Karen House

Inhaled fluticasone propionate delivered by means of two different multidose powder inhalers is effective and safe in a large pediatric population with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND Inhaled corticosteroids are increasingly being used to treat mild-to-moderate asthma in children. However, data regarding therapy with this class of compounds, especially in children under age 6 years, is limited. Fluticasone propionate is a third generation inhaled corticosteroid with an optimal therapeutic index. Few large prospective clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate powder in children. OBJECTIVE We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate powder administered by means of the Diskus and Diskhaler multidose powder inhalers in pediatric patients with persistent asthma. METHODS Fluticasone propionate powder (50 microg or 100 microg twice daily) or placebo was administered by means of the Diskus or Diskhaler inhalers to 437 children (4 to 11 years old) with persistent asthma for 12 weeks in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multi-center trial. Patients were stratified according to whether they were receiving prior treatment with inhaled corticosteroids or cromolyn or beta2-agonists alone. RESULTS Fluticasone propionate powder administered by means of Diskus or Diskhaler significantly improved FEV1 (mean increase from baseline of 0.22 to 0.24 L; p < or = 0.023), clinic morning peak expiratory flow (mean increase from baseline of 48 to 55 L/min; p < or = 0.006), patient-measured morning (p < or = 0.001) and evening (p < or = 0.003) peak expiratory flow, and asthma symptom scores (in all but the 50 microg Diskus group; p < or = 0.036), as well as reduced albuterol use (p < or = 0.002) and nighttime awakenings (p < or = 0.019) at endpoint. Efficacy parameters were not significantly different between the two doses with either device. More placebo-treated patients discontinued the study because of lack of efficacy than patients in any fluticasone propionate group (p < 0.001). Fluticasone propionate did not suppress morning plasma cortisol concentrations and did not affect 24-hour urinary free-cortisol excretion. Adverse events were primarily pharmacologic effects of inhaled corticosteroids, and those related to the study drug occurred with low frequency. Patient satisfaction with both the Diskus and Diskhaler devices was high, with a majority of patients (> 80%) rating them favorably. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that fluticasone propionate powder, at the conventional recommended doses of up to 200 microg/day administered by means of Diskus or Diskhaler, was well tolerated and improved lung function in children even as young as 4 and 5 years old regardless of whether they were previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids or cromolyn or beta2-agonists alone.

The safety of twice-daily treatment with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol in pediatric patients with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND For children older than 5 years with asthma who remain symptomatic despite inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy, the preferred treatment is to add an inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist vs increasing the ICS dose. OBJECTIVE To compare the safety of twice-daily treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate plus the inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist salmeterol with that of fluticasone propionate used alone in children aged 4 to 11 years with persistent asthma. METHODS A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group study in 203 children with persistent asthma who were symptomatic during ICS therapy. Patients received fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (100/50 microg) or fluticasone propionate (100 microg) alone twice daily for 12 weeks. RESULTS The safety profile of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol was similar to that of fluticasone propionate alone. The overall incidence of adverse events was 59% for fluticasone propionate-salmeterol and 57% for fluticasone propionate. Both treatments were well tolerated. Two patients receiving fluticasone propionate-salmeterol and 5 receiving fluticasone propionate withdrew from the study because of worsening asthma. Changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and laboratory variables were infrequent and were similar between treatments. No patients had clinically significant abnormal electrocardiographic findings during treatment. Geometric mean 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment was comparable within and between groups; no patient in either group had abnormally low 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion after 12 weeks of treatment. The incidence of withdrawals due to asthma exacerbations was 2% in the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol group and 5% in the fluticasone propionate group. CONCLUSIONS In pediatric patients with persistent asthma, fluticasone propionate-salmeterol twice daily was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of fluticasone propionate used alone.

Efficacy and safety of dry powder fluticasone propionate in children with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND Flovent Diskus is a powder formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) delivered via a breath-actuated, multidose inhaler. OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy and safety of dry powder FP administered once or twice daily (200 microg per day) to children with persistent asthma. METHODS Twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a 52-week, open-label extension. Children aged 4 to 11 were required to have pulmonary function 50% to 85% of predicted values. The population was stratified for baseline therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/cromolyn or bronchodilators only). After a 2-week placebo run-in, 242 patients received dry powder FP 200 microg each morning, dry powder FP 100 microg BID, or placebo for 12 weeks; 192 were rerandomized to the QD or BID regimen for an additional 52 weeks of open-label treatment. Primary endpoints were mean changes in FEV1 and morning PEF recorded at clinic visits. RESULTS Both dry powder FP regimens significantly improved FEV1, evening PEF, and asthma symptoms at the double-blind phase endpoint (P < or = .017 compared with placebo). The BID regimen also significantly improved morning PEF and nighttime awakenings due to asthma (P < or = .005). Among patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids/cromolyn, improvements observed with the QD and BID regimens were similar. Patients switched from BID to open-label QD treatment showed additional improvements at week 52 generally comparable to patients who received the BID regimen during both phases. Fluticasone propionate was well tolerated for up to 64 weeks with few reports of drug-related adverse events or morning plasma cortisol abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS Once daily dosing of dry powder FP 200 microg is an effective and convenient alternative for children whose asthma is controlled with a more frequent dosing regimen of inhaled corticosteroids.

Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Propionate/Salmeterol HFA 134A MDI in Patients with Mild‐to‐Moderate Persistent Asthma

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) (44 µg)/salmeterol (21 µg) delivered as two inhalations twice daily via a single hydrofluoroalkane (HFA 134a) metered dose inhaler (MDI) (FSC) with that of placebo HFA 134a (PLA), fluticasone propionate 44 µg chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) alone and salmeterol 21 µg CFC alone (S) in patients (n = 360) with persistent asthma previously treated with β2‐agonists (short‐ or long‐acting) or inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). After 12 weeks of treatment, patients treated with FSC had a significantly greater increase (p ≤ 0.006) in mean FEV1 AUC(bl) compared with PLA, FP, or S. At end point, mean change from baseline in morning predose FEV1 for FSC (0.58 L) was significantly (p ≤ 0.004) greater than PLA (0.14 L), FP (0.36 L), and S (0.25 L). Patients treated with FSC also had a significantly higher probability of remaining in the study without being withdrawn due to worsening asthma (2%) compared with those in the PLA (29%) and S (25%) groups (p < 0.001). Finally, treatment with FSC resulted in significantly (p ≤ 0.007) greater improvements in morning and evening peak expiratory flow, need for rescue albuterol, and asthma symptom scores compared with FP, S, and PLA. The safety profile of FSC was also similar to FP or S alone. Initial maintenance treatment of the two main components of asthma, inflammation, and smooth muscle dysfunction (e.g., bronchoconstriction), with FSC results in greater overall improvements in asthma control compared with treatment of either individual component alone.

Once-daily fluticasone furoate is efficacious in patients with symptomatic asthma on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND Fluticasone furoate (FF) is an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) with 24-hour activity in development as a once-daily treatment for the long-term management of asthma. OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and safety of 4 doses of once-daily FF administered using a dry powder inhaler in patients (≥12 years) with moderate asthma, uncontrolled on low-dose ICS (fluticasone propionate [FP] 200 μg/day or equivalent). METHODS This double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study randomized 622 patients to 1 of 6 treatments: FF (100, 200, 300, or 400 μg) once daily in the evening, FP 250 μg twice daily (active control), or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in predose evening forced expiratory colume in 1 second (FEV1) at week 8. RESULTS At week 8, relative to placebo, all doses of FF once daily and FP twice daily demonstrated significantly (P < .001) greater increases from baseline and greater than 200-mL increases in predose FEV1. There was no evidence of a dose-response relationship between FF doses. Improvement with once-daily FF was similar to or greater than that for twice-daily FP. Secondary efficacy endpoint findings generally supported the efficacy of FF 100 to 400 μg once daily, although statistically significant improvements versus placebo in symptom-free 24-hour periods were only reported for FF 400 μg. There were few withdrawals due to lack of efficacy. Oral candidiasis was reported in 0 to 4% of patients; 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion ratios were similar across active treatment groups and not significantly different from placebo. CONCLUSION FF 100 to 400 μg once daily in the evening is effective and well tolerated in patients with asthma uncontrolled on low-dose ICS, with 100 μg and 200 μg, considered the most applicable doses in this asthma population. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00603278.

Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, efficacy, and safety data from two randomized, double-blind studies in patients with asthma and an in vitro study comparing two dry-powder inhalers delivering a combination of salmeterol 50 μg and fluticasone propionate 250 μg: Implications for establishing bioequivalence of inhaled products

BACKGROUND The use of dry-powder inhalers (DPIs) to administer respiratory medicines is increasing, and new DPIs are likely to be developed because of expiring patents. However, there is considerable debate concerning the extent to which DPIs are interchangeable without altering disease control or the safety profile of the treatment. OBJECTIVE This study was designed to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), efficacy, and safety data for 2 DPIs delivering a combination of salmeterol 50 microg plus fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 microg (SFC 50/250) to investigate assumptions of bioequivalence. METHODS Three studies compared SFC 50/250 delivery using a reservoir powder inhalation device (RPID) and a Diskus multiple-dose inhaler: an in vitro assessment of fine-particle-mass (FPM) profiles of the emitted doses; a PK/PD study of SFC 50/250 administered in two 14-day crossover treatment periods to 22 adults with moderate, persistent asthma to determine the equivalence of the RPID and Diskus inhaler in terms of drug delivery and systemic exposure; and a 12-week clinical efficacy and safety study of SFC 50/250 in 270 patients > or =12 years of age with moderate, persistent asthma to assess the equivalence of the RPID and Diskus inhaler based on peak expiratory flow (PEF) rates. FPM was summed from the quantity of active pharmaceutical ingredient deposited on stages 1 to 5 of a cascade impactor, representing an aerodynamic particle size range of 0.8 to 6.2 microm. Systemic exposure to SFC 50/250 was declared no greater with RPID than with the Diskus inhaler if the upper limit of the 90% CI for the ratio of FP AUC for the 2 devices was below the upper limit of the equivalence range (ie, <1.25). Adverse events, clinical laboratory test results, and vital signs were recorded throughout the 2 clinical studies. RESULTS In vitro, mean FPM values for the RPID and Diskus inhaler, respectively, were 13.1 and 12.8 microg/dose for salmeterol (P = NS) and 66.8 and 66.2 microg/dose for FP (P = NS). The only notable differences were mean FP for particle sizes 2.3 to 3.2 microm (21.4 microg/dose for RPID, 25.6 microg/dose for Diskus) and for sizes 4.0 to 6.2 microm (17.3 microg/dose for RPID, 11.7 microg/dose for Diskus). In the PK/PD study, there were 22 patients (16 men and 6 women), most (86%) of whom were white. Mean (SD) age was 26.0 (5.0) years (range, 19-35 years), and mean (SD) weight was 67.3 (8.9) kg. The 2 inhalers did not meet the criteria for declaring bioequivalence: estimated ratios (RPID:Diskus) were 2.00 (90% CI, 1.56 to 2.55) for FP AUC up to the time point of next dosing and 1.92 (90% CI, 1.64 to 2.25) for salmeterol maximum observed plasma concentration at the end of the dosing interval (at steady state). Urine cortisol (0-24 hours) was significantly lower for the RPID than for the Diskus inhaler (ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.96]; P = 0.026); no significant difference in plasma cortisol was noted between the 2 inhalers (ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.7 to 1.04]). A small but statistically significant increase in maximum heart rate (5 beats/min) was noted in the RPID group (ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.01 to 1.10]; P = 0.029). No notable differences in other PD end points were observed. Drug-related adverse events occurred in both groups (2 [dysphagia and tremor] in the RPID group and 3 [2 cases of dysphonia, 1 case of mucous-membrane irritation] in the Diskus group). There were 270 patients (136 females, 134 males) in the clinical efficacy and safety study, most (94%) of whom were white; mean (SD) age was 37.2 (17.0) years (range, 11-77 years) in the RPID group and 35.4 (17.2) years (range, 12-77 years) in the Diskus group. The RPID and the Diskus inhaler met the predefined equivalence criteria (+/-15 L/min) in terms of mean change in morning PEF from baseline: 3.9 L/min (95% CI, -3.1 to 11.0). The 2 SFC 50/250 inhalers were well tolerated; the most frequently reported adverse event was bronchitis, reported by 12% of the patients in the RPID group and 9% of those in the Diskus group. The only serious adverse event, which occurred in the RPID group and was related to bronchial infection, was considered unrelated to treatment. CONCLUSIONS In vitro particle size distribution data were potentially superimposable for the RPID and the Diskus inhaler. The 2 devices were considered to be clinically equivalent in terms of mean morning PEF but were not considered equivalent in terms of PK systemic exposure. The 2 SFC 50/250 inhalers were well tolerated and had comparable safety profiles; no serious adverse events were attributed to the study product.

Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol administered via Diskus compared with salmeterol or fluticasone propionate alone in patients suboptimally controlled with short-acting β2-agonists

BACKGROUND Optimal therapy for many patients with persistent asthma requires control of both main components of this disease: inflammation and bronchoconstriction. OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy and safety of initiating maintenance therapy with an inhaled, long-acting beta2-agonist and an inhaled corticosteroid administered from a single device with that of the individual agents alone. METHODS A 12-week, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in patients 12 years and older with persistent asthma who were symptomatic while taking as-needed, short-acting beta2-agonists alone. Treatments were administered twice daily via the Diskus device: salmeterol, 50 microg; fluticasone propionate, 100 microg; or fluticasone propionate, 100 microg, with salmeterol, 50 microg. RESULTS Of 555 patients screened, 267 were randomly assigned to treatment. At end point, fluticasone propionate and salmeterol significantly increased predose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) compared with salmeterol alone (0.51 +/- 0.05 L vs 0.38 +/- 0.04 L, P = .04). Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol significantly increased area under the serial FEV1 curve at treatment week 12 relative to predose FEV1 (baseline) on treatment day 1 (AUCb1, 8.4 +/- 0.6 L/h; P < or = .02) compared with salmeterol (6.2 +/- 0.5 L/h) and fluticasone propionate (7.0 +/- 0.6 L/h). Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol were significantly (P < or = .02) more effective than the individual agents used alone in improving morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate and asthma symptoms. In addition, fluticasone propionate and salmeterol effectively reduced rescue albuterol use (P < or = .04). All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS In patients symptomatic while taking short-acting beta2-agonists alone, initial maintenance treatment of the 2 main components of asthma, inflammation and smooth muscle dysfunction, with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol, 100 and 50 microg, administered via the Diskus results in greater improvements in overall asthma control compared with treatment of either component alone.