Karel H. Wesseling

Circadian Profile of Systemic Hemodynamics

We determined the continuous 24-hour profile of mean arterial pressure, heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, and total peripheral resistance in eight healthy ambulatory volunteers. Beat-to-beat intra-arterial blood pressure was recorded with the Oxford system; subjects were ambulant during daytime and slept at night. Beat-to-beat stroke volume was determined by the pulse contour method from the arterial pulse wave. During the nighttime, compared with the daytime average, there was a decrease in blood pressure (9 mm Hg), heart rate (18 beats per minute), and cardiac output (29%); stroke volume showed a small decrease (7%), and total peripheral resistance increased unexpectedly by 22%. When subjects arose in the morning a steep increase in cardiac output and decrease in total peripheral resistance were found. Comparable changes were seen during a period of supine resting in the afternoon, whereas physical exercise caused opposite changes in hemodynamics. This pattern was observed in all subjects. We conclude that the circadian pattern of cardiac output and total peripheral resistance originates from the day-night pattern in physical activity: during the nighttime, blood flow to the skeletal muscles is decreased through local autoregulation, which increases total peripheral resistance and decreases cardiac output compared with the daytime.

Nexfin noninvasive continuous blood pressure validated against Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff.

BACKGROUND The Finapres methodology offers continuous measurement of blood pressure (BP) in a noninvasive manner. The latest development using this methodology is the Nexfin monitor. The present study evaluated the accuracy of Nexfin noninvasive arterial pressure (NAP) compared with auscultatory BP measurements (Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff, RRK). METHODS In supine subjects NAP was compared to RRK, performed by two observers using an electronic stethoscope with double earpieces. Per subject, three NAP-RRK differences were determined for systolic and diastolic BP, and bias and precision of differences were expressed as median (25th, 75th percentiles). Within-subject precision was defined as the (25th, 75th percentiles) after removing the average individual difference. RESULTS A total of 312 data sets of NAP and RRK for systolic and diastolic BP from 104 subjects (aged 18-95 years, 54 males) were compared. RRK systolic BP was 129 (115, 150), and diastolic BP was 80 (72, 89), NAP-RRK differences were 5.4 (-1.7, 11.0) mm Hg and -2.5 (-7.6, 2.3) mm Hg for systolic and diastolic BP, respectively; within-subject precisions were (-2.2, 2.3) and (-1.6, 1.5) mm Hg, respectively. CONCLUSION Nexfin provides accurate measurement of BP with good within-subject precision when compared to RRK.

Models of brachial to finger pulse wave distortion and pressure decrement

OBJECTIVE To model the pulse wave distortion and pressure decrement occurring between brachial and finger arteries. Distortion reversion and decrement correction were also our aims. METHODS Brachial artery pressure was recorded intra-arterially and finger pressure was recorded non-invasively by the Finapres technique in 53 adult human subjects. Mean pressure was subtracted from each pressure waveform and Fourier analysis applied to the pulsations. A distortion model was estimated for each subject and averaged over the group. The average inverse model was applied to the full finger pressure waveform. The pressure decrement was modelled by multiple regression on finger systolic and diastolic levels. RESULTS Waveform distortion could be described by a general, frequency dependent model having a resonance at 7.3 Hz. The general inverse model has an anti-resonance at this frequency. It converts finger to brachial pulsations thereby reducing average waveform distortion from 9.7 (s.d. 3.2) mmHg per sample for the finger pulse to 3.7 (1.7) mmHg for the converted pulse. Systolic and diastolic level differences between finger and brachial arterial pressures changed from -4 (15) and -8 (11) to +8 (14) and +8 (12) mmHg, respectively, after inverse modelling, with pulse pressures correct on average. The pressure decrement model reduced both the mean and the standard deviation of systolic and diastolic level differences to 0 (13) and 0 (8) mmHg. Diastolic differences were thus reduced most. CONCLUSION Brachial to finger pulse wave distortion due to wave reflection in arteries is almost identical in all subjects and can be modelled by a single resonance. The pressure decrement due to flow in arteries is greatest for high pulse pressures superimposed on low means.

Validation of brachial artery pressure reconstruction from finger arterial pressure

Objective Measurement of finger artery pressure with Finapres offers noninvasive continuous blood pressure, which, however, differs from brachial artery pressure. Generalized waveform filtering and level correction may convert the finger artery pressure waveform to a brachial waveform. An upper-arm cuff return-to-flow measurement may be used to calibrate the blood pressure on an individual basis. We tested these corrective methods as implemented in the Finometer device. Methods Intrabrachial artery pressure (BAP) and finger artery pressures were recorded simultaneously in 37 cardiac patients, aged 41–83 years, who underwent a cardiac catheterization procedure. Finger artery pressures were compared after waveform filtering and level correction and after an additional return-to-flow calibration. Measurements were performed in supine and sitting positions. Accuracy and precision were considered clinically acceptable if the mean and standard deviation of the return-to-flow intrabrachial artery pressure (reBAP)–BAP differences were smaller than 5 ± 8 mmHg (Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation requirements). Results Finger artery systolic, diastolic and mean pressures for the group differed from that of intrabrachial artery pressure by −10 ± 13, −12 ± 8 and −16 ± 8 mmHg, respectively. After waveform filtering and level correction the filtered level corrected arterial pressure differed by −1 ± 11, −0 ± 7 and −2 ± 7 mmHg. After individual calibration, reBAP differed by 3 ± 8, 4 ± 6 and 3 ± 5 mmHg. Comparable results were found in the sitting position but only when the supine return-to-flow calibration was used. Conclusion Reconstruction of intrabrachial artery pressure from finger artery pressure with waveform filtering and level correction reduces the pressure differences substantially, with diastolic and mean within Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation requirements. After one supine return-to-flow calibration, all pressure differences meet the requirements. Return-to-flow calibration should not be repeated in sitting position.

Comparison of intrabrachial and finger blood pressure in healthy elderly volunteers

This study was performed to compare continuous Finapres (FIN) and intrabrachial (IAP) blood pressure in healthy elderly volunteers. Fifteen elderly subjects (age 71 to 83) without cardiovascular disease and an intraarterial mean (range) systolic and diastolic blood pressure of 162 (122 to 195) and 73 (62 to 88) mm Hg, respectively, participated in the study. A 10-min head-up tilt, 10 min active standing, a 15-sec Valsalva, and a 5-min mental arithmetic were performed in random order. Beat-to-beat values of systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure were analyzed. At rest, FIN underestimated IAP by 16.8 +/- 2.6 (SE), 10.8 +/- 1.5, and 17.5 +/- 1.6 mm Hg for systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure, respectively (P < .05). During head-up tilt, FIN overestimated the intraarterial systolic blood pressure response by 7.2 +/- 1.6 (SE) mm Hg (P < .05). Group-averaged changes in diastolic and mean arterial IAP were followed closely by FIN. During standing, Finapres closely followed intraarterial diastolic and mean arterial pressure but the increase in systolic blood pressure was higher at the finger as compared to intrabrachial recordings, resembling the results of head-up tilt. During the Valsalva maneuver, maximal responses in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure were underestimated by FIN by 12.1 +/- 3.3 (SE), 6.8 +/- 2.7, and 7.1 +/- 1.7 mm Hg, respectively (P < .05 for all parameters). During mental arithmetic, FIN underestimated the intraarterial systolic blood pressure response by 6.1 +/- 2.7 (SE) mm Hg (P < .05), while diastolic and mean arterial pressure responses were followed correctly by FIN. It is concluded that apart from systolic blood pressure, FIN closely follows intraarterial blood pressure responses for the orthostatic maneuvers and mental arithmetic. During Valsalva, the rapid changes in blood pressure were followed in direction but not in magnitude.

Cardiac and hemodynamic effects of hemodialysis and ultrafiltration

Imbalance between cardiac oxygen supply and demand may trigger cardiac events in already vulnerable hemodialysis (HD) patients. We studied the effect of ultrafiltration (UF) and HD in nine chronic HD patients by continuously measuring blood volume (BV; by Critline), blood pressure (BP; by Portapres), and changes in hemodynamics (Modelflow) during isolated UF (iUF) of 500 mL in 30 minutes and subsequent HD combined with UF (HD + UF). Aortic pressure was reconstructed from finger pressure. Changes in cardiac oxygen supply were assessed by calculating the area under the aortic pressure curve during diastole (diastolic pressure time index [DPTI]). Changes in cardiac oxygen demand were assessed by calculating systolic pressure time index (SPTI). BV decreased 4.0% +/- 1.8% during UF and 7.3% +/- 3.3% during HD + UF (both P < 0.01). Systolic BP did not change; diastolic and mean BP increased 11 +/- 7.4 and 11 +/- 8.4 mm Hg during iUF, respectively (both P < 0.01), and stabilized during HD + UF. Overall pulse pressure decreased 19 +/- 11.1 mm Hg (P < 0.01). Heart rate increased 13 +/- 11 beats/min (P < 0.01) and systemic vascular resistance increased 59% +/- 51% (P < 0. 01), whereas stroke volume and cardiac output (CO) decreased by 40% +/- 17% and 30% +/- 13%, respectively (both P < 0.01). Both cardiac oxygen supply (DPTI) and demand (SPTI) increased during iUF, and both decreased during HD + UF. By the end of the procedure, DPTI/SPTI ratio had increased 9% +/- 8% (P < 0.05). Changes in CO correlated closely to changes in BV. Despite large changes in hemodynamics during uncomplicated UF and HD, the balance between cardiac oxygen supply and demand (DPTI/SPTI ratio) did not decrease, but improved slightly.

EFFECTS OF PERIPHERAL VASOCONSTRICTION ON THE BLOOD-PRESSURE IN THE FINGER, MEASURED CONTINUOUSLY BY A NEW NONINVASIVE METHOD (THE FINAPRES)

The authors determined whether vasoconstriction alters the ability of a noninvasive method (Finapres) of continuously measuring arterial blood pressure in the finger to function accurately. They compared the response of the Finapres to blood pressures determined simultaneously by an oscillometric technique (Dinamap) in six anesthetized patients. Vasoconstriction was detected from a photoelectric plethysmogram, which was recorded continuously from an adjacent finger. Vasoconstriction was defined as a decrease in amplitude to less than half of its highest value in one and the same patient. From the 378 paired blood pressure readings obtained in this study, 51% took place in such a vasoconstricted state. The authors found that diastolic and mean blood pressures in the finger were, on the average, 9 mmHg below those in the upper arm and that the systolic pressure was 7 mmHg above that in the upper arm. The authors concluded that the Finapres keeps functioning well during peripheral vasoconstriction and is a recommendable method to monitor arterial blood pressure in the finger.

Effects of graded vasoconstriction upon the measurement of finger arterial pressure

OBJECTIVE To assess the effects of incremental phenylephrine infusion rates and subsequent graded vasoconstriction upon the performance of the Ohmeda Finapres. DESIGN Blood pressure in eight hypertensive patients in the finger and the brachial artery was recorded simultaneously. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DPB) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were compared as well as additional waveform characteristics like the pressure at moment of the dicrotic notch and calculation of the pulsatile-systolic areas. RESULTS Before phenylephrine infusion SBP and DBP were higher in the finger. At maximal infusion (1.6 micrograms/kg/min) the increase in brachial SBP was significantly underestimated by Finapres. Thus, the computed sensitivities of baroreflex control for SBP differed significantly between the two measurements. Under control conditions, the shape of the finger waveform differed from the brachial-artery waveform in terms of: (1) a more peaked appearance; (2) a dicrotic notch (Pnotch) which is located at a lower percentage of pulse pressure; and (3) a larger pulsatile-systolic area. At maximal infusion rates finger Pnotch increased whilst intrabrachial Pnotch did not. In contrast, the brachial and finger pulsatile-systolic areas changed fully in parallel. CONCLUSIONS Phenylephrine infusion caused a significant, and clinically important, underestimation of the increase in brachial SBP when assessed by Finapres, whereas MAP and DBP and pulsatile-systolic area track intra-arterial pressure reliably.

Estimation of Blood Pressure Variability From 24-Hour Ambulatory Finger Blood Pressure

Portapres is a noninvasive, beat-to-beat finger blood pressure (BP) monitor that has been shown to accurately estimate 24-hour intra-arterial BP at normal and high BPs. However, no information is available on the ability of this device to accurately track ambulatory BP variability. In 20 ambulatory normotensive and hypertensive subjects, we measured 24-hour BP by Portapres and through a brachial artery catheter. BP and pulse interval variabilities were quantified by (1) the SDs of the mean values (overall variability) and (2) spectral power, computed either by fast Fourier transform and autoregressive modeling of segments of 120-second duration for spectral components from 0.025 to 0.50 Hz or in a very low frequency range (between 0.00003 and 0.01 Hz) by broadband spectral analysis. The 24-hour SD of systolic BP obtained from Portapres (24+/-2 mm Hg) was greater than that obtained intra-arterially (17+/-1 mm Hg, P<0.01), but the overestimation was less evident for diastolic (3+/-1 mm Hg, P<0.01) and mean (3+/-1 mm Hg, P<0.01) BP. The BP spectral power <0.15 Hz was also overestimated by Portapres more for systolic than for diastolic and mean BPs; similar findings were obtained by the fast Fourier transform, the autoregressive approach, and focusing on the broadband spectral analysis. BP spectral power >0.15 Hz obtained by the Portapres was similar during the day but lower during the night when compared with those obtained by intra-arterial recordings (P<0.01). No differences were observed between Portapres and intra-arterial recordings for any estimation of pulse interval variabilities. The overestimation of BP variability by Portapres remained constant over virtually the entire 24-hour recording period. Thus, although clinical studies are still needed to demonstrate the clinical relevance of finger BP variability, our study shows that Portapres can be used with little error to estimate 24-hour BP variabilities if diastolic and mean BPs are used. For systolic BP, the greater error can be minimized by using correction factors.

Individualization of transfer function in estimation of central aortic pressure from the peripheral pulse is not required in patients at rest.

Central aortic pressure gives better insight into ventriculo-arterial coupling and better prognosis of cardiovascular complications than peripheral pressures. Therefore transfer functions (TF), reconstructing aortic pressure from peripheral pressures, are of great interest. Generalized TFs (GTF) give useful results, especially in larger study populations, but detailed information on aortic pressure might be improved by individualization of the TF. We found earlier that the time delay, representing the travel time of the pressure wave between measurement site and aorta is the main determinant of the TF. Therefore, we hypothesized that the TF might be individualized (ITF) using this time delay. In a group of 50 patients at rest, aged 28-66 yr (43 men), undergoing diagnostic angiography, ascending aortic pressure was 119 +/- 20/70 +/- 9 mmHg (systolic/diastolic). Brachial pressure, almost simultaneously measured using catheter pullback, was 131 +/- 18/67 +/- 9 mmHg. We obtained brachial-to-aorta ITFs using time delays optimized for the individual and a GTF using averaged delay. With the use of ITFs, reconstructed aortic pressure was 121 +/- 19/69 +/- 9 mmHg and the root mean square error (RMSE), as measure of difference in wave shape, was 4.1 +/- 2.0 mmHg. With the use of the GTF, reconstructed pressure was 122 +/- 19/69 +/- 9 mmHg and RMSE 4.4 +/- 2.0 mmHg. The augmentation index (AI) of the measured aortic pressure was 26 +/- 13%, and with ITF and GTF the AIs were 28 +/- 12% and 30 +/- 11%, respectively. Details of the wave shape were reproduced slightly better with ITF but not significantly, thus individualization of pressure transfer is not effective in resting patients.