Karen M. Lionello-DeNolf

The search for symmetry: 25 years in review

It has been 25 years since the publication of Sidman et al.’s (1982) report on the search for symmetry in nonhuman animals. They attributed their nonhuman subjects’ failure to the absence of some critical experiences (e.g., exemplar training, control of location variables, and generalized identity matching). Since then, species ranging from rats to chimpanzees have been tested on symmetry, and the results have been equivocal. Twenty-four investigations of symmetry in nonhumans are reviewed to determine whether the underlying factors first addressed by Sidman et al. (1982) have been verified and whether new factors have been identified. The emergent picture shows that the standard procedures as typically implemented on a three-key apparatus are insufficient by themselves to produce emergent symmetry in nonhumans. Recent successful demonstrations of symmetry in sea lions and pigeons have clarified certain important stimulus control variables (i.e., select and reject control) and suggest avenues for future research. Reliable symmetry may be achievable with nonhumans if training and test procedures that encourage compatible stimulus-control topographies and relations are designed.

Reversal learning set and functional equivalence in children with and without autism

To evaluate whether children with and without autism could exhibit (a) functional equivalence in the course of yoked repeated-reversal training and (b) reversal learning set, 6 children, in each of two experiments, were exposed to simple discrimination contingencies with three sets of stimuli. The discriminative functions of the set members were yoked and repeatedly reversed. In Experiment 1, all the children (of preschool age) showed gains in the efficiency of reversal learning across reversal problems and behavior that suggested formation of functional equivalence. In Experiment 2, 3 nonverbal children with autism exhibited strong evidence of reversal learning set and 2 showed evidence of functional equivalence. The data suggest a possible relationship between efficiency of reversal learning and functional equivalence test outcomes. Procedural variables may prove important in assessing the potential of young or nonverbal children to classify stimuli on the basis of shared discriminative functions.

Evaluation of Resistance to Change under Different Disrupter Conditions in Children with Autism and Severe Intellectual Disability

Translational research inspired by behavioral momentum theory in the area of developmental disabilities has shown effects in individuals over a range of functioning levels. In the current study, behavioral momentum was assessed in 6 children diagnosed with autism and severe intellectual disability. In a repeated measures design, participants were exposed to relatively rich versus lean reinforcement contingencies in a multiple schedule with food reinforcers. This was followed by exposure to each of four disrupting conditions: prefeeding, presentation of a concurrent alternative stimulus, presentation of a movie, and the presence of a researcher dispensing response-independent reinforcers on a variable-time schedule. Consistently greater resistance to disruption in the component with the richer schedule occurred with the alternative stimulus disrupter but not with the other disrupters. These results suggest parameters that may be more (or less) effective if behavioral momentum inspired techniques are to be exploited in therapeutic environments.

Some tests of the anticipatory mediated generalization model of acquired sample equivalence in pigeons’ many-to-one matching

Transfer-of-control tests typically show the development of acquired equivalence between samples occasioning the same comparison choice in pigeons’ many-to-one matching-to-sample. Specifically, when some of those samples are later explicitly trained to occasion new comparison choices, the remaining samples immediately exert control over the new choices as well. In the present experiments, we examined whether or not this transfer effect depends on the order in which the various sample-comparison relations in training are learned. One group of pigeons initially acquired 0-delay many-to-one matching with four samples and two comparisons, followed by 0-delay matching with two of those samples and two new comparisons. Another group of pigeons learned the two-sample matching task first, followed by many-to-one matching. When subsequently tested for their ability to match the remaining samples from many-to-one matching to the comparisons used in the two-sample task, both groups showed comparable levels of transfer. These findings challenge the view that common anticipatory processes ostensibly arising from the samples in many-to-one matching are necessary mediators for the subsequent transfer effects indicative of acquired sample equivalence.

Contextual influences on resistance to disruption in children with intellectual disabilities

Training context can influence resistance to disruption under differing reinforcement schedules. With nonhumans, when relatively lean and rich reinforcement schedules are experienced in the context of a multiple schedule, greater resistance is found in the rich than the lean component, as described by behavioral momentum theory. By contrast, when the schedules are experienced in separated blocks of sessions (i.e., as single schedules), resistance is not consistently greater in either component. In the current study, two groups of 6 children with intellectual disabilities responded to stimuli presented in relatively lean or rich components. For both, reinforcers were delivered according to the same variable-interval reinforcement schedule; additionally, the rich component included the delivery of response-independent reinforcers. The Within group was trained on a multiple schedule in which lean and rich components alternated regularly within sessions; the Blocked group was trained on two single schedules in which sessions with either the lean or rich schedule were conducted in successive blocks. Disruption tests presented a concurrently available alternative stimulus disrupter signaling the availability of tangible reinforcers. All 6 Within participants showed greater resistance to disruption in the rich component, consistent with behavioral momentum theory. By contrast, there was no consistent or significant difference in resistance for Blocked participants. This finding is potentially relevant to the development of interventions in applied settings, where such interventions often approximate single schedules and include response-independent reinforcers.

The role of common reinforced comparison responses in acquired sample equivalence.

Different samples occasioning the same reinforced comparison response in matching-to-sample are interchangeable for one another outside of original training. The present studies were designed to verify the role of these common responses in producing acquired sample equivalence by explicitly varying the presence or absence of this commonality during training. In each of the two experiments, one group of pigeons made the same reinforced choice response following multiple sample stimuli, whereas controls either made different reinforced choices following each sample (Experiment 1) or reinforced choices after only two of four center-key stimuli (Experiment 2). Later, two of the original samples/center-key stimuli were established as conditional cues for new comparison responses, after which the ability of the remaining samples/center-key stimuli to occasion those new responses was assessed. Following common-response training, matching accuracy was higher on class-consistent than on class-inconsistent transfer tests, whereas accuracy in the controls was generally intermediate between these two extremes, a pattern similar to that reported in the human paired-associate literature. These findings confirm that occasioning the same reinforced choice response is one means by which disparate samples become functionally equivalent.

Assessing the contributions of S-O and R-O associations to differential-outcome matching through outcome reversals.

Pigeons were trained on symbolic matching with 2 samples, 2 pairs of comparisons, and different outcomes for the correct responses within each comparison pair. For one group, the 2 samples were also associated with different outcomes, whereas for another group, they were not. When the response-outcome (R-O) relations for one pair were subsequently reversed, the group trained with differential sample-outcome (S-O) associations was significantly disrupted in its performance on both reversed- and nonreversed-outcome trials. By contrast, the group trained with just differential R-O associations was disrupted only on reversed-outcome trials. These results were replicated when the outcomes on the initially nonreversed trials were then reversed. The findings indicate that differential S-O associations, when present, have a stronger influence on matching performances than differential R-O associations. They are also consistent with hierarchical and configural models of discriminative control.

A NOVEL METHOD FOR TEACHING THE FIRST INSTANCES OF SIMPLE DISCRIMINATION TO NONVERBAL CHILDREN WITH AUTISM IN A LABORATORY ENVIRONMENT

A novel method for initiating discrimination training with nonverbal children combines a delayed S+ procedure that requires children to refrain from responding to either of 2 physically different choice stimuli until a prompt stimulus is added onto 1 of the choices, and a delayed prompting procedure that presents the same 2-choice stimulus display, but stimuli are initially added onto both choices. After a short delay, the added stimulus on the S- is removed, and the choice of the S+ is thus prompted. If the children learn to observe and respond to the defining features of the S+ choice stimulus, then they may respond to the S+ prior to the added-stimulus removal. Implementation was successful with 8 nonverbal children who had not previously exhibited simple simultaneous discrimination, suggesting a useful methodology for initiating discrimination training with populations for whom verbal instruction is ineffective.

Teaching stimulus–stimulus relations to minimally verbal individuals: reflections on technology and future directions

ABSTRACT This paper discusses recent methodological approaches and investigations that are aimed at developing reliable behavioral technology for teaching stimulus–stimulus relations to individuals who are minimally verbal and show protracted difficulty in acquiring such relations. The paper has both empirical and theoretical contents. The empirical component presents recent data concerning the possibility of generating rapid relational learning in individuals who do not initially show it. The theoretical component (1) considers decades of methodological investigations with this population and (2) suggests a testable hypothesis concerning some individuals who exhibit unusual difficulties in learning. Given this background, we suggest a way forward to better understand and perhaps resolve these learning challenges.

Teaching visual conditional discriminations using errorless learning: The role of prompts requiring simple and conditional discriminative control

ABSTRACT Errorless learning procedures were first developed in Basic Research Laboratories with nonhuman subjects to teach simple (i.e., nonconditional) discriminations (SD). Today, errorless procedures are widely used for teaching both simple and conditional discriminations (CD), often to developmentally limited learners. The present article puts forward the idea that the stimulus control engendered by prompts in errorless learning procedures may also be classified as requiring simple versus conditional discriminative control. The present paper presents data comparing two errorless prompting procedures to teach visual CDs to six typically developing children and three children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A matching-to-sample procedure with unfamiliar forms as visual stimuli was used. A comparison of two different prompts was conducted: prompts requiring SD control and prompts requiring conditional discriminative control. Results indicated that eight of nine participants acquired CDs in fewer trials when the prompts required conditional control; one child with ASD required fewer trials when prompts required simple discriminative control. Results suggest an advantage for teaching CDs using prompts requiring conditional discriminative control.