Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Karen R. Cleary is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Karen R. Cleary.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2002

Simplified Staging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Gregory Y. Lauwers; Nestor F. Esnaola; Kim Anh Do; Jacques Belghiti; Nadeem Q. Mirza; Steven A. Curley; Lee M. Ellis; Jean Marc Regimbeau; Asif Rashid; Karen R. Cleary; David M. Nagorney

PURPOSE The current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) fails to stratify patients adequately with respect to prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS The ability of the currently proposed tumor (T) categories to effectively stratify the survival of 557 patients who underwent complete resection for HCC at four centers was examined. Independent predictors of survival were combined into a new staging system. RESULTS Using the current AJCC T classification, patients with T1 and T2 tumors had similar 5-year survivals (P =.6). In addition, the survival of patients with multiple bilobar tumors (T4) matched that of T3 patients (P =.5). Independent predictors of death were major vascular invasion (P <.001), microvascular invasion (P =.001), severe fibrosis/cirrhosis of the host liver (P =.001), multiple tumors (P =.007), and tumor size greater than 5 cm (P =.01). Based on our results, a simplified stratification is proposed: (a) patients with a single tumor and no microvascular invasion, (b) patients with a single tumor and microvascular invasion or multiple tumors, none more than 5 cm, and (c) patients with either multiple tumors, any more than 5 cm, or tumor with major vascular invasion (P <.001). Severe fibrosis/cirrhosis had a negative impact on survival within all categories. The survival of patients with lymph node involvement matched that of patients with major vascular invasion (P =.3). CONCLUSION The current AJCC staging system for HCC is unnecessarily complex. We propose a simplified model of stratification that is based on vascular invasion, tumor number, and tumor size and incorporates the effect of fibrosis on survival.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2008

Preoperative Gemcitabine-Based Chemoradiation for Patients With Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Head

Douglas B. Evans; Gauri R. Varadhachary; Christopher H. Crane; Charlotte C. Sun; Jeffrey E. Lee; Peter W.T. Pisters; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Huamin Wang; Karen R. Cleary; Gregg Staerkel; Chusilp Charnsangavej; Elizabeth A. Lano; Linus Ho; Renato Lenzi; James L. Abbruzzese; Robert A. Wolff

PURPOSE We conducted a phase II trial to assess the outcomes of patients who received preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for stage I/II pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients with pancreatic head/uncinate process adenocarcinoma and radiographically defined potentially resectable disease received chemoradiation with 7 weekly intravenous (IV) infusions of gemcitabine (400 mg/m(2) IV over 30 minutes) plus radiation therapy (30 Gy in 10 fractions over 2 weeks). Patients underwent restaging 4 to 6 weeks after completion of chemoradiation and, in the absence of disease progression, were taken to surgery. RESULTS The study enrolled 86 patients. At the time of restaging, disease progression or a decline in performance status precluded 13 patients from surgery. Seventy-three (85%) of 86 patients were taken to surgery, extrapancreatic disease was found in nine, and 64 (74%) of 86 underwent a successful PD. Median overall survival (86 patients) was 22.7 months with a 27% 5-year survival. Median survival was 34 months for the 64 patients who underwent PD and 7 months for the 22 unresected patients (P < .001). The 5-year survival for those who did and did not undergo PD was 36% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSION Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation followed by restaging and evaluation for surgery separated the study population into two different subsets: patients likely to benefit from PD (n = 64) and those in whom surgery would be unlikely to provide clinical benefit (n = 22). Furthermore, the encouraging overall survival observed in this large trial supports the continued investigation of gemcitabine-based preoperative therapy in resectable pancreatic cancer.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 1997

Preoperative and postoperative chemoradiation strategies in patients treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Francis R. Spitz; James L. Abbruzzese; Jeffrey E. Lee; Peter W.T. Pisters; Andrew M. Lowy; Claudia J. Fenoglio; Karen R. Cleary; Nora A. Janjan; Mary S. Goswitz; Tyvin A. Rich; Douglas B. Evans

PURPOSE The effects of preoperative versus postoperative fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy and irradiation on treatment toxicity, duration of treatment, tumor recurrence, and survival were compared in patients who underwent potentially curative therapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head during a 5-year period. METHODS From July 1990 to July 1995, 142 patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head deemed resectable on the basis of radiographic images were treated with curative intent using a multimodality approach involving either preoperative or postoperative chemoradiation. Patients with biopsy confirmation of adenocarcinoma and a low-density mass in the pancreatic head identified by computed tomography (CT) received preoperative chemoradiation. Patients without a mass on CT or in whom the preoperative biopsy was negative underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with planned postoperative chemoradiation. Protocol-based preoperative chemoradiation consisted of external-beam irradiation at a dose of 50.4 Gy (standard fractionation; 1.8 Gy/d, 5 d/wk) or 30 Gy (rapid fractionation; 3 Gy/d, 5 d/wk) combined with continuous infusion 5-FU (300 mg/m2/d, 5 d/wk). Postoperative chemoradiation combined 50.4 Gy of external-beam irradiation (standard fractionation) with continuous-infusion 5-FU. RESULTS No patient who received preoperative chemoradiation experienced a delay in surgery because of chemoradiation toxicity, but six of 25 eligible patients (24%) did not receive postoperative chemoradiation because of delayed recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy. No significant differences in toxicities from chemoradiation were observed between groups. Patients treated with rapid-fractionation preoperative chemoradiation had a significantly (P < .01) shorter duration of treatment (median, 62.5 days) compared with patients who received postoperative chemoradiation (median, 98.5 days) or standard-fractionation preoperative chemoradiation (median, 91.0 days). At a median followup of 19 months, no significant differences in survival were observed between treatment groups. No patient who received preoperative chemoradiation and pancreaticoduodenectomy experienced a local recurrence; peritoneal (regional) recurrence occurred in 10% of these patients. Local or regional recurrence occurred in 21% of patients who received pancreaticoduodenectomy and postoperative chemoradiation. CONCLUSION Delivery of preoperative and postoperative chemoradiation in patients who underwent potentially curative pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head resulted in similar treatment toxicity, patterns of tumor recurrence, and survival. Rapid-fractionation preoperative chemoradiation ensured the delivery of all components of therapy to all eligible patients with a significantly shorter duration of treatment than with standard-fractionation chemoradiation given either before or after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Prolonged recovery after pancreaticoduodenectomy prevents the delivery of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation in up to one fourth of eligible patients.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1999

Tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation with preoperative chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

Nora A. Janjan; Vincent S. Khoo; James L. Abbruzzese; Richard Pazdur; Ronelle A. DuBrow; Karen R. Cleary; Pamela K. Allen; Patrick M. Lynch; Gary Glober; Robert A. Wolff; Tyvin A. Rich; John M. Skibber

PURPOSE To evaluate the rates of tumor downstaging after preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CTX/XRT) that delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m2/day) was given to 117 patients. The pretreatment stage distribution, as determined by endorectal ultrasound (u), included uT2N0 in 2%, uT3N0 in 47%, uT3N1 in 49%, and uT4N0 in 2% of cases; endorectal ultrasound was not performed in 13% of cases (15 patients). Approximately 6 weeks after completion of CTX/XRT, surgery was performed. RESULTS The pathological tumor stages were Tis-2N0 in 26%, T2N1 in 5%, T3N0 in 21%, T3N1 in 15%, T4N0 in 5%, and T4NI in 1%; a complete response (CR) to preoperative CTX/XRT was pathologically confirmed in 32 (27%) of patients. Tumor downstaging occurred in 72 (62%) cases. Only 3% of cases had pathologic evidence of progressive disease. Pretreatment tumor size (< 5 cm vs. > or = 5 cm) was the only factor predictive of tumor downstaging (p < 0.04). A decrease of > 1 T-stage level was accomplished in 45% of those downstaged. Overall, a sphincter-saving (SP) procedure was possible in 59% of patients and an abdominoperineal resection (APR) was required in 41 % of cases. Factors predictive of SP included downstaging (p < 0.03), age > 40 years (p < 0.007), pretreatment tumor distance, 3 to 6 cm from the anal verge (p < 0.00001), tumor size <6 cm (p < 0.02), mobility (p < 0.004), tumor stage <T4 (p < 0.01), and uN negative (p < 0.008). SP was performed in 23 patients (72%) with a CR and in 48 (67%) of downstaged cases. Among the 69 tumors located < 6 cm from the anal verge, 29 (42%) were resected with a SP. The level of response was important for tumors located < 6 cm from the anal verge because a SP was performed in 9 of the 17 (53%) CRs in this group while only 20 of 52 patients (38%) had a SP when residual disease was present after CTX/XRT. For tumors located > 6 cm from the anal verge, SP was performed in 14 of the 15 (93%) patients with a CR and 32 of 33 (97%) of patients with residual disease (p < 0.00004). CONCLUSIONS Significant tumor downstaging results from preoperative chemoradiation allowing sphincter sparing surgery in over 40% of patients whose tumors were located < 6 cm from the anal verge and who otherwise would have required colostomy.


Annals of Surgery | 1996

Rationale for en bloc vein resection in the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma adherent to the superior mesenteric-portal vein confluence

George M. Fuhrman; Steven D. Leach; Charles A. Staley; James C. Cusack; Chusilp Charnsangavej; Karen R. Cleary; Adel K. El-Naggar; Claudia J. Fenoglio; Jeffrey E. Lee; Douglas B. Evans

OBJECTIVE Tumor invasion of the superior mesenteric-portal vein (SMPV) confluence is often considered a contraindication to pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with malignant tumors of the pancreas or periampullary region. The authors sought to determine whether pancreaticoduodenectomy with en bloc resection of the SMPV confluence could be safely performed and whether tumors involving the SMPV confluence were associated with pathologic parameters suggesting poor prognosis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Several centers have reported high rates of retroperitoneal margin positivity after pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumors of the pancreatic head and periampullary region. Positive-margin or incomplete resection is associated with early tumor recurrence and no survival benefit compared with palliative therapy. Tumor adherence to the lateral of posterior wall of the SMPV confluence often represents the only barrier to complete tumor resection at the time of pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS Data on all patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas or periampullary region over a 3.5-year period were entered prospectively in a pancreatic tumor database. To be considered for surgery, patients were required to fulfill the following computed tomography criteria for resectability: 1) the absence of extrapancreatic disease, 2) no tumor encasement of the superior mesenteric artery or celiac axis, and 3) a patent SMPV confluence. Tumor adherence to the superior mesenteric vein or SMPV confluence was assessed intraoperatively, and en bloc venous resection was performed when necessary to achieve complete tumor extirpation. Data on operative characteristics, morbidity, mortality, tumor size, nodal metastases, margin positivity, perineural invasion, and tumor DNA content were compared for patients who did and did not receive venous resection. RESULTS Fifty-nine patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, 36 without venous resection and 23 with en bloc resection of the SMPV confluence. No differences in median hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, tumor size, margin positivity, nodal positivity, or tumor DNA content were observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS When necessary, segmental resection of the SMPV confluence may be performed safely during pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary malignant tumors. Tumors invading the SMPV confluence are not associated with histologic parameters suggesting a poor prognosis. Our data suggest that venous involvement is a function of tumor location rather than an indicator of aggressive tumor biology.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 1995

Preoperative infusional chemoradiation therapy for Stage T3 rectal cancer

Tyvin A. Rich; John M. Skibber; Jaffer A. Ajani; Daniel J. Buchholz; Karen R. Cleary; Ronelle A. DuBrow; Bernard Levin; Patrick M. Lynch; Sarkis Meterissian; Leor D. Roubein; David M. Ota

PURPOSE To evaluate preoperative infusional chemoradiation for patients with operable rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Preoperative chemoradiation therapy using infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), (300 mg/m2/day) together with daily irradiation (45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks) was administered to 77 patients with clinically Stage T3 rectal cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound confirmed the digital rectal exam in 63 patients. Surgery was performed approximately 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation therapy and included 25 abdominoperineal resections and 52 anal-sphincter-preserving procedures. RESULTS Posttreatment tumor stages were T1-2, N0 in 35%, T3 N0 in 25%, and T1-3, N1 in 11%; 29% had no evidence of tumor. Local tumor control after chemoradiation was seen in 96% (74 out of 77); 2 patients had recurrent disease at the anastomosis site and were treated successfully with abdominoperineal resection. Overall, pelvic control was obtained in 99% (76 out of 77). The survival after chemoradiation was higher in patients without node involvement than in those having node involvement (p = n.s.). More patients with pathologic complete responses or only microscopic foci survived than did patients who had gross residual tumor (p = 0.07). The actuarial survival rate was 83% at 3 years; the median follow-up was 27 months, with a range of 3 to 68 months. Acute, perioperative, and late complications were not more numerous or more severe with chemoradiation therapy than with traditional radiation therapy (XRT) alone. CONCLUSIONS Excellent treatment response allowed two-thirds of the patients to have an anal-sphincter-sparing procedure. Gross residual disease in the resected specimen indicates a poor prognosis, and therapies specifically targeting these patients may improve survival further.


Gastroenterology | 1994

MUC1 mucin expression as a marker of progression and metastasis of human colorectal carcinoma.

Shoji Nakamori; David M. Ota; Karen R. Cleary; Keiro Shirotani; Tatsuro Irimura

BACKGROUND/AIMS The MUC1 mucin distributes among a variety of epithelial tissues (except the intestinal epithelia) and is often detectable in colorectal carcinoma tissues and cell lines. This study aimed to elucidate whether MUC1 mucin expression correlated to the progression of colorectal carcinomas. METHODS We collected 113 tissue specimens, including primary colorectal carcinoma, normal mucosa, liver metastases, lymph node metastases, and normal livers from 58 patients with colorectal carcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining and Western blotting analysis with mature MUC1 mucin-specific monoclonal antibodies were performed. RESULTS The levels of mature MUC1 mucins were significantly higher in carcinoma tissues than those in normal colonic mucosa (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the levels of mature MUC1 mucins were significantly higher in primary tumors from patients having metastasis or metastatic tumors than in primary tumors from patients without metastasis (P < 0.001). In the primary sites, mature MUC1 mucin levels apparently increased according to progression of the stages (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS These results strongly suggest that mature MUC1 mucins become ectopically expressed in colorectal carcinoma progressed to the metastatic stages and that mature MUC1 mucins may be a useful marker for advanced colorectal carcinoma.


American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2001

Improved overall survival among responders to preoperative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer

Nora A. Janjan; Christopher H. Crane; Barry W. Feig; Karen R. Cleary; Ronelle A. DuBrow; Steven A. Curley; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Patrick M. Lynch; Lee M. Ellis; Robert A. Wolff; Renato Lenzi; James L. Abbruzzese; Richard Pazdur; Paulo M. Hoff; Pamela K. Allen; Thomas Brown; John M. Skibber

The aim of this study was to determine if the response to preoperative radiation and chemotherapy with continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was predictive for survival among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Preoperative chemoradiation (CTX/XRT) that delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with continuous infusion 5-FU (300 mg/m2/day) was given to 117 patients. The pretreatment stage distribution, as determined by endorectal ultrasound (u), included uT2N0 in 2%, uT3N0 in 47%, uT3N1 in 49%, and uT4N0 in 2% of cases; endorectal ultrasound was not performed in 13% of cases (15 patients). Approximately 6 weeks after completion of CTX/XRT, surgery was performed. Adjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of 400 to 425 mg/m2 of 5-FU plus 20 mg/m2 leucovorin for 5 days, was administered every 28 days for 4 to 6 cycles after surgical resection. Among the 74 patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, the preoperative stage of disease was 31 with T3N0 and 43 T3N1. Median follow-up was 46 months (range 2 to 89 months). The pathologic tumor stages were Tis-2N0 in 26%, T2N1 in 5%, T3N0 in 21%, T3N1 in 15%, T4N0 in 5%, and T4N1 in 1%; a complete response (CR) to preoperative CTX/XRT was pathologically confirmed in 32 (27%) of patients. Tumor down-staging occurred in 72 (62%) cases. A sphincter-saving procedure (SP) was possible in 59% of patients. The median DFS and overall survival rates for responders were 46 months and 47 months, respectively; for non-responders these outcome measures were 38 months and 41 months, respectively. Log-rank analysis showed that the distant metastatic-free survival rates improved with any response to CTX/XRT (p < 0.00001), CR to CTX/XRT (p < 0.009) and SP (p < 0.012). Likewise, these parameters also significantly influenced DFS rates (CTX/XRT p < 0.00001; CR p < 0.006; and SP p < 0.008). Control of pelvic disease was influenced by clinical size (p < 0.002) and SP (p < 0.016) on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis only clinical size (p < 0.002) continued to be a significant factor for local control. Factors on multivariate analysis that resulted in significant improvements in cancer-specific survival included any response to preoperative CTX/XRT (p < 0.017) and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.034). Any response to preoperative CTX/XRT improved distant metastatic-free and disease-free survival rates. Multivariate analysis confirmed that a response to preoperative CTX/XRT predicted for improvements in overall survival among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Patients who fail to respond to preoperative 5-FU based chemotherapy given concomitantly with radiation have higher rates of distant metastases with adjuvant 5-FU therapy.


American Journal of Surgery | 1994

Thin-section contrast-enhanced computed tomography accurately predicts the resectability of malignant pancreatic neoplasms☆

George M. Fuhrman; Chusilp Charnsangavej; James L. Abbruzzese; Karen R. Cleary; Richard G. Martin; Claudia J. Fenoglio; Douglas B. Evans

A prospective diagnostic study was designed to determine the ability of thin-section contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to predict the resectability of malignant neoplasms of the pancreatic head. Patients with a presumed resectable pancreatic neoplasm referred during a 21-month period were studied with abdominal CT performed at 1.5-mm section thickness and 5-mm slice interval during the bolus phase of intravenous contrast enhancement. CT criteria for resectability included the absence of extrapancreatic disease, no evidence of arterial encasement, and a patent superior mesenteric-portal venous confluence. Of 145 patients evaluated, 42 were considered to have resectable tumors by CT criteria, and 37 (88%) underwent potentially curative pancreaticoduodenectomy. Six patients were found to have a microscopically positive retroperitoneal resection margin; no patient had a grossly positive resection margin. Five (12%) of 42 patients were found at laparotomy to have unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic tumors. Thin-section contrast-enhanced CT is an essential component of the preoperative evaluation for pancreaticoduodenectomy and can prevent needles laparotomy in most patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease.


Bone Marrow Transplantation | 1997

Management of lymphoma recurrence after allogeneic transplantation : the relevance of graft-versus-lymphoma effect

K. Van Besien; M. de Lima; Sergio Giralt; D. F. Moore; Issa F. Khouri; G. Rondon; R. Mehra; Borje S. Andersson; C. Dyer; Karen R. Cleary; Donna Przepiorka; James Gajewski; Richard E. Champlin

Donor lymphocyte infusions, by virtue of a graft-versus-tumor effect, have been shown to induce remissions in leukemia that recurs after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Similar effects have been postulated to contribute to the decreased recurrence rate observed after allogeneic transplantation in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. This lower recurrence rate may be due to a variety of other mechanisms. We aimed to evaluate the role of graft-versus-lymphoma effects in patients in whom lymphomas recur after allogeneic transplantation. At the time of recurrence, immunosuppressive therapy was withheld. Patients with non-responding disease received an infusion of donor lymphocytes. Patients were observed for response and graft-versus-host disease. Disease in four of nine patients responded to withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy. A minor response was observed in one of three recipients of donor lymphocyte infusions. Responses were observed among two patients with follicular lymphoma, one with large cell lymphoma and one with lymphoblastic lymphoma. A minor response was observed in a patient with prolymphocytic leukemia/lymphoma. We conclude that withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy and donor lymphocyte infusion can induce durable remissions in patients with recurrent lymphoma after allogeneic transplantation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Karen R. Cleary's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas B. Evans

Medical College of Wisconsin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John M. Skibber

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lee M. Ellis

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nora A. Janjan

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Claudia J. Fenoglio

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter W.T. Pisters

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert A. Wolff

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge