in several studies that infants with anotia/microtia are more common among Hispanics compared with other racial/ethnic groups. We examined the association between selected Hispanic ethnicity and acculturation factors and anotia/microtia in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. METHODS We examined data from mothers of 351 infants with isolated anotia/microtia and 8435 unaffected infants from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study with an expected delivery date from 1997 to 2007. Sociodemographic, maternal, and acculturation factors (e.g., age, maternal education, household income, body mass index, gestational diabetes, folic acid, smoking, alcohol intake, study center, parental birthplace, and years lived in the United States, maternal language) were assessed as overall risk factors and also as risk factors among subgroups of Hispanics (United States- and foreign-born) versus non-Hispanic whites. RESULTS Compared with non-Hispanic whites, both United States- and foreign-born Hispanic mothers demonstrated substantially higher odds of delivering infants with anotia/microtia across nearly all strata of sociodemographic and other maternal factors (adjusted odds ratios range: 2.1-11.9). The odds of anotia/microtia was particularly elevated among Hispanic mothers who emigrated from Mexico after age five (adjusted odds ratios = 4.88; 95% confidence interval = 2.93-8.11) or who conducted the interview in Spanish (adjusted odds ratios = 4.97; 95% confidence interval = 3.00-8.24). CONCLUSION We observed that certain sociodemographic and acculturation factors are associated with higher risks of anotia/microtia among offspring of Hispanic mothers.


Maternal and Child Health Journal | 2018

Making Decisions About Medication Use During Pregnancy: Implications for Communication Strategies

Molly M. Lynch; Linda Squiers; Katherine M. Kosa; Suzanne Dolina; Jennifer Gard Read; Cheryl S. Broussard; Meghan T. Frey; Kara N. D. Polen; Jennifer N. Lind; Suzanne M. Gilboa; Janis Biermann

Objective To explore women’s perceptions of the risks and benefits associated with medication use during pregnancy and to better understand how women make decisions related to medication use in pregnancy. Methods We conducted online focus groups with 48 women who used medication during pregnancy or while planning a pregnancy, and 12 in-depth follow-up interviews with a subset of these women. Results We found that women were aware of general risks associated with medication use but were often unable to articulate specific negative outcomes. Women were concerned most about medications’ impact on fetal development but were also concerned about how either continuing or discontinuing medication during pregnancy could affect their own health. Women indicated that if the risk of a given medication were unknown, they would not take that medication during pregnancy. Conclusion This formative research found that women face difficult decisions about medication use during pregnancy and need specific information to help them make decisions. Enhanced communication between patients and their providers regarding medication use would help address this need. We suggest that public health practitioners develop messages to (1) encourage, remind, and prompt women to proactively talk with their healthcare providers about the risks of taking, not taking, stopping, or altering the dosage of a medication while trying to become pregnant and/or while pregnant; and (2) encourage all women of childbearing age to ask their healthcare providers about medication use.

Collaboration


Dive into the Kara N. D. Polen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Margaret A. Honein

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Denise J. Jamieson

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dana Meaney-Delman

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emily E. Petersen

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Meghan T. Frey

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sonja A. Rasmussen

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Susan L. Hills

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Suzanne M. Gilboa

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Titilope Oduyebo

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ann M. Powers

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge