Karen N. Keating

Search for Evidence-Based Approaches for the Prevention and Palliation of Hand–Foot Skin Reaction (HFSR) Caused by the Multikinase Inhibitors (MKIs)

BACKGROUND The anticancer multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) are associated with cutaneous adverse events, including hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), a condition affecting 20%-40% of patients. Symptoms are usually mild, but can evolve into a painful condition that limits function and impacts quality of life (QoL), resulting in shortened cancer treatment duration or intensity. The goal of this study was to systematically review the literature on the prevention and palliation of MKI-associated HFSR, to identify areas for further clinical study, and to provide a foundation for evidence-based guidelines for HFSR management. METHODS Systematic searches of the National Library of Medicines PubMed database, Cochrane Reviews, BIOSIS, CancerLit, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology website were conducted using search terms for cutaneous toxicities associated with chemotherapeutic agents. Articles were categorized (C) based on type of agent and cutaneous reaction as: C1 (MKI and HFSR); C2 (MKI and other cutaneous toxicity); C3 (other antineoplastic agents and HFSR); and C4, other. RESULTS Of the 2,069 abstracts screened, 350 (17%) met the criteria for C1-C4, with 56 (16%) coded as C1 with details of HFSR histology, pathogenesis, clinical outcome, QoL impact, and/or prevention and treatment approaches in MKI-treated patients. No randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) on prevention/palliation of HFSR were identified. Anecdotal evidence or expert opinion advocated protective measures, preventive and therapeutic skin care, systemic analgesics for pain, vitamin B(6), and MKI dose modification. CONCLUSION No articles containing evidence from RCTs on preventive/palliative approaches to MKI-associated HFSR have been published. Systematic study of optimal treatment strategies for HFSR is needed to advance development of evidence-based treatment guidelines.

Clinical, safety, and economic evidence in radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy, with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) comprising ~93% of all thyroid cancers. While most cases of DTC are curable with the use of surgery and radioactive iodine (RAI) ablation of the remaining thyroid remnant, prognosis is dire and treatment options limited when DTC becomes RAI-refractory (RAI-R). Standard cytotoxic chemotherapy has limited efficacy, making enrollment in clinical trials of novel targeted therapies the preferred treatment approach. Thus, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review of the clinical trial scientific literature with a focus on efficacy, safety, and economics to identify all potential treatment options that have been or are currently being evaluated for the treatment of RAI-R DTC. METHODS Embase.com (including Medline), Medline In-Process and other nonindexed citations, the Cochrane Libraries, ClinicalTrials.gov, and relevant recent conference proceedings were searched using predefined search criteria. Important inclusion criteria included English language, randomized controlled studies or interventional single-arm studies only, and studies of drug therapies only. Search results were screened utilizing the discretion of multiple researchers, and key data were abstracted. RESULTS Forty-five unique trials (16 full-text, 4 conference abstracts, and 25 ClinicalTrials.gov entries) were included in the clinical review. No studies that met criteria for inclusion in the economic review were identified. Among 20 trials with results available, all were Phase II and only one was randomized. The most commonly studied drugs were tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs); other drugs included celecoxib, doxorubicin with interferon alpha-2b, rosiglitazone, selumetinib (AZD6244), thalidomide, VEGF trap, and vorinostat. Overall, efficacy and safety profiles were specific to treatment regimen, with objective response rates (ORR) ranging from 0% on gefitinib, rosiglitazone, VEGF trap, and vorinostat to 50% on lenvatinib, a TKI. CONCLUSIONS Limited clinical research and no economic research has been conducted in RAI-R DTC. Certain treatments, notably TKIs, have shown promise in Phase II trials, and two Phase III randomized placebo-controlled trials are ongoing. New research on the economic and humanistic burden of RAI-R DTC must be paired with the clinical evidence currently in development to examine the existing burden and future promise in treating patients with RAI-R DTC.

Validation of a patient‐administered questionnaire to measure the severity and bothersomeness of lower urinary tract symptoms in uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI): the UTI Symptom Assessment questionnaire

To develop and validate a self‐administered questionnaire to assess the ‘severity’ and ‘bothersomeness’ of the most frequently reported signs and symptoms of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI).

Psychometric Evaluation of the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 and Activity Impairment Assessment in Acute Bacterial Sinusitis:

Objective To validate the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 and Activity Impairment Assessment in patients with acute bacterial sinusitis. Study Design Data were used from a phase III clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily for 5 consecutive days in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis. The psychometric properties and factor structure of the 2 measures were assessed. Setting Participants were given the measures to self-complete using either a telephone voice response system or a paper-and-pencil format. Subjects and Methods Three hundred seventy-four patients with acute bacterial sinusitis were used in the analysis. Patients received either a placebo or 400 mg moxifloxacin once daily. Patients were then reviewed at test of cure and follow-up. All analyses were conducted on a combined sample of placebo and active treatment patients. Results The Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 was associated with minimal missing data at baseline but a higher proportion by test of cure. There was no evidence of floor or ceiling effects and no significant skew. The Activity Impairment Assessment also had low missing data at baseline and no obvious floor or ceiling effects, but the data were not normally distributed. Both measures had good internal consistency. Convergent and divergent validity as well as sensitivity and the minimally important difference are also reported. Conclusion The measures both have good psychometric properties and are suitable for use with patients with acute bacterial sinusitis. Both instruments are sensitive. The minimal important difference estimates for the Sinonasal Outcome Test-16 are quite high but are similar to estimates reported previously.

Modification of existing patient-reported outcome measures: qualitative development of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MDASI-MPM)

PurposeMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer of the lung pleura. The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) is a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure of symptom burden, the combined impact of disease-related and treatment-related symptoms on functioning. Validated PRO measures may require modification for use in specific study populations. We sought to modify the MDASI for patients with MPM and create a fit-for-purpose symptom-burden measure for use in a clinical trial, according to US Food and Drug Administration guidance on PRO utilization to support labeling claims.MethodsA literature review for MPM symptoms was conducted. Patients with MPM were qualitatively interviewed about experiences of disease and treatment. Descriptive analysis identified symptoms and interference with functioning to define MPM-related symptom burden. An expert panel rated the relevance of identified symptoms to patients with MPM. Patients who received the investigational drug in a previous Phase I study were interviewed for drug-specific symptoms.ResultsLiterature review and interviews of 20 patients identified 31 MPM-related symptoms. A conceptual model of MPM-related symptom burden was developed. After expert-panel relevance review, five MPM-specific items and the 13 core MDASI symptoms met criteria for inclusion in a provisional MDASI-MPM for psychometric testing. Interviews with six patients identified six drug-specific symptoms; three were mentioned by multiple patients. Of these three, one was not in the core MDASI.ConclusionsThe MDASI-MPM has established content validity and, with the addition of one symptom item, is ready for psychometric testing as fit-for-purpose for a clinical trial of an investigational agent.