Karel Van Brussel
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Karel Van Brussel.
Spine | 2001
Jan Goffin; Karel Van Brussel; Kirsten Martens; Jos Vander Sloten; Remi Van Audekercke; Maria-Helena Smet
Study Design. Cadaver and preliminary clinical study. Objectives. To enhance the precision of screw positions for posterior transarticular fixations according to Magerl at C1–C2. Summary of Background Data. The vertebral arteries are at risk during the Magerl operation and may be damaged in up to 4.1% of cases. Even intraoperative navigation, as often used nowadays, does not provide optimal screw positioning in all patients. Methods. According to the three-dimensional CT data obtained for every individual cadaver or patient, a template was designed for the posterior course of C2: the template contains a drill guide allowing navigated screw positioning inside the left and right isthmus of C2. For a first series of five cadavers a template with clamps connecting only to the lamina of C2, excluding the spinous process from the interface, was carried out. For a second series of three cadavers the template was connected not only to the lamina but also to the spinous process of C2. Both cadaver series were performed without any fluoroscopic control at surgery. Eventually the technology was applied in two clinical cases. Results. The rotational stability of the template toward the lamina C2 was insufficient in the first series, but for the second series both the entry points and screw trajectories were very satisfactory . Conclusions. Although the actual experience is limited, the idea of using a template with drill guide might simplify and shorten the surgical act and at the same time enhance the accuracy of C1–C2 transarticular screw positioning.
Work-a Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation | 2012
Vincent Verhaert; Hans Druyts; Dorien Van Deun; Tom De Wilde; Karel Van Brussel; Bart Haex; Jos Vander Sloten
The sleep system (i.e. the combination of mattress and bed base) is an important factor of the sleep environment since it allows physical recuperation during sleep by providing proper body support. However, various factors influence the interaction between the human body and the sleep system. Contributing factors include body dimensions, distribution of body weight and stiffness of the sleep system across the mattress surface. During the past decade, the rise of several new bedding technologies has made it increasingly difficult for the consumer to select a proper sleep system. Therefore, this study presents a method to model human-bed interaction in order to objectively predict the ideal sleep system for a particular individual. The proposed method combines a personalized anthropometric model with standardized load-deflection characteristics of mattress and bed base. Results for lateral sleep positions show a root mean square deviation of 11.9 ± 6.1 mm between modeled spine shapes and validation shapes, derived from 3D surface scans of the back surface. The method showed to be a reliable tool to individually identify the sleep system providing superior support from a variety of possible mattress-bed base combinations.
medical image computing and computer assisted intervention | 1999
Kirsten Martens; Kris Verstreken; Johan Van Cleynenbreugel; Karel Van Brussel; Jan Goffin; Guy Marchal; Paul Suetens
OBJECTIVE Posterior transarticular spine fusion is a surgical procedure used to stabilize the cervical bodies C1 and C2. Currently, spine screws are used most frequently, according to the procedure of Magerl. As the anatomy is rather complex and the view is limited, this procedure has a high risk factor. We present and validate a planning system for cervical screw insertion based on preoperative CT imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS The planning system discussed allowed a neurosurgeon to interactively determine the desired position of the cervical screws, based on appropriate and real-time reslices through the preoperative CT image volume. From the planning, a personalized mechanical drill guide was derived as a means of transferring the plan intraoperatively. Eight cadaver experiments were performed to validate this approach. Postoperative CT was applied, and screw locations were extracted from the postoperative images after registering them to preoperative images. In this way, the deviations of the axes of the planned and inserted screws were determined. RESULTS From an initial cadaver series, it was observed that the drill guides were not stable enough to cope with the drilling forces, and tended to become displaced. Still, most of the inserted screws were reported to be placed adequately. No vascular compromise or invasion of the spinal canal was observed. For a second cadaver series, the design of the drill guide was altered. In this series, the displacement was no longer present, and all screws were optimally placed. CONCLUSIONS The preoperative planning system allowed the neurosurgeon to rehearse screw insertion in a way that is closer to surgical reality. The image-based validation technique allowed verification and enhancement of the template design on a cadaver study, giving accuracies comparable to those obtained with transfer by navigation.
Computer Aided Surgery | 2002
Johan Van Cleynenbreugel; Filip Schutyser; Jan Goffin; Karel Van Brussel; Paul Suetens
Neuro-orthopedics | 1999
Jan Goffin; Karel Van Brussel; Jos Vander Sloten; Remy Van Audekercke; Maria-Helena Smet; Guy Marchal; W Van Craen; B Swaelens; Kris Verstreken
Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering | 1997
Karel Van Brussel; Jos Vander Sloten; Remy Van Audekercke; B Swaelens; F Richard; R Assaker; Jf Kulik
Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering | 2004
Karel Van Brussel; Bart Haex; Jos Vander Sloten; Remy Van Audekercke; Jan Goffin; Philippe Lauweryns; P Rozing
Proceedings of the 5th Conference of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine | 1999
Karel Van Brussel; Philippe Lauweryns; Jos Vander Sloten; Remy Van Audekercke; G. Fabry; W Vancraen
Proceedings of the Triennial Conference of the International Ergonomics Society | 2006
Tom De Wilde; Nico Bogaert; Cristian Forausberger; Bart Haex; Jos Vander Sloten; Marcin Witkowski; Robert Sitnik; Walter Rapp; Sven Mooshake; Karel Van Brussel
Proceedings of the 90th ICB Seminar 'Biomechanics of Human - Machine Systems. Trends and Applications' | 2006
Bart Haex; Tom De Wilde; Karel Van Brussel; Tom Huysmans; Remy Van Audekercke; Georges Van der Perre; Jos Vander Sloten