Karen A. Bantel
Wayne State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Karen A. Bantel.
Academy of Management Journal | 1992
Margarethe F. Wiersema; Karen A. Bantel
This study examined the relationship between the demography of top management teams and corporate strategic change, measured as absolute change in diversification level, within a sample of Fortune ...
Group & Organization Management | 1993
Karen A. Bantel
This study examined hypotheses linking three categories of variables, top management team demography, environmental uncertainty, and firm performance, to the extent to which retail banks engage in a formal strategic planning process. The specific variables studied included: mean tenure, mean age, mean education level, functional background heterogeneity, and education major heterogeneity under team demography; environmental complexity and instability under environmental uncertainty; and performance level and volatility under firm performance. Results show that low tenure mean, functional heterogeneity, environmental complexity, and performance volatlity all had positive effects on strategic planning formality.
Group & Organization Management | 1994
Karen A. Bantel
The effect of top management team demography on the strategic planning dimension of planning openness was examined in a sample of retail banks. The following demographic characteristics were analyzed: mean tenure, age, and education level, and heterogeneity on educational major and functional background. After controlling for firm size and performance volatility, low tenure mean, low education mean, and functional heterogeneity were found to have an influence on planning openness.
Psychological Reports | 1993
Karen A. Bantel
A conceptual model linking the demographic heterogeneity of the top management team to comprehensiveness of strategic planning is developed. Planning comprehensiveness is one of the key dimensions underlying the dominant models of formulation of strategy, consistent with the tradition of “synoptic” strategic planning. Drawing on group process theory, heterogeneity among team members in outlooks and perspectives, represented by their demographic backgrounds, is expected to stimulate an open, broad, and challenge-oriented approach to the process of strategic planning, consistent with comprehensiveness. Heterogeneity on five characteristics—age, organizational tenure, team tenure, functional background, and educational curriculum—was included. Also discussed are the complexities of managing the group process of a heterogeneous team and additional influences, external to the team, on the comprehensiveness of strategic planning.
Journal of small business and entrepreneurship | 1993
Karen A. Bantel
ABSTRACT Several key influences on the growth of entrepreneurial, technology-based small firms are described. First, the level of technical change in the environment is an important factor both by itself and as a context within which the appropriateness of strategic approaches and strategic planning processes can be evaluated. Second, the importance of four aspects of strategy—product/service relatedness to founder(s) background, persistence of initial product/service focus, pioneering, and strategy type (focus, differentiated, undifferentiated)—are described. Finally, the role of three aspects of planning processes—openness, comprehensiveness and formality—are discussed.
Strategic Management Journal | 1989
Karen A. Bantel; Susan E. Jackson
Strategic Management Journal | 1993
Margarethe F. Wiersema; Karen A. Bantel
Psychological Reports | 1993
Karen A. Bantel
British Journal of Management | 1995
Karen A. Bantel; Richard N. Osborn
Psychological Reports | 1994
Andrew R. McGill; Michael D. Johnson; Karen A. Bantel